View Poll Results: How does Angel Season 5 compare to smallville
Are you nuts? Angel is way way better !! No comparison
58
69.88%
Angel is better
11
13.25%
Both are of the same caliber
1
1.20%
Smallville is better
5
6.02%
Smallville is way way better
8
9.64%
Voters: 83. You may not vote on this poll
Poll: current Smallville season better than Angel Season 5?
#26
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
As of poll # 62, less than 20% feel smallville is equal to or better than Angel. 70% feel Angel is way way better. And yet the morons at WB cancelled it, and have kept Smallville It doesnt make sense to me. Which geniuses decide what shows to keep and which to ax???
I just watched "Smile Time" so much funnier than the dog episode in smallville.
I just watched "Smile Time" so much funnier than the dog episode in smallville.
#27
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Nashville and Crossville, TN
Posts: 9,821
Received 812 Likes
on
601 Posts
Angel is way way better. The writing quality of Angel is way way better than Smallville. Smallville has had some of the worst written episodes of any show that I have seen this season. Smallville is one of my favorite shows put the writing is subpar.
#28
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 20,804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wearetheborg
As of poll # 62, less than 20% feel smallville is equal to or better than Angel. 70% feel Angel is way way better. And yet the morons at WB cancelled it, and have kept Smallville It doesnt make sense to me. Which geniuses decide what shows to keep and which to ax???
To date, Smallville has 3 solid seasons (1 - 3) under its belt and 1 "what the fuck" season. They really seemed to have some repect for the superman legacy up till now, but this bad Lana business is just dumb. Smallville needs to be a long arc focusing on Clark's journey to wearing the suit and Lex's journey to darkness. Lana Lang is a footnote, and bringing Lois Lane into the story is a HUGE mistake. It really seemed like they were building up a story in which Clark likes two girls in high school, forshadowing that in adulthood he would end up with a woman with characteristics of both. Now the person they were forshadowing is just another character on the show. Bottom line on Smallville: It's time to start wrapping it up because they are clearly out of good ideas. We need a bad Lex and we need Clark to take on more of Superman's characteristics and it needs to happen soon.
Similarly, Angel had 3 solid seasons (1, 2, and 5) and 2 "what the fuck" seasons (3 & 4). Those 2 seasons, the ones with the Conner arc and Cordy being written off the show in an entirely unsatisfactory way (and promptly forgotten) killed the show...not the morons at WB. It seemed like the writers for Angel also lost their sense of humor for a season or two there. It was all drama all the time, with some good action here and there, but not nearly enough comic relief. Season 5 was funny again, but it was too late.
#29
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,829
Received 1,882 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Originally Posted by chess
Probably the same morons who keep track of ratings and ad revenues, but I could be wrong. Besides, it wasn't season 5 of Angel that killed the show...it was a miserable season 4 and latter part of season 3. I loved season 5, but I'm guessing the decision was made earlier.
The WB had a very large number of series on their last legs, meaning that those shows would have to be replaced with something new. Rather than have a bunch of existing series go off the air at once, the WB was trying to stagger that. Taking Angel off the air meant another series could take its place and potentially get a decent foothold. The lineup a year from then wouldn't be "all old/all new", but staggered with some series going into their second season.
#30
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 20,804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
From what I understand, the decision had nothing to do with that, and certainly nothing to do with specific characters, story arcs, or a lack of comic relief.
The WB had a very large number of series on their last legs, meaning that those shows would have to be replaced with something new. Rather than have a bunch of existing series go off the air at once, the WB was trying to stagger that. Taking Angel off the air meant another series could take its place and potentially get a decent foothold. The lineup a year from then wouldn't be "all old/all new", but staggered with some series going into their second season.
The WB had a very large number of series on their last legs, meaning that those shows would have to be replaced with something new. Rather than have a bunch of existing series go off the air at once, the WB was trying to stagger that. Taking Angel off the air meant another series could take its place and potentially get a decent foothold. The lineup a year from then wouldn't be "all old/all new", but staggered with some series going into their second season.
#32
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,829
Received 1,882 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Originally Posted by chess
So, you're saying that even had Angel been a ratings success with high ad revenues, it still would have been cancelled?
