![]() |
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by achau9598
(Post 10492177)
When Grimes laid down next to his wife and tried to initiate the nasty he looked over at their sleeping son - her comment? "don't worry - he won't wake up" ... WTF? My wife and I both wondered why he didn't ask "um .. how do YOU know this?"
Originally Posted by Gunde
(Post 10493064)
Why?
Shane tells her that Rick is dead. After some time she and Shane hook up because let's face it, being one of the few survivors in the world is fucking lonely. Then Rick turns up and of course she feels bad. She's also angry at Shane for lying. I think she reacting perfectly reasonable. |
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 10492470)
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blo...ason-two-45474
Not that anyone should be surprised by this at all, but season 2 isn't expected to premiere until October 2011. Frank Darabont is expected to write and direct at least 1 episode next season. |
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 10491094)
The locks on handcuffs are incredibly simple to pick.
Basically, all you have to do is stick something small enough to fit into the keyhole and wriggle it around until the locking mechanism triggers. You can unlock a handcuff with a bent paperclip as easily and quickly as you can with a key. |
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
jesus christ people. it's spelled dialogue! not dialog.
as for the episode, it was good. while light on zombie action, i like the dynamic between the characters. i can understand rick's want to go back for the guns/walkie. everyone he's encountered has had little or no firearms, so he probably would reasonably conclude that firearms are valuable. |
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by fumanstan
(Post 10492483)
It'll be interesting how people respond after going nearly a year away from the show. I could see people losing interest by then. That or maybe Zombies will be the new Vampire. :lol:
|
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by maingon
(Post 10491545)
The camp doesnt feel stressfull or a zombie Apocalypse.
My problem is just the camp stuff is alittle too slow, no real sense of danger or danger. It feels to removed from the zombie outbreak Everyone seems way too nonchalant about the zombie hordes and the violence inflicted upon the dead and dying zombies (like the group's ho-hum reaction to the dismembering of the zombie corpse last week and then the quickly forgotten bludgeoning of the deer-eating zombie). If this show is going for character study, the creators should watch/read The Road for the way survivors would probably react in event of an apocalypse. |
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by Deftones
(Post 10493342)
jesus christ people. it's spelled dialogue! not dialog.
Originally Posted by Deftones
(Post 10493345)
quite a few summer shows have a year break in between. i'm sure the ratings will hold, as they've held for 3 episodes already.
|
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by Charlie Goose
(Post 10491028)
All Michael Rooker needed to do was saw off his thumb, then his hand would've slipped through the cuff. |
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
I have the same nitpicks as everyone else. Still enjoy it, but this series is super-nitpickable. I hope Season 2 is thought out a little better.
|
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 10491070)
What are you basing that on, the comic? I've read the first few WD trades and think the comic is poorly-written crap - especially when it comes to character stuff.
Originally Posted by Panda Phil
(Post 10491128)
Heres a salute to all the people who've hung around for three episodes of a program they hate. Nice of you folks to make the sacrifice just so you can let us know the show sucks. -rolleyes-
I'm with Superfro. I knew when this episode was over people would be bitching about the lack of exploding heads. *eyeroll* Some folks should just just stick to playing Left 4 Dead.
Originally Posted by superfro
(Post 10491461)
What in particular did you find weak dialogue-wise in this episode? I watch a lot of TV, and am highly critical of writing in particular. Last episode was weak all over the place in terms of dialogue, but I thought the stuff this week was much more balanced and better done in general.
The stereotypes are still horrible, I hope they get away from that or show something different in those characters. I was ready to give the overall episode a :up: until the ridiculously bad ending. Cringe worthy. But the combination of the few positives and the lack of other stuff to watch right now gives it another 3 weeks of viewing (while multi-tasking) from me. |
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by d2cheer
(Post 10493456)
I have not read the whole thread yet but... he was handcuffed to a metal bolt. Hacksaws are designed to cut metal...this is beyond forgiveable for this series. I get that not every detail had to be coverd and he was starting to lose it but come on.
fake edit: or what Lemmy said :) Beyond forgivable :lol: Guess you're out then. |
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by majorjoe23
(Post 10493178)
I'm curious what the AMC schedule will be like next year. Since Breaking Bad is starting in July, The Walking Dead will probably follow it. Where will Mad Men fall? Breaking Bad seems to be taking its spot next year.
|
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by Gunde
(Post 10493580)
Considering the mad zombies at the door and the sunstroke, I don't think it's weird that he might have thought it faster to saw through his arm than metal.
fake edit: or what Lemmy said :) Beyond forgivable :lol: Guess you're out then. I do like the series but there are a few lapses in judgement that drive me nuts about it. But then again I am not in the situation they are in either so who knows how I would act. |
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by d2cheer
(Post 10493456)
I have not read the whole thread yet but... he was handcuffed to a metal bolt. Hacksaws are designed to cut metal...this is beyond forgiveable for this series. I get that not every detail had to be coverd and he was starting to lose it but come on.
|
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by d2cheer
(Post 10493456)
I have not read the whole thread yet but... he was handcuffed to a metal bolt. Hacksaws are designed to cut metal...this is beyond forgiveable for this series. I get that not every detail had to be coverd and he was starting to lose it but come on.
|
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Next episodes preview had what looks like our heroes running into a street gang... that wasn't in the comic. I like the deviations; make the show unpredictable.
|
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Forget the zombies, forget life at the camp; what we really needed was an 8 hour episode on watching the guy try and escape the handcuffs. We want him kicking, pulling, picking, sawing, trying to dislocate his thumb, remove his thumb (before then removing his hand) and we'd like to hear him babble to himself exactly what his thoughts are while he suffers from sunstroke. We also want to watch how he gets off the roof.
