![]() |
I think that Dave will avoid a good number of Sammy's songs simply because Sammy has a higher vocal range than Dave, and those songs would just sound odd being taken into a lower key. I think they'll stick to the '78-'84 stuff and break out several of the deeper cuts that the Sammy-era tours had been avoiding. It's Dave's turn now.
|
Yep. I don't think they will play even a single Sammy-era tune.
|
Originally Posted by B5Erik
Last time I checked Alex was considered one of the better Rock drummers of the last 30 years. He has a unique - and quite good - drumming style. I played drums for 10 years, so I know a little about drumming. I rate Alex very highly - and he's a perfect fit for Van Halen.
Alex is a steady drummer, nothing too flashy, not bad and not great. Regarding bass playing, unless you're a Flea or a Paul McCartney, you're basically playing a rhythm instrument where it doesn't matter if you're really that good. Chris |
Originally Posted by cdollaz
There is quite a bit of good Sammy stuff. Of course there is crap like "When It's Love", but there is some really great songs, like "Humans Being", "5150", "Judgment Day", etc.
It makes no sense either as his Red Rider stuff is not like that at all. |
Is VH's son gonna use the Jack Daniels bass?
|
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
Sammy had a way of turning a monster riff like Humans Being into a sappy ass love song. That's why he does and always will suck in my book.
It makes no sense either as his Red Rider stuff is not like that at all. But I did really like his stuff back then. |
Originally Posted by cdollaz
There is quite a bit of good Sammy stuff.
|
Originally Posted by mrpayroll
Regarding bass playing, unless you're a Flea or a Paul McCartney, you're basically playing a rhythm instrument where it doesn't matter if you're really that good. Chris Intro (0:00) G------------------------------------------------------------------ D------------------------------------------------------------------ X2 A-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3---------------- E---------------------------------------------------1-1-3-3-3-3-3-- 1st Verse (0:29) G------------------------------------------------------------------ D------------------------------------------------------------------ X2 A-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3---------------- E---------------------------------------------------1-1-3-3-3-3-3-- 1st Verse (cont..) (0:44) / 2nd Verse (1:30) G------------------------------------------------------------------ D------------------------------------------------------------------ X2 A-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3---------------- E---------------------------------------------------1-1-3-3-3-3-3-- Pre-Chorus (0:59, 1:45) G--------------------------------------------------------- D--------------------------------------------------------- A---------------------------------------5~--5----5-------- E-5----3----5----3---3~-3----1--1-1-0---------5----0-5-3-- |
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
Sammy had a way of turning a monster riff like Humans Being into a sappy ass love song. That's why he does and always will suck in my book.
|
Originally Posted by The_Infidel
I think that Dave will avoid a good number of Sammy's songs simply because Sammy has a higher vocal range than Dave, and those songs would just sound odd being taken into a lower key. I think they'll stick to the '78-'84 stuff and break out several of the deeper cuts that the Sammy-era tours had been avoiding. It's Dave's turn now.
I think they'll stick to Dave era songs because: 1. When Sammy joined the band through the time Sammy left the band, they had to play Dave era songs because they did not have enough Sammy era "good" songs to last an entire concert. They had no choice. -popcorn- I don't think we need another reason. As far as "deep cuts", How about "One Foot Out the Door", "Take Your Whiskey Home", and "The Full Bug" just to name three. |
Dave will not be singing any of the Sammy stuff, I can guarantee it. Eddie completely lost his "edge" when Sammy joined the band, and that's obvious listening to the music they made with him. I mean, it's somewhat listenable stuff, but it really lacks the balls of the Roth era stuff. And the true classics are all on the first 6 LPs/CDs. They really need to put out a DVD collection ala KISS (Van Halen-ology, Vol. 1).
|
Ticketmaster is showing prices for the Charlotte date. $55 - $125.
|
Originally Posted by tommyp007
Ticketmaster is showing prices for the Charlotte date. $55 - $125.
I would have been looking forward to this much more if Dave hadn't come out w/ that Bluegrass VH album. Not to say it's related, it just made me sad to see him like that. I tried to win tickets on our radio station, and still might. That's probably the only way for me to go. Thursday night's not so bad, but Charlotte is a hike. I'm closer to Asheville, but they'd never play there. The funny thing w/ our radio station is, they had this "BIG 5:00 ANNOUNCEMENT OF A CONCERT", but it's still to a band that is 2 hours away!! I know it's Van Halen w/ David Lee Roth and everything, but it's still funny. Columbia is getting excited about something in Charlotte! We've got the Carolina Coliseum that holds 12,000. You think they're trying to get concerts there? Naw, if they can't sell 25,000 tickets at the Colonial Center, they're not worthy of coming to the Capital City and playing. Meanwhile, I'm running to Asheville, Charlotte, Greenville, Charleston, and Myrtle Beach to catch concerts. I mean, the Flaming Lips are playing at Amos' on a Wednesday. That's a tough sell for somebody to have to be at work the next morning in Columbia at 8:30. Sorry for the hijack. |
Originally Posted by zombiezilla
Dave will not be singing any of the Sammy stuff, I can guarantee it. Eddie completely lost his "edge" when Sammy joined the band, and that's obvious listening to the music they made with him. I mean, it's somewhat listenable stuff, but it really lacks the balls of the Roth era stuff. And the true classics are all on the first 6 LPs/CDs. They really need to put out a DVD collection ala KISS (Van Halen-ology, Vol. 1).
