Highlander (2027, D: Stahelski) S: Cavill
09-15-11 | 09:52 AM
#76
Banned by request
Re: Highlander (2010)
Two is a hilarious, outrageous mess but at least they tried to explain how there could be more immortals after the events of the first film. I never bought the poor explanation of the third. If an immortal is alive, even if he's trapped in a cave, then he's alive, and Connor isn't the only one remaining at the end of the first film.
09-15-11 | 01:46 PM
#77
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Highlander (2010)
Two is a hilarious, outrageous mess but at least they tried to explain how there could be more immortals after the events of the first film. I never bought the poor explanation of the third. If an immortal is alive, even if he's trapped in a cave, then he's alive, and Connor isn't the only one remaining at the end of the first film.
Then the theatrical cut of Endgame added Duncan but used the first movie's rules. That is why there was no penalty for killing on Holy Ground. The producer's cut tried to rememdy that by deleting any mention that the Sanctuary was on Holy ground but then that begged the question as to why the watchers would be so stupid as to not build it on Holy Ground.
The Source was an abortion and is best forgotten.
Last edited by RocShemp; 09-15-11 at 06:04 PM.
09-15-11 | 02:05 PM
#78
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Highlander (2010)
Well I think anything after the first film you had to assume the closed nature of the story went out the window. They just took a successful premise and ran with it. Given how fun the tv series was for a bulk of the run I'm okay with that. However, the twists and turns of 2 were just dumb. It's amazing how writers/producers have so much time to work on sequels and churn out sub-par products. Maybe I'll have to go back and watch Endgame sometime soon, because from all the discussion it sounds worse than I recall.
04-05-12 | 02:30 AM
#79
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: Highlander (2010)
Juan Carlos Fresnadillo (28 Weeks Later, Intruders) is the new director.
HC: Is “Highlander” the next thing you’re going to do?
JCF: Probably. I wouldn’t say with total security that it’s going to be, because you never know in this industry. But I’m working on that and I’m so excited because I think there is a theme in that movie that really touches me. Again, the connection between the supernatural and the human side, immortality as a curse.
JCF: Probably. I wouldn’t say with total security that it’s going to be, because you never know in this industry. But I’m working on that and I’m so excited because I think there is a theme in that movie that really touches me. Again, the connection between the supernatural and the human side, immortality as a curse.
04-05-12 | 08:55 PM
#81
Banned by request
Re: Highlander (2010)
Get Ewan McGregor for Connor MacLeod. Let's have an actual Scot play the Highlander.
Vin Diesel for the Kurgan, and Antonio Banderas as Ramirez.
Vin Diesel for the Kurgan, and Antonio Banderas as Ramirez.
04-05-12 | 08:59 PM
#82
DVD Talk God
Re: Highlander (2010)
Since it's already 2012, Wanna change the thread title? 
Maybe just Highlander with the new Director's name?
Maybe just Highlander with the new Director's name?
04-05-12 | 09:11 PM
#84
DVD Talk God
re: Highlander (2027, D: Stahelski) S: Cavill
at the new thread title...Nice.
04-05-12 | 09:30 PM
#86
DVD Talk Hero
re: Highlander (2027, D: Stahelski) S: Cavill
I agree with Banderas. I always thought Thomas Jane would make for a good Mcleod.
04-05-12 | 10:45 PM
#87
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Highlander (2010)
Supermallet isn't the only one who think the Kurgan is an outstanding villain and the film as a whole is well crafted, especially the clever and ingenious transitions. Any reboot will be the antithesis of what the original presented. It will (probably) have forgettable characters, a bland soundtrack and/or score, predictable pacing, and will otherwise be unremarkable in a sea of other unremarkable films in whatever year it gets released.
IMO, the first film had style coming out its ears. Substance might've been a bit of a stretch, but we're not talking Pride and Prejudice. Mulcahy's direction combined with a great quotable script, fine cinematography, and outstanding scenery-chewing actors made for a very unique and memorable film. I just can't see any of that happening with a reboot/remake given the current "flash in a pan" method of filmmaking.
IMO, the first film had style coming out its ears. Substance might've been a bit of a stretch, but we're not talking Pride and Prejudice. Mulcahy's direction combined with a great quotable script, fine cinematography, and outstanding scenery-chewing actors made for a very unique and memorable film. I just can't see any of that happening with a reboot/remake given the current "flash in a pan" method of filmmaking.
