Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > TV Talk
Reload this Page >

Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV

Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-09 | 03:51 PM
  #276  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,774
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by DthRdrX
Evidence on the identities of Adam and Eve.
Nice
Old 03-23-09 | 04:59 PM
  #277  
ATX
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

all this adam eve stuff is stupid

when Lost is all said and done, i don't want any nonsense

i wouldn't even mind if it ended w a wtf? moment, because at least that would be in true Lost fashion
Old 03-23-09 | 09:10 PM
  #278  
calhoun07's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by DthRdrX
Evidence on the identities of Adam and Eve.

Spoiler:

A qoute from a while back:



What someone else recently figured out:



Nadler is Rose and Bernard's last name.
Rather interesting. But if that's the case and it does turn out to be true...
Spoiler:
I sure as hell hope the black and white rocks have deeper meaning than what race they were. Because that's the part of the theory that bugs me the most. Not so much what characters are Adam and Eve, but what the rocks symbolize. Maybe they were never really meant to symbolize anything, but even if it turns out to be something deeper only Rose and Bernard know about then that's OK as long as the writers share it with the rest of us.

And I still think it's a crappy way to write them out of the show. They've barely been in it since I don't remember when and this is the way they go about it? As O'Riley would say, "f'nig thing SUCKS!"
Old 03-23-09 | 09:54 PM
  #279  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by DthRdrX
There is no evidence that the island was moved through time. When we saw it sink into the ocean it was moved to a different place on Earth. This was done so Widmore couldn't just send another boat to the same spot. If it had moved through time, the Others that were left over would have been left in the ocean. Also, if it moved through time, what is it going to do, land on itself?

The only thing that has moved through time was the losties and some of the stuff they had on them.
Alright, I can buy this. Christian said the island needed to be moved by Locke then Ben turned the wheel off its' axis and caused the time traveling as well as the island physically relocating. This is when the island disappeared. Since the whole idea around the Orchid station is studies in time travel, it makes sense that the wheel is designed to move objects through time and space. The survivors got bounced around while the Others stayed in the present. Ben was escaping the island, knowing what was going to happen to the people who stayed there.

The question is: when Locke turned the wheel back on its' axis did that move the island again to a different place or back to where it was visible so Widmore could find it? Is it just the turn of the wheel that moves the island around to various locations?
Old 03-24-09 | 12:50 AM
  #280  
GenPion's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,665
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/03/lost-exclusive.html

For those following this, Damon and Carlton admitted to their mistake on the continuity for Charlotte.
Old 03-24-09 | 02:18 AM
  #281  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 11,957
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
From: Pa
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

I'd be surprised if they don't work around it in season six by giving Charlotte's mother a reason to fake documents on her when they left Dharma. When Charlotte is 'outted' by Ben in the first or second episode of Season 4 he clearly states her name that she was born in 1979, in Essex England.

There are other continuity errors that I think are much bigger. First, Walt mentions to Hurley in season 4 that Locke visited him as Jeremy Bentham, yet in season five Locke never even mentioned that name to Walt. In the season 4 finale, Jack is standing over Locke's coffin when Ben enters the room. Ben asks Jack if Locke mentioned that he (Ben) was off the island now and Jack stated that Locke told him. Locke didn't even see Ben until after his visit with Jack, when Ben strangled him.
Old 03-24-09 | 03:27 AM
  #282  
GenPion's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,665
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Yeah, I know. Those are even bigger continuity errors. I am still waiting for them to address them.
Old 03-24-09 | 12:01 PM
  #283  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Orlando, FL
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by DthRdrX
Ben asks Jack if Locke mentioned that he (Ben) was off the island now and Jack stated that Locke told him. Locke didn't even see Ben until after his visit with Jack, when Ben strangled him.
But Locke knew Ben was off the island from the point Ben moved the island with the frozen donkey wheel. He didn't need to see him again to know that.
Old 03-24-09 | 12:52 PM
  #284  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,774
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by DthRdrX
In the season 4 finale, Jack is standing over Locke's coffin when Ben enters the room. Ben asks Jack if Locke mentioned that he (Ben) was off the island now and Jack stated that Locke told him. Locke didn't even see Ben until after his visit with Jack, when Ben strangled him.
It wasn't that Locke didn't know Ben was off the island. It was that Locke didn't mention it to Jack in the conversation we saw.
Old 03-24-09 | 03:25 PM
  #285  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 11,957
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
From: Pa
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by Palaver
It wasn't that Locke didn't know Ben was off the island. It was that Locke didn't mention it to Jack in the conversation we saw.
That's correct. My bad.
Old 03-24-09 | 05:35 PM
  #286  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 11,957
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
From: Pa
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by cracksky
The question is: when Locke turned the wheel back on its' axis did that move the island again to a different place or back to where it was visible so Widmore could find it? Is it just the turn of the wheel that moves the island around to various locations?
The interesting thing to note is that Ben turned the wheel in the present but Locke could still fix it in the past. Whatever time they flashed to would probably result in the wheel still acting up, yet the island didn't seem to move again after Locke fixed it. This is the only problem that happened in the present that we have seen fixed in the past.

