![]() |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
The 60 Minutes interview ... now with NSFW subtitles:
<object width="512" height="328" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000"><param name="movie" value="http://player.ordienetworks.com/flash/fodplayer.swf" /><param name="flashvars" value="key=17af1a1fef" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="512" height="328" flashvars="key=17af1a1fef" allowfullscreen="true" quality="high" src="http://player.ordienetworks.com/flash/fodplayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object><div style="text-align:center;width:512px;"><a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/17af1a1fef/conan-o-brien-s-60-minutes-inner-monologue" title="from FOD Team">Conan O'Brien's 60 Minutes Inner Monologue</a> - watch more <a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/" title="on Funny or Die">funny videos</a></div> |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Chew
(Post 10141165)
The same can be said about the numerous Leno bashing posts. :shrug:
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Mike86
(Post 10141764)
Except for the fact that this is a Conan thread and he (and others) just keep crapping in it constantly...
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/dvd-talk/23...ease-read.html |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 10141895)
While I don't agree with wm_lopez at all, I don't think his comments on this thread count as thread crapping. The discussion is about Conan, NBC, Leno and the events that transpired between them. If wm_lopez dislike's Conan's actions, he's free to voice his opinion in this thread, no matter how wrong-headed and incorrect those opinions are. ;)
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/dvd-talk/23...ease-read.html |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Mike86
(Post 10141933)
:shrug: But whatever I'm done with him not gonna waste time arguing.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Stay classy! |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Conan has talent. As far as comidians go if Rody Dangerfield is a grade A I give Conan a grade B+ . I only have a problem with him on the way he's acted after his ratings have not been good and he is given $30 million to go away. That's all. It's no different than say baseball's Milton Bradley was playing the race card last year while playing for the Cubs.
So guess what he still sucks this year. Conan I say your funny but not funny enough to have people want to see you. Live with it. |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Mike86
(Post 10141933)
I guess I've got a different idea of what a thread crap is but to me when someone is constantly coming in to only make comments about how much they dislike the person the thread is about (I mean lets face it NBC and Leno are discussed but its mostly a Conan thread it even says so in the title) and keeps on making stupid comments that contribute nothing to the thread that to me seems like a thread crap:shrug: But whatever I'm done with him not gonna waste time arguing.
I honestly don't think a lot of what he posts is done to make a genuine argument but just to get a reaction from people. I think we all are probably guilty of doing that from time to time, but when it's a pattern, and believe me it's a pattern, I do think it's not good for the threads and the forum. It's by no means the worst thing in the world either. Just my opinion. As I've stated, I like Conan, I think anyone who's reasonable knows he got screwed by Jay (NBC too) and I don't think you have to hate Jay or love Conan to see that's what happened. Letterman's got more money than he could ever need, so having the Tonight Show taken from him by Jay was far from the end of the world. But this was the man's dream. He worshiped Johnny Carson and his dream came true in that Carson ended up loving him and wanted him to replace him. When you think about how many people grew up watching that show and wanted the same thing, that's probably longer odds than winning power-ball. So, it's not just about whether the money is good or whether you life is ruined. Conan wanted to host the Tonight show with every fiber of his being and I know he'd have done very well and I'm not even a big fan. To have someone rip that away from you, to basically undercut you from the beginning after handing off the show and wishing you well, I mean that just has to hurt. Yes, his wife is beautiful, he's blessed with many, many things. But he can still have all those things and get royally screwed by a man that, despite the ratings wins, has almost driven the brand of the Tonight Show into the ground. Very few people in the comedy business think he's funny and, while I don't have the stats in front of me, I think he's gone years without being nominated for an Emmy. That's the Emmys saying, "You suck, Jay." It's not them hating on the Tonight Show, itself. The only thing that saves the guy is that he SO FAR, and for many years prior, he is able to attract a lot of fans who don't like anything edgy, he also has had the benefit of better lead-ins and affiliates, and he's been in LA with no real competition for guests, when a large pool of A-list stars are more often able to be booked because they live there or work there a lot. Take those advantages away and if you just went with what Jay brings to late night and he would never have even beaten Dave. And, even then, if he had stayed behind Dave and not had a lot of fortunate things happen, I know NBC wouldn't have replaced him in 6 months. I don't think they would have replaced him or thought to replace him for at least a few years and some of that would have just been because of how bad it would have looked to have lost Dave and then lost the ratings battle to him. No way they would have screwed over Jay the way they did Letterman and Conan. |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by devilshalo
(Post 10142247)
Stay classy! |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by wm lopez
(Post 10142360)
Conan has talent. As far as comidians go if Rody Dangerfield is a grade A I give Conan a grade B+ . I only have a problem with him on the way he's acted after his ratings have not been good and he is given $30 million to go away. That's all. It's no different than say baseball's Milton Bradley was playing the race card last year while playing for the Cubs.
So guess what he still sucks this year. Conan I say your funny but not funny enough to have people want to see you. Live with it. |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by dolphinboy
(Post 10142377)
Where can I see this Rody guy perform? Does he have a Comedy Central special?
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Jimmy James
(Post 10142379)
You've never heard of "Rowdy" Rody Dangerfield? He had that movie where he went back to school and found out everybody was an alien-controlled zombie.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Guys, he seems to have gone from full-on trolling to actually making a real argument for his point of view. No reason to go after him b/c of Rody. Hell, the first time I read it, my brain filled in the missing letters. Let's not get the thread locked.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Oh, I forgot this one point: I do find it amazing that he spelled Dangerfield correctly but not Rodney. Fascinating.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
I just find it amazing that wmlopez considers Rodney Dangerfield the gold standard of comedy.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by wm lopez
(Post 10140425)
...I found Jay funny and I liked that way he treated Bill O'Reilly on the show.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Come on Gentlemen, ripping into wm lopez over spelling, grammar, logic, counting, reasoning, or coherency issues is like tactical-nuking fish in a barrel. -ohbfrank-
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by wm lopez
(Post 10142360)
Conan I say your funny but not funny enough to have people want to see you. Live with it.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 10142622)
Come on Gentlemen, ripping into wm lopez over spelling, grammar, logic, counting, reasoning, or coherency issues is like tactical-nuking fish in a barrel. -ohbfrank-
:rimshot: |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by JasonF
(Post 10142580)
I just find it amazing that wmlopez considers Rodney Dangerfield the gold standard of comedy.
Spoiler:
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Jimmy James
(Post 10142369)
The use of "Team CoCo" on screen is the funniest thing I have seen from Leno in about a decade.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 10142797)
Yeah, that was actually subtle and far, far more clever than the typical Leno joke.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by JasonF
(Post 10142580)
I just find it amazing that wmlopez considers Rodney Dangerfield the gold standard of comedy.
I went safe with a legend. If we were talking music I would say THE BEATLES and not CREED. |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 10142797)
Yeah, that was actually subtle and far, far more clever than the typical Leno joke.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Interesting that Leno went out of his way to keep Slash from getting a close-up when he was on the show performing "By The Sword" because Slash was wearing a "Team Coco" button, but he's not beneath sneaking a reference to it in one of his gags.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.