Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV

Friends: 2/5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-04 | 12:18 PM
  #26  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Manhattan
I thought the episode was hysterical. It was obvious that Ross kissed Monica, but it was still so disgustinly funny. I was only four in 1987, so I don't know how realistic they portrayed it, but I definitely felt the 80's vibe.
Old 02-06-04 | 12:23 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: San Antonio, TX
So in ten seasons...they have done 5 or so flashback episodes...
Hmmmm....
and that's with me probably counting the one that could have been as one.
Old 02-06-04 | 12:52 PM
  #28  
Guest
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Glendale, next to L.A.
Originally posted by Groucho
I actually wasn't being sarcastic this time. I had no idea DeVito was going to be on the show. I guess I was lucky and missed the ads.
Sure your didn't!

Chris
Old 02-06-04 | 01:03 PM
  #29  
Kal-El's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,992
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Fortress of Solitude
Originally posted by maxpower
So in ten seasons...they have done 5 or so flashback episodes...
Hmmmm....
and that's with me probably counting the one that could have been as one.
The One That Could've Been isn't even a flashback ep IMO. Off the top of my head:

The One with the Prom Video (does this even count?)
The One with All The Thanksgivings
The One with the Flashback
Last night's ep.

So that's 4. In 10 seasons, with 24 or so eps per, that's over 200 episodes. 4 episodes is "tired"?
Old 02-06-04 | 01:36 PM
  #30  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,205
Received 36 Likes on 20 Posts
From: Washington, DC
Originally posted by Daytripper
Pretty good episode. Some very funny lines. And some pretty not so funny ones as well. Like everything Joey said.

A couple of questions and observations. How old are these characters supposed to be? Just curious. Also, no one wore their hair or dressed like Chandler in 1987. Unless they were just trying to point out how out of touch he was. Also, A Flock of Seagulls were big in 1982. And "Der Kommissar" was also released around that time. If they were trying to play songs/groups popular in 1987, they should have played the Cure ("Just Like Heaven") or Depeche Mode.
Their 80s timeline is all screwed up. Ross & Chandler were supposed to be class of 1991 (and why is the class of 1991 having a reunion in 2004? SHouldn't they wait until 2006?), but by the time the show starts in 2004, Ross already has a PhD and a job at the museum. Just barely possible, but possible. What's not possible, though, if Ross and Chandler were in the class of 1991, is for Ross to have been with Carol for eight years (which he was), for them to have divorced in 1994 (which they did), and for Ross to have started dating her in college (which he did).

On the other hand, Rachel turned 30 in 2000, so for her to be a senior in high school while Ross is still in college, you can't move Ross and Chandler too much earlier than class of 1991.

Basically, the timeline on the flashbacks is all f^%*ed up.

My favortie line of the night was Joey's "Yeah, and who even keeps a ghost in their refrigerator?"

Last edited by JasonF; 02-06-04 at 01:41 PM.
Old 02-06-04 | 02:28 PM
  #31  
Charlie Goose's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 20,195
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Sesame Street (the apt. next to Bob's)
Originally posted by movieking
I guess that I am in the minority since I didn't really enjoy it. Didn't like the whole DeVito thing. Ok, we get it: Monica was fat, and Ross had bad hair and a mustache. How many times do we have to go back? At the beginning of the series, weren't we told that Rachel and Chandler had never met, or at least that they didn't really know each other? Now we have found out that they met a number of times.
I agree. The first "flashback" episode with the prom video was classic. Very funny, and it fit. Unfortunately, they've beaten the premise into the ground, and ignored history to boot. Only now it's been revealed that Chandler and Rachel made out?

Best part of the episode was when Joey chose the category "Jack & Jill went up the hill", thinking it was about nursery rhymes, and it was really about Congress.
Legislature
"Pass!"
Rotunda
"Pass!"
Addendum
"That little thing that hangs at the back of your throat!"
"Uvula!"
"Oh. Pass!"
Old 02-06-04 | 03:29 PM
  #32  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: New York City
This was a great episdoe of FRIENDS. It's been a while since I've actually laughed while watching an episode. The ending was priceless.
Old 02-06-04 | 04:25 PM
  #33  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 8,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Portland, OR
Originally posted by JasonFliegel
Their 80s timeline is all screwed up. Ross & Chandler were supposed to be class of 1991 (and why is the class of 1991 having a reunion in 2004? SHouldn't they wait until 2006?), but by the time the show starts in 2004, Ross already has a PhD and a job at the museum. Just barely possible, but possible. What's not possible, though, if Ross and Chandler were in the class of 1991, is for Ross to have been with Carol for eight years (which he was), for them to have divorced in 1994 (which they did), and for Ross to have started dating her in college (which he did).

On the other hand, Rachel turned 30 in 2000, so for her to be a senior in high school while Ross is still in college, you can't move Ross and Chandler too much earlier than class of 1991.

Basically, the timeline on the flashbacks is all f^%*ed up.

