Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-14, 09:45 PM
  #51  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 45,376
Received 1,039 Likes on 823 Posts
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

The Hobbit is a mix of cash grab and masturbatory playground for Peter Jackson.
Old 11-12-14, 11:21 PM
  #52  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Matthew Chmiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 13,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

Originally Posted by RichC2
The Hobbit is a mix of cash grab and masturbatory playground for Peter Jackson.
It's just a three-hour circle jerk per film. There's nothing redeeming in either of the two films released so far and the films, even in their theatrical cut forms, are too bloated. When I saw The Desolation of Smaug in theaters last December, it felt like I was there for eight hours.

However, it's interesting to watch Peter Jackson go from a great director to an absolute shit director in under a decade.
Old 11-12-14, 11:32 PM
  #53  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Nick Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 30,721
Received 1,497 Likes on 946 Posts
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

Originally Posted by Chadm
a good movie is a good movie.

Here are some directors I thank god on my hand and knees were never "reigned in" at different points in there career.

Ingmar Bergman
Akira Kurosawa
David Lean
Michael Cimino
Francis Ford Coppola
Martin Scorsese
Sergio Leone
Andrei Tarkovsky


Imagine The Godfather as it was released was deemed bloated and ran under 2 hours like the studio originally wanted. I can't think of anything that could be more tragic cinematically. Not to mention the scores of great directors who WERE affected by this. Orson Welles, Michael Cimino, Sam Peckinpah, Samuel Fuller.
Kurosawa was definitely reined in. No one in Japan would hire him for decades. Luckily for us, Dersu Uzala, Kagemusha, Ran, and Dreams were financed by foreign producers.
Old 11-13-14, 05:25 AM
  #54  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Ash Ketchum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 12,652
Received 283 Likes on 217 Posts
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

Cimino's best film was the one where he was reigned in the most: THUNDERBOLT AND LIGHTFOOT. The story is that Eastwood gave him a deadline to finish all the remaining shots and that he--Eastwood--was heading to the airport back to L.A. at such-and-such a time the next afternoon and he had until then. Cimino did it.
Old 11-13-14, 05:43 AM
  #55  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Hazel Motes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,524
Received 404 Likes on 270 Posts
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

Nah, The Deer Hunter is his best film. And even with its flaws Heaven's Gate is better than Thunderbolt & Lightfoot. But I still love all 3.

Point is reigned in or not Cimino still got to make the film he wanted with Thunderbolt & Lightfoot. He had creative control, he just had to work with a budget and a timeframe. The film was his. Its not as if the film was taken away from him and recut. All it says about Cimino to me is that he could make a really good film under any circumstance. Until the reception to Heaven's Gate crushed his career and his soul.
Old 11-13-14, 07:26 AM
  #56  
kd5
DVD Talk Legend
 
kd5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,983
Received 382 Likes on 256 Posts
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

Could you imagine Apocalypse Now as a 90 minute movie? I don't think it would have a fraction of the impact that it does at 153 minutes. Never watched Redux so I can't speak to the additional 49 minutes on top of that.
Old 11-13-14, 08:29 AM
  #57  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
hanshotfirst1138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Livonia MI
Posts: 9,678
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
There's apparently a rough cut workprint of AN which has kicked around on bootleg for many years in VHS quality which is even longer (I think around 5 hours) and has a whole bunch of interesting stuff in it. It's never had an official release and was never intended to be a final cut by Coppola, but I hear a lot of what is in it is fascinating to see. I never had much interest in see Redux (Maybe because of the sour taste that his friend Mr. Lucas has left me after his horrid "special editions"), but its been a lot of years since I saw AN and was pretty young when I did. I'll have to revisit it one of these days.
Old 11-13-14, 08:45 AM
  #58  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

Damn. I never paid attention to the running time on AN Redux. 202 minutes. The theatrical had 153 minutes. the biggest additions to it being the Plantation and the Playboy bunnies bit in that storm.

I like the Redux. It adds something for me. Like it becomes trippier. It's not better than the theatrical but it adds another layer of fucked up. Especially that bunnies bit. Like the sadness that man becomes, the desperation.... gets fucking darker than before.
Old 11-13-14, 09:04 AM
  #59  
DVD Talk Legend
 
DaveyJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 19,344
Received 190 Likes on 132 Posts
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

Apocalypse Redux turns an amazing film into an insufferable bore, in my opinion.
Old 11-13-14, 09:08 AM
  #60  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

there is that. Pacing issues.
Old 11-13-14, 09:08 AM
  #61  
RIP
 
EddieMoney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Paradise, USA
Posts: 9,918
Received 61 Likes on 44 Posts
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

The worst offender of this right now is Judd Apatow, IMO. We're only talking 120-140 minutes for his films, but my God, do we need comedies that are THAT long?
Old 11-13-14, 09:22 AM
  #62  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Ash Ketchum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 12,652
Received 283 Likes on 217 Posts
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

Originally Posted by EddieMoney
The worst offender of this right now is Judd Apatow, IMO. We're only talking 120-140 minutes for his films, but my God, do we need comedies that are THAT long?
Only if they're called IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD and THE BLUES BROTHERS.
Old 11-13-14, 09:26 AM
  #63  
DVD Talk Legend
 
milo bloom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 18,348
Received 1,430 Likes on 1,044 Posts
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

I don't like to generalize by genre but for comedies pacing is so important that I think you can go too long and lose something in the process.

