Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Saw VI (2009)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-09 | 11:07 AM
  #26  
dsa_shea's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,281
Received 353 Likes on 253 Posts
From: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Re: Saw VI (2009)

There on opening night. If they would give us more choices on Halloween I might see something else but they don't so their loss.
Old 10-04-09 | 11:34 AM
  #27  
tylergfoster's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,540
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Saw VI (2009)

Originally Posted by Tarantino
As long as they keep making money, they'll keep making Saw sequels. In terms of movie budgets, they're cheap as hell to make.
It's the most profitable horror franchise ever, almost the highest-earning, depending on how Friday the 13th (2009) has done in comparison, since Friday had previously held the latter title.

It's just going to continue on DTV too. Even if Lionsgate stops making money theatrically, they're probably not going to change much; just cut costs and send 'em straight to disc.
Old 10-04-09 | 01:35 PM
  #28  
asianxcore's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 20,841
Received 443 Likes on 366 Posts
From: California
Re: Saw VI (2009)

Definitely will be seeing this on opening night.

I still have a bad taste with the fifth film (which I saw in theaters), so I hope at the very least this film is better than it.
Old 10-05-09 | 12:36 AM
  #29  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seattle,WA
Re: Saw VI (2009)

Can't they pretty much just reuse the same trailer but just stick another number on the end?
Old 10-05-09 | 01:08 AM
  #30  
Rival11's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,322
Received 337 Likes on 234 Posts
From: Western N.Y.
Re: Saw VI (2009)

I honestly have no idea if I've seen all of these or not...I'm pretty sure I have with the lst one ending
Spoiler:
some dude lowering himself into the floor while the walls caved in
and I don't think I'll ever know as I would never watch one of these flicks again but for whatever reason...I always rent the latest installment. Definitely not looking forward to this but as always...a rental will be done.
Old 10-05-09 | 01:26 AM
  #31  
DeanoBKN's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,404
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
From: Connecticut
Re: Saw VI (2009)

I will be there opening night. I love the series, and I don't really think they have jumped the shark just yet.
Old 10-05-09 | 07:10 AM
  #32  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,453
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Re: Saw VI (2009)

Originally Posted by Rival11
I honestly have no idea if I've seen all of these or not...I'm pretty sure I have with the lst one ending
Spoiler:
some dude lowering himself into the floor while the walls caved in
and I don't think I'll ever know as I would never watch one of these flicks again but for whatever reason...I always rent the latest installment. Definitely not looking forward to this but as always...a rental will be done.
That was V.
Old 10-05-09 | 02:19 PM
  #33  
DJariya's Avatar
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 87,132
Received 6,014 Likes on 4,065 Posts
From: La Palma, CA
Re: Saw VI (2009)

I've enjoyed them and look forward to VI and then VII, which was already greenlighted.

I do think the series misses Darren Lynn Bousman, James Wan and Leigh Whannell.

I can't believe Lionsgate has kept the Project Greenlight writers for 4 movies!! (IV-VII)

II was probably my favorite one and IV was probably my least favorite.
Old 10-05-09 | 03:16 PM
  #34  
sauce07's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,547
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Centreville, VA
Re: Saw VI (2009)

1 and 2 I really liked
3 I thought was still fun but the story and format started showing cracks
4 was horrible and got me to give up on the series
Never saw 5, heard mostly bad. Should I give it a chance?
Old 10-05-09 | 04:19 PM
  #35  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Re: Saw VI (2009)

As always, I'll wait for the Blu-ray of this in January/February.
Old 10-05-09 | 04:20 PM
  #36  
fumanstan's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 55,349
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
From: Irvine, CA
Re: Saw VI (2009)

Originally Posted by sauce07
1 and 2 I really liked
3 I thought was still fun but the story and format started showing cracks
4 was horrible and got me to give up on the series
Never saw 5, heard mostly bad. Should I give it a chance?
Depends if you're still interested in the story. 5 wasn't very good and felt awfully uninspired (the characters, the traps) but did enough to move the story forward with the characters that it was still interesting to me.

I think for a horror series to still move the plot along adequately this far along is pretty darn impressive.
Old 10-05-09 | 06:05 PM
  #37  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 37,811
Received 1,722 Likes on 1,127 Posts
From: Montreal, Canada
Re: Saw VI (2009)

If a movie title ends with a number higher than 3, it will suck. Simple rule.
Old 10-05-09 | 11:23 PM
  #38  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bay Area, CA
Re: Saw VI (2009)

Originally Posted by eXcentris
If a movie title ends with a number higher than 3, it will suck. Simple rule.
Not always true... Star Wars IV and V were awesome.
Old 10-05-09 | 11:31 PM
  #39  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: San Leandro/San Francisco
Re: Saw VI (2009)

The first two were decent but the rest are an embarrassment.
Old 10-06-09 | 04:28 AM
  #40  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 7,936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Somewhere out there... YES THERE!!!
Re: Saw VI (2009)

This movie needs to die seriously. It was good at the start, but talk about beating a dead horse. That horse is bloody, beaten, and bruised. Think of the poor horses people.
Old 10-06-09 | 04:43 AM
  #41  
DJariya's Avatar
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 87,132
Received 6,014 Likes on 4,065 Posts
From: La Palma, CA
Re: Saw VI (2009)

You can bash them all you want, but the movies make money and the producers behind the series are smart businessmen. Not counting the 1st and 2nd movies, the budget for each movie is no more than $10M and is a money making machine for Lionsgate.
Old 10-06-09 | 04:49 AM
  #42  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 7,936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Somewhere out there... YES THERE!!!
Re: Saw VI (2009)

I can't fault them for taking advantage of people who are willing to pay for pretty much the exact same movie every time. I would do the same in their position.

