View Poll Results: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
0
0%
Voters: 277. You may not vote on this poll
The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
#276
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
I enjoyed the look of the Hulk. He had that caveman/gorilla look to him. He'd be standing there on his feet and fists. Also, his physique was slightly different in that when he was still or not fighting his body looked like Tom Hardy's in Bronson, but when he would get ready for action he would tense up all over and just get shredded. I also identified with him more, because Ruffalo's likeness was there as opposed to Bana's and Norton's. Once those guys turned into the Hulk - Hulk looked nothing like them. Not with Ruffalo.
As for an Avengers 2, does anyone know if they've even thought that far ahead? Have they thrown potential release years out there yet?
Thanos will obviously be the bad guy, but here's hoping that they use Leader in there somewhere if they don't put him in the next Hulk flick. *thinking out loud*
As for an Avengers 2, does anyone know if they've even thought that far ahead? Have they thrown potential release years out there yet?
Thanos will obviously be the bad guy, but here's hoping that they use Leader in there somewhere if they don't put him in the next Hulk flick. *thinking out loud*
#277
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: May 2001
Location: The Appian Way by way of Birmingham, AL
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
[QUOTE=Supermallet;11220458]I'd go with (best to worst): S5, S6, S3, S2, S7, S1, S4
QUOTE]
For me..
Season 3,2,5,6,4,1,7
QUOTE]
For me..
Season 3,2,5,6,4,1,7
#278
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
They did blatantly set the seeds for him in the Norton Hulk and considering they've done Ross twice and Abomination already, I don't see a better logical pick.
#279
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Somewhere out there... YES THERE!!!
Posts: 7,936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
I thought the Hulk took the entire movie. We all lost it when
and of course
Spoiler:
and of course
Spoiler:
#280
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
It's funny because...Oh, about 6 years ago, it was considered taboo to introduce intergalactic characters for Marvel Movies (Think back to the days of the theatrical releases of Spider-Man,X2,Punisher,Daredevil,Hulk) everything just had to be "Down to Earth" for audiences to accept.
And we're now we've entered the next phase where Marvel heroes get to fight battles pertaining to outer-space villainy (Maybe some good came out of Fantastic Four afterall!)
#281
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sitting on a beach, earning 20%
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
By the way, was anyone else hoping Thor would wear his helm when he was summoning the rest of his armour towards the end of the movie? If they're willing to have Loki appear in quite a few scenes with his heml on, I don't see why the same could not have been done for Thor.
Last edited by DonnachaOne; 05-06-12 at 01:07 AM. Reason: Helmets cover part of the head; Helms cover the whole head
#283
Banned by request
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
I saw it as a character choice. In Thor, Thor did not wear his helmet in battle, and the helmets seem to be used more for ceremonial purpose. Thor has humility and doesn't show off anymore, and even forewent armor for most of the film because he wasn't on Earth for the purpose of war. In contrast, Loki, to show how entitled he is and how regal he feels, is rarely seen without his helmet once he takes the throne in Thor and for much of The Avengers, always wearing it during moments he perceives to be of domination or grand victory.
Also, sorry to continue this side discussion, but I can't fathom anyone rating a season of Buffy lower than season 4. The whole military storyline felt hokey even for the Buffyverse, and the terribly designed bad guy was just the worst. And Riley was the blandest (not most annoying, that would be Druscilla, but most bland) character ever on the show. And let's not forget such heart-wrenching storylines as "Buffy sleeps with guy who doesn't want a relationship OMG", "Enchanted beer turns people into cavemen", and "Xander feels aimless." Seasons 1 and 7 had flaws and dud episodes, but they were both masterpieces compared to season 4, which, "Hush" aside, is pointless and embarrassing and Whedon should be ashamed of himself for having agreed to it.
#284
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Oh, and I remember a few weeks ago where that GIF of Black Widow's obvious fake telegraphed headbutt looked like shit - it looked great on the big screen at full speed.
There's a lesson there: Don't put faith in slowed down GIFs. Unless they have bouncy (o) (o)
There's a lesson there: Don't put faith in slowed down GIFs. Unless they have bouncy (o) (o)
#285
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
I saw it as a character choice. In Thor, Thor did not wear his helmet in battle, and the helmets seem to be used more for ceremonial purpose. Thor has humility and doesn't show off anymore, and even forewent armor for most of the film because he wasn't on Earth for the purpose of war. In contrast, Loki, to show how entitled he is and how regal he feels, is rarely seen without his helmet once he takes the throne in Thor and for much of The Avengers, always wearing it during moments he perceives to be of domination or grand victory.
And the prologue of Thor clearly illustrated that Asgardians wear their helms in battle. Just look at any scene where Odin went into battle.
#286
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Leandro/San Francisco
Posts: 7,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
There's more to a movie than special effects. You can have the greatest effects around but if the story and cast blow then so does the movie. Have so-so effects and a great cast and story and the movie is still good. I think folks are too harsh on special effects these days. Just my opinion though.
Story>special effects in my book.
Story>special effects in my book.
A great ride.
Great cast. Great writing and... Great effects.
#287
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sitting on a beach, earning 20%
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
You must have missed the bit where Thor, Loki, Sif and the Warriors Three battle the Frost Giants. Without helmets. I still contend that they're ceremonial, though one could surmise that his kit for the Frost Giants battle demonstrated Thor's unpreparedness (although that's unlikely, considering the other five people with him went into battle without helmets as well, even the ones who told Thor it was a foolhardy endeavor).
