View Poll Results: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
Voters: 250. You may not vote on this poll
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
#127
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
Wow, the quote that came to mind was "Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing" when watching this film. I get the feeling Michael Bay gets a script, and then just picks the pages he wants to film because he thinks it'll look and sound cool on the big screen. But, Michael Bay is a known directorial quantity, you know he doesn't care about plot development, character development, and always goes for cheap laughs and bombastic action sequences, never provides enough cinematic connective tissue to make his films dramatically engaging, all the while providing top-shelf action porn.
So, Transformers 2 is truly bigger and louder than the initial installment, but not better, and simply goes to well of "robot-on-robot" violence too many times, and its sparse dramatic beats lack subtlety or weight. It's like a live-action cartoon, but it's even more over-the-top than the average Saturday morning cartoon, trading quick, swishy camera moves for what could have been awe-inspiring transformations. The tension from "danger" is both cartoonish and unconvincing, leaving us with 1-dimensional characters and caricatures who don't provide any emotional engagement for us to hook into their situation.
There is, what seemed to be, a 30 minute stretch where it was the cinematic equivalent of watching the characters running in place in quicksand, a lot of action was going on, but nothing was happening until they introduced a deux ex machina to get the gang from point A to a far away point B. There was just a ridiculous amount of story-telling deficiencies going on in this film.
I think I seriously overdosed on all the robot carnage and explosions on the screen, after a while you just get numb to it all.
I give it 1.75 stars, or a grade of C-.
So, Transformers 2 is truly bigger and louder than the initial installment, but not better, and simply goes to well of "robot-on-robot" violence too many times, and its sparse dramatic beats lack subtlety or weight. It's like a live-action cartoon, but it's even more over-the-top than the average Saturday morning cartoon, trading quick, swishy camera moves for what could have been awe-inspiring transformations. The tension from "danger" is both cartoonish and unconvincing, leaving us with 1-dimensional characters and caricatures who don't provide any emotional engagement for us to hook into their situation.
There is, what seemed to be, a 30 minute stretch where it was the cinematic equivalent of watching the characters running in place in quicksand, a lot of action was going on, but nothing was happening until they introduced a deux ex machina to get the gang from point A to a far away point B. There was just a ridiculous amount of story-telling deficiencies going on in this film.
I think I seriously overdosed on all the robot carnage and explosions on the screen, after a while you just get numb to it all.
I give it 1.75 stars, or a grade of C-.
Last edited by Patman; 06-24-09 at 01:49 PM.
#128
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Janitor's closet in Kinnick Stadium
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
Can't wait to see this abortion saturday in IMAX. (real IMAX that is) Hope it's as bad as everyone says.
#129
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
Can anyone confirm if this is "old school" Michael Bay (i.e. Armageddon, Bad Boys 2: nonstop quick cuts and frenetic editing), or "new school" (i.e. The Island, Transformers 1: kinda like old Bay but the cuts aren't as fast and the editing a little slower)?
I prefer old school!
I prefer old school!
#133
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#134
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
Only a few minutes of the film are shot in true IMAX, and those minutes are not complete sequences. Random shots will appear in IMAX, meaning that the aspect-ratio for just one shot will change. Take into account how quick your average Michael Bay shot is and you'll understand how bizarre this decision was. Another sign that nobody making the movie gave a shit.
#135
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Janitor's closet in Kinnick Stadium
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
Only a few minutes of the film are shot in true IMAX, and those minutes are not complete sequences. Random shots will appear in IMAX, meaning that the aspect-ratio for just one shot will change. Take into account how quick your average Michael Bay shot is and you'll understand how bizarre this decision was. Another sign that nobody making the movie gave a shit.
#137
Senior Member
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
i really don't know why people are complaining.
i watched the 1986 movie, and then the first bay transformers movie tuesday evening prior to this. Revenge of the Fallen felt much more like the 86 movie than Transformers 1 did.
the humor did go a little over the top, i'll give you that. I could have done without Sam's mom getting wacked out on special brownies. there was a lot of silly humor in 1986 Transformers as well. beyond the baked Mom though, it was an excellent, enjoyable film...for what it is (a movie based on a cartoon).
as far as the action being too jumbled, i didnt think so. i thought they did a much better job of focusing the action and making it clearer what was happening than in the first. maybe the rest of you were tired or maybe my eyesight is better, i dont know, but i could tell who and what was fighting more often than not.
the fight in the forest was epic.
optimus merging with the older robot at the end reminded me of Optimal Optimus Primal from Beast Wars. he was bad ass.
i did not make the connection that Skid and Mudflaps were portrayed as stereotypical black people. if anything I just figured they were juvenille brothers.
i watched the 1986 movie, and then the first bay transformers movie tuesday evening prior to this. Revenge of the Fallen felt much more like the 86 movie than Transformers 1 did.
the humor did go a little over the top, i'll give you that. I could have done without Sam's mom getting wacked out on special brownies. there was a lot of silly humor in 1986 Transformers as well. beyond the baked Mom though, it was an excellent, enjoyable film...for what it is (a movie based on a cartoon).
as far as the action being too jumbled, i didnt think so. i thought they did a much better job of focusing the action and making it clearer what was happening than in the first. maybe the rest of you were tired or maybe my eyesight is better, i dont know, but i could tell who and what was fighting more often than not.
the fight in the forest was epic.
optimus merging with the older robot at the end reminded me of Optimal Optimus Primal from Beast Wars. he was bad ass.
i did not make the connection that Skid and Mudflaps were portrayed as stereotypical black people. if anything I just figured they were juvenille brothers.