I would love to have a copy of that Fair Warning show that they shot "So This Is Love" and "Unchained" from. That was a Fair Warning show, right? I've got a boot from Diver Down, but it's no better than the KISS '79 Largo show from Volume 2. |
Originally Posted by zombiezilla
Dave will not be singing any of the Sammy stuff, I can guarantee it. Eddie completely lost his "edge" when Sammy joined the band, and that's obvious listening to the music they made with him. I mean, it's somewhat listenable stuff, but it really lacks the balls of the Roth era stuff. And the true classics are all on the first 6 LPs/CDs. They really need to put out a DVD collection ala KISS (Van Halen-ology, Vol. 1).
HOWEVER, I like both Dave and Sammy equally, but for different reasons. To say that Sammy is the reason that Eddie lost his 'edge' is absolutely ridiculous. For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge would never have been possible with Dave in the band, and that album is quite representative of all the musical talent in the band, including Eddie's edge. Is it the same EVH from, say, Fair Warning (the best Dave album, IMO, and, conversely, one that never would have been possible with Sammy)? No. But they're equally as good. I never understood the whole Dave vs. Sammy debate. I liked both incarnations of the band, as different as they were and will be. But neither incarnation is more rock than the other. At best, the Roth version is more 'raw' and the Hagar version more 'refined', and that's as far as I'll go on it. But there are definitely songs in the catalog that, I feel, are suited for either vocalist. For example, I actually think DLR could do a damn fine rendition of "Don't Tell Me What Love Can Do", and that Sam always did a great version of "Ain't Talkin' 'Bout Love". I don't think Sam would work singing "Me Wise Magic", but Dave wouldn't work singing "Cabo Wabo". There are good songs on either side...and it would be a shame for VH as a band to ignore some of the great songs they did with Sammy. Much the same as it would have been a shame for them to ignore songs they did with DLR over the past 2 decades. And I fully expect them to do at least one DLR solo song, and please god let it be either "Yankee Rose" or "A Lil' Ain't Enough".
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
Sammy had a way of turning a monster riff like Humans Being into a sappy ass love song. That's why he does and always will suck in my book.
On the 'deep cuts' topic...I'd love to hear them bust out something like "Black Star" and finally play the fucking thing with Dave singing it. |
If they won't be touching the post-1984 era of Van Halen, maybe we can expect a few songs from "Eat'em and Smile."
Or maybe not. |
They could come out and just play Fair Warning from beginning to end with no encore and I'd feel I got my money's worth.
|
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
They could come out and just play Fair Warning from beginning to end with no encore and I'd feel I got my money's worth.
|
At the press conv. Dave had his hair cut short like Huey Lewis and it didn't look right.
Will he wear a wig and do his leg splits? |
Originally Posted by wm lopez
At the press conv. Dave had his hair cut short like Huey Lewis and it didn't look right.
Will he wear a wig and do his leg splits? |
I saw Dave at the local HOB a few years back, and he was actually pretty good. Had a young guitar player that was really good.
I've seen VH once with Dave (Diver Down tour), and almost every tour with Sammy. Looks like I'm gonna be doing one of the So Cal shows solo...(Wife is not a VH fan) |
Originally Posted by lordzeppelin
:rolleyes: Dave is half the vocalist Sammy is. And the last time I saw Dave (when he and Sammy toured), He couldn't even remember the lyrics to 'Jump', which isn't too fucking hard of a song.
Originally Posted by lordzeppelin
HOWEVER, I like both Dave and Sammy equally, but for different reasons. To say that Sammy is the reason that Eddie lost his 'edge' is absolutely ridiculous. For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge would never have been possible with Dave in the band, and that album is quite representative of all the musical talent in the band, including Eddie's edge. Is it the same EVH from, say, Fair Warning (the best Dave album, IMO, and, conversely, one that never would have been possible with Sammy)? No. But they're equally as good.
Originally Posted by lordzeppelin
I never understood the whole Dave vs. Sammy debate. I liked both incarnations of the band, as different as they were and will be. But neither incarnation is more rock than the other. At best, the Roth version is more 'raw' and the Hagar version more 'refined', and that's as far as I'll go on it.
Originally Posted by lordzeppelin
...and it would be a shame for VH as a band to ignore some of the great songs they did with Sammy. Much the same as it would have been a shame for them to ignore songs they did with DLR over the past 2 decades.
Originally Posted by lordzeppelin
And I fully expect them to do at least one DLR solo song, and please god let it be either "Yankee Rose" or "A Lil' Ain't Enough".
|
VH with Dave = Immature. VH with Sammy = Mature (well, minus the punny acronymical album titles).
And, I like BOTH guys, "immature" is not meant as an insult. |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfYjg...elated&search=
I've never been able to post a direct video link, but this is what VH was about. If Sammy tried that split, he'd split his Cabo Wabos. |
So, to recap, VH is about a pretty meaningless gymnastic trick?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.