My favortie line of the night was Joey's "Yeah, and who even keeps a ghost in their refrigerator?"
Dude, too much math. Head...hurting...
Old 02-06-04 | 05:18 PM
  #34  
Suspended
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: 5 Point West Side
For some reason, I didn't find Penguin funny at all. In fact, it was totally disgusting.

Fat Monica dancing's always funny though.

Originally posted by Sunday Morning
The whole monica fat jokes thing is just lame.
All fat people (in this case faux fat people) on sitcoms act like morons.
And the whole point of having fat Monica is: Take hint chunkies, lose the junk in the trunk.
Old 02-06-04 | 05:22 PM
  #35  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,252
Received 487 Likes on 350 Posts
Originally posted by Morf
Aw, come on. "Paper. Snow. A ghost!" I laughed.
*cough*

But glad you enjoyed it
Old 02-06-04 | 07:33 PM
  #36  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,252
Received 487 Likes on 350 Posts
Originally posted by JasonFliegel
Their 80s timeline is all screwed up. Ross & Chandler were supposed to be class of 1991 (and why is the class of 1991 having a reunion in 2004? SHouldn't they wait until 2006?), but by the time the show starts in 2004, Ross already has a PhD and a job at the museum. Just barely possible, but possible. What's not possible, though, if Ross and Chandler were in the class of 1991, is for Ross to have been with Carol for eight years (which he was), for them to have divorced in 1994 (which they did), and for Ross to have started dating her in college (which he did).

Basically, the timeline on the flashbacks is all f^%*ed up.
Not to mention Ross wearing a Members Only jacket. And "Funky Town" being played (!?) That was the 70's. Unless it was just an "oldies" tune being played at this party. Just seemed like an odd choice. Like Jason, I remember the 80's quite vividly. Year by year.
Old 02-06-04 | 09:28 PM
  #37  
fumanstan's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 55,349
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
From: Irvine, CA
Pretty funny show. For the first time this season, Joey wasn't the funniest part of the show. The flashback thing might be a bit iffy, as the writers were clearly going for the obvious laughs... but you know what, it worked. Don't really care about the timeline though... no big deal.
Old 02-06-04 | 11:04 PM
  #38  
nazz's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 5,993
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Land of the Free
Hint: It's made with eggs.

Joey: Chickens!

Old 02-07-04 | 08:52 AM
  #39  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,453
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
I watched it again last night with my wife. A couple of things that might explain the timeline discrepencies.

First, it wasn't a class reunion. They specifically said alumni meeting, which is quite different. If it was a class reunion don't you think they would have taken dates? (well, Ross, since Monica was busy) Not to mention it probably would have had quite a different storyline. The overused but familiar "having to impress people we went to school with, with lies" plotline.

Second, Chandler mentioned that him and Ross were freshmen when Monica & Rachel (she said they were seniors) visited. So only a year apart between her and Ross.

Now as far as the 8 years with Carol, they could have met/married in early 87. We all know how fast Ross moves. That would put them at 8 years when they divorce in 94. Right? That timeline is a tad screwy though.

And as far as the clothes, they were trying to be in a band. Bands often imitate/cover artist they love. So they were a fan of early 80's music and style and wanted to keep it alive in their band. Was everyone else dressed like them? I can't remember.
Old 02-07-04 | 11:18 AM
  #40  
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: SoCal
[Ed Rooney]So that's how it is in their family.[/Ed Rooney]

I'm a little bit country, I'm a little bit Rock 'n Roll.
Old 02-08-04 | 06:52 AM
  #41  
Suspended; also need updated email
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 16,564
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
funny episode !
Old 02-08-04 | 08:22 AM
  #42  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,252
Received 487 Likes on 350 Posts
Originally posted by Michael Corvin


And as far as the clothes, they were trying to be in a band. Bands often imitate/cover artist they love. So they were a fan of early 80's music and style and wanted to keep it alive in their band. Was everyone else dressed like them? I can't remember.
That's a bit of a stretch, wouldn't you say? I don't recall if everyone else was dressed like them. But how do you explain the music they were playing during the party? Like I said before, sure, they could have been playing records a few years old. I just think they goofed up overall on the timeline. No big deal of course. But those of us who know that decade well, picked up on this immediately.
Old 02-08-04 | 08:33 AM
  #43  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 6,092
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: BV VA
Why is everyone so caught up why how accurate their hair, clothes, and music being played was. Who cares. It's a sitcom. I'm sure they went overboard for the humor factor and guess what. It was! Just take it for what it is and leave it alone.
Old 02-08-04 | 08:47 AM
  #44  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,252
Received 487 Likes on 350 Posts
Originally posted by kantonburg
Why is everyone so caught up why how accurate their hair, clothes, and music being played was. Who cares. It's a sitcom. I'm sure they went overboard for the humor factor and guess what. It was! Just take it for what it is and leave it alone.
Because it was a rather glaring error. Who cares? Obviously the people who commented on it. Myself included. Once again, I'll point out that this is a discussion group. If I want to talk about this, I will.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.