Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > TV Talk
Reload this Page >

Cancelled Series - Ticked Off Public - Solution?

Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV

Cancelled Series - Ticked Off Public - Solution?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-08 | 06:56 AM
  #51  
benedict's Avatar
Mod Emeritus
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 10,674
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Outside of the U.S.A.
Originally Posted by JamesDFarrow
I have noticed that all over the net people are really getting ticked off. Shows ending (especially on cliffhangers) with no resolutions. It is starting to become the expectation of many people.
[....]
So I was thinking. Why not do series intentionally designed for one season. A beginning, middle, and end. And if the series is a hit then a second season can be done, using the same formula. If it doesn't do well then it gets the axe after the first season but at least the story is done. People may not be happy with the cancellation but at least they are not left hanging.

[....]

Opinions? Suggestions?
I think that the tv companies should recognise the implicit covenant they have with the viewers/fans and make it a hard and fast rule than any show running to more than x episodes (the value of "x" is up for discussion) should be guaranteed a resolution, whether it be the conclusion of a season or a TV movie to bring together any loose ends.
Originally Posted by Jimmy James
The idea of making a wholly self contained show can backfire. I remember ABC had some crime show that went, if I have it right, from crime to verdict over the course of a season. The first season was a sensation. The second was an afterthought. It's not too much to ask the networks to commit to leaving a show at a point that is at least somewhat palatable to the viewer, though.
Murder One?
Originally Posted by Red Dog
Let's keep in mind that "public" in these cases usually means a "very devoted few."

Cancelled series and pissed off fans is nothing new.
Among other shows, I remember catching late night UK screenings of "Prey" and being somewhat peeved by the last episode. I like my late night pulp tv and felt that I was owed a little more than a guy locked up in a cage! The same goes for "Brimstone" i.e. cheesy but a guilty pleasure I'd've liked to've stuck with for longer. I guess we now have "Reaper"!
Old 03-30-08 | 07:56 AM
  #52  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,067
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
I believe the biggest problem is the Nielsen rating system itself. The Nielsen people need to seriously look at increasing the number their metering boxes from 1,500 to as many as 50,000 and go to year-round "sweeps period" style monitoring, something that is now in easy reach with cheap electronic components and cheap high-volume computing power.

I wouldn't be surprised if this happens within the next 3-4 years. With an improved, higher sampling rate for viewership, Nielsen can identify smaller, but much more devoted viewing audiences that have a strong pull on advertisers. (It's been said if Nielsen had implemented their viewership sampling change done in the late 1970's in the middle 1960's a series like the original Star Trek would have lasted at least two more seasons on-air).
Old 03-30-08 | 09:06 AM
  #53  
Ayre's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,196
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by RayChuang
I believe the biggest problem is the Nielsen rating system itself. The Nielsen people need to seriously look at increasing the number their metering boxes from 1,500 to as many as 50,000 and go to year-round "sweeps period" style monitoring, something that is now in easy reach with cheap electronic components and cheap high-volume computing power.
Higher sampling will mean little. The sample size could even be less and draw the same conclusions. Now if you mean that the sampling pool could be more diverse, I would have to agree. It's very difficult to capture a cross-section, regardless of the size. If you increase the size of the sample pool, you also magnify the bias.

Last edited by Ayre; 03-30-08 at 03:57 PM.
Old 03-30-08 | 10:09 AM
  #54  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Southside Virginia
I have to agree. I'd far rather see a competitor wire up another 1500 households in their attempt to get a good cross-section. That way, we could at least compare the two.
Old 03-30-08 | 09:07 PM
  #55  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,067
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Ayre
Now if you mean that the sampling pool could be more diverse, I would have to agree.
That's exactly what I'm looking for with 50,000 metering boxes. With that many boxes out there, you can look at Nielsen data with greater accuracy and that could show that some low-rated programs could actually be hits because they have a highly-devoted audience, something that advertisers strongly covet.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.