![]() |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Doesn't he own part of the franchise? It's in his best financial interest that the movie does well.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
(Post 12815317)
Doesn't he own part of the franchise? It's in his best financial interest that the movie does well.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Here's Dan Ackroyd's cameo in a UK TV spot. Spoilers if you care.
https://twitter.com/welshghostbust/s...32986221875200 |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
The butt-hurt in this thread is priceless. :lol:
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
(Post 12815317)
Doesn't he own part of the franchise? It's in his best financial interest that the movie does well.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by bluetoast
(Post 12815343)
Here's Dan Ackroyd's cameo in a UK TV spot. Spoilers if you care.
https://twitter.com/welshghostbust/s...32986221875200 |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Doctor WHOO WHOO Doctor... DETROIT!
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Maybe between this thread, the eventual review thread, and the regressive left thread. We might have the thread of the year for 2016.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by bluetoast
(Post 12815343)
Here's Dan Ackroyd's cameo in a UK TV spot. Spoilers if you care.
https://twitter.com/welshghostbust/s...32986221875200 |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Bluelitespecial
(Post 12815512)
Maybe between this thread, the eventual review thread, and the regressive left thread. We might have the thread of the year for 2016.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Tony Zhou (the "Every Frame a Painting" guy) did a pretty great write-up about why he perceives that the UK trailer was so much better than the US one. It's worth a click. Here's just one section of it.
https://medium.com/@tonyszhou/the-tr...221#.towa6xll9 Spoiler for size Spoiler:
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Guru Askew
(Post 12807037)
On the other hand, I will admit that I was pleasantly surprised to see so many positive reactions on the otherwise-vile Ghostbusters Reddit a couple days ago when the 2nd US trailer launched.
Even though this film started out with a lot of negative criticisms by fans, I bet it's gonna be a huge hit. All the un-likes the youtube trailer got only created more public awareness for the movie, and casual movie goers who were probably ambivalent about it will now want to see it just to see what all the hubub was about. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Yes, the international trailer is an improvement. I guess it shows what the studio thinks Americans go for.
On a different note, I watched Trainwreck last night, and it made me think how good Bill Hader could have been as a new Ghostbuster. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
That television clip should have been the theatrical trailer .. short, to the point, and the famous line (and spoken by Ackroyd, no less). I liked that one. Less is certainly more.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Did anyone else get caught up in the great Ecto Cooler freakout of 2016?
I ordered 6 cases on Amazon like any other level-headed person would have. Edit: currently in-stock Https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01FUB9XMY..._vQVtxb2PZA82E |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
I ordered 3 cases. Should be enough to last me a long time...I still have cans of Moxie from like 3 months ago.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
out of stock
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
(Post 12815317)
Doesn't he own part of the franchise? It's in his best financial interest that the movie does well.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Let's be perfectly honest with ourselves here. If Aykroyd was critical of the movie the same people writing off his endorsement would be treating his critique as the word of God.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
I'm sure Dan Aykroyd liked it as much as James Cameron liked Terminator Genisys.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by inri222
(Post 12816008)
I'm sure Dan Aykroyd liked it as much as James Cameron liked Terminator Genisys.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Well, Alan Moore hasn't seen them, so that's a bit different. He just dislikes adaptations, and the shit that he got pulled into (lawsuit with League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, the V for Vendetta false endorsement by Joel Silver). He did read the script for V for Vendetta if I remember right, but that's about it.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Guru Askew
(Post 12815995)
Let's be perfectly honest with ourselves here. If Aykroyd was critical of the movie the same people writing off his endorsement would be treating his critique as the word of God.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Goat3001
(Post 12816152)
Well, yeah, that's because there is no incentive to criticize the movie. There is a big incentive to praise the movie though so people are going to be more reluctant to believe it.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Guru Askew
(Post 12816174)
If the movie is the soul-crushing humiliation that internet nerds would have you believe.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Guru Askew
(Post 12816174)
If the movie is the soul-crushing humiliation that internet nerds would have you believe then the affect it would have on his reputation would be plenty incentive. Aykroyd wouldn't be the first person to sit back and cash the checks they get from project they didn't approve of.