#33
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by chess
Similarly, Angel had 3 solid seasons (1, 2, and 5) and 2 "what the fuck" seasons (3 & 4). Those 2 seasons, the ones with the Conner arc and Cordy being written off the show in an entirely unsatisfactory way (and promptly forgotten) killed the show...not the morons at WB. It seemed like the writers for Angel also lost their sense of humor for a season or two there. It was all drama all the time, with some good action here and there, but not nearly enough comic relief. Season 5 was funny again, but it was too late.
Those two seasons WERE dark, very dark.
I also feel Angel is more rewatchable than smallville. I have bought the Angel dvds. Smallville I'm curious with the recent chloe finding out, but I wouldn't want to rewatch an episode.
The morons at WB should have kept Angel. With Spike in the mix it could have done well, VERY well for at least a couple more seasons. I mean how can the spike/angel puppet fight NOT rule????
Was Angel much more costlier to produce than smallville?
#34
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 20,804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wearetheborg
I think Angel S3 & 4 were much better than anything smallville has put out. The overall story arc in S4 wasnt good, but the individual episodes were decent. I really liked S3 beacuse of the whole westly betrayal thing. The part where westley inadvertently hums to the child in front of Lorn was one of the best TV moments ever. Also when Holtz gets stabbed - that was genius.
Those two seasons WERE dark, very dark.
I also feel Angel is more rewatchable than smallville. I have bought the Angel dvds. Smallville I'm curious with the recent chloe finding out, but I wouldn't want to rewatch an episode.
The morons at WB should have kept Angel. With Spike in the mix it could have done well, VERY well for at least a couple more seasons. I mean how can the spike/angel puppet fight NOT rule????
Was Angel much more costlier to produce than smallville?
Those two seasons WERE dark, very dark.
I also feel Angel is more rewatchable than smallville. I have bought the Angel dvds. Smallville I'm curious with the recent chloe finding out, but I wouldn't want to rewatch an episode.
The morons at WB should have kept Angel. With Spike in the mix it could have done well, VERY well for at least a couple more seasons. I mean how can the spike/angel puppet fight NOT rule????
Was Angel much more costlier to produce than smallville?
My guess is that the production costs are pretty close between the two shows. Smallville has solid (for TV) visual FX and Angel had very good practical FX.
The point of my post was simply that more people watch Smallville, hence its survival. My guess is that it crosses a lot more demographics than Angel did. Some people watch it just to see the hot cast, others watch for the soap opera aspects, others watch for the Superman lore...you get the idea. Angel was much more of a niche show. Granted it was my niche, but I never had high hopes.
I really liked the humor seasons 1, 2 and 5...and missed it in 3 and 4. The scene with Angel and Wes dancing at that party in season 1 was one of the funniest things I've ever seen on TV.
#35
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 20,804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
No, I'm pretty sure I didn't say anything like that at all.
Then I guess you were disputing my rationale for the REASON viewership was down?
#36
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,829
Received 1,882 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Originally Posted by chess
Then I guess you were disputing my rationale for the REASON viewership was down?
Here are some actual numbers, if you're curious. The series does bottom out in season four, but there isn't necessarily any correlation between ratings and quality (would anyone pick "I Fall To Pieces" as the 9th all-time best episode of the series?), and the churn did seem to peter off in season four.
|
|
|
|
#37
DVD Talk Hero
While we're debating why the WB Network decided to shitcan Angel and not Smallville, I would also speculate that The WB would tend to favor Smallville over Angel because it's an in-house production. Smallville is based on Superman, which is in turn a DC Comics, which is under the corporate WB umbrella.
As was the aborted Dark Shadows revival.
Given the choice between a Fox-owned vampire series, and a Warners-owned vampire series, I could certainly see them going with the latter. (Not that I'm happy about the decision...)
As was the aborted Dark Shadows revival.
Given the choice between a Fox-owned vampire series, and a Warners-owned vampire series, I could certainly see them going with the latter. (Not that I'm happy about the decision...)
