Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters
View Poll Results: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
6.00%
3.60%
16.00%
9.20%
12.80%
6.00%
10.00%
6.80%
8.00%
2.80%
3.20%
I have no desire to avenge the fallen and transform into a moviegoer for this.
15.60%
Voters: 250. You may not vote on this poll

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-09, 10:29 AM
  #126  
TGM
DVD Talk Legend
 
TGM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,974
Received 401 Likes on 250 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread



George Bush doesn't care about Autobots.
Old 06-24-09, 10:43 AM
  #127  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Duluth, GA, USA
Posts: 37,797
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Wow, the quote that came to mind was "Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing" when watching this film. I get the feeling Michael Bay gets a script, and then just picks the pages he wants to film because he thinks it'll look and sound cool on the big screen. But, Michael Bay is a known directorial quantity, you know he doesn't care about plot development, character development, and always goes for cheap laughs and bombastic action sequences, never provides enough cinematic connective tissue to make his films dramatically engaging, all the while providing top-shelf action porn.

So, Transformers 2 is truly bigger and louder than the initial installment, but not better, and simply goes to well of "robot-on-robot" violence too many times, and its sparse dramatic beats lack subtlety or weight. It's like a live-action cartoon, but it's even more over-the-top than the average Saturday morning cartoon, trading quick, swishy camera moves for what could have been awe-inspiring transformations. The tension from "danger" is both cartoonish and unconvincing, leaving us with 1-dimensional characters and caricatures who don't provide any emotional engagement for us to hook into their situation.

There is, what seemed to be, a 30 minute stretch where it was the cinematic equivalent of watching the characters running in place in quicksand, a lot of action was going on, but nothing was happening until they introduced a deux ex machina to get the gang from point A to a far away point B. There was just a ridiculous amount of story-telling deficiencies going on in this film.

I think I seriously overdosed on all the robot carnage and explosions on the screen, after a while you just get numb to it all.

I give it 1.75 stars, or a grade of C-.

Last edited by Patman; 06-24-09 at 01:49 PM.
Old 06-24-09, 10:46 AM
  #128  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mopower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Janitor's closet in Kinnick Stadium
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Can't wait to see this abortion saturday in IMAX. (real IMAX that is) Hope it's as bad as everyone says.
Old 06-24-09, 10:51 AM
  #129  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by hapgilmore
Can anyone confirm if this is "old school" Michael Bay (i.e. Armageddon, Bad Boys 2: nonstop quick cuts and frenetic editing), or "new school" (i.e. The Island, Transformers 1: kinda like old Bay but the cuts aren't as fast and the editing a little slower)?

I prefer old school!
Anybody?
Old 06-24-09, 10:51 AM
  #130  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Michael Corvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 62,520
Received 913 Likes on 648 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Mopower
Can't wait to see this abortion saturday in IMAX. (real IMAX that is) Hope it's as bad as everyone says.
Old 06-24-09, 11:04 AM
  #131  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by hapgilmore
Anybody?
old school.
Old 06-24-09, 11:16 AM
  #132  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

^ Thank you. Now i'm excited!
Old 06-24-09, 11:24 AM
  #133  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by hapgilmore
^ Thank you. Now i'm excited!
i actually thought, this is the bad boys 2 version of transformers, after seeing it. and that was a good thing.
Old 06-24-09, 11:28 AM
  #134  
DVD Talk Hero
 
slop101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 43,911
Received 445 Likes on 312 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Mopower
Can't wait to see this abortion saturday in IMAX. (real IMAX that is) Hope it's as bad as everyone says.
Only a few minutes of the film are shot in true IMAX, and those minutes are not complete sequences. Random shots will appear in IMAX, meaning that the aspect-ratio for just one shot will change. Take into account how quick your average Michael Bay shot is and you'll understand how bizarre this decision was. Another sign that nobody making the movie gave a shit.
Old 06-24-09, 11:50 AM
  #135  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mopower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Janitor's closet in Kinnick Stadium
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by slop101
Only a few minutes of the film are shot in true IMAX, and those minutes are not complete sequences. Random shots will appear in IMAX, meaning that the aspect-ratio for just one shot will change. Take into account how quick your average Michael Bay shot is and you'll understand how bizarre this decision was. Another sign that nobody making the movie gave a shit.
Oh well. Luckily the IMAX prices were the same as a regular theater prices. And still it's a giant ass screen.
Old 06-24-09, 11:59 AM
  #136  
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
GenPion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,665
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

I can't believe this movie exists.



