Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > TV Talk
Reload this Page >

why does digital cable look like ass?

Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV

why does digital cable look like ass?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-02, 02:02 AM
  #1  
Suspended Pending Valid Email
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Philly
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why does digital cable look like ass?

on urban cable works' website, they make the statement:

9. How is Digital Cable better than a satellite dish?

Our Digital Cable service offers you sharper, brighter digital pictures and clearer, CD-quality sound, dozens more channels and our innovative Interactive Program Guide. We can also offer you local broadcast stations, affordable equipment for additional outlets throughout your home - all without the need to purchase costly equipment that the satellite companies require. In addition, we provide dependable, on-time, guaranteed customer service from our local office.
however, on every person's tv that i have seen digital cable on, i can notice a ridiculous amount of compression artifacts, and terrible, washed-out sound from all the compression that is done to the signal. on some channels it's almost unwatchable because it's like watching a real media file.

is directv like this too?
Old 09-01-02, 05:16 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
that could be a result of many things, a bad Distribution amp on there part, or maybe bad cables (longer then expected or the Amp can really handle without losing good signal). you should check or ask them about the line, see if thats the problem.
Old 09-01-02, 07:31 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Mount Laurel, NJ
Posts: 554
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Keep in mind that the only channels that will look good on digital cable are the digital channels. The analog channels actually look worse, as the S-video cable doesn't hide the artifacts like a regular coax cable does.

Because of this, I've got both connected to different inputs in my TV, and just use the S-video input for the digital channels, and the coax for everything else. A bit of a pain, but what can you do.

I will say this - HBO on digital cable is STUNNING on my set. It's the closest thing to HDTV I've seen yet.
Old 09-01-02, 10:14 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HBO probably looks so good because they take bandwidth from the normal channels in order to give it to the premium ones so you get good quality premium channels and ass quality regular channels.

Satellite does the same thing.
Old 09-02-02, 01:07 AM
  #5  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My local cable company offers analog or digital cable. I tried standard definition digital for two weeks. It was simply unwatchable. In fact...a friend across town went digital at the same time...his signal was just as bad.

50% of the channels were filled with MPEG2 artifacts..clearly visible on my 36" flat screen...barely watchable. 25% of the channels were unwatchable due to the compression artifact. 25% had slight artifacting and were decent.

I dropped it and went back to analog.

If...standard definition digital cable looks like this in the future (and it probably will)...I may finally be weaned off my TV addiction.
Old 09-02-02, 01:11 AM
  #6  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Asabase is correct. I love the Golf Channel. On analog cable...it is the best looking feed I get. Clear...crisp images. On digital cable...the channel becomes unwatchable...severe compression.

Ever try to watch a sporting event in standard definition digital cable???? I did...looked like bad Real Media feed.
Old 09-02-02, 01:53 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Mount Laurel, NJ
Posts: 554
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Alot of this has to do with your cable company as well.. I first went digital last year, right after I got my 55" HDTV. I was hoping for a noticable improvement, and instead got more artifacts with the S-video connection - Since I wasn't subscribing to any digital premium channels, it didn't make sense and I got rid of it.

I now work for my local cable company, and as a result get free service with all of the channels. So after a year, I revisited digital, and ALOT has changed. The picture is pretty good on the analog stations (you'd be hard pressed to notice a difference between the different inputs most of the time), and as I said, the premium stations look GREAT.

Give the cable companies a chance to upgrade their equipment at the headend, and upgrade their bandwidth, and I think you'll start to see improvements. Our HighDef service is still pretty bad from what I hear, but is rapidly improving.
Old 09-02-02, 03:15 AM
  #8  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 6,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had digital cable and satellite at the same time a few years ago (free upgrade to digital cable by TW).

The difference was striking. Even my wife noticed it. However, it wasn't what TW said at all, it the digital cable was much, much worse. Don't even get me started on their crappy menu system. Given a choice, we always watched the satellite.

I do occaisionally notice compression on the satellite service, particularly on local channels, but I have 55" HDTV, and I work in the computer industry and I'm used to looking for compression, so I spot it pretty quickly. My wife doesn't ever notice it on satellite, but she constantly sees it on digital cable.
Old 09-04-02, 06:36 AM
  #9  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Living Room on the Couch
Posts: 4,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have digital cable, and I've noticed that the HBO channels etc... look really good...but the other channels like FX, TNN, stuff like that are very bad quality...the pic looks better on regular cable in fact.
Old 09-04-02, 07:26 AM
  #10  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 12,349
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Because it is cable.

My parents was supposedly upgraded. After a "technician" came out the picture was worse than ever. He disconnected several cables telling my parents "they did not need them".

I am switching them to Direct TV this month.
Old 09-04-02, 07:45 AM
  #11  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: wishing I was in Vegas
Posts: 6,646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would someone mind sharing with the ignorant about compression artifacts, or maybe a link to a discussion?
Old 09-04-02, 09:15 AM
  #12  
Moderator
 
Geofferson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: The Village Green
Posts: 39,768
Received 99 Likes on 82 Posts
I've never had problems with my digital cable reception. Though some channels don't look the best at times, the HD signal more than makes up for it.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.