Six Feet Under (6/20/04)
#26
Cool New Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Daytripper
I disagree. How does it take away from the rest of the show? They're showing her getting closer to this new guy Joe. As *I* said, I don't think the two actors have any chemistry. But it's part of the story. And you know that Nate will re-enter the picture later. You can't expect them to just put her character aside until that happens.
I disagree. How does it take away from the rest of the show? They're showing her getting closer to this new guy Joe. As *I* said, I don't think the two actors have any chemistry. But it's part of the story. And you know that Nate will re-enter the picture later. You can't expect them to just put her character aside until that happens.
Also, as said, there's no chemistry.. and she was a hell of a lot more interesting when she was nuts. She better have a relapse and make a huge debacle of it to justify this attention.
#28
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by Another40oz
it takes away because as mentioned, the time would otherwise be spent on one of the family members or employees. If the show ever spent that much time on ex's in the time until they become relevant again, the show would be much more boring.
Also, as said, there's no chemistry.. and she was a hell of a lot more interesting when she was nuts. She better have a relapse and make a huge debacle of it to justify this attention.
it takes away because as mentioned, the time would otherwise be spent on one of the family members or employees. If the show ever spent that much time on ex's in the time until they become relevant again, the show would be much more boring.
Also, as said, there's no chemistry.. and she was a hell of a lot more interesting when she was nuts. She better have a relapse and make a huge debacle of it to justify this attention.