#38
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
While we're debating why the WB Network decided to shitcan Angel and not Smallville, I would also speculate that The WB would tend to favor Smallville over Angel because it's an in-house production. Smallville is based on Superman, which is in turn a DC Comics, which is under the corporate WB umbrella.
As was the aborted Dark Shadows revival.
Given the choice between a Fox-owned vampire series, and a Warners-owned vampire series, I could certainly see them going with the latter. (Not that I'm happy about the decision...)
As was the aborted Dark Shadows revival.
Given the choice between a Fox-owned vampire series, and a Warners-owned vampire series, I could certainly see them going with the latter. (Not that I'm happy about the decision...)
Anyone have ratings for smallville? Is there a ratings site? I would be interesting to see how they compare.
#39
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,829
Received 1,882 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Originally Posted by wearetheborg
Didnt know that. BTW if Angel is fox owned, why was WB showing it instead of Fox???
#40
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 20,804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I don't consider extrapolating your opinions to the world at large to be much of a rationale....
I also appreciate the numbers, though one could form any number of arguments based on those numbers. For instance, I could point out that the ratings went down almost 20% for the episode "Dad" and only got above a 3.0 one time (none in all of season 4) until Conner left...then the nearly Connor-free season 5 started with 20%+ jump and a 3.x share in 6 of its first 7 episodes.
I understand that correlation is not necessarily causation, but you have to admit that it is an interesting coincidence. I'm not saying that Conner was universally annoying, but he sure annoyed the hell out of me...and I'll bet at least a few people would agree.
I maintain that the story and the tone of Angel went down the wrong path in the latter part of season 3 and all of season 4, but I recognize that it is just my opinion. I also agree with you that the series had the deck seriously stacked against it in terms of timeslot, lead in, ad time, etc. It's sad, really.
Last edited by chess; 03-07-05 at 08:23 PM.
#41
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,829
Received 1,882 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Originally Posted by chess
I also appreciate the numbers, though one could form any number of arguments based on those numbers.
Originally Posted by chess
For instance, I could point out that the ratings went down almost 20% for the episode "Dad" and only got above a 3.0 one time (none in all of season 4) until Conner left...then the nearly Connor-free season 5 started with 20%+ jump and a 3.x share in 6 of its first 7 episodes.
Originally Posted by chess
I'm not saying that Conner was universally annoying, but he sure annoyed the hell out of me...and I'll bet at least a few people would agree.
Originally Posted by chess
I maintain that the story and the tone of Angel went down the wrong path in the latter part of season 3 and all of season 4, but I recognize that it is just my opinion.
#42
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Season 3 of angel is quite good, IMO. We some major development in the Wesley. Probably one of the most drastic chararater changes in recent tv history, which i happened to enjoy. It did lack some humor and conner can grate the nerves but i think it held more motional weight then season 1 or 2. We see the beloved wesley getting shunned by everyone who was once his best friends.
He takes a giant step from bumbling watcher who seemed to have trouble talkign to women into this ultimate bad ass who no longer takes any shit and could bed any female he came across. I dont see season 3 as the wrong path but a entirely different dynmanic for the show. It turned away from demons and dealt with some very human issues that any of us could go through. The arc of angel becoming a father, wes's "betrayal" , conners return and how angel tried everything to get him back in his life, fred choosing gunn and wes left with nothing, holtz death and conners bitch ass betraying angel and sending him into the ocean. it also had one of the most intense moment in the buffyverse run.
When angel chokes wes.In my personal opinon the best buffyverse episodes are the ones that dive into painful issues and just deal with lifes drama. Dont get me wrong, i love the humor that are in those these 2 shows and love many episodes that have 90% comedy in the them. Season 4 on the other hand had 2 terrible angles. conner and cordelia and that fucking jasmine. ehh. Those things made the season the worst but far from bad.
I found the scenes with the beast to be quite well down and entertaining. That was a great baddie who was damn near unstoppable and just bad ass and it also spawned probably some oh most enjoyable action and devestation the show had to offer. People without heads, wes with his shotgun, zombies, and just about every scene with the beast was cool. I loved the return of angelus and faith. So evil and sadistic. Faith was so weclome. it also contains one of the best comedic episodes whedon has to offer in "spin the bottle". That was also the fall down the hill after that. save for angelus and faith and fred being the only one to see the real jasmine and how she dealt with that therefor adding the final piece of development she needed.
