Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Talk
Reload this Page >

HD-DVD Officially HDMI Only?

Community
Search
DVD Talk Talk about DVDs and Movies on DVD including Covers and Cases

HD-DVD Officially HDMI Only?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-05 | 12:36 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
HD-DVD Officially HDMI Only?

Source

At a recent Toshiba road show in the US they demonstrated their upcoming HD-DVD specification and a few more details became available as to what we can expect from the format when it launches in the US late November.It will launch with 89 titles available in HD. The audience reaction was very positive to the comparable images shown in both standard DVD and HD-DVD.

The most interesting thing for people buying TVs at the moment is that Toshiba have stated that their HD-DVD Player will ONLY output high Def on the player's HDMI output ,the analogue output will be downrezed to 480 lines. The Toshiba player will also have a USB interface to allow connection to computers for enhanced content and interactive options direct off the disk. In addition mastering of the underlying DVD content will be based on 1080p - but there was no discussion on the resolution of the MPEG4 images.

The HD-DVD disk will come in 3 sizes when first launched. There will be 15Gb / 30Gb / 45Gb disks,and there will also be a fourth variety which will have a SD-DVD version on the reverse side of the disk, allowing retailers to have a single version of new films on the shelves and allow consumers to build a library before they have the equipment.

As you can see Toshiba will be trying to ensure that studios are confident in the security that they are offering with HD output only being available on the secure digital outputs (HDMI and IEEE1394). So once again if you are thinking about buying a HD capable screen make sure it has HDMI.
Old 07-10-05 | 12:43 AM
  #2  
X's Avatar
X
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 1987
Posts: 12,070
Received 416 Likes on 290 Posts
From: AA-
Isn't Toshiba the one whose "standard" probably won't be the standard?
Old 07-10-05 | 12:49 AM
  #3  
darkside's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 19,879
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
From: San Antonio
I have a HDMI input, but Toshiba will have to get back to me when and if they win the format war. Good old regular DVD will do for the next couple of years.
Old 07-10-05 | 01:08 AM
  #4  
The Cow's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 25,145
Received 1,214 Likes on 783 Posts
From: Grazing in a field somewhere...
Still an unknown.

My cable box (Scientific Atlanta) has an HDMI output. I also have a Toshiba HDTV (bought the TV before our cable even had HD, so that is really just a coincidence for this thread).

This actually caught my eye more that anything, though. Are we still talking about a console box type player?

Originally Posted by Premise
The Toshiba player will also have a USB interface to allow connection to computers for enhanced content and interactive options direct off the disk. In addition mastering of the underlying DVD content will be based on 1080p - but there was no discussion on the resolution of the MPEG4 images.
Old 07-10-05 | 01:09 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blu-ray + full res component = teh win. They should do it.
Old 07-10-05 | 01:13 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Mpls, MN
That's standard right now for upconverting players due to the silly rules the MPAA and others are imposing. Only a few are breaking the rules, and they are non-mainstream. This really isn't a shock.
Old 07-10-05 | 04:20 AM
  #7  
Rubix's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my rptv only has a dvi input. i really hope a dvi to hdmi adapter will work with it. but i'd rather have the option of component at full res still though.
Old 07-10-05 | 06:01 AM
  #8  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,510
Received 942 Likes on 638 Posts
Any dvd player of any HD format will only output hi-def through the HDMI output/input. Old news. The dvi and USB will also work. People with analog tvs will have to stick to the composite hookups and really shouldn't even bother buying a HD dvd player. What I'm looking forward to is the fact that since the players will be backward compatible, we will be able to watch our standard dvds through the HDMI, which noticeably sharpens the picture. I've seen this demonstated with a Samsung "upscaler" player and was impressed. Even if I never buy a hi-def dvd I'll buy a player for this reason alone, that is when 5 disc changers are available at a reasonable price.
Old 07-10-05 | 06:20 AM
  #9  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I have said before, I think that this is a lawsuit in the making, not to mention a nice way to say "fuck you" to early adopters. My TV does not have an HDMI port, but tha does not mean it is an analog TV, it is digital.