Althought I will concede that this isn't much worse than the Friday the 13th movies, Nightmare on elm street, and Halloween movies. Wasn't a huge fan of those either though.

Last edited by glassdragon; 10-06-09 at 04:52 AM.
Old 10-06-09 | 07:42 AM
  #43  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,453
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Re: Saw VI (2009)

Originally Posted by eXcentris
If a movie title ends with a number higher than 3, it will suck. Simple rule.
Ivan Drago would like you to step a little closer.
Old 10-06-09 | 11:44 AM
  #44  
tylergfoster's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,540
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Saw VI (2009)

Originally Posted by DJariya
You can bash them all you want, but the movies make money and the producers behind the series are smart businessmen. Not counting the 1st and 2nd movies, the budget for each movie is no more than $10M and is a money making machine for Lionsgate.
The first and second cost less than the others, I'm not sure why you're singling them out. When I saw the original at that Q+A with Wan and Whannell, they were contractually obligated not to mention how little it cost.
Originally Posted by glassdragon
I can't fault them for taking advantage of people who are willing to pay for pretty much the exact same movie every time. I would do the same in their position.
It's kind of condescending to assume that most people are essentially tricked into watching them. Each chapter in the Saw franchise is no more or less "the same movie" as your average sequel, and even then, this is a gross generalization, since 70% of the first Saw takes place in a single room, the second one is 50-50 on two plotlines, the third one is built around flashbacks and the fourth is focused on the chronology. The only one that doesn't introduce anything new, really, is the fifth one, and it seems to be the least-popular among fans.
Old 10-06-09 | 02:25 PM
  #45  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 7,936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Somewhere out there... YES THERE!!!
Re: Saw VI (2009)

Originally Posted by droidguy1119
The first and second cost less than the others, I'm not sure why you're singling them out. When I saw the original at that Q+A with Wan and Whannell, they were contractually obligated not to mention how little it cost.It's kind of condescending to assume that most people are essentially tricked into watching them. Each chapter in the Saw franchise is no more or less "the same movie" as your average sequel, and even then, this is a gross generalization, since 70% of the first Saw takes place in a single room, the second one is 50-50 on two plotlines, the third one is built around flashbacks and the fourth is focused on the chronology. The only one that doesn't introduce anything new, really, is the fifth one, and it seems to be the least-popular among fans.
Yes, and most sequels are not that good since they are usually just a rehash of the original. To me it is rare to see a sequel that is any good since they rarely break new ground, or have some kind of original story. I personally go to movies for the story. I don't go to movies to know what is going to happen 90 percent of it since I've seen it before with 1 "twist" at the end. Same reason I don't see M. Night Shama... Shamala... that guys movies anymore.
Old 10-06-09 | 03:32 PM
  #46  
fumanstan's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 55,349
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
From: Irvine, CA
Re: Saw VI (2009)

Originally Posted by glassdragon
Yes, and most sequels are not that good since they are usually just a rehash of the original. To me it is rare to see a sequel that is any good since they rarely break new ground, or have some kind of original story. I personally go to movies for the story. I don't go to movies to know what is going to happen 90 percent of it since I've seen it before with 1 "twist" at the end. Same reason I don't see M. Night Shama... Shamala... that guys movies anymore.
Story is the reason why I enjoy the Saw series. As I said earlier, we're 5 sequels in and they're still unraveling major plot points and developing characters (and doing so without being too absurd).

Of course, the other side of the audience is going just to see the different death traps, and in that case there's something new every time out.
Old 10-06-09 | 04:38 PM
  #47  
Matthew Chmiel's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 13,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Las Vegas, NV
Re: Saw VI (2009)

Originally Posted by droidguy1119
The first and second cost less than the others, I'm not sure why you're singling them out.
Not counting marketing and distribution budgets, only production costs:

I: $2 million budget, $102 million worldwide gross.
II: $4 million budget, $155 million worldwide gross.
III: $10 million budget, $165 million worldwide gross.
IV: $10 million budget, $140 million worldwide gross.
V: $10 million budget, $135 million worldwide gross.

Even when you subtract the distribution costs, just think about how much money the films have made due to video rentals and sales. Even with the franchise losing steam at a progressive rate, the films still cost cheap enough that they're guaranteed a profit no matter what.

When I saw Zombieland the other night, I heard nothing but groans from the audience when the trailer for VI played. I still think it'll have a $25 - 30 million opening weekend; but I think it'll be the lowest grossing one in the franchise (domestically at least) unless there's a substantial jump in quality to get WOM better than the very lackluster perception of the last two.
Old 10-15-09 | 03:00 PM
  #48  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bay Area, CA
Re: Saw VI (2009)

Looks like Part VIII is the last...

http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news...s.php?id=12305

As much as I would go for more, I would like to see it end before it gets beyond far fetched I have enjoyed 1-5 very much and hope good things with VI. VII and VIII can close it up... but who will be the last apprentice? Jill? Gordon? Santa Claus?!
Old 10-15-09 | 03:09 PM
  #49  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,453
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Re: Saw VI (2009)

Last one. My ass.

I don't see why they can't start fresh at this point. Tying 8 movies together on what began as a shoestring plot to begin with is preposterous.
Old 10-15-09 | 04:28 PM
  #50  
islandclaws's Avatar
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,084
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Behind the Orange Curtain
Re: Saw VI (2009)

Sure, VIII will be the last one... theatrically. I have few doubts that they won't continue this series Jigsaw-less as a DTV property.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.