The Inside 6/22/05
#5
This episode was a good improvement; now we know there's some sun in Los Angeles.
Though I don't understand how they could let Roger go, didn't he order child porn online? That alone could have put him in federal prison for up to 15 years.
Though I don't understand how they could let Roger go, didn't he order child porn online? That alone could have put him in federal prison for up to 15 years.
#6
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Southside Virginia
Originally Posted by Ranger
This episode was a good improvement; now we know there's some sun in Los Angeles.
Though I don't understand how they could let Roger go, didn't he order child porn online? That alone could have put him in federal prison for up to 15 years.
Though I don't understand how they could let Roger go, didn't he order child porn online? That alone could have put him in federal prison for up to 15 years.
I got the idea it wasn't supposed to be child porn but was instead the closest you could legally get to child porn obviously marketed to disgusting sicko perverts. It was apparently sent in the mail like any magazine is, and you'd have to think any child porn magazine sent openly like that would be shut down with much prejudice about three days after the first issue came out.
#7
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I'm still giving this show a chance too, but after 3 weeks I think it might be time to call this one DOA. It's so "blah".
it was nice to see the Bones preview commercial.
Its good to have Angel back on Tv.
it was nice to see the Bones preview commercial.
Its good to have Angel back on Tv.
#8
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Southside Virginia
It certainly pales in comparison to the last three shows Tim Minear was involved in, but the show turned a corner for me last night. I'm looking forward to seeing how episode four works for me.
#9
Moderator
Originally Posted by Patman
The lead actress just isn't that good, though (acting-wise).
#11
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Patman
The lead actress just isn't that good, though (acting-wise).
#12
Originally Posted by Jimmy James
Even if it was child porn, there may be 4th Amendment issues with federal agents getting into your house to protect you and then expanding the scope of their presence to go through your attic trunk. Beyond that, he could pretty easily claim it was planted, as the agents mentioned.
I got the idea it wasn't supposed to be child porn but was instead the closest you could legally get to child porn obviously marketed to disgusting sicko perverts. It was apparently sent in the mail like any magazine is, and you'd have to think any child porn magazine sent openly like that would be shut down with much prejudice about three days after the first issue came out.
I got the idea it wasn't supposed to be child porn but was instead the closest you could legally get to child porn obviously marketed to disgusting sicko perverts. It was apparently sent in the mail like any magazine is, and you'd have to think any child porn magazine sent openly like that would be shut down with much prejudice about three days after the first issue came out.
As for the main character, Rachel, I admit her personality is kind of flat, but it does seems more realistic and professional though not necessarily what viewers are used to.
Also, I read that on July 6, FOX will air two new episodes. Two possible reasons are: 1)Test different time slots 2) Just use up the episodes quickly as possible. I think it's a little of both.




