Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
#26
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
Reminds me of Possessor from Brandon Cronenberg -- at least with the melting faces. Looks like a hardcore body horror flick.
#27
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
Looks good. I get this is a DC Studios production, but is it part of the DCU or standalone like Joker?
#29
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
#30
DVD Talk Legend
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 18,526
Received 443 Likes
on
313 Posts
From: Formerly known as Groucho AND Bandoman/Death Moans, Iowa
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
James Gunn says otherwise.
”"Clayface is totally DCU"
https://www.ign.com/articles/james-g...pic-crime-saga
”"Clayface is totally DCU"
https://www.ign.com/articles/james-g...pic-crime-saga
#31
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
Interesting. Well if they are going this dark with Clayface, I am curious what they do with Batman's other rogues, and the Dark Knight himself.
#32
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
James Gunn says otherwise.
”"Clayface is totally DCU"
https://www.ign.com/articles/james-g...pic-crime-saga
”"Clayface is totally DCU"
https://www.ign.com/articles/james-g...pic-crime-saga
The following 4 users liked this post by GoldenJCJ:
#33
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
Clayface looks really good. Very creepy with the body horror vibes. Makes total sense for the character though.
I still think should just tie the universe of The Batman into the DCU. Clayface looks to be of similar tone and it’s in the DCU. I just don’t see the point in establishing another new Batman when there’s already a good actor in the role.
I still think should just tie the universe of The Batman into the DCU. Clayface looks to be of similar tone and it’s in the DCU. I just don’t see the point in establishing another new Batman when there’s already a good actor in the role.
#34
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
Clayface looks really good. Very creepy with the body horror vibes. Makes total sense for the character though.
I still think should just tie the universe of The Batman into the DCU. Clayface looks to be of similar tone and it’s in the DCU. I just don’t see the point in establishing another new Batman when there’s already a good actor in the role.
I still think should just tie the universe of The Batman into the DCU. Clayface looks to be of similar tone and it’s in the DCU. I just don’t see the point in establishing another new Batman when there’s already a good actor in the role.
#35
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
You have to add, they may want to keep Matt Reeves happy as I assume he only signed on to keep his Batman in its own universe. No doubt however Gunn and co. floated the idea of Reeves's Batman being folded into the DCU.
#36
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
Add to that Gunn not wanting to start The Brave and the Bold until after the second Pattinson film, and it’s likely going to be at least 2030 or most likely later until we get a proper DCU Batman. They could just take Reeves universe and adapt it to fit the DCU and I think it would be just fine.
At that point Corenswet will have at least two movies under his belt as Superman. It feels like DC shooting themselves in the foot yet again.
#37
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
Truthfully I don’t necessarily see why that matters. It’s just so silly because The Batman Part II is taking forever to release.
Add to that Gunn not wanting to start The Brave and the Bold until after the second Pattinson film, and it’s likely going to be at least 2030 or most likely later until we get a proper DCU Batman. They could just take Reeves universe and adapt it to fit the DCU and I think it would be just fine.
At that point Corenswet will have at least two movies under his belt as Superman. It feels like DC shooting themselves in the foot yet again.
Add to that Gunn not wanting to start The Brave and the Bold until after the second Pattinson film, and it’s likely going to be at least 2030 or most likely later until we get a proper DCU Batman. They could just take Reeves universe and adapt it to fit the DCU and I think it would be just fine.
At that point Corenswet will have at least two movies under his belt as Superman. It feels like DC shooting themselves in the foot yet again.
#38
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
I mostly just don’t want to have to wait close to five or more years to see Batman interacting with the new DCU when you could make some shifts with Pattinson’s version to make him fit.
Again this trailer very much looks like it would fit in with what Reeves has established so why make a different one just because of egos? It’s silly and a waste of time.
At the rate things are going by the time Batman appears in the DCU Corenswet will probably be near wrapping up as Superman.
Again this trailer very much looks like it would fit in with what Reeves has established so why make a different one just because of egos? It’s silly and a waste of time.
At the rate things are going by the time Batman appears in the DCU Corenswet will probably be near wrapping up as Superman.
#39
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
From a practical stand point you can incorporate The Batman into the new DCU, but it's still Matt Reeves' version. James Gunn has the keys to comic paradise, why would he pass on the chance to create his own Batman? This is a once in a lifetime chance for Gunn and he is the boss, he can decide, so why waste this one chance, only to be practical?
Because it's his job to be practical and think about financial solvency and success? It's not like he's a complete creative that doesn't bear some of that weight.
#40
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
The business man is keeping the Reeves version alive, but the creative executive is starting his own thing and I don't see a problem with that. I don't need a team up between Corenswet and Pattinson.
#41
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
We don't need a team up at all. However, it'd be a good shortcut and Gunn is clearly not opposed to retrofitting iterations of characters he didn't personally develop. True, those were all minor/supporting characters, but given how well received Pattinson was as Batman, it wouldn't be a bad idea to apply that same strategy with him. However, is Pattinson even interested in doing more than Reeves' intended trilogy? What did he sign up for? A new contract might be rejected by Pattinson outright.
#42
Re: Clayface (2026, D: Watkins)
We don't need a team up at all. However, it'd be a good shortcut and Gunn is clearly not opposed to retrofitting iterations of characters he didn't personally develop. True, those were all minor/supporting characters, but given how well received Pattinson was as Batman, it wouldn't be a bad idea to apply that same strategy with him. However, is Pattinson even interested in doing more than Reeves' intended trilogy? What did he sign up for? A new contract might be rejected by Pattinson outright.