I mean, I can... but I'm trying to pretend that it doesn't.
Old 06-24-09, 12:16 PM
  #137  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Stu 17
i really don't know why people are complaining.

i watched the 1986 movie, and then the first bay transformers movie tuesday evening prior to this. Revenge of the Fallen felt much more like the 86 movie than Transformers 1 did.

the humor did go a little over the top, i'll give you that. I could have done without Sam's mom getting wacked out on special brownies. there was a lot of silly humor in 1986 Transformers as well. beyond the baked Mom though, it was an excellent, enjoyable film...for what it is (a movie based on a cartoon).

as far as the action being too jumbled, i didnt think so. i thought they did a much better job of focusing the action and making it clearer what was happening than in the first. maybe the rest of you were tired or maybe my eyesight is better, i dont know, but i could tell who and what was fighting more often than not.

the fight in the forest was epic.

optimus merging with the older robot at the end reminded me of Optimal Optimus Primal from Beast Wars. he was bad ass.

i did not make the connection that Skid and Mudflaps were portrayed as stereotypical black people. if anything I just figured they were juvenille brothers.
ROTF actually followed the source material of the cartoons quite a bit more than the first. i remember one episode actually featured the decepticons trying to destroy the sun for energon cubes. we finally get the matrix of leadership. soundwave's voice was done by welker. we get more megatron/starscream bantering. for anyone to say this was not close to the source material.....flat out did not watch the G1 series. after seeing what 20th century Fox does to its marvel movies, that's what the term "bastardization" comes from.
Old 06-24-09, 12:17 PM
  #138  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

So I take it this movie is awesome?
Old 06-24-09, 12:19 PM
  #139  
DVD Talk Legend
 
stingermck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Cobra Island
Posts: 17,130
Received 427 Likes on 291 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

'Transformers' opens with $16 million

Nabs best midnight run ever for a Wednesday

Paramount's "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" grossed an estimated $16 million in midnight runs, the second best ever after "The Dark Knight."
"Dark Knight" earned $18.5 million in midnight showings, but had the advantage of opening on a Friday.

"Transformers 2" played in roughly 3,000 runs beginning at 12:01 ayem on Wednesday. It's the best midnight run ever for a movie opening on a Wednesday.

Film expands today into a total of 4,226 runs.

http://www.variety.com/article/VR111...&cs=1&nid=2854
Old 06-24-09, 12:35 PM
  #140  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: detroit, MI, USA
Posts: 3,669
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

I agree with your list of cons, but you gave the movie 4 out of 5 stars. Your cons are the very reason why this movie is an epic fail, IMO. Your pros don't seem like a strong enough reason to give it such a high mark.

If the action in the big fight scenes is almost unrecognizable, then isn't that a major issue?

And years ago, all of Bay's sweeping camera movements, quick editing and slow motion was kind of cool. But, I'm really over it now it's all flash and no substance. Like eating candy all day with no real food.
Old 06-24-09, 12:37 PM
  #141  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,381
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

The only way anyone could like this "film" is if they're young, they grew up with the toys, and/or watched the cartoon.




Coming into this thing cold is futile. It's a colossal piece of shit.

Michael Bay's camera will make you want to rip your eyes out, I guarantee.
Old 06-24-09, 12:42 PM
  #142  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: london
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

But if you look at the pros I really did enjoy it. And I will be seeing it again. I did enjoy the humor but it was OTT and not all jokes hit their target. I loved the final battle but it could have got there 30 mins earlier. That sort of thing.

There were too many robots, and most of them are the small ones and they seem to use them to get around story problems.
The way I look at it is this. When Revenge of the Sith came out Lucas said that the last saber fight would last for 15 minutes and you think "Cool!". Yet when you are watching it you think "Just finish it! it's taking too long".

Same thing with this. You want more robots then there are too many. You want more action and then you just want to get to the end battle all the while thinking you have seen certain plot points and action scenes before.

Like I said before I'm going to see this again next Tuesday.
Old 06-24-09, 12:42 PM
  #143  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mopower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Janitor's closet in Kinnick Stadium
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by jeffkjoe
The only way anyone could like this "film" is if they're young, they grew up with the toys, and/or watched the cartoon.




Why else would anyone watch it?
Old 06-24-09, 12:46 PM
  #144  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 11,311
Received 290 Likes on 211 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
So I take it this movie is awesome?

Gizmo, please PLEASE change your Avatar! Now THAT makes me want to rip my eyes out. Or his.
Old 06-24-09, 12:56 PM
  #145  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
mdc3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 9,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Oh yeah, two other things I wanted to mention. 1. Could Green Day's 21 Guns have been used any more? I mean they played it like 4 damn times (instrumental and regular)...I love Green Day but that was excessive and 2. Could we put a moratorium on the scene where someone's heart stops and they have to be revived - but since it's a character we know can't possibly die, there is no tension whatsoever... the use of that in big blockbusters is getting tiresome.
Old 06-24-09, 01:04 PM
  #146  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mopower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Janitor's closet in Kinnick Stadium
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by mdc3000
Oh yeah, two other things I wanted to mention. 1. Could Green Day's 21 Guns have been used any more? I mean they played it like 4 damn times (instrumental and regular)...I love Green Day but that was excessive and 2. Could we put a moratorium on the scene where someone's heart stops and they have to be revived - but since it's a character we know can't possibly die, there is no tension whatsoever... the use of that in big blockbusters is getting tiresome.