Hell, even Highlander II, as bad as it is, still has some great sequences here and there.
04-06-12 | 07:33 AM
#88
Re: Highlander (2010)
Let's also not forget that 3 tried to shoehorn the Holy Ground penalties from the series (of which there were none in the first movie) while still ignoring Duncan altogether (while the series was currently airing).
Then the theatrical cut of Endgame added Duncan but used the first movie's rules. That is why there was no penalty for killing on Holy Ground. The producer's cut tried to rememdy that by deleting any mention that the Sanctuary was on Holy ground but then that begged the question as to why the watchers would be so stupid as to not build it on Holy Ground.
The Source was an abortion and is best forgotten.
Then the theatrical cut of Endgame added Duncan but used the first movie's rules. That is why there was no penalty for killing on Holy Ground. The producer's cut tried to rememdy that by deleting any mention that the Sanctuary was on Holy ground but then that begged the question as to why the watchers would be so stupid as to not build it on Holy Ground.
The Source was an abortion and is best forgotten.
I thought that was pretty funny at the time.
Now that I write this, maybe this scene occured in Endgame? Becuase Kell ignores holy ground?
I wish somebody would release the tv series in a nice compact complete set as opposed to the awful cardboard collection/expensive messes that are out now. And the 1st season blu-ray got AWFUL reviews.
I would actually like a reboot of the first movie to complement the original. I like the original but a new one could be great if done right. I imagine sword fights in the vein of the Kenobi/Maul fight in Episode 1.
Originally, The Source was supposed to be Duncan helping a group of young immortals figure out the game and be a "passing of the torch". When I saw it, I went like this:
04-06-12 | 07:52 AM
#89
DVD Talk Legend
re: Highlander (2027, D: Stahelski) S: Cavill
Highlander is not a good movie. I honestly can't understand why it had sequels and TV shows. It doesn't need to be remade.
04-06-12 | 10:29 AM
#90
DVD Talk Legend
re: Highlander (2027, D: Stahelski) S: Cavill
If you think it's bad, wouldn't that be a good reason to remake it? I've always felt the moves that can benefit the most from remakes are bad or mediocre.
04-06-12 | 11:10 AM
#91
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
re: Highlander (2027, D: Stahelski) S: Cavill
As an aside, I would say there is a memorable scene from H:II.
If I recall correctly, after the train yard sequence Connor and the lady end up back at his place. He's getting changed and she's surveying all of his old photos with some neat sound effects and music. Regardless of venue, I always found individuals reactions to the lives the characters have lived interesting.
If I recall correctly, after the train yard sequence Connor and the lady end up back at his place. He's getting changed and she's surveying all of his old photos with some neat sound effects and music. Regardless of venue, I always found individuals reactions to the lives the characters have lived interesting.
04-06-12 | 11:15 AM
#92
Banned by request
re: Highlander (2027, D: Stahelski) S: Cavill
This I can agree with. Not because Highlander is awful (it's clearly not), but because it's a self-contained story.
04-09-12 | 04:15 PM
#94
Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Winter Park, FL
Re: Highlander (2010)
Yeah, most of the film is dreck, but it's dreck with a tremendous amount of character.
This is why I worry when Highlander reboots are discussed. A lot of movies today are "studio directed", which convey no artistic individuality. Sure, they're very competently done, some are even a feast for the eyes, but ultimately forgettable when compared with the next Hollywood offering. Highlander II was anything but forgettable, with its thick atmosphere, striking camera angles and sweeps, lighting, set design, and framing. In fact, I'd go so far as to say Mulcahy was on directorial fire when he helmed Highlander II.
For Zeist!
04-09-12 | 04:36 PM
#95
Banned
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: Highlander (2010)
What can I say? I really, REALLY like Mulcahy's directorial style, which was on display in spades in Highlander II. Plus, that first quickening sequence, where Connor regains his immortality, has to be seen to be believed. Queen's music was used once again. And I've always liked Ironside (for better or worse).
Yeah, most of the film is dreck, but it's dreck with a tremendous amount of character.
This is why I worry when Highlander reboots are discussed. A lot of movies today are "studio directed", which convey no artistic individuality. Sure, they're very competently done, some are even a feast for the eyes, but ultimately forgettable when compared with the next Hollywood offering. Highlander II was anything but forgettable, with its thick atmosphere, striking camera angles and sweeps, lighting, set design, and framing. In fact, I'd go so far as to say Mulcahy was on directorial fire when he helmed Highlander II.