#139
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
'Transformers' opens with $16 million
Nabs best midnight run ever for a Wednesday
Paramount's "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" grossed an estimated $16 million in midnight runs, the second best ever after "The Dark Knight."
"Dark Knight" earned $18.5 million in midnight showings, but had the advantage of opening on a Friday.
"Transformers 2" played in roughly 3,000 runs beginning at 12:01 ayem on Wednesday. It's the best midnight run ever for a movie opening on a Wednesday.
Film expands today into a total of 4,226 runs.
http://www.variety.com/article/VR111...&cs=1&nid=2854
Nabs best midnight run ever for a Wednesday
Paramount's "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" grossed an estimated $16 million in midnight runs, the second best ever after "The Dark Knight."
"Dark Knight" earned $18.5 million in midnight showings, but had the advantage of opening on a Friday.
"Transformers 2" played in roughly 3,000 runs beginning at 12:01 ayem on Wednesday. It's the best midnight run ever for a movie opening on a Wednesday.
Film expands today into a total of 4,226 runs.
http://www.variety.com/article/VR111...&cs=1&nid=2854
#140
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
I agree with your list of cons, but you gave the movie 4 out of 5 stars. Your cons are the very reason why this movie is an epic fail, IMO. Your pros don't seem like a strong enough reason to give it such a high mark.
If the action in the big fight scenes is almost unrecognizable, then isn't that a major issue?
And years ago, all of Bay's sweeping camera movements, quick editing and slow motion was kind of cool. But, I'm really over it now it's all flash and no substance. Like eating candy all day with no real food.
If the action in the big fight scenes is almost unrecognizable, then isn't that a major issue?
And years ago, all of Bay's sweeping camera movements, quick editing and slow motion was kind of cool. But, I'm really over it now it's all flash and no substance. Like eating candy all day with no real food.
#141
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
The only way anyone could like this "film" is if they're young, they grew up with the toys, and/or watched the cartoon.
Coming into this thing cold is futile. It's a colossal piece of shit.
Michael Bay's camera will make you want to rip your eyes out, I guarantee.
Coming into this thing cold is futile. It's a colossal piece of shit.
Michael Bay's camera will make you want to rip your eyes out, I guarantee.
#142
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
But if you look at the pros I really did enjoy it. And I will be seeing it again. I did enjoy the humor but it was OTT and not all jokes hit their target. I loved the final battle but it could have got there 30 mins earlier. That sort of thing.
There were too many robots, and most of them are the small ones and they seem to use them to get around story problems.
The way I look at it is this. When Revenge of the Sith came out Lucas said that the last saber fight would last for 15 minutes and you think "Cool!". Yet when you are watching it you think "Just finish it! it's taking too long".
Same thing with this. You want more robots then there are too many. You want more action and then you just want to get to the end battle all the while thinking you have seen certain plot points and action scenes before.
Like I said before I'm going to see this again next Tuesday.
There were too many robots, and most of them are the small ones and they seem to use them to get around story problems.
The way I look at it is this. When Revenge of the Sith came out Lucas said that the last saber fight would last for 15 minutes and you think "Cool!". Yet when you are watching it you think "Just finish it! it's taking too long".
Same thing with this. You want more robots then there are too many. You want more action and then you just want to get to the end battle all the while thinking you have seen certain plot points and action scenes before.
Like I said before I'm going to see this again next Tuesday.
#144
DVD Talk Legend
#145
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 9,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
Oh yeah, two other things I wanted to mention. 1. Could Green Day's 21 Guns have been used any more? I mean they played it like 4 damn times (instrumental and regular)...I love Green Day but that was excessive and 2. Could we put a moratorium on the scene where someone's heart stops and they have to be revived - but since it's a character we know can't possibly die, there is no tension whatsoever... the use of that in big blockbusters is getting tiresome.
#146
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Janitor's closet in Kinnick Stadium
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
Oh yeah, two other things I wanted to mention. 1. Could Green Day's 21 Guns have been used any more? I mean they played it like 4 damn times (instrumental and regular)...I love Green Day but that was excessive and 2. Could we put a moratorium on the scene where someone's heart stops and they have to be revived - but since it's a character we know can't possibly die, there is no tension whatsoever... the use of that in big blockbusters is getting tiresome.
