![]() |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Couple of interesting cases for the judges last night.
In one, the contestant answered the question wrong, realized his mistake and corrected it before Ken said "no". Luckily both answers he gave were wrong and neither of the other contestants answered at all so it didn't matter. The one that bothered me was "This former Colts quarterback is now host of College Bowl". A contestant buzzed in with "Who is Manning?", and Ken replied "More specific" so the contestant added "Peyton Manning". But I think that because the clue specified "COLTS quarterback" the answer of "Manning" was specific enough because there's no other Colts' quarterback Manning. Now had the clue said "NFL quarterback", then you'd need to specify if it was Peyton, Eli, or Archie. |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
I’ve had about a dozen sponsored posts show up in my Facebook feed about “allegations” against Mayim Biyalik being confirmed. I’m not clicking on any of them, but anyone else seeing this?
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
It's something about her likeness being used to sell CBD gummies without her consent. The same thing happened with Trebek.
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by majorjoe23
(Post 14075861)
I’ve had about a dozen sponsored posts show up in my Facebook feed about “allegations” against Mayim Biyalik being confirmed. I’m not clicking on any of them, but anyone else seeing this?
Didn't know what the fuck was going on;like if someone with a lot of money has some kind of vendetta against her, or what. (LeVar Burton? :lol: ) I haven't clicked on any of them, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was some CBD asshole spamming facebook. Never saw any about Alex Trebek, though. |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by Paff
(Post 14075830)
The one that bothered me was "This former Colts quarterback is now host of College Bowl". A contestant buzzed in with "Who is Manning?", and Ken replied "More specific" so the contestant added "Peyton Manning". But I think that because the clue specified "COLTS quarterback" the answer of "Manning" was specific enough because there's no other Colts' quarterback Manning. Now had the clue said "NFL quarterback", then you'd need to specify if it was Peyton, Eli, or Archie.
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Except by your logic, that would exclude all "Who is (last name only)?" answers. Like if I asked you, "Who is Costello?" would you come up with the answer? You might say something about comedy, or about new wave music. But if the clue was, "This comedian paired with Bud Abbott in the famous 'Who's on First' routine" then "Who is Costello" is a perfectly good answer because it's the only comedian with that name.
Likewise, there's only one former COLT quarterback with the name Manning and thus specification was not neccessary. That was the part I took exception to, and like I said already, had the clue not included the team I definitely would have expected a distinction as to which Manning. |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by Paff
(Post 14075977)
Likewise, there's only one former COLT quarterback with the name Manning and thus specification was not neccessary. That was the part I took exception to, and like I said already, had the clue not included the team I definitely would have expected a distinction as to which Manning.
Same how, when the answer involves a President Roosevelt, they want the player to specify Teddy or FDR instead of just Roosevelt. |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 14076180)
On the other hand, if they were to give an answer such as, One of these brothers began his career as a quarterback for the Colts, they would probably want a first name.
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
We didn't get to watch the game. We turned on the TV, and it was playing NCAA basketball.
I was disappointed, because the returning champion is from my hometown. |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Interesting, they put up a disclaimer that last night's episode was filmed in January when there was a question about putin
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
She's, like, only 23 years old. How is she so good?
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
One of those rewarding finals where all 3 contestants miss it, and I get it.
Of course, I haven't won over $200 000. It's the small victories. :lol: |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by andicus
(Post 14092066)
One of those rewarding finals where all 3 contestants miss it, and I get it.
Was last night the first ever solo FJ? I was going back and forth with the episode while doing other stuff, but I can't believe the two in-the-red contestants didn't at least guess at the final clue as a correct answer would at least allow them to play FJ. It's not like you have to write them a check if you're in the negative, do you? And bonus because I knew the answer (wasn't a difficult question for a $2K clue). |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by Paff
(Post 14092693)
Was last night the first ever solo FJ?
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by Paff
(Post 14092693)
For me that was one of those finals where I don't have the slightest clue to the answer, then when it's revealed I'm like, "duh, of course".
Was last night the first ever solo FJ? I was going back and forth with the episode while doing other stuff, but I can't believe the two in-the-red contestants didn't at least guess at the final clue as a correct answer would at least allow them to play FJ. It's not like you have to write them a check if you're in the negative, do you? And bonus because I knew the answer (wasn't a difficult question for a $2K clue). I was thinking the same thing with the last clue. There was no harm in the other two just taking a wild shot in the dark at getting the question correct. At that point they didn't have anything to lose. It seemed like an easy clue as well. |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by movieguru
(Post 14092705)
I wonder if they've ever had a situation where all three were in the negative or had $0 at the end of Double Jeopardy.
