![]() |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Did, like, no parent or anybody talk to you about that? I'm just so surprised you didn't at least hear about them all those years. We talked about that all the time when I was a little kid.
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 13645056)
I think all y'all are just unobservant. ;)
I may just have to blame my parents' crappy TV when I was a kid. The picture was always way too dark. So it's possible Crispy Owen and Burnt Beru just blended into their surroundings. |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 13644951)
I mean, yes, there's smoke, and maybe you could've missed them in the wide pan shot, but this shot....
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/dvdtalk...3f2a9f57f7.png Is pretty explicit. What did you think Luke was averting his eyes from? Seeing Star Wars in the theater was an overwhelming experience, and the bodies sort of blend in with the rest of the debris. I wouldn't have wondered why Luke looked away from the smoldering remains of his home. I just accepted that Luke knew his Aunt and Uncle were killed. |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
I don’t think I grasped exactly what had happened when I was younger either. Picked up on it upon later viewings.
All the Star Wars movies have some darkish things in them, but really nothing beyond burnt to a crisp Anakin in Revenge of the Sith is too gruesome. Yeah there’s a lot of limbs lost, a guy gets cut in half, a couple decapitations, and a couple characters get impaled. None of those are terribly gruesome though. The acts are violent but we don’t see much of anything. |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Just a thought, but they could have also been edited out of TV broadcasts.
Count me as another that doesn't recall the skeletons being that 'in your face.' Like Josh said, they just kinda blended in with the other debris. |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
(Post 13645142)
Just a thought, but they could have also been edited out of TV broadcasts.
Count me as another that doesn't recall the skeletons being that 'in your face.' Like Josh said, they just kinda blended in with the other debris. This was back in the times before home video (the dark times), so there wasn't any option to pause or rewind, and movies weren't available to view like they are now. I don't know when my third viewing of Star Wars was (maybe cable, or another tv broadcast?) but I did get the widescreen VHS boxed set in 1995, and I was able to pause and rewind as much as I wanted to, though the image was fuzzy and rather small with those black bars. |
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
I actually have the trilogy that my mom taped off of USA for me back in the day (never actually owned the official releases on VHS). Could check and see how it aired on that.
|
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.
pretty sure for a lot of us it was likely multi-factorial... cropping, resolution, bewilderment, and just down right naivety.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
I saw this for the first time today and thought it was pretty awesome. I'd like to think this progression based on Yoda's dialogue was intentional, because it does work. Anyone seen this?
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/dvdtalk...027edcfcaa.jpg |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
I saw it come up a few times on FB. I don’t really associate Fear with young Anakin though. He was hesitant to leave mom, but he was more cocky than a fearful kid.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by The Cow
(Post 13656601)
I saw it come up a few times on FB. I don’t really associate Fear with young Anakin though. He was hesitant to leave mom, but he was more cocky than a fearful kid.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Good news to hear about Waititi.
Regarding that image above, I don’t like to think of Darth Vader as suffering. He’s an evil bad guy who likes to destroy things and hurt people. To feel too deeply about the suffering he must feel because of a bad childhood is to give him too much humanity. Like trying to ask me to understand how much the Oklahoma City bomber must have been suffering. |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Mabuse
(Post 13672306)
Good news to hear about Waititi.
Regarding that image above, I don’t like to think of Darth Vader as suffering. He’s an evil bad guy who likes to destroy things and hurt people. To feel too deeply about the suffering he must feel because of a bad childhood is to give him too much humanity. Like trying to ask me to understand how much the Oklahoma City bomber must have been suffering. Within simply the spirituality of Star Wars, Vader suffers because he is incapable of overcoming his negative traits or reflecting on himself or his actions. It's like a cautionary Buddhist story to illustrate the Four Noble Truths (which seem to be a major influence on Lucas' development of Jedi philosophy). |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 13672627)
Your mileage may definitely vary on this. Personally, I think that every person must be humanized, no matter what wrong they do.
Within simply the spirituality of Star Wars, Vader suffers because he is incapable of overcoming his negative traits or reflecting on himself or his actions. It's like a cautionary Buddhist story to illustrate the Four Noble Truths (which seem to be a major influence on Lucas' development of Jedi philosophy). |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 13672627)
Your mileage may definitely vary on this. Personally, I think that every person must be humanized, no matter what wrong they do.
Within simply the spirituality of Star Wars, Vader suffers because he is incapable of overcoming his negative traits or reflecting on himself or his actions. It's like a cautionary Buddhist story to illustrate the Four Noble Truths (which seem to be a major influence on Lucas' development of Jedi philosophy). |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 13672635)
Cool. Now humanize Palpatine.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Mike86
(Post 13672669)
Not even just all that, but Vader is physically suffering after being defeated on Mustafar and being put into the suit. Of course we aren’t supposed to think about that and he’s just supposed to be a badass in black, but there’s some interesting lore about the suit itself.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
As a kid before the Prequels I always thought the Darkside had a possession like hold on Vader and the Emperor controlled him through that. Once the Emperor was about to kill Luke he broke from it.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by stvn1974
(Post 13672733)
As a kid before the Prequels I always thought the Darkside had a possession like hold on Vader and the Emperor controlled him through that. Once the Emperor was about to kill Luke he broke from it.
That was a very powerful statement by Vader, as it jives with the exact thing you are saying. Once Anakin turned to the darkside in Revenge of the Sith because he was fooled by Palpatine (along with the whole scene being utterly ridiculous), the whole power of the darkside lost alot of weight to me. |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
The one thing I love about the OT is that every time I watch I find something new that just bothers me. I was just watching ESB and the scene when Vader is talking to the bounty hunters, how the hell would they have gotten there? The fleet was in middle of nowhere in an asteroid field.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Deadman31
(Post 13672892)
The one thing I love about the OT is that every time I watch I find something new that just bothers me. I was just watching ESB and the scene when Vader is talking to the bounty hunters, how the hell would they have gotten there? The fleet was in middle of nowhere in an asteroid field.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
So Vader had to wait until they all showed to brief them? Were there any bounty hunters that showed up after that? That would be embarassing.
Did they really have to meet on the bridge of the Star Destroyer? That seems like a security risk. You'd think a ship that big would have some empty meeting rooms or something. |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Vader probably did it on the bridge to embarrass the officers who were having trouble catching one little freighter.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by windom
(Post 13672943)
So Vader had to wait until they all showed to brief them? Were there any bounty hunters that showed up after that? That would be embarassing.
Did they really have to meet on the bridge of the Star Destroyer? That seems like a security risk. You'd think a ship that big would have some empty meeting rooms or something. |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by milo bloom
(Post 13673094)
Vader probably did it on the bridge to embarrass the officers who were having trouble catching one little freighter.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.