#288
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
On a bit of a personal dislike, though not of the films themselves...
I really wish Thor used the complete chainmail look he's recently had.
I really wish Thor used the complete chainmail look he's recently had.
#289
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Cape Ann, Massachusetts
Posts: 10,928
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
It's funny because...Oh, about 6 years ago, it was considered taboo to introduce intergalactic characters for Marvel Movies (Think back to the days of the theatrical releases of Spider-Man,X2,Punisher,Daredevil,Hulk) everything just had to be "Down to Earth" for audiences to accept.
And we're now we've entered the next phase where Marvel heroes get to fight battles pertaining to outer-space villainy (Maybe some good came out of Fantastic Four afterall!)
And we're now we've entered the next phase where Marvel heroes get to fight battles pertaining to outer-space villainy (Maybe some good came out of Fantastic Four afterall!)
I really enjoyed The Avengers. Not much character development or slow moments, but that's okay because we got that in the solo movies---and the actors did a good job of keeping the tone they had developed there and bringing those characters into this one. Great banter among the heroes, both when they're arguing with each other, and teaming up. And yes, each of the heroes got plenty of great individual action scenes. Although I really liked both previous Hulk movies, Ruffalo was great and brought something really different to the role, I thought.
My only somewhat gripe---I didn't read comics much between 1985 and 2005, and I was more familiar with the Silver Age Avengers, so Black Widow still seemed a bit out of place amongst all those incredibly powerful heroes to me, given her relatively meager abilities. I thought her actual portrayal in the film was fine, but I would have rather had Giant Man and the Wasp in there---although it would have probably been impossible to introduce two more characters for this movie.
#290
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
My only somewhat gripe---I didn't read comics much between 1985 and 2005, and I was more familiar with the Silver Age Avengers, so Black Widow still seemed a bit out of place amongst all those incredibly powerful heroes to me, given her relatively meager abilities. I thought her actual portrayal in the film was fine, but I would have rather had Giant Man and the Wasp in there---although it would have probably been impossible to introduce two more characters for this movie.
I'm not a comic book guy and didn't even know who those two were so maybe something just got lost in the translation but I think they should have used 2 other actual superheroes rather than 2 human beings who just had special skills compared to normal humans. I coud theoretically learn to shoot arrows as well as Jeremy Renner but I sure as Hell could never fly like Iron Man, smash stuff like the hulk or do godly stuff like Thor.
But minor gripe. Really enjoyable movie. I had a lot of fun watching it. I laughed my ass off when the hulk punched Thor for no reason.
#291
DVD Talk Godfather & 2020 TOTY Winner
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Not much to add but I really enjoyed this film also. Not the most cerebral (TDK sort of set that bar at a different level), but what a geeky fun ride. Some guy in the theater shouted out "I'm loving this!" during a Hulk scene and I agree with him. It's just a fun, cool movie that works way better than I expected it would.
For all the bitching about this first image we got on this forum:
The scene wasn't in the movie, was it?
For all the bitching about this first image we got on this forum:
The scene wasn't in the movie, was it?
#293
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
You must have missed the bit where Thor, Loki, Sif and the Warriors Three battle the Frost Giants. Without helmets. I still contend that they're ceremonial, though one could surmise that his kit for the Frost Giants battle demonstrated Thor's unpreparedness (although that's unlikely, considering the other five people with him went into battle without helmets as well, even the ones who told Thor it was a foolhardy endeavor).
It makes sense since Thor can be impulsive and, as he stated in this movie, he didn't come for war (hence the incomplete armour). Once Thor decided to fight his brother and the Chitauri, that was the moment to wear the helm.
But given there was a deleted scene in Thor were Loki teases Thor about the feathers (wings, really) on his helm and Thor shows embarrassment, I'm guessing the writers (and possibly the filmmakers as well) just don't like Thor's helm.
#294
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
There must have been at least 50+ open seats in the theater but they decided to sit right next to me and the baby kept crying and fussing throughout a good portion of the movie. When he/she got really loud, and other people started staring at the couple, the mom took he/she out for 5 minutes then brought the baby right back in.
I'll probably go back to this theater because it's nice not to have to line up super early to run and get better seats.
#295
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Etiquette rules on bringing a autistic kid who was occasionally disruptive to opening weekend prime time show? It was pretty annoying
#298
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Another thing I forgot to mention:
They did a good job of making Ruffalo look small, so that his transformation would have more impact. His clothes and the camera angles made him appear smaller than RDJ, who is about the same height as him. Then again when RDJ is in the suit it makes him even taller than Captain America, so there are a lot of different sizes going on.
They did a good job of making Ruffalo look small, so that his transformation would have more impact. His clothes and the camera angles made him appear smaller than RDJ, who is about the same height as him. Then again when RDJ is in the suit it makes him even taller than Captain America, so there are a lot of different sizes going on.
#299
Re: The Avengers (Whedon, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
Saw it with a near sold out crowd this morning and it was a complete blast. Whedon did a phenomenal job blending in all of the characters. Everyone got a good amount of the spotlight, and the Hulk, who is my favorite Marvel character, really shined in this one. The scene with Loki had everyone cheering/clapping. I suspect that is happening in most other theaters.