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/dvdtalk...18fc4df563.png No luck finding the actual episode though, it appears to be from July of 2016 |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Being a sole contestant in FJ seems like a great opportunity to bet everything save a dollar but not everyone plays like James Holzhauer. ;)
Also, if a sole contestant in FJ bets everything with a wrong answer would that be considered a loss? |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by wishbone
(Post 14092747)
Being a sole contestant in FJ seems like a great opportunity to bet everything save a dollar but not everyone plays like James Holzhauer. ;)
Also, if a sole contestant in FJ bets everything with a wrong answer would that be considered a loss? |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by Obi-Wanma
(Post 14092752)
Yes, if you end the game with $0 you win nothing and they have 3 new contestants the next game. Games have ended with all of the final Jeopardy contestants at $0 and they all lose.
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by movieguru
(Post 14092705)
I wonder if they've ever had a situation where all three were in the negative or had $0 at the end of Double Jeopardy.
I could have sworn I saw that happen once, but I guess it hasn't happened yet. It's rare, but the Washington Generals have defeated the Harlem Globetrotters a few times. These things are bound to happen eventually given enough time. |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
I know the second ever Trebek game ended with all three contestants with $0.
This article claims "it’s happened on no less than seven different occasions" although there's no data or references to back it up. |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
The Alex Trebek estate sale. I would be willing to have some of those things in my house.
https://www.estatesales.net/CA/Studi.../91604/3243012 |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by Nick Danger
(Post 14093840)
The Alex Trebek estate sale. I would be willing to have some of those things in my house.
https://www.estatesales.net/CA/Studi.../91604/3243012 |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
That’s really funny.
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by movieguru
(Post 14093904)
He had a lot of stuff, but isn't his wife still alive and has a younger child living with her? Seems like they wanting to dispose of everything in his house, or at least one or two of his houses.
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by Nick Danger
(Post 14093840)
The Alex Trebek estate sale. I would be willing to have some of those things in my house.
https://www.estatesales.net/CA/Studi.../91604/3243012 NSFW:
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
I'm sure there's nothing in the estate sale that I could even afford even if there was something I would want, but do they list the prices of the items anywhere online?
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by Norm de Plume
(Post 14094043)
The "bereaved widow" looks like she's getting rid of every last thing he ever owned.-rolleyes-
Shoppers continue to line up in Day 2 of Alex Trebek estate sale (foxla.com) |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
wow, that's a lot of random stuff
I would buy his collection of potent potables though |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by movieguru
(Post 14094184)
I just found a news cast that gives a few prices of some paintings and sculptures. Some fairly decent affordable prices; $400-$750. I would probably have bought something like the Trebek animated sculpture for $400. It was said in another article that his daughter is selling his house, so his widow may not have inherited as much as his children, and it may be his children selling the items.
Shoppers continue to line up in Day 2 of Alex Trebek estate sale (foxla.com) |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by Norm de Plume
(Post 14094375)
Whoever is behind the fire sale, it's a travesty. That's an awful lot of personal stuff these people are unloading. They should be ashamed.
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
I think I'm most impressed by his collection of tools. I've watched Jeopardy for close to three decades and never imagined Alex as someone who would own a welder.
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by John Galt
(Post 14094409)
I think I'm most impressed by his collection of tools. I've watched Jeopardy for close to three decades and never imagined Alex as someone who would own a welder.
They portrayed his as someone who liked to tinker around and do home repairs. And those tools do look well-used. |
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by Norm de Plume
(Post 14094375)
Whoever is behind the fire sale, it's a travesty. That's an awful lot of personal stuff these people are unloading. They should be ashamed.
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
^ I guess so. It just always seems so crass to sell off the belongings of a deceased loved one, but you're right that they probably didn't have enough space to store his stuff.
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
When someone dies they have a ton of stuff you don’t really want, it’s their taste and their stuff, not yours. If other people would appreciate it you may as well sell it to people who will enjoy it, that’s what I did with a lot of my mom’s stuff, and it was actually a huge relief, because all of that stuff was like an anchor.
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
In addition, his many fans who loved him and grieved for him have a chance to own something that belonged to him, and not at an outrageous price. It's kind of a win-win.
|
Re: Jeopardy! Discussion
Originally Posted by Norm de Plume
(Post 14094560)
^ I guess so. It just always seems so crass to sell off the belongings of a deceased loved one, but you're right that they probably didn't have enough space to store his stuff.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.