How many times does that crappy Linkin Park song play?
#147
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
i really don't know why people are complaining.
i watched the 1986 movie, and then the first bay transformers movie tuesday evening prior to this. Revenge of the Fallen felt much more like the 86 movie than Transformers 1 did.
the humor did go a little over the top, i'll give you that. I could have done without Sam's mom getting wacked out on special brownies. there was a lot of silly humor in 1986 Transformers as well. beyond the baked Mom though, it was an excellent, enjoyable film...for what it is (a movie based on a cartoon).
as far as the action being too jumbled, i didnt think so. i thought they did a much better job of focusing the action and making it clearer what was happening than in the first. maybe the rest of you were tired or maybe my eyesight is better, i dont know, but i could tell who and what was fighting more often than not.
the fight in the forest was epic.
optimus merging with the older robot at the end reminded me of Optimal Optimus Primal from Beast Wars. he was bad ass.
i did not make the connection that Skid and Mudflaps were portrayed as stereotypical black people. if anything I just figured they were juvenille brothers.
i watched the 1986 movie, and then the first bay transformers movie tuesday evening prior to this. Revenge of the Fallen felt much more like the 86 movie than Transformers 1 did.
the humor did go a little over the top, i'll give you that. I could have done without Sam's mom getting wacked out on special brownies. there was a lot of silly humor in 1986 Transformers as well. beyond the baked Mom though, it was an excellent, enjoyable film...for what it is (a movie based on a cartoon).
as far as the action being too jumbled, i didnt think so. i thought they did a much better job of focusing the action and making it clearer what was happening than in the first. maybe the rest of you were tired or maybe my eyesight is better, i dont know, but i could tell who and what was fighting more often than not.
the fight in the forest was epic.
optimus merging with the older robot at the end reminded me of Optimal Optimus Primal from Beast Wars. he was bad ass.
i did not make the connection that Skid and Mudflaps were portrayed as stereotypical black people. if anything I just figured they were juvenille brothers.
I actually don't think he went far enough "over the top" And what we've ended up with is a realistic setting with unrealistic actions.
The Smithsonian Aerospace Museum only has like... 4 guards? Right...
You can put a decepticon in your checked baggage? Right...
You can get high off a pot brownie that small? Right...
Where the hell were all the Autobots when Opimus got OWNED by the Decepticons?
What I could not believe all the testicle jokes, the "gangsta" twins (which every 18-25 joe schmo white rapper fan will love), and generally lots of potty humor. That brought the film waaay down for me.
That and I don't find Meagan Fox's brand of hot... hot. I'm not big into chicks with no personality that let their titties bounce around for 3 hours.
#148
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 9,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
^I think it's only twice - once as part of the score, then for 2 minutes during the credits.
I think she had already chowed down on a few brownies by the time we see her show them the bag....
I think she had already chowed down on a few brownies by the time we see her show them the bag....
Last edited by mdc3000; 06-24-09 at 01:27 PM.
#149
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 3,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
Well I seen it last night I thought it was pretty awesome. I liked it alot. I loved the first one though. I do feel both movies are too long though. I thought the first half was pretty awesome. Thuough I am not a fan of john turturro in these movies. I seen it with a pretty full audience and they seemed to really enjoy it. They were laughing at all the jokes, and I thought the action was excellent.
I dont get the hate of this movie or Micheal Bay. These are fun movies and most of all of Micheal Bay movies are a ton of fun, and are great popcorn movies. Some of these post are just dumb, its a transformers movies. Stop trying to find things that are unrealsitc and just sit back and enjoy. I mean its a movie with Cars that transform to alien robots.
Some people just start going negative when they just hear Micheal Bay. I think hes one of the best Action directors today and one that still uses alot of practical effects. I think hes movies are always exciting, always great looking and just are alot of fun.
I dont get the hate of this movie or Micheal Bay. These are fun movies and most of all of Micheal Bay movies are a ton of fun, and are great popcorn movies. Some of these post are just dumb, its a transformers movies. Stop trying to find things that are unrealsitc and just sit back and enjoy. I mean its a movie with Cars that transform to alien robots.
Some people just start going negative when they just hear Micheal Bay. I think hes one of the best Action directors today and one that still uses alot of practical effects. I think hes movies are always exciting, always great looking and just are alot of fun.
Last edited by maingon; 06-24-09 at 01:36 PM.
#150
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) The Reviews Thread
But I guess we all find different things important in our movies. I need to be able to clearly follow the action and some more plot. I mean, Shia is a hottie, but not hot enough to make my rating go up.
I can even see someone defending this movie as a guilty pleasure, I have quite a few. I've been known to watch Catwoman everytime it airs on TBS, but I know that I should hang my head in shame because I do...it's bad. This isn't even "so bad it's good" bad, it's really just pitiful.
Last edited by iggystar; 06-24-09 at 01:44 PM.