![]() |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
....I already knew that....guess I'll take that as a plot cuz it's a Bay film.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
I'm sure the macguffin will be either another doomsday device (like that sun smasher from the second movie) or a source of limitless power (like the AllSpark in the first) that Shockwave desperately seeks and is conveniently located on Earth. :shrug:
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
the macguffin this time will be finding the device that allows a skinny tool like Shia Lebeouf the ability to attract smoking hot chicks that are well out of his league.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
I'm still holding out hope for this film, but from the pics it looks like it will be just more running away from robots. Oh well.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Say what you will about Megan Fox, but she's definitely hotter than this new chick, who just feels generically waif-ish.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by Blu Man
(Post 10227446)
I'm still holding out hope for this film, but from the pics it looks like it will be just more running away from robots. Oh well.
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10227449)
Say what you will about Megan Fox, but she's definitely hotter than this new chick, who just feels generically waif-ish.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
I wonder how Sam explained to his friends how he got a new Camaro. One day he has a beat up old one then the next day he has a 2008 model. He sure couldn't tell them it was Bumblebee.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
I wonder how he's going to explain losing a hot piece of ass girlfriend and downgrading to the troll that's in this movie.
Never go backwards man. Always trade up. |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Maybe that hot piece of ass realized she could do better without the threat of getting squished by a robot? Or they kill her off between movies?
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
As much as I sneer at Megan Fox's acting, no denying she was much hotter in Transformers
http://coedmagazine.files.wordpress....sformers-8.jpg http://www.megansafox.com/news/data/...28Small%29.jpg |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 10227622)
Maybe that hot piece of ass realized she could do better without the threat of getting squished by a robot? Or they kill her off between movies?
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Or like that stupid female Decepticon in Transformers 2. *sigh*
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10227718)
Or like that stupid female Decepticon in Transformers 2. *sigh*
But blame the comics/toys for the Pretender in the second movie. That's where they come from. Personally, I had no problem with there being a Pretender. My issue is that for someone presumably sent to capture Sam, she didn't seem to have issue with outright killing him. I can understand killing him after the Doctor decided they only needed his brain but not before that order was issued. |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Michael Bay Shooting Transformers 3 with 3D Cameras http://media2.slashfilm.com/slashfil...ZZ4E16909C.jpg <object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DIs9hm3AsnU&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DIs9hm3AsnU&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object> I'm surprised and a little disappointed (as I prefer 35mm film over 2K digital any day of the week) but, if he was to have 3D in this movie, I'm glad they're doing it right. That said, I would have prefered more IMAX footage or a 70mm shoot. |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 10245633)
I'm surprised and a little disappointed (as I prefer 35mm film over 2K digital any day of the week) but, if he was to have 3D in this movie, I'm glad they're doing it right.
That said, I would have prefered more IMAX footage or a 70mm shoot. I too would much prefer 35mm, but I would like him to not shit all over the IMAX format again. The guy clearly has no idea how to shoot large format film, so I'd just prefer if he stayed away from it. |
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
I dunno. The forest battle was fantastic. It's a shame there weren't more scenes like that in the second movie.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 10245832)
I dunno. The forest battle was fantastic. It's a shame there weren't more scenes like that in the second movie.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Wow, from being completely anti-3-D to operating the camera himself? Way to do a 180. Also, I read that in order for the shots to actually be perceived by our eyes, they need to be at least 3 or more seconds long. Wonder if Bay got the memo on that yet?
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by bluetoast
(Post 10245849)
Wow, from being completely anti-3-D to operating the camera himself? Way to do a 180. Also, I read that in order for the shots to actually be perceived by our eyes, they need to be at least 3 or more seconds long. Wonder if Bay got the memo on that yet?
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by Blu Man
(Post 10245837)
He cut between the two negatives way to much. He would shoot part of a scene in 65mm and then the other part in 35mm, sometimes going back and forth several times in the same minute. It's annoying and extremely noticeable. It's just sloppy.
The only back and forth during the Devestator sequence was shot of Megatron and Starscream talking and a couple of shots of the Constructicons driving up to the... I dunno what it was. A dig site? For the most part, Devastator was all IMAX. The only letdown was when he climbed the pyramid where he was soley 35mm and poorly rendered to boot.
Originally Posted by bluetoast
(Post 10245849)
Wow, from being completely anti-3-D to operating the camera himself? Way to do a 180. Also, I read that in order for the shots to actually be perceived by our eyes, they need to be at least 3 or more seconds long. Wonder if Bay got the memo on that yet?
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by bluetoast
(Post 10245849)
Wow, from being completely anti-3-D to operating the camera himself? Way to do a 180. Also, I read that in order for the shots to actually be perceived by our eyes, they need to be at least 3 or more seconds long. Wonder if Bay got the memo on that yet?
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Megan Fox is way hotter than that chick could ever be. :down:
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Conveniently, her 10th-round-knockout face is obscured.
|
Re: Transformers 3 Announced
Originally Posted by KillerCannibal
(Post 10246780)
Conveniently, her 10th-round-knockout face is obscured.
Here's the ugly truth: Spoiler:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.