The ones that disapprove of their own movies are directors that complain about studio involvement. That's not even close to the case here. As has been mentioned many times before in this thread, Akroyd has gone full carny. Coming out to say the movie is good helps sells tickets plus it puts an approving face on the movie that GB fans know, a much needed one considering the backlash. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
It would be "hogwash" if we lived in a world where nobody ever disowned or disavowed an entertainment property in which they have a financial stake. Obviously that isn't the case.
What is "hogwash" is the motion that Dan "Nothing But Trouble" Aykroyd has anything against McCarthy, Feig etc. If that's where you're coming from them the burden is on you to find something that even suggests it. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
I don't put much stock in what Akroyd has to say about anything these days, but it's pretty obvious that the people who want to hate the movie will justify this as another reason to hate the movie.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Guru Askew
(Post 12816301)
What is "hogwash" is the motion that Dan "Nothing But Trouble" Aykroyd has anything against McCarthy, Feig etc. If that's where you're coming from them the burden is on you to find something that even suggests it.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by inri222
(Post 12816008)
I'm sure Dan Aykroyd liked it as much as James Cameron liked Terminator Genisys.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Supermallet
(Post 12816324)
I don't put much stock in what Akroyd has to say about anything these days, but it's pretty obvious that the people who want to hate the movie will justify this as another reason to hate the movie.
Yet Akroyd is continually held up as someone who would have made a "great" Ghostbusters 3 if given the chance. When evidence like Ghostbusters 2 already exists to counter that notion. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Goat3001
(Post 12816331)
No, I think the burden is on you to point out where I even suggested that. Otherwise, maybe you should accept that you're making it up in your head.
You, on the other hand, subscribe to a scenario in which Aykroyd disapproves of the movie and has been pressured to lie about it. Based on nothing but your imagination. Those two scenarios aren't on even footing, kinda like how a conspiracy theorist's ridiculous claims aren't inherently equal to the "accepted" view by merely existing. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Supermallet
(Post 12816324)
I don't put much stock in what Akroyd has to say about anything these days, but it's pretty obvious that the people who want to hate the movie will justify this as another reason to hate the movie.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by EddieMoney
(Post 12816229)
I think all of your posts in this thread are basically the same.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Guru Askew
(Post 12815754)
Did anyone else get caught up in the great Ecto Cooler freakout of 2016?
I ordered 6 cases on Amazon like any other level-headed person would have. Edit: currently in-stock Https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01FUB9XMY..._vQVtxb2PZA82E I bought one case. :up: |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Aykroyd said he liked it. Considering the fact that he has no beef with anyone involved in the new movie and as well as the fact that it's not unprecedented for someone in his position to criticize the remake/adaptation etc. it's reasonable to take him at his word. On another note when I saw XM:A over the weekend, the trailer for this played and not a single person laughed and it was booed after it was done. I will confess though the special effects looked pretty impressive on the big screen. Minus Slimer who just looks off. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Aykroyd's stake in the movie might be a valid reason to doubt his endorsement of the movie if there was even the tiniest shred of evidence that he disapproved of it.
You won't find it. The haters would have been running with it for months by now if there was as much as hint that Aykroyd was against this movie. This is a case of people projecting their own disapproval onto Aykroyd. Being suspicious of a rabid hater changing his tune after he realizes he's a Sony shareholder? Valid. Playing mental gymnastics to the point where someone's positive report of a movie somehow proves he hated it? Invalid. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
I almost feel like it would've been better for Aykroyd to either not say anything or downplay his remarks. He sounded desperate, doing damage control.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Guru Askew
(Post 12816487)
Aykroyd's stake in the movie might be a valid reason to doubt his endorsement of the movie if there was even the tiniest shred of evidence that he disapproved of it.
That said, seeing the international trailer, combined witih Aykroyd's endorsement makes me believe this new Ghostbusters film is going to be a worthy reboot/sequel. The humor seems pretty inline with the original. Yates: Why am I operating the untested nuclear laser? Hotlzmann: Because you have the longest arms. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by TomOpus
(Post 12816522)
I almost feel like it would've been better for Aykroyd to either not say anything or downplay his remarks. He sounded desperate, doing damage control.
It does sound a little desperate, but the producers have to deal with the unprecedented hate this reboot has received in the form of most dislikes for a YouTube trailer ever, and negative videos like the one from the AVGN. However, he can't not endorse it because if the original Ghostbusters don't endorse it, then it looks bad. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.