For Zeist!
Yeah, most of the film is dreck, but it's dreck with a tremendous amount of character.
This is why I worry when Highlander reboots are discussed. A lot of movies today are "studio directed", which convey no artistic individuality. Sure, they're very competently done, some are even a feast for the eyes, but ultimately forgettable when compared with the next Hollywood offering. Highlander II was anything but forgettable, with its thick atmosphere, striking camera angles and sweeps, lighting, set design, and framing. In fact, I'd go so far as to say Mulcahy was on directorial fire when he helmed Highlander II.
For Zeist!
04-10-12 | 06:45 AM
#96
DVD Talk Hero
05-06-12 | 10:09 PM
#97
DVD Talk Hero
re: Highlander (2027, D: Stahelski) S: Cavill
<object id="vid_a61d9ec7c912dafef5229c274d897ae3" class="ign-videoplayer" width="468" height="293" data="http://oystatic.ignimgs.com/src/core/swf/IGNPlayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="movie" value="http://oystatic.ignimgs.com/src/core/swf/IGNPlayer.swf" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="url=http://www.ign.com/videos/2012/03/27/highlander-reboot-news"/></object>
I don't like the notion of a "cover" to Princes of the Universe (or any of the Queen songs). Unless he uses the original song, it's best to keep it out of the remake entirely.
I don't like the notion of a "cover" to Princes of the Universe (or any of the Queen songs). Unless he uses the original song, it's best to keep it out of the remake entirely.
05-18-12 | 05:03 PM
#99
DVD Talk Hero
re: Highlander (2027, D: Stahelski) S: Cavill
Ryan Reynolds May Star in HIGHLANDER Reboot
I like Reynolds but... Booooo! 
Ryan Reynolds has had a difficult time getting his “action leading man” career to take off. He’s an undeniably talented guy, but he was only briefly seen as Deadpool in X-Men Origins: Wolverine, and Green Lantern failed to connect with audiences. He’s long been attached to a Deadpool spinoff film, but that project has been in the development stages for some time now. However, that all might change as Lionsgate/Summit is apparently keen on the actor taking the lead in their reboot of the Highlander franchise. Hit the jump for more.
Juan Carlos Fresnadillo (28 Weeks Later) is attached to direct the update, and Variety reports that Reynolds is the frontrunner to topline the project. Both sides are apparently very interested in working together and they’re in talks, but Variety cautions that Reynolds is also weighing other offers so this isn’t a done deal just yet. Fast Five’s Justin Lin was previously set to direct the reboot, but he left the project to focus on Fast and Furious 6. He still remains onboard as an executive producer.
Plot details on the reboot are slim, but the original 1986 film starred Christopher Lambert as an immortal swordsman. Reynolds has plenty of experience with a blade, as he showed off his skills in X-Men Origins: Wolverine. The actor has been carefully weighing his options after the success of this year’s Safe House, so he could very well end up choosing a film besides Highlander as his next project.
When Fresnadillo signed on, a Spring 2012 production start-date was planned. That looks unlikely, but if Reynolds does sign on filming should get underway sometime this year. The actor recently wrapped the supernatural action-comedy R.I.P.D. alongside Jeff Bridges.
Juan Carlos Fresnadillo (28 Weeks Later) is attached to direct the update, and Variety reports that Reynolds is the frontrunner to topline the project. Both sides are apparently very interested in working together and they’re in talks, but Variety cautions that Reynolds is also weighing other offers so this isn’t a done deal just yet. Fast Five’s Justin Lin was previously set to direct the reboot, but he left the project to focus on Fast and Furious 6. He still remains onboard as an executive producer.
Plot details on the reboot are slim, but the original 1986 film starred Christopher Lambert as an immortal swordsman. Reynolds has plenty of experience with a blade, as he showed off his skills in X-Men Origins: Wolverine. The actor has been carefully weighing his options after the success of this year’s Safe House, so he could very well end up choosing a film besides Highlander as his next project.
When Fresnadillo signed on, a Spring 2012 production start-date was planned. That looks unlikely, but if Reynolds does sign on filming should get underway sometime this year. The actor recently wrapped the supernatural action-comedy R.I.P.D. alongside Jeff Bridges.