Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > TV Talk
Reload this Page >

Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV

Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-10 | 12:24 PM
  #526  
Pointyskull's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,840
Received 54 Likes on 45 Posts
From: Formerly known as "12thmonkey"/Frankfort, IL
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

I've long been a supporter of "Team Darlton" and the notion that they will make it all good once the finale ends. But reading that HitFix interview was kind of maddening.

If they consider the skeletons an obscure reference, then I think we've all been wasting a lot of time over-analyzing stuff that isn't even on their explanation radar.

And don't get me started on that whole unexplained "who shot at the outrigger" situation. OK, maybe there isn't time to properly show that scene from another perspective, but certainly a character could mumble a line or two to clear that up...
Old 05-13-10 | 12:26 PM
  #527  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Works for me. MiB shall henceforth be known as Cosmo. Mystery solved.
Hey, I suggested Jim first, a few posts back. That's not good enough?
Old 05-13-10 | 12:30 PM
  #528  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by spainlinx0
Seriously there is no reason to not give him a name. It's not about it being a mystery. It's about it being ridiculous. Stop saying the woman didn't have a name picked out. So what? They aren't capable of thinking of one?
It wouldn't be his name
only his mother could give him, his name
If claire had given the baby up for adoption in the alternate timeline, we would all be calling him aaron instead of whatever name the new fake parents gave him
Old 05-13-10 | 12:43 PM
  #529  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 14,448
Likes: 0
Received 294 Likes on 223 Posts
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by spainlinx0
Seriously there is no reason to not give him a name. It's not about it being a mystery. It's about it being ridiculous. Stop saying the woman didn't have a name picked out. So what? They aren't capable of thinking of one?
It's just sloppy and it makes for awkward dialog and storytelling, especially since one of them has a name.

I think the reason they didn't give him a name was they still haven't worked out whether they should be calling present day MiB Locke or Cosmo.
Old 05-13-10 | 12:45 PM
  #530  
spainlinx0's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 19,735
Received 586 Likes on 347 Posts
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by kaze0
It wouldn't be his name
only his mother could give him, his name
If claire had given the baby up for adoption in the alternate timeline, we would all be calling him aaron instead of whatever name the new fake parents gave him
With that kind of logic, you must write for the show.
Old 05-13-10 | 12:47 PM
  #531  
dsa_shea's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,313
Received 360 Likes on 260 Posts
From: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by kaze0
It wouldn't be his name
only his mother could give him, his name
If claire had given the baby up for adoption in the alternate timeline, we would all be calling him aaron instead of whatever name the new fake parents gave him
However, Aaron, like Walt, has become very insignificant in the big picture unlike how he was portrayed earlier in season 2 with that weird heavenly scene, babynapping and talks of his importance. Now he is just piss in the wind. MIB on the otherhand is now the big baddie that C&L are waving in our face and I think the writers believe he is scarier and more mysterious without a name. On the other hand the whole calling him "you" is ridiculous and uncreative. I know they likely don't want to admit that they sucked a good portion of this story from Jacob and Esau and that is why the outright refuse to name him.
Old 05-13-10 | 12:49 PM
  #532  
Groucho's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 71,383
Received 130 Likes on 92 Posts
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by kaze0
It wouldn't be his name
only his mother could give him, his name
Are you arguing that of all the thousands of babies born to a mother who dies in childbirth, none of them have names?
Old 05-13-10 | 12:50 PM
  #533  
dsa_shea's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,313
Received 360 Likes on 260 Posts
From: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

And to be honest with you I would have preferred the smoke monster to have been some trapped jinn rather than a mysterious smoke presence left after the death of an angry guy. Imagine if Gacy and Bundy's bodies were somehow able to make it "into the light".
Old 05-13-10 | 12:52 PM
  #534  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: On a little blue planet, third from the Sun.
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Well, I'm on board Groucho! I think we should start a Facebook page to officially name MiB Cosmo and fuck what Darlton intended. If it worked for Bette White, it'll work for Cosmo.

