Does anyone hate the sound of live shows on CD?
#33
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have always thought the studio is the canvas for the fine artist.
A live show is a performance art and should be appreciated first person. That doesn't mean I cannot appreciate and enjoy a live recording. Sometimes the atmosphere created by the show creates a level of intamacy, while the studio can be cold.
I will always prefer studio work.
Todd Rundgren's A Wizard A True Star is still an amazing studio production, 30 years after it's release.
A live show is a performance art and should be appreciated first person. That doesn't mean I cannot appreciate and enjoy a live recording. Sometimes the atmosphere created by the show creates a level of intamacy, while the studio can be cold.
I will always prefer studio work.
Todd Rundgren's A Wizard A True Star is still an amazing studio production, 30 years after it's release.
#34
Moderator
I've never had a prob with live albums: my faves are:
Deep Forest: Live in Japan
Banco de Gaia: Glastonbury
Pulp: Glastonbury
Luna: Live (the vinyl edition with two extra tracks)
Deep Forest: Live in Japan
Banco de Gaia: Glastonbury
Pulp: Glastonbury
Luna: Live (the vinyl edition with two extra tracks)
#35
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: WV
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I usually like live albums much better than studio albums (for example Motley Crue, Oasis, Pearl Jam). I get tired of hearing songs the exact same way, so the live albums offer an alternative. Also, live albums make the studio songs seem more fresh the next time I listen to them.
#36
DVD Talk Hero
A live band will 99x out of 100 sound more raw, aggresive and "ballsier" than their studio equivilant. If a live show is recorded well (no echo, low crowd noise, good fidelity, etc.), I will always prefer it to the studio version - that is unless the band can't play live - though a live album from those bands is quite rare.