![]() |
Re: Trailers on youtube
It wouldn't be bad if they specifically state in the video title that it's fake. A lot of times, it says "official". Because nobody reads the descriptions where it says Trailer Concept.
|
Re: Trailers on youtube
Originally Posted by devilshalo
(Post 14684089)
It wouldn't be bad if they specifically state in the video title that it's fake. A lot of times, it says "official". Because nobody reads the descriptions where it says Trailer Concept.
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
This is pretty awesome:
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
I had been playing that song a lot on my headset whilst on the clock. :lol:
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
It's very catchy!
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
Disco? This actually looks and sounds like something that would have been used to promote the movie in 1979!
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
Blitzed Frodo is the best part.
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 14688368)
Disco? This actually looks and sounds like something that would have been used to promote the movie in 1979!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHrhPXduFl8 I still have this vinyl record at home: As for AI music videos, not disco but I really enjoy this one: |
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
Here's my problem with these music videos: there's no unifying structure or logic. They're all just a series of random, unrelated shots with nothing tying them together beyond a similar aesthetic. Like in that Gollum rock one, just exactly how many guitarists are in this band? Is Frodo the lead singer or is Gollum? And all the characters not playing instruments, are they in the same bar/club? Are they in different spaces? What do they even have to do with any of the rest of it besides being people in rock-ish clothes?
I mean it's kind of cool what the technology is capable, but just imagine if it was applied with any amount of actual creativity. As it is, these things are mostly just a single fleeting idea/joke stretched out to 6 minutes. |
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
Originally Posted by rocket1312
(Post 14688557)
Here's my problem with these music videos: there's no unifying structure or logic. They're all just a series of random, unrelated shots with nothing tying them together beyond a similar aesthetic. Like in that Gollum rock one, just exactly how many guitarists are in this band? Is Frodo the lead singer or is Gollum? And all the characters not playing instruments, are they in the same bar/club? Are they in different spaces? What do they even have to do with any of the rest of it besides being people in rock-ish clothes?
I mean it's kind of cool what the technology is capable, but just imagine if it was applied with any amount of actual creativity. As it is, these things are mostly just a single fleeting idea/joke stretched out to 6 minutes. |
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
Originally Posted by Cellar Door
(Post 14688196)
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
Nintendo plans on making this for real, right?
It's not very good, but at least it makes me want a legitimate live action Metroid movie. |
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
Ha. There were probably 30,000 animators working on the prequels. Now it's done with a guy, all the electric in the Bay Area, and a hundred million gallons of water!
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
Not a trailer but a short, and a pretty impressive one.
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
So guess what you get when you place AI in the hands of a “visionary” filmmaker like Darren Aronofsky and a venerated media giant like Time Magazine.
More AI slop. -rolleyes- Plastic faces, uncanny valley, medium close-ups galore, everyone centred or positioned according to the golden rule, constant one-second cuts so you can’t focus too long. It’s almost tiresome at this point. Considering all the hubbub surrounding Aronofsky’s high-profile embrace of AI as if only Hollywood craftspeople could truly work wonders with if, unlike mere commoners, it’s pretty obvious that anyone could have made these (as illustrated by several recent videos posted above). I’m definitely not seeing anything here that makes Aronofsky’s (or his team of prompters’) use of the tools any different than anyone else’s. At a fundamental level, it all looks the same. The voices are real in these because of union rules. https://www.avclub.com/american-revo...nofsky-trailer |
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
I guess this is the appropriate place to bring this up...
Has anyone noticed that the History Channel is using a lot of AI in their shows recently? History Unearthed with Danny Trejo, History's Deadliest with Ving Rhames, and Monsterquest all run with a disclaimer that they have AI generated content. Okay, granted that Monsterquest is bullshit, but it's kind of off-putting to watch things documenting actual history that use fake AI-generated footage. And they don't label the AI footage, either, so you're not really sure if you're seeing AI, a re-entacment, stock footage, or actual historical footage. Programs like these have always used re-enactments (often times labeled as "dramatization" or such) and stock footage, but now it feels like it's a sort of melange of sources that jumbles reality. But I guess I shouldn't expect better from the people that brought us277 and counting episodes of Ancient Aliens and bunch of the-world-will-end-in-2012 documentaries. |
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
The age of Skynet is nigh, because the "AI slop" is getting better.
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
The Tom Cruise/Brad Pitt fig he was interesting but that was weird to throw Epstein in there. :lol:
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
Been going through a rabbit hole of these. This 4-way comparison is really interesting.
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
Hollywood as we know it is about to get destroyed. We are about 5 to 7 years away from a movie made almost entirely by AI that ends up being one of the year's top-ten highest grossing films.
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 14706764)
Hollywood as we know it is about to get destroyed. We are about 5 to 7 years away from a movie made almost entirely by AI that ends up being one of the year's top-ten highest grossing films.
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
Also remember that AI (for now) can only "create" what it already knows. So unless it knows what Brad Pitt looks like, it can't recreate him. And the only reason it knows is because he's been filmed. Same with something like Iron Man. You can't tell an AI to make a movie with Iron Man if it doesn't know what Iron Man in the movies looks like. Someone still has to make that first.
What I think we'll actually see before a "Hollywood movie" is fan movies that are much higher in quality. Before the new X-Men specific trailer for Avengers: Doomsday officially came out, I saw multiple AI versions that I totally would have bought as the real thing except for a few little quirks that clued me in to the fact they weren't real. That's what we'll see more of. |
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
It is quite impressive how quickly the tech has improved.
|
Re: AI Trailers: 1950s Super Panavision 70
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.