Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > TV Talk
Reload this Page >

What Decade Had The Best TV Shows?

Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV

What Decade Had The Best TV Shows?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-07 | 06:25 PM
  #26  
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 133,162
Received 898 Likes on 742 Posts
From: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Originally Posted by WallyOPD
If you're just looking at network shows that might be a valid point (although there have been some kickass network shows this decade too). Throw in Sci-Fi, USA, f/x, HBO and a few other cable networks and there have been numerous fresh and innovating ideas the past 7 years.

That's why I said we are in a golden age of drama. It's just that most of it isn't found on network TV which has to worry about the FCC.
Old 05-29-07 | 06:45 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Missouri
I would probably go with the 90s for comedy and the current decade for drama. People who don't think there have been many good shows in this decade must not be familiar with HBO.

I think old TV shows suck.
Old 05-29-07 | 07:06 PM
  #28  
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would go with the 80s...

Miami Vice
The A-Team
Knight Rider
Married with the children
Macgyver

and the 70s..
Sanford and Son!!!!!! Hands down!!!!!!
Old 05-29-07 | 07:09 PM
  #29  
dhmac's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 7,422
Received 68 Likes on 59 Posts
From: Kissimmee, Florida
While I think Movies and Music are in serious free-fall, I think Television has been in arguably its best era starting about 1990.

So the best decades in order, IMO:
(1) 1990s
(2) 2000s
(3) 1960s
(4) 1970s
(5) 1950s
(6) 1980s
(7) 1940s
Old 05-29-07 | 07:31 PM
  #30  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Electric Ladyland
I don't (and won't) get cable, so I can't argue the premise that premium channels have elevated the quality of TV in the 2000's. Perhaps they have. But I do know that network television is at an all-time nadir in the current decade, even exceeding the corniest low-brow stuff of the 1970's and 1980's. Eight million clones of Survivor and American Idol (each mindless drivel in their own right) have seen to that.

I think the 1990's were far and away the best decade for sit-coms, in any case (with only a slight nod to the 1970's). And the 1960's produced the most entertaining escapist/genre shows by far.

I can't think of any decade that was really strong on serious drama, unless you want to count the 1950's live drama anthology shows, or PBS and its British imports over the decades as the best of TV drama (both arguably true). So it may be that the 2000's can claim that category as its own, after all.
Old 05-29-07 | 07:39 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by Sex Fiend
I don't (and won't) get cable, so I can't argue the premise that premium channels have elevated the quality of TV in the 2000's.
I guess you also don't (and won't) watch TV shows on DVD, huh?
Old 05-29-07 | 08:37 PM
  #32  
sracer's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 15,380
Received 60 Likes on 38 Posts
From: Prescott Valley, AZ
Originally Posted by WallyOPD
If you're just looking at network shows that might be a valid point (although there have been some kickass network shows this decade too). Throw in Sci-Fi, USA, f/x, HBO and a few other cable networks and there have been numerous fresh and innovating ideas the past 7 years.
It is unfair to include cable networks. Cable wasn't around in the the 50's, 60's and most of the 70's. So it is an apples and oranges comparison. The unique nature of cable programming skews the results.


Originally Posted by WallyOPD
I also think that television writing and directing has naturally evolved and matured over time. While the stories of many older shows are timeless, the pacing and dialogue leaves a lot to be desired at times. I can more easily watch a mediocre show from the past 5 years than a good show from 40 years ago.
I think that is more of a function of how you view things today than of the writing. We're all jaded. If we don't look at those old shows through more innocent eyes, the dialog of shows 40 years ago seem simplistic and naive.
I'm thankful that I can do that... others just think that I'm going senile.
Old 05-29-07 | 08:49 PM
  #33  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,869
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
From: Florida
The 90s

Farscape
ST: DS9
Babylon 5
Batman: The Animated Series
X-Files
Stargate SG-1
Buffy
Millennium
Old 05-31-07 | 02:22 PM
  #34  
Ayre's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,196
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by WallyOPD
I also think that television writing and directing has naturally evolved and matured over time. While the stories of many older shows are timeless, the pacing and dialogue leaves a lot to be desired at times. I can more easily watch a mediocre show from the past 5 years than a good show from 40 years ago.
That's a huge point. Most people's answers appear to be in the context they SAW them.

The question should be ...

If you were given a free network to watch and you could pick the shows, but they all must be from one decade. What decade would you want?

2000 without a doubt.

