Cancelled Series - Ticked Off Public - Solution?
#51
Mod Emeritus
Originally Posted by JamesDFarrow
I have noticed that all over the net people are really getting ticked off. Shows ending (especially on cliffhangers) with no resolutions. It is starting to become the expectation of many people.
[....]
So I was thinking. Why not do series intentionally designed for one season. A beginning, middle, and end. And if the series is a hit then a second season can be done, using the same formula. If it doesn't do well then it gets the axe after the first season but at least the story is done. People may not be happy with the cancellation but at least they are not left hanging.
[....]
Opinions? Suggestions?
[....]
So I was thinking. Why not do series intentionally designed for one season. A beginning, middle, and end. And if the series is a hit then a second season can be done, using the same formula. If it doesn't do well then it gets the axe after the first season but at least the story is done. People may not be happy with the cancellation but at least they are not left hanging.
[....]
Opinions? Suggestions?
Originally Posted by Jimmy James
The idea of making a wholly self contained show can backfire. I remember ABC had some crime show that went, if I have it right, from crime to verdict over the course of a season. The first season was a sensation. The second was an afterthought. It's not too much to ask the networks to commit to leaving a show at a point that is at least somewhat palatable to the viewer, though.
Originally Posted by Red Dog
Let's keep in mind that "public" in these cases usually means a "very devoted few."
Cancelled series and pissed off fans is nothing new.
Cancelled series and pissed off fans is nothing new.
#52
I believe the biggest problem is the Nielsen rating system itself. The Nielsen people need to seriously look at increasing the number their metering boxes from 1,500 to as many as 50,000 and go to year-round "sweeps period" style monitoring, something that is now in easy reach with cheap electronic components and cheap high-volume computing power.
I wouldn't be surprised if this happens within the next 3-4 years. With an improved, higher sampling rate for viewership, Nielsen can identify smaller, but much more devoted viewing audiences that have a strong pull on advertisers. (It's been said if Nielsen had implemented their viewership sampling change done in the late 1970's in the middle 1960's a series like the original Star Trek would have lasted at least two more seasons on-air).
I wouldn't be surprised if this happens within the next 3-4 years. With an improved, higher sampling rate for viewership, Nielsen can identify smaller, but much more devoted viewing audiences that have a strong pull on advertisers. (It's been said if Nielsen had implemented their viewership sampling change done in the late 1970's in the middle 1960's a series like the original Star Trek would have lasted at least two more seasons on-air).
#53
Originally Posted by RayChuang
I believe the biggest problem is the Nielsen rating system itself. The Nielsen people need to seriously look at increasing the number their metering boxes from 1,500 to as many as 50,000 and go to year-round "sweeps period" style monitoring, something that is now in easy reach with cheap electronic components and cheap high-volume computing power.
Last edited by Ayre; 03-30-08 at 03:57 PM.
#54
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Southside Virginia
I have to agree. I'd far rather see a competitor wire up another 1500 households in their attempt to get a good cross-section. That way, we could at least compare the two.
#55
Originally Posted by Ayre
Now if you mean that the sampling pool could be more diverse, I would have to agree.