Old 05-13-10 | 12:55 PM
  #535  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 18,543
Received 445 Likes on 314 Posts
From: Formerly known as Groucho AND Bandoman/Death Moans, Iowa
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by Flave
Well, I'm on board Groucho! I think we should start a Facebook page to officially name MiB Cosmo and fuck what Darlton intended. If it worked for Bette White, it'll work for Cosmo.

I hear Cosmo doesn't like black smoke monsters.
Old 05-13-10 | 12:56 PM
  #536  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,464
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

That's not right.
Old 05-13-10 | 12:57 PM
  #537  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 18,543
Received 445 Likes on 314 Posts
From: Formerly known as Groucho AND Bandoman/Death Moans, Iowa
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by Timber
It's just sloppy and it makes for awkward dialog and storytelling, especially since one of them has a name.
That was one of the reasons Bill Waterson didn't have many adults in Calvin & Hobbes. He didn't want to give Calvin's parents names, and brief attempts to introduce characters like Calvin's uncle lead to him awkwardly calling them "bro" and "sis" all the time.
Old 05-13-10 | 01:06 PM
  #538  
Meglos's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,407
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Chicago, IL
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by majorjoe23
I hear Cosmo doesn't like black smoke monsters.
Old 05-13-10 | 02:00 PM
  #539  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Malvern, PA
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Not necessary, but they are basically to the point of just pointing and saying "hey, you!" It's ham-fisted and the writers are just being obstinate.
Point taken.
Old 05-13-10 | 02:08 PM
  #540  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Malvern, PA
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Maybe they didn't name him yet because they're waiting to reveal it in the finale where it will be this humongous shock!
Old 05-13-10 | 02:13 PM
  #541  
dsa_shea's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,313
Received 360 Likes on 260 Posts
From: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

ign really gave this episode a beating. It was one of their lowest rated episodes of recent memory. There was another post that I read elsewhere that was on point about why this episode wasn't very good. He basically stated that leaving it to the viewer to draw their own conclusions on what things are or mean is not providing answers. This episode was good about guiding you towards a possible answer without really enlightening anything at all.
Old 05-13-10 | 02:22 PM
  #542  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,200
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
From: Larryville, GA
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by spainlinx0
I still think that the MIB's essence is the smoke monster. Why else would it be as eager to get off the island as he did? I don't know why people are separating the two.
I think that the smoke monster takes on characteristics of the person he is imitating. That would explain why he as screaming "Don't tell me what to do!" as Locke.
Old 05-13-10 | 02:24 PM
  #543  
Groucho's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 71,383
Received 130 Likes on 92 Posts
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

I want Mr. Plinkett to review this episode.
Old 05-13-10 | 02:25 PM
  #544  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,464
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by dsa_shea
It was one of their lowest rated episodes of recent memory.
Does anyone have a quick link to that episode ratings list that was posted a handful of episodes back? It will be interesting to see how this episode fared.
Old 05-13-10 | 02:25 PM
  #545  
dsa_shea's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,313
Received 360 Likes on 260 Posts
From: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by Cartload
I think that the smoke monster takes on characteristics of the person he is imitating. That would explain why he as screaming "Don't tell me what to do!" as Locke.
This! I would much rather this be true than believe that the MIB suddenly became the smoke monster out of rage.
Old 05-13-10 | 02:32 PM
  #546  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,780
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
From: DFW
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by Goldblum
Maybe they didn't name him yet because they're waiting to reveal it in the finale where it will be this humongous shock!
I made this comment to a friend yesterday. I swear if they do this, I'll cut a bitch.
Old 05-13-10 | 02:43 PM
  #547  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,835
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Madison, WI
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Does anyone have a quick link to that episode ratings list that was posted a handful of episodes back? It will be interesting to see how this episode fared.
I can't remember the exact rating, but it was around a 9 (out of 10).

crazy
Old 05-13-10 | 02:43 PM
  #548  
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: The Planet of the Apes
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

Originally Posted by 12thmonkey
I've long been a supporter of "Team Darlton" and the notion that they will make it all good once the finale ends. But reading that HitFix interview was kind of maddening.

