West Wing 3/30
#1
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hero
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 29,850
Received 23 Likes
on
16 Posts
From: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
West Wing 3/30
josh is a moron. even if he knew for a fact santos was sitting in a chair putting on his shoes he should have knocked
it would have been real funny if santos was balls deep in her though
and russel/santos would be cool as I want gary cole to be a regular on this show
it would have been real funny if santos was balls deep in her though
and russel/santos would be cool as I want gary cole to be a regular on this show
#3
DVD Talk Legend
There certainly setting this up like there is no possible way Vinnick should lose. Great convention speech that "steals democratic votes", a moderate, a California Senator with a "mortal lock" on that state, and a opposing party that act like children.
In the real world, no Democrat would have a snowballs chance of winning the White House without California.
On the other hand, this is Well's West Wing we're talking about.
In the real world, no Democrat would have a snowballs chance of winning the White House without California.
On the other hand, this is Well's West Wing we're talking about.
#4
DVD Talk God
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 133,148
Received 896 Likes
on
740 Posts
From: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Originally Posted by Chew
There certainly setting this up like there is no possible way Vinnick should lose. Great convention speech that "steals democratic votes", a moderate, a California Senator with a "mortal lock" on that state, and a opposing party that act like children.
In the real world, no Democrat would have a snowballs chance of winning the White House without California.
On the other hand, this is Well's West Wing we're talking about.
In the real world, no Democrat would have a snowballs chance of winning the White House without California.
On the other hand, this is Well's West Wing we're talking about.

In the real world, an Arnie Vinnick would not win the GOP nomination either.
The assumption is that Santos would win Texas, his home state. That would somewhat offset the loss of California.
I hate when there is a lack of continuity, however. In past seasons, it is revealed that Hoines is from Texas, not Colorado. Otherwise, it was an entertaining episode.
Well I guess Allison Janney won't be on the show next season.
#5
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I feel somewhat vindicated that the writers did not just push a Russell/Santos ticket. They really are going out of their way to push Vinnick as the winner so unless some controversy explodes in his face, Alda should win (though I'm still pushing for Santos). The ending certainly paved the way for C.J. to exit in case one of the Dems does pull out a win and they are setting up the possibility of Leo as the DNC head.
#6
Originally Posted by Red Dog
Well I guess Allison Janney won't be on the show next season. 

#7
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Red Dog
The assumption is that Santos would win Texas, his home state. That would somewhat offset the loss of California.
A Congressmen, who has only won a district, doesn't strike me as a given for carrying his state. Especially when he's of the opposite party his state is known for. Sorta like a Republican Congressmen carrying Massachusetts.
#8
DVD Talk God
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 133,148
Received 896 Likes
on
740 Posts
From: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Originally Posted by Chew
A Senator, who has already won his state, is a good bet for carrying it in the general.
A Congressmen, who has only won a district, doesn't strike me as a given for carrying his state. Especially when he's of the opposite party his state is known for. Sorta like a Republican Congressmen carrying Massachusetts.
A Congressmen, who has only won a district, doesn't strike me as a given for carrying his state. Especially when he's of the opposite party his state is known for. Sorta like a Republican Congressmen carrying Massachusetts.

What party currently holds the governorship in Mass?

I'm not saying it is sound strategy - I'm just saying this is the apparently the assumption of the people in the fictional WW world.
#9
Originally Posted by Chew
A Senator, who has already won his state, is a good bet for carrying it in the general.
A Congressmen, who has only won a district, doesn't strike me as a given for carrying his state. Especially when he's of the opposite party his state is known for. Sorta like a Republican Congressmen carrying Massachusetts.
A Congressmen, who has only won a district, doesn't strike me as a given for carrying his state. Especially when he's of the opposite party his state is known for. Sorta like a Republican Congressmen carrying Massachusetts.

But in essence your argument is completely true. Not that it matters - any sheen of verisimilitude The West Wing ever had has long been worn away.
#10
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally Posted by Red Dog
I hate when there is a lack of continuity, however. In past seasons, it is revealed that Hoines is from Texas, not Colorado. Otherwise, it was an entertaining episode.
#11
DVD Talk God
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 133,148
Received 896 Likes
on
740 Posts
From: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Originally Posted by djbrown
The Colorado reference was to the current VP, Bingo Bob Russell, who does hail from Colorado.
I thought the Hoines rep wanted the Colorado delegation up front.
#12
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fremont, CA USA
Originally Posted by Red Dog
I thought the Hoines rep wanted the Colorado delegation up front.
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mikehunt
josh is a moron. even if he knew for a fact santos was sitting in a chair putting on his shoes he should have knocked
As for the press leak, I don't think it was CJ for some reason. We already had Toby do his leak a few weeks ago. I know this is very unlikely, but I'm thinking it may have been the president, he didn't seem at all happy with what either side was telling him in the briefing.
#17
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by Red Dog
I thought the Hoines rep wanted the Colorado delegation up front.
Josh said they're not putting Colorado up front to Will.
Will said they're not putting Texas up fromt and Hoynes guy said what do you have against my guys home state.
Ok episode
The Charlie and Bartlett scenes were pretty good. You knew he was going to get caught the secong he stepped outside the door but it was stll funny.
#18
DVD Talk Legend
Those veteran West Wing watchers may know this is only the second weekly thread I've joined in on since I caught up last week, so please forgive the question if it's been asked and answered already.....
What's the deal with the season being over the first week in April? It's not like it was cut short, it's the same number of episodes. Does NBC have big Wednesday mini-series plans for May sweeps or something?
What's the deal with the season being over the first week in April? It's not like it was cut short, it's the same number of episodes. Does NBC have big Wednesday mini-series plans for May sweeps or something?
#19
Banned
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Sand Point
Originally Posted by Chew
Those veteran West Wing watchers may know this is only the second weekly thread I've joined in on since I caught up last week, so please forgive the question if it's been asked and answered already.....
What's the deal with the season being over the first week in April? It's not like it was cut short, it's the same number of episodes. Does NBC have big Wednesday mini-series plans for May sweeps or something?
What's the deal with the season being over the first week in April? It's not like it was cut short, it's the same number of episodes. Does NBC have big Wednesday mini-series plans for May sweeps or something?
There were no reruns this year.
#22
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fremont, CA USA
Originally Posted by Chew
Those veteran West Wing watchers may know this is only the second weekly thread I've joined in on since I caught up last week, so please forgive the question if it's been asked and answered already.....
What's the deal with the season being over the first week in April? It's not like it was cut short, it's the same number of episodes. Does NBC have big Wednesday mini-series plans for May sweeps or something?
What's the deal with the season being over the first week in April? It's not like it was cut short, it's the same number of episodes. Does NBC have big Wednesday mini-series plans for May sweeps or something?