How many times does that crappy Linkin Park song play?
Old 06-24-09, 01:24 PM
  #147  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Stu 17
i really don't know why people are complaining.

i watched the 1986 movie, and then the first bay transformers movie tuesday evening prior to this. Revenge of the Fallen felt much more like the 86 movie than Transformers 1 did.

the humor did go a little over the top, i'll give you that. I could have done without Sam's mom getting wacked out on special brownies. there was a lot of silly humor in 1986 Transformers as well. beyond the baked Mom though, it was an excellent, enjoyable film...for what it is (a movie based on a cartoon).

as far as the action being too jumbled, i didnt think so. i thought they did a much better job of focusing the action and making it clearer what was happening than in the first. maybe the rest of you were tired or maybe my eyesight is better, i dont know, but i could tell who and what was fighting more often than not.

the fight in the forest was epic.

optimus merging with the older robot at the end reminded me of Optimal Optimus Primal from Beast Wars. he was bad ass.

i did not make the connection that Skid and Mudflaps were portrayed as stereotypical black people. if anything I just figured they were juvenille brothers.
There's a point where sticking too close to the animated source material does not work though... and becomes ridiculous... especially when Bay claims to be shooting for "realism" through his changes to more realistic bot designs and military involvement.

I actually don't think he went far enough "over the top" And what we've ended up with is a realistic setting with unrealistic actions.

The Smithsonian Aerospace Museum only has like... 4 guards? Right...
You can put a decepticon in your checked baggage? Right...
You can get high off a pot brownie that small? Right...
Where the hell were all the Autobots when Opimus got OWNED by the Decepticons?

What I could not believe all the testicle jokes, the "gangsta" twins (which every 18-25 joe schmo white rapper fan will love), and generally lots of potty humor. That brought the film waaay down for me.

That and I don't find Meagan Fox's brand of hot... hot. I'm not big into chicks with no personality that let their titties bounce around for 3 hours.
Old 06-24-09, 01:24 PM
  #148  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
mdc3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 9,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Mopower
How many times does that crappy Linkin Park song play?
^I think it's only twice - once as part of the score, then for 2 minutes during the credits.

Originally Posted by RobLutter
You can get high off a pot brownie that small?
I think she had already chowed down on a few brownies by the time we see her show them the bag....

Last edited by mdc3000; 06-24-09 at 01:27 PM.
Old 06-24-09, 01:33 PM
  #149  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 3,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Well I seen it last night I thought it was pretty awesome. I liked it alot. I loved the first one though. I do feel both movies are too long though. I thought the first half was pretty awesome. Thuough I am not a fan of john turturro in these movies. I seen it with a pretty full audience and they seemed to really enjoy it. They were laughing at all the jokes, and I thought the action was excellent.


I dont get the hate of this movie or Micheal Bay. These are fun movies and most of all of Micheal Bay movies are a ton of fun, and are great popcorn movies. Some of these post are just dumb, its a transformers movies. Stop trying to find things that are unrealsitc and just sit back and enjoy. I mean its a movie with Cars that transform to alien robots.

Some people just start going negative when they just hear Micheal Bay. I think hes one of the best Action directors today and one that still uses alot of practical effects. I think hes movies are always exciting, always great looking and just are alot of fun.

Last edited by maingon; 06-24-09 at 01:36 PM.
Old 06-24-09, 01:41 PM
  #150  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: detroit, MI, USA
Posts: 3,669
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by jdslater1
But if you look at the pros I really did enjoy it. And I will be seeing it again.
Yes, I see that you enjoyed it by your 4/5 rating, I don't doubt that. And I agree with your cons as well. But the cons are major...not being able to really see the bots in the fight scenes is something that would seem to drop your high rating down a little bit more.

But I guess we all find different things important in our movies. I need to be able to clearly follow the action and some more plot. I mean, Shia is a hottie, but not hot enough to make my rating go up.

I can even see someone defending this movie as a guilty pleasure, I have quite a few. I've been known to watch Catwoman everytime it airs on TBS, but I know that I should hang my head in shame because I do...it's bad. This isn't even "so bad it's good" bad, it's really just pitiful.

Last edited by iggystar; 06-24-09 at 01:44 PM.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.