Fantasy and science fiction are generally helped more since the setting is what helps set the story - the more time you're experiencing it, the more you can process it. I know the extended cut of David Lynch's Dune is a hot mess, but I love that setting so much I'm willing to deal with it just to be in that world. I might even consider that DVD one of my desert island discs.
Old 11-13-14, 09:44 AM
  #64  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,699
Received 657 Likes on 455 Posts
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

Originally Posted by Mr. Salty
It goes back a lot farther than that. "Les Vampires" in 1915 was almost seven hours long.
That doesn't really count, as it was a serial, originally shown as 10 separate episodes ranging from 15 minutes to 60 minutes each.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Vampires

A better example would be the 1924 film Greed, which in its original cut was 462 minutes (almost 8 hours) long. Of course, the studio cut it down to 140 minutes and most of the deleted footage was subsequently lost.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greed_(film)

Originally Posted by ~~ PAL ~~
Perhaps not a fair assessment as I have never laid eye ball on a single frame of the Hobbit movies, but I simply cannot fathom how these movies would not be bloated when they used the shortest of the four books sourced for these Middle Earth movies and made three movies out of it. On the other hand, the three much more dense books were made into a single movie per each book.
The LOTR movies were made by severely editing down the content of the books. Even with 3 movies, a lot was cut, most notably Tom Bombadil.

With the Hobbit movies, very little is actually cut. PJ even includes several songs. In the first Hobbit movie, I don't think they leave the shire until around 40 minutes into the film, and nothing was added to that section in the film.
Old 11-13-14, 09:48 AM
  #65  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
inri222's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 50,673
Received 182 Likes on 120 Posts
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

Originally Posted by Jay G.
A better example would be the 1924 film Greed, which in its original cut was 462 minutes (almost 8 hours) long. Of course, the studio cut it down to 140 minutes and most of the deleted footage was subsequently lost.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greed_(film)
And that along with what happened to The Magnificent Ambersons is a travesty
Old 11-13-14, 04:29 PM
  #66  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Matthew Chmiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 13,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

Originally Posted by DaveyJoe
Apocalypse Redux turns an amazing film into an insufferable bore, in my opinion.


Saw Redux in theaters, once was enough for me. I have zero problems going back to the original and superior theatrical cut.

I'll second the comment on Apatow. There's great films inside This Is 40 and Funny People, but only if someone grabbed Apatow by the balls and trimmed out 30-45 minutes out of both films. Both films have subplots and scenes that go absolutely nowhere.

I'll also add that all of the Apatow-involved extended cuts are awful.
Old 11-21-14, 05:27 PM
  #67  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
hanshotfirst1138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Livonia MI
Posts: 9,678
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveyJoe
Apocalypse Redux turns an amazing film into an insufferable bore, in my opinion.
At least both versions have been properly restored. Unlike a certain friend of Coppola's . Frankly, the stories about the production on that film are even more fascinating than the movie sometimes.

Last edited by hanshotfirst1138; 11-21-14 at 09:03 PM.
Old 11-21-14, 05:33 PM
  #68  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138
At least bother versions have been properly restored. Unlike a certain friend of Coppola's . Frankly, the stories about the production on that film are even more fascinating than the movie sometimes.
It's weird because in The Conversations, Walter Murch wrote that Redux was cut from the original negatives and that the process permanently altered the film.
Old 11-21-14, 06:29 PM
  #69  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Why So Blu?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 38,282
Received 1,208 Likes on 928 Posts
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

I love Apocalypse Now REDUX and I think the scenes in the French plantation are great. I love the shot of the fog that clears away and you have the platoon of soldiers standing there intercepting the guys. I'm in the minority when it comes to preferring Redux over the TC version.
Old 11-21-14, 08:05 PM
  #70  
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 23,528
Received 212 Likes on 163 Posts
Re: Bloated Movies:are Directors Getting out of Hand?

While I do think the Hobbit movies suffer from bloat, I did like that they took a lot of time at Bilbo's house in the first one. It was more true to the book and helped develop the characters. Everything else I could have done without.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.