1970's was the best for me ... at that time. But now, it would be torture and not entertainment.
Old 05-31-07 | 09:01 PM
  #35  
dhmac's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 7,422
Received 68 Likes on 59 Posts
From: Kissimmee, Florida
Originally Posted by sracer
It is unfair to include cable networks. Cable wasn't around in the the 50's, 60's and most of the 70's. So it is an apples and oranges comparison. The unique nature of cable programming skews the results.
I personally think it would be unfair NOT to include cable networks. Artificially excluding them when they are a viable option in television viewing would be skewing the results.
Old 06-01-07 | 08:21 AM
  #36  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
1970's was the best for me ... at that time. But now, it would be torture and not entertainment.
I wouldn't say that, Watch shows like Sanford & Son, early seasons of the Jefferson's & Maude which still hold up extremly well today.
Old 06-01-07 | 12:54 PM
  #37  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,644
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
From: San Jose, CA
I vote for the 80s.

How can anyone vote for the 2000s with all the reality shows, some good some bad?
Survivor
Amazing Race
American Idol
The Bachelor
Last Comic Standing
Flavor of Love
I Love NY
The Swan
My Big Fat Obnoxious Fiance
Fear Factor
Temptation Island
Britney & Kevin: Chaotic

and the list goes on...
Old 06-01-07 | 01:23 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by DVDChris
How can anyone vote for the 2000s with all the reality shows, some good some bad?
Survivor
Amazing Race
American Idol
The Bachelor
Last Comic Standing
Flavor of Love
I Love NY
The Swan
My Big Fat Obnoxious Fiance
Fear Factor
Temptation Island
Britney & Kevin: Chaotic
Because I don't watch any of that shit. There are more great TV shows on today than there were in the 80s, so why should I care how many bad shows are on today? It's real easy to not watch shit. How many shows from the 80s were as good as stuff like The Wire? Answer: None.
Old 06-01-07 | 03:24 PM
  #39  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,466
Received 1,378 Likes on 944 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Yep. The 80's appears to be home to guilty pleasures. There are a TON of shows that were hits back in the day, but 99% of them don't hold up at all. Cheers is the only show that comes to mind that fits in that 1%.
Old 06-01-07 | 04:41 PM
  #40  
DRG
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 13,421
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: ND
I don't know. I find a lot of the shows I loved in the 80s are almost unwatchable as anything but nostalgia these days. I would say 2000s just because the gap between movie and tv quality is so slim, with tv actually winning in many regards. But I can't think of a tv show from the 80s that would hold a candle to any of my favorite 80s movies.
Old 06-04-07 | 08:45 AM
  #41  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 21,580
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by HerdfanWV
I would guess that most people are selecting the decade that they were adolescents.
I would agree with that assessment, since I'm voting for the 1960's.

Having said that, I do think that the 60's had better quality than the preceding decades & more variety than the succeeding decades. One could choose between drama, comedy, western, science-fiction, horror/thriller, adventure, variety shows, soaps, spy shows, war dramas, talk shows, cop, legal...you name the genre, and you could probably find several fine examples.

Most of the 60's writers came out of literary traditions (stage, screen, fiction, etc.) and seemed to have a better sense of plot structure than many contemporary writers. Keep in mind that the writers were constrained by a strict censorship code that precluded them from examining many "taboo" topics or going into graphic detail. That meant they had to be more imaginative in order to achieve a serious impact upon the audience or to shock the audience. Many of the writers (as well as directors & actors) had considerable experience with motion pictures or would become future stars (Sam Peckinpah, Clint Eastwood, etc.) and you have to remember that a continued storyline back then was a major (and rare) event. The writers had to introduce the conflict, go through the rising action to the climax, and then come to some resolution...often within 30 minutes for dramas!

Another thing to keep in mind is that decades that predated cable were confined to only 3 major networks (even PBS didn't start to make an impact until the 70's). When you look at so many of the excellent shows since 1990 (Buffy, Deadwood, The Shield, Sopranos, Angel, X-Files, Prime Suspect, and many, many others) and realize that those shows were on cable tv or "alternative" networks (Fox, WB, BBCAmerica), then the 60's seem even more impressive.

Every decade has had a few gems and many losers, but the 60's still seems to have standouts in almost every genre that has stood the test of time and remain fresh & entertaining today: Andy Griffith, The Defenders, The Twilight Zone, Star Trek, Rawhide, I Spy, The Prisoner, Combat...way too many to list.

Setting aside nostalgic biases and not taking into account the vast number of cable outlets today (in addition to the many BBC, Showtime & HBO series, even Sundance & IFC offer original series), we seem to be enjoying a wealth of great television right now. Still wish the westerns would make a comeback, though.

Last edited by creekdipper; 06-04-07 at 09:06 AM.
Old 06-04-07 | 10:01 AM
  #42  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,044
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Marina Del Rey, California
We're in it IMO.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.