If they consider the skeletons an obscure reference, then I think we've all been wasting a lot of time over-analyzing stuff that isn't even on their explanation radar.
They said it was NOT an obscure reference. They included the flashback for other reasons. Look:

DL: The reason that we put it in certainly wasn't because we thought it was too obscure and we wanted to hit people over the heads with it. It was more a matter of, here's an episode where our characters don't appear in it at all, and we wanted to make it clear to the audience that this little family drama, this dysfunctional relationship between these three people is really responsible for everything that's happening to the passengers of Oceanic 815. We wanted to illustrate that by, at the very end of the show saying, "Oh, right, Jack and Kate and Locke are affected by the fact that Mother decided to raise her kids this way, and Jacob ended up bringing these people to the island." The idea was to say that this chapter of the series is significant to the story we've been telling you, and that the series is about the survivors of Oceanic 815. To have an episode that they did not appear in at all was never our intention.
Old 05-13-10 | 03:15 PM
  #549  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Los Angeles
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

My impression of the Fmother is that she had dual roles (both was the previous smokie and the light's protector simultaneously). She ended up killing the real mother in the beginning after the 2nd child was born because she realized she'd finally be able to die once she could split her responsibilities between the two, picking one as the protector and knowing that her death would eventually lead to the other becoming the smokie given the vengeance the other son would have at her death and the knowledge there was another role that had to be filled by MIB. She originally thought MIB would become the protector until he chose to live with the humans and knew that his exposure to the humans would lead to him not having hope in mankind but knew he couldn't become the protector due to his mistrust of her due to her lying to him. She stated that neither could "hurt" each other but I think that only meant they couldn't kill each other, they could still beat each up other up short of the point of death but this may not have been actually true until they became their destined roles (she may have just wanted them both to believe they couldn't "hurt" each other, and they never really tested out trying to kill each other beforehand).


So, after MIB joined the humans, she had no choice except to make Jacob the protector, and when she had Jacob drink the mystical water, he gained the knowledge or instinct that he had to get MIB to become smokie for balance on the island vs. the Fmother knew Jacob would end up doing that as revenge since she said it was a fate worse than death. Jacob knocked MIB unconscious but did not kill him in any direct manner as he'd already become the protector, just let his body float into the cave where his physical body was separated from his soul and the soul manifested as smokie. Sayid didn't kill Flocke a few eps back since Flocke talked to him before he stabbed him, but MIB stabbed Fmother before she knew he was present and since she had gotten rid of the protector role, maybe she finally achieved the susceptibility to be killed (since smokies can only be killed by humans before a smokie knows they're there and MIB hadn't become smokie yet).


Maybe Fmother knew that smokie couldn't/shouldn't leave the island for the purpose to be a counterweight to Jacob because she knew Jacob would eventually develop hope for mankind and eventually bring more humans to the island to try and prove fMother wrong. Possibly, smokie couldn't leave the island until *after* the protector was killed and all the current candidates are too and now has a deal with Widmore to let him have the island in exchange for his help to get off the island. I'm sure there are plenty of holes and such but this is my working theory

Last edited by Jamezuva; 05-13-10 at 10:24 PM.
Old 05-13-10 | 03:20 PM
  #550  
Jim
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "Across the Sea" -- 05/11/10

I think it was last season there was an episode where Ben confronted Widmore in his office and accused him of breaking the rule (I think in reference to having Ben's daughter killed). Is that rule the one that Jacob and MIB have about not killing each other? And if so, does that mean Ben & Widmore are incarnations of Jacob & MIB?


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.