The season became lame and the whole conner, cordelia and jasmine fiasco turned me off completely, although some great scenes were still sprinked in. Conner is entirely unlikable and their pairing really baffled me in how rediculous it all was. jasmine was just annoying and wanted to punch her every word she uttered. The only saving grace for prior said fiasco is the last episode. A fitting end for a shitty story arc. Conners whiny ass gone made it all the better. Thank god season 5 stepped up and delivered a noteworthy season overall. Damn, that was a long write and as you can tell, i love buffy and angel to the point of obsession. Hope i didnt ramble to much and become too incoherent to make this an unworthy read. oh yeah and to on topic.
ANGEL, any season>>>>>smallville. I watched the first 3 seasons and save for a few episodes was bored to tear. Just really bland characters outside of lex and lionel.
He takes a giant step from bumbling watcher who seemed to have trouble talkign to women into this ultimate bad ass who no longer takes any shit and could bed any female he came across. I dont see season 3 as the wrong path but a entirely different dynmanic for the show. It turned away from demons and dealt with some very human issues that any of us could go through. The arc of angel becoming a father, wes's "betrayal" , conners return and how angel tried everything to get him back in his life, fred choosing gunn and wes left with nothing, holtz death and conners bitch ass betraying angel and sending him into the ocean. it also had one of the most intense moment in the buffyverse run.
When angel chokes wes.In my personal opinon the best buffyverse episodes are the ones that dive into painful issues and just deal with lifes drama. Dont get me wrong, i love the humor that are in those these 2 shows and love many episodes that have 90% comedy in the them. Season 4 on the other hand had 2 terrible angles. conner and cordelia and that fucking jasmine. ehh. Those things made the season the worst but far from bad.
I found the scenes with the beast to be quite well down and entertaining. That was a great baddie who was damn near unstoppable and just bad ass and it also spawned probably some oh most enjoyable action and devestation the show had to offer. People without heads, wes with his shotgun, zombies, and just about every scene with the beast was cool. I loved the return of angelus and faith. So evil and sadistic. Faith was so weclome. it also contains one of the best comedic episodes whedon has to offer in "spin the bottle". That was also the fall down the hill after that. save for angelus and faith and fred being the only one to see the real jasmine and how she dealt with that therefor adding the final piece of development she needed.
The season became lame and the whole conner, cordelia and jasmine fiasco turned me off completely, although some great scenes were still sprinked in. Conner is entirely unlikable and their pairing really baffled me in how rediculous it all was. jasmine was just annoying and wanted to punch her every word she uttered. The only saving grace for prior said fiasco is the last episode. A fitting end for a shitty story arc. Conners whiny ass gone made it all the better. Thank god season 5 stepped up and delivered a noteworthy season overall. Damn, that was a long write and as you can tell, i love buffy and angel to the point of obsession. Hope i didnt ramble to much and become too incoherent to make this an unworthy read. oh yeah and to on topic.
ANGEL, any season>>>>>smallville. I watched the first 3 seasons and save for a few episodes was bored to tear. Just really bland characters outside of lex and lionel.
Last edited by UltimateHigh; 03-07-05 at 09:57 PM.
#43
DVD Talk Limited Edition
This season has been GOD-FUCKIN' AWFUL!!!! (there... I said it )
The show is in serious need of a Reboot, Restart or Reshuffle or whatever the hell they call it nowadays.
Don't get me wrong...the season started out great with Clark "flying" and the "Flash" episode, but I'm really tired of all this "Countess" bullshit!!!
...and I'm still pissed that the writers killed off Alicia Baker (Sarah Carter).
The show is in serious need of a Reboot, Restart or Reshuffle or whatever the hell they call it nowadays.
Don't get me wrong...the season started out great with Clark "flying" and the "Flash" episode, but I'm really tired of all this "Countess" bullshit!!!
...and I'm still pissed that the writers killed off Alicia Baker (Sarah Carter).
Last edited by candyrocket786; 03-07-05 at 10:05 PM.