Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > TV Talk
Reload this Page >

'Enterprise' Crew To Be Fired In March?

Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV

'Enterprise' Crew To Be Fired In March?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-05 | 06:35 AM
  #26  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 37,797
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Duluth, GA, USA
Dammit, I'm just 4 episodes behind for this season!
Old 01-20-05 | 08:13 AM
  #27  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 26,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: in da cloud
Originally Posted by kvrdave
I cannot live without a Trek on the air, so they better have something to take its place
battlestar galactica
Old 01-20-05 | 08:31 AM
  #28  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: The Big Easy
Originally Posted by kvrdave
I cannot live without a Trek on the air, so they better have something to take its place
I know you play fantasy football. You wouldn't want football year round would you? Give it a break for a while. Hasn't Star Trek been on since 1990? 15 freaking years, the writting gets worse and worse. Take off for a decade then come see me.
Old 01-20-05 | 02:09 PM
  #29  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fremont, CA USA
Originally Posted by Chew
After seeing the ratings come out for Friday's episode, I'm starting to see this is likely going to be the last season.

Battlestar Galactica on a cable channel had better ratings!
BSG only had 70,000 more viewers which really doesn't amount to that much. The premiere was expected to do well considering the massive promotional push by SciFi and NBC/Universal. The more surprising thing is that it lost over 1 million viewers from the miniseries and had over 1 million less viewers than the less-promoted premiere of Stargate: Atlantis. It's still a good number, but it will probably go down.

And the rating for Enterprise wasn't that bad. It was less than the season average, but still higher than the season premiere. However, if the ratings don't at least get up to around 3.3-3.6 million, you're right that the show will definitely end after this season.
Old 01-21-05 | 11:47 AM
  #30  
Numanoid's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Down in 'The Park'
Originally Posted by latenight
Hasn't Star Trek been on since 1990?
Actually, Next Gen premiered in 1987.
Old 01-21-05 | 02:44 PM
  #31  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fremont, CA USA
Originally Posted by Numanoid
Actually, Next Gen premiered in 1987.
25 Seasons of Star Trek in almost 18 years, 624 episodes by the end of this season.
Old 01-21-05 | 06:03 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: SoCal
Star Trek needs to rest for a few years. Keeping the show going simply for the need to keep the show going borders on the obscene. As though the producers are determined to wring every last cent and brain cell from its audience...

1. Stop the shows.

2. Watch a few episodes of '24,' 'Buffy', the Prisoner, and Sandbaggers.

3. Read some Warren Ellis to see HOW good Science fiction is done.

4. Make shows again in 2008.
Old 01-22-05 | 12:43 PM
  #33  
IDrinkMolson's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,389
Received 966 Likes on 443 Posts
From: DE
In this month's Playboy they asked Jolene Blalock 20 questions. She said she thinks it's their last year.
Old 01-22-05 | 01:26 PM
  #34  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,042
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Pearland, TX
Doesn't Star Trek series (TNG, DS9, and Yoyager) all run for 7 years? So why wouldn't Enterprise follow that tradition and run for 7 years too?
Old 01-22-05 | 02:03 PM
  #35  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by mookiemeister
Doesn't Star Trek series (TNG, DS9, and Yoyager) all run for 7 years? So why wouldn't Enterprise follow that tradition and run for 7 years too?
The ratings are terrible.
Old 01-22-05 | 08:02 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lawrenceville, GA
TNG, DS9 and Voyager ran for six years with a one year extention. The standard contract was for six years; after that, the execs thought that the Law of Diminishing Returns would kick in (what they pay out is more than what they take in). The seventh year of TNG and DS9 were expensive in comparison to the earlier years due to actor pay raises; I don't know if Voyager's got raises or not.

As to Blalock's comments about this being the last year, Paramount is known for starting rumors about Trek to measure support or disdain for an idea. It's possible - but not definate - that she could have been told to say something like that.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.