I'll happily wait for the director's cut where we also watch him peeing off the side of the building. for the next 8 hour episode I'm voting we watch those gals to laundry. If we don't see them separate the whites and see where they hang stuff to dry I'm quitting this show. Don't get me started on what they're using for detergent as everyone knows how easy it is to obtain lye and rend animal fat. Inexcusable! |
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Please don't post spoilers from previews, thanks!
|
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by Navinabob
(Post 10493787)
A dull hacksaw won't cut metal... it will cut meat. That situation is plausible, but feels like an excuse unless they showed him trying to cut the pipe first and failing at it.
|
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by KillerCannibal
(Post 10491560)
Man, Rick's wife is a B-I-T-C-H.
No, and Kirkman says that there will be no explanation. In one case a character claimed to know, but it was revealed he was lying. |
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by Xiroteus
(Post 10494275)
She really was, she did not have to be so nasty about it, geez. I am guessing that Shane said Rick was dead because he thought that is what happened? Of course Shane is no saint either for some things he has said.
Oh that is cheap, I like the know reasons for such things, kind of reads, no idea what write for how it started so I will make up nothing. (I like Kirkman, still that is cheap) In Y: The Last Man, the series clearly is set towards solving the mystery of the plague so it sorta makes sense, but in Walking Dead it is a moot point. Lets pretend they put in a three panel scene with a generic scientist going "ah-ha! It was a virus from the Amazon!" and then he gets eaten by zombies. How would that knowledge impact our group of survivors who are trapped in an attic of a house surrounded by the undead? How would that knowledge get to them? What would they do with it? Personally speaking, it was much cooler to pick apart things like the rules from becoming a zombie to how they behave from watching how things unfold. A cool part of the book is that at least 50% of the crap we are told turn out to be wrong (or right for the wrong reasons). That's why I mentioned when we learned to "rules" from the guy with his kid to not take everything he said as scripture. It's like the weeks after 9/11 where truth got so mixed with fear and confusion that everyone who said they "knew" something turned out to be wrong. |
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
*facepalms* I usually don't follow names in Hollywood, so I only just realized that the director Frank Darabont also directed one of my favorite horror movies, The Mist. No wonder I love this show so much. :)
Anyway folks, look on the bright side. With only six episodes, at least the Season 1 box set won't cost a fortune. ;)
Originally Posted by Trevor
(Post 10493479)
Don't lump us all together. I find it perfectly reasonable to give any show with several solid pluses a few episodes before bailing on it. No offense intended. It's just that posters who come to the board week after week just to say "Well that was crap" get on my nerves after awhile. |
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by Navinabob
(Post 10494319)
He originally had an idea, but didn't want it to become a series where they were trying to solve a mystery. They did a mini-comic where it was revealed that aliens were behind it (that many people thought was real and wrote in letters about it) even though it was clearly an alternate universe styled joke.
In Y: The Last Man, the series clearly is set towards solving the mystery of the plague so it sorta makes sense, but in Walking Dead it is a moot point. Lets pretend they put in a three panel scene with a generic scientist going "ah-ha! It was a virus from the Amazon!" and then he gets eaten by zombies. How would that knowledge impact our group of survivors who are trapped in an attic of a house surrounded by the undead? How would that knowledge get to them? What would they do with it? Personally speaking, it was much cooler to pick apart things like the rules from becoming a zombie to how they behave from watching how things unfold. A cool part of the book is that at least 50% of the crap we are told turn out to be wrong (or right for the wrong reasons). That's why I mentioned when we learned to "rules" from the guy with his kid to not take everything he said as scripture. It's like the weeks after 9/11 where truth got so mixed with fear and confusion that everyone who said they "knew" something turned out to be wrong. The book does bother me in the sense that there is so much death, not something I am a fan of at all, yet I am some how too curious not to find out what happens. Y-The Last Man was different in the sense of why it was still alive, he was in the middle of it. I can see how these two stories are very different and how they are never likely to find out the cause. I do wonder how long it will be before the Zombies just die off, can a zombie just die off? *facepalms* I'm not usually one to follow names in Hollywood, so I only just realized that the director Frank Darabont also directed one of my favorite horror movies, The Mist. No wonder I love this show so much. |
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by Geofferson
(Post 10493609)
Yeah, that looks to be the case. Not sure how the scheduling will line up (I doubt AMC will pair any shows together). Although it may make sense to pair this with Breaking Bad in an effort to boost its ratings (tragic how low the BB ratings continue to be).
|
Re: The Walking Dead -- "Tell it to the Frogs" -- 11/14/10
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 10494341)
They haven't even started writing/production on season 2 yet. This is 100% not being paired with Breaking Bad. Mad Men will still premiere in July or August and season 2 will premiere October 2011.
*I bet. ;) |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.