Someone will release the component to HDMI adapter just like the RCA to RF adapter.
Old 07-10-05 | 07:15 AM
  #10  
speedyray's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kingston, TN
Originally Posted by rw2516
Any dvd player of any HD format will only output hi-def through the HDMI output/input. Old news. The dvi and USB will also work. People with analog tvs will have to stick to the composite hookups and really shouldn't even bother buying a HD dvd player. What I'm looking forward to is the fact that since the players will be backward compatible, we will be able to watch our standard dvds through the HDMI, which noticeably sharpens the picture. I've seen this demonstated with a Samsung "upscaler" player and was impressed. Even if I never buy a hi-def dvd I'll buy a player for this reason alone, that is when 5 disc changers are available at a reasonable price.
I have watched a lot of programming on the HDMI and Component cables and HDMI has never seemed that much better. There IMHO was no difference in my HD satelite using HDMI over component. I prefer my old ass DVD player over my brothers brand new upscaling HDMI using model as well. Because it is HDMI, if the title is non-anamorphic or the features are non-anamorphic you can not change the picture size and everything is stretched. Since I have a good deal of non enhanced titles and like special features that is a big deal to me. These are just my opinions and just used to illustrate how this whole subject is a matter of opinion. Oh, and one other thing, I am not looking foward to buying a new theater receiver. Mine is only a couple of years old, but it does not have HDMI switching so I will need a new one so that I can plug multiple HDMI sources into my sytem. Then what do I do with the $1500 system I am replacing. Needless to say I would much rather have my HD coming from component. If I have to buy a modified box to get it I will.

Last edited by speedyray; 07-10-05 at 07:22 AM.
Old 07-10-05 | 08:28 AM
  #11  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 40 Posts
From: Hail to the Redskins!
Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
As I have said before, I think that this is a lawsuit in the making, not to mention a nice way to say "fuck you" to early adopters. My TV does not have an HDMI port, but tha does not mean it is an analog TV, it is digital.

Someone will release the component to HDMI adapter just like the RCA to RF adapter.
I don't think that's possible. That's taking digitial video and making it analog video through a cable.

If your TV has a DVI input, it will be fine. If it doesn't have either, then what's the sense of having a "digital" TV with only analog inputs?
Old 07-10-05 | 10:23 AM
  #12  
Josh Z's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,962
Received 350 Likes on 243 Posts
From: Boston
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
I don't think that's possible. That's taking digitial video and making it analog video through a cable.
Not only would the "adaptor" have to convert digital to analog (making it a transcoder, which is much more expensive than an adaptor), it would also have to decrypt the HDCP, which violates the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

It isn't going to happen, not from a legitimate source anyway. I'm sure some pirate or some kid with a home PC will find a way to hack HDCP eventually, but those of us who choose to stay on the right side of the law are screwed.
Old 07-10-05 | 03:23 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Mpls, MN
Originally Posted by Rubix
my rptv only has a dvi input. i really hope a dvi to hdmi adapter will work with it. but i'd rather have the option of component at full res still though.
An adapter will work, DVI and HDMI are nearly interchangeable. IF your TV has HDCP.
Old 07-10-05 | 03:46 PM
  #14  
Rubix's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah hdmi is basically dvi with audio also, correct? i just checked my manual and it calls my dvi a dvi/hdcp input, so that is good to know. i feel really bad for people who bought a $1000+ tv and have to replace it just because of an input port.
Old 07-10-05 | 04:10 PM
  #15  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 11,957
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
From: Pa
Originally Posted by Premise
Source

and there will also be a fourth variety which will have a SD-DVD version on the reverse side of the disk, allowing retailers to have a single version of new films on the shelves and allow consumers to build a library before they have the equipment.
We knew about the component issue for a long time now.

