![]() |
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14097400)
30 minutes into watching this week's episode and they are seriously talking about granting immunity to a confessed murderer so they can go after his father. Holy fucking christ is this stupid!
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by flansered
(Post 14097809)
I think that they were going for a ripped from the headlines thing about the kid shot some of his classmates with a gun that his parents bought him for Christmas. The parents have been charged in that case, but in the episode it looked bad that a kid who has obvious issues getting a pass on murder so the lawyers could make a political stance.
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
SVU is the only one worth watching at this point. OC is laughably bad (I heard it will be more like SVU next season instead of these long arcs) and the mothership is poorly written.
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Gizmo
(Post 14097934)
SVU is the only one worth watching at this point. OC is laughably bad (I heard it will be more like SVU next season instead of these long arcs) and the mothership is poorly written.
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
You have to watch OC as a comedy because it's the funniest show on television
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by MrX
(Post 14098346)
You have to watch OC as a comedy because it's the funniest show on television
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Gizmo
(Post 14098646)
Where is the GIF of the car going off the cliff?
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
I like how the lawyer side lately is basically just
Jack: Lays out key points of why Price shouldn’t take the case to trial and just offer a deal Price: I can win this Jack: Well if you think so :shrug: |
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
This one was just boring. Pretty dull story to begin with, and the "twist" usually reserved for the court side of the episode didn't make it any more interesting.
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
This reboot, whatever, isn't very good. I expect Wolf to dump half the characters for Season 2.
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
I didn’t get that one either. Why was the DNA thrown out? Where was the victim’s family, friends and coworkers? The whole case seemed strange.
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Eric F
(Post 14100378)
Why was the DNA thrown out?
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by MrX
(Post 14100459)
Because he voluntarily gave it up and his lawyer argued his state his state of mind and the drug he was on prevented him from thinking clearly. That’s why the judge told Price to get a warrant next time.
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Eric F
(Post 14100510)
Yes, but if that was the case anything offered voluntarily could be thrown out after the fact.
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Is this garbage likely going to get renewed and then I am forced to watch this crap because i hung in there for 21 seasons
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Paff
(Post 14100606)
I'm no Lionel Hutz, but no. You could say "I did it", but if you hadn't been read your Miranda rights, it gets thrown out. The DNA was presented as "coerced evidence", which even though we know is allowed all the time, it can be thrown out if they feel it wasn't obtained properly.
These are the types of things they should deal with on the show, not leave for us to figure out. :lol: |
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
If this gets a season 22, there will be some cast changes. Waterston is only signed for this season and if he wants to continue, he will need a new deal. Anderson is probably out as he's also only signed to 1 year. Not sure about Donovan's status.
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Eric F
(Post 14100619)
Seems odd because he wasn’t charged with a crime until after he provided the evidence, so he didn’t need to be read his Miranda rights until he was arrested.
These are the types of things they should deal with on the show, not leave for us to figure out. :lol: |
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Renewed for season 22
https://deadline.com/2022/05/law-ord...aa5dee56334940 I would expect a full 22 episode season for the Fall. |
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 14101893)
Renewed for season 22
https://deadline.com/2022/05/law-ord...aa5dee56334940 I would expect a full 22 episode season for the Fall. |
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
I'm not jazzed about the cast either, but maybe they can grow into the roles. What needs to go is the "topical" stories and attempts to connect to current events.
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Paff
(Post 14102161)
What needs to go is the "topical" stories and attempts to connect to current events.
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Wonder if Wolf will bring back Chris Noth's character Logan.
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by morriscroy
(Post 14102405)
Wonder if Wolf will bring back Chris Noth's character Logan.
|
Re: Law & Order -- Series Discussion Thread
Had me then they lost me.
Good start to an episode (even if the "assumed identity" victim angle has been done in several previous episodes), then a clunky segue to an Oxycontin executive trial. Didn't really make sense. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.