I don't think the island moved again though. I think the island just wanted Locke to travel to the main land to get the 06 so it course-corrected so Locke would have to turn the wheel.
Old 03-24-09 | 07:25 PM
  #287  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Michigan
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by DthRdrX
There are other continuity errors that I think are much bigger. First, Walt mentions to Hurley in season 4 that Locke visited him as Jeremy Bentham, yet in season five Locke never even mentioned that name to Walt. In the season 4 finale, Jack is standing over Locke's coffin when Ben enters the room. Ben asks Jack if Locke mentioned that he (Ben) was off the island now and Jack stated that Locke told him. Locke didn't even see Ben until after his visit with Jack, when Ben strangled him.
Yeah, these mistakes were really glaring - even I noticed them right away. You would think whoever is in charge of continuity would've caught them. I guess they must have missed it since there is a lot going on plot-wise. Still, it's kind of disappointing they are getting sloppy with some of the details.
Old 03-25-09 | 09:54 AM
  #288  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Any continuity issues surrounding Ben can pretty much be explained away by "He lies"

Originally Posted by dvdhook
Yeah, these mistakes were really glaring - even I noticed them right away. You would think whoever is in charge of continuity would've caught them. I guess they must have missed it since there is a lot going on plot-wise. Still, it's kind of disappointing they are getting sloppy with some of the details.
Old 03-25-09 | 10:19 AM
  #289  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

I had a lengthy discussion with a friend pertaining to Ben meeting the gang when he was a child. I know plenty of you have more of a grasp than I do on this show, so I wanted to ask something.

Since we now know Ben knew Jack and co. when he was a kid, meaning that's the explanation as to why he knew about them in the earlier seasons....

IF Jack and co. never left the island, how would they have gotten back to the past to meet Ben as a kid? Ben tells Jack they're not supposed to leave, etc. So if they didn't, and everything stayed the same, how would Ben have met them as a child? Since up until this season, we know he already met them growing up. His life hasn't experienced any of the jumping around, unless I'm mistaken. Once he got to the island as a kid (as we saw in his flashback), technically, Jack and crew are there somewhere. So he has met them twice. If they never left the island later, how is it possible he met them as a child?

I guess what I posted makes sense. I'm confusing myself the more I think about this show.

Last edited by Mr. Cinema; 03-25-09 at 10:23 AM.
Old 03-25-09 | 10:26 AM
  #290  
pinata242's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 30,155
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Owasso, OK
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

It's easy to understand. Remember what Faraday said: "Whatever happened, happened."

Jack & co had to leave the island and end up in the past because they had already been in the past.
Old 03-25-09 | 10:51 AM
  #291  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Orlando, FL
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
IF Jack and co. never left the island, how would they have gotten back to the past to meet Ben as a kid?
The same way Sawyer & crew did. They would have been time jumping with the rest of them.
Old 03-25-09 | 10:56 AM
  #292  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by DthRdrX
The interesting thing to note is that Ben turned the wheel in the present but Locke could still fix it in the past. Whatever time they flashed to would probably result in the wheel still acting up, yet the island didn't seem to move again after Locke fixed it. This is the only problem that happened in the present that we have seen fixed in the past.

I don't think the island moved again though. I think the island just wanted Locke to travel to the main land to get the 06 so it course-corrected so Locke would have to turn the wheel.
I think the proof that the island absolutely had to have moved again after Locke turned the wheel (or got it back on track) was the fact that it was visible in 2008 for the survivors of flight 316. If it hadn't moved there would've simply been ocean out there as Frank flew out of the turbulent storm.
Old 03-25-09 | 11:15 AM
  #293  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
Ben tells Jack they're not supposed to leave, etc.
Ben lies
Old 03-25-09 | 01:35 PM
  #294  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 11,957
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
From: Pa
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by cracksky
I think the proof that the island absolutely had to have moved again after Locke turned the wheel (or got it back on track) was the fact that it was visible in 2008 for the survivors of flight 316. If it hadn't moved there would've simply been ocean out there as Frank flew out of the turbulent storm.
It isn't visable until you fly near it regardless of the wheel. Hawkings chose flight 316 because that is where she calculated the island to be.
Old 03-25-09 | 01:55 PM
  #295  
The Bus's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 54,920
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
From: New York
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by pinata242
It's easy to understand. Remember what Faraday said: "Whatever happened, happened."
Now you're bringing future episodes into the discussion.
Old 03-25-09 | 02:01 PM
  #296  
pinata242's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 30,155
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Owasso, OK
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Sorry about the incident I just caused, Bus.
Old 03-25-09 | 03:26 PM
  #297  
GenPion's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,665
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

So? Am I missing something in this conversation? Faraday said "Whatever Happened, Happened" just two episodes ago before he saw Charlotte. It's neat though that they have an episode coming up entitled that.
Old 03-25-09 | 04:07 PM
  #298  
chess's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 20,804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: San Antonio
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by GenPion
So? Am I missing something in this conversation? Faraday said "Whatever Happened, Happened" just two episodes ago before he saw Charlotte. It's neat though that they have an episode coming up entitled that.
They're joking.
Old 03-25-09 | 05:34 PM
  #299  
calhoun07's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by Kevin M. Dean
The same way Sawyer & crew did. They would have been time jumping with the rest of them.
Exactly...the course correction has begun. For some reason, Sun's course didn't need to be corrected by sending her back to 1977.
Old 03-25-09 | 06:07 PM
  #300  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "Namaste" -- 03/18/09

Originally Posted by Oliver Clothesoff
Saw this on another forum:



Shot of Sun in the cabin with Christian.
I watched this again with some TV adjustments and it looks like a crew member got stuck in the shot. It's a woman with a short-sleeve black shirt that might say CATS on it in white letters (from the musical). She has medium-length blond or red hair and is standing behind some boxes with her right arm resting on one of them. During the shot she turns her head toward Sun. When you watch this in normal lighting conditions, you can see a slight movement behind Sun when the woman turns her head.

There's really no way this can be a character in the show. It's a mistake.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.