The big news here is the confirmation of the dual sided discs being approved to use. As much as I hate 2 sided discs this is pretty good thinking by the Hd-dvd group. Even if you aren't buying into a new format, the cost of the Hd version is going to be built right into the new standard dvds coming out.
Old 07-10-05 | 04:56 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
...
If your TV has a DVI input, it will be fine. If it doesn't have either, then what's the sense of having a "digital" TV with only analog inputs?
Not quite. Not all DVI is DVI/HDCP, i.e., DVI that supports the HDCP protocol. Some sets and projectors that first appeared with DVI inputs did not support HDCP. See this article at Secrets of Home Theater and High Fidelity:

http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volum...s-11-2004.html

What's the sense of having a "digital" TV with only analog inputs?

I think you're confused. A digital TV is one that can accept and display progressive scan input and high definition signals using the component analog inputs - the only kind of inputs that exist on thousands of HDTVs in homes today, including my 4 year old Pioneer Elite. The picture is tremendous. You don't need digital (DVI or HDMI) inputs for high definition. So this restriction is a big deal to earlier adopters like me who have perfectly good HDTVs but won't be allowed to participate in these new formats without upgrading to a new TV. It's all in the name of copy protection. People like me who have no interest in illegally copying HD content will suffer as a result. Thanks Hollywood.

http://www.dvdfile.com/news/viewpoin...005/04_06.html
http://www.dvdfile.com/news/viewpoin...005/05_18.html
Old 07-10-05 | 05:16 PM
  #17  
X's Avatar
X
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 1987
Posts: 12,070
Received 416 Likes on 290 Posts
From: AA-
Originally Posted by hondo21
I think you're confused. A digital TV is one that can accept and display progressive scan input and high definition signals using the component analog inputs - the only kind of inputs that exist on thousands of HDTVs in homes today, including my 4 year old Pioneer Elite. The picture is tremendous. You don't need digital (DVI or HDMI) inputs for high definition. So this restriction is a big deal to earlier adopters like me who have perfectly good HDTVs but won't be allowed to participate in these new formats without upgrading to a new TV. It's all in the name of copy protection. People like me who have no interest in illegally copying HD content will suffer as a result. Thanks Hollywood.
Having the same set myself, I am interested in these developments.

However I use an HTPC as my primary DVD player and I find it hard to believe that I won't be able to pass an HD-DVD signal out my video card's VGA port right into the Pioneer. As long as there's a software player for HD-DVD that allows you to view on your monitor, that would have to work.
Old 07-10-05 | 06:25 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most owners of HDTV have sets that only came with component inputs. By not offering HD-DVD/Blu-ray players that offer component outputs, the manufacturers are basically saying "FU" to the consumer. Most consumers will therefore not be upgrading to the HD-DVD/Blu-ray format. Translation: Unless these companies get their acts together and forget the greed, then we can expect HD-DVD/Blu-ray to become the "laserdisc" of the 21st century. Long live standard DVD!
Old 07-10-05 | 06:56 PM
  #19  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,697
Received 2,796 Likes on 1,859 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by Cocopugg
Most owners of HDTV have sets that only came with component inputs.
"Most" is very much an exaggeration. The majority of the HD sets out there have been sold in the past few years, and virtually all of them have HDCP-capable digital inputs. Early adopters are getting screwed, and while I agree that that's not cool, saying that "most owners of HDTV" are component-only is incorrect.
Old 07-10-05 | 07:03 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
"Most" is very much an exaggeration. The majority of the HD sets out there have been sold in the past few years, and virtually all of them have HDCP-capable digital inputs. Early adopters are getting screwed, and while I agree that that's not cool, saying that "most owners of HDTV" are component-only is incorrect.
How do you know it's incorrect? I have 2 HDTVs, one bought in 2002, the other just last year and neither have HDMI inputs. I believe most people who have bought an HDTV set to date probably own sets that don't have HDMI as well. For what you are saying to be true, it would mean almost no one bought an HDTV in the last 4 or 5 yrs, then suddenly in the last year mostly everyone bought one...stats will prove this to be wrong. I stand by what I said...most people own HDTVs that only have component inputs. That's not to say eventually HDMI sets won't outnumber component only sets (of course they will), but not now they don't. What this will say to those of us with component only is "we got screwed". That's fine...I'll do my part to get back at the greedy manufacturers...I don't plan on buying into the HD-DVD/Blu-ray format ever...Just like laserdisc, I can enjoy watching them fail. Yet another format doomed by greed.
Old 07-10-05 | 07:36 PM
  #21  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,697
Received 2,796 Likes on 1,859 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by Cocopugg
How do you know it's incorrect?
Like I said -- HDCP-compliant digital inputs have been standard issue for the past few years, and the past few years have been when the majority of HDTVs were sold. Do a lot of people have HDTVs without HDMI/HDCP-capable DVI? Sure. Does that number encompass "most" (meaning "more than half") HDTV owners? No.

Edit -- first of all, your comment about Laserdisc is ridiculous, which makes me wonder if you're worth having this sort of common-sense argument with in the first place. (A failed format typically doesn't last a decade and a half.) Second, I'd be willing to bet that unless you bought a very outdated model, your newer TV has an HDCP-capable DVI input or iLink/Firewire, both of which will work with HD-DVD. I believe the number of component-only HDTVs is somewhere around 5 million, which is a hair over a quarter of the total number of HDTVs expected to be sold by year's end.
Old 07-10-05 | 09:06 PM
  #22  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 11,957
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
From: Pa
Originally Posted by X
Having the same set myself, I am interested in these developments.

However I use an HTPC as my primary DVD player and I find it hard to believe that I won't be able to pass an HD-DVD signal out my video card's VGA port right into the Pioneer. As long as there's a software player for HD-DVD that allows you to view on your monitor, that would have to work.
That's a good point X. If they don't allow Hd-dvd out the VGA port then Toshiba would be giving the computer market to Blu-Ray. Considering they are already losing the GB battle I can't see this happening as well. If you can't play movies on your computer why would they be planning on selling HD drives?
Old 07-10-05 | 10:26 PM
  #23  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Mpls, MN
I believe that so far the VGA ports have all been capable of HD resolution on HT sources. Not component, but VGA. Also, if you are an HTPC user, this is a no-brainer. Get a card with DVI.
Old 07-10-05 | 10:38 PM
  #24  
The Cow's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 25,145
Received 1,214 Likes on 783 Posts
From: Grazing in a field somewhere...
Originally Posted by Cocopugg
How do you know it's incorrect? I have 2 HDTVs, one bought in 2002, the other just last year and neither have HDMI inputs. I believe most people who have bought an HDTV set to date probably own sets that don't have HDMI as well. For what you are saying to be true, it would mean almost no one bought an HDTV in the last 4 or 5 yrs, then suddenly in the last year mostly everyone bought one...stats will prove this to be wrong. I stand by what I said...most people own HDTVs that only have component inputs. That's not to say eventually HDMI sets won't outnumber component only sets (of course they will), but not now they don't. What this will say to those of us with component only is "we got screwed". That's fine...I'll do my part to get back at the greedy manufacturers...I don't plan on buying into the HD-DVD/Blu-ray format ever...Just like laserdisc, I can enjoy watching them fail. Yet another format doomed by greed.
Wow! What are your models and brands? We have 3 now and all of them at least have DMI or HDMI. (and can dumb down to composite - amazed if you don't even have that.)

And your comment on LaserDisc, that's just laughable.
Old 07-10-05 | 10:54 PM
  #25  
Josh Z's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,962
Received 350 Likes on 243 Posts
From: Boston
Originally Posted by DthRdrX
That's a good point X. If they don't allow Hd-dvd out the VGA port then Toshiba would be giving the computer market to Blu-Ray.
Neither HD-DVD nor Blu-Ray will allow analog HD output, not through component video, not through VGA. If you want to add a Blu-Ray or HD-DVD drive to your computer, you will need to add a DVI/HDMI output and a DVI/HDMI capable monitor.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.