What actor are you surpised isn't a bigger star?
#52
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sometimes actors self-select the avoidance of becoming a big star. One person mentioned here was Patrick Swayze. I looked up his credits on IMDb, and there's a quote from him that he chose to stop doing starring roles in big projects when his career was still hot, one reason being that he's a recovering alcoholic. Not every person is made to handle that kind of pressure. It might also not be personally fulfilling to do projects for the sake of money and stardom. Billy Crudup used to get a lot of press coverage several years ago as "the next big thing," but his career didn't really go that way, mostly because of choices he made. It's one thing for actors to really want stardom or whatever passes for that; it's another thing if it's just their publicists or film producers who are the ones trying to push them in that direction.
#53
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Peoples Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 3,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Legolas
And definitely agree with Alicia Silverstone. Clueless was supposed to elevate her to a whole new level, but it's where she peaked.
#54
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So last night was a slow night at work, and I'm passing the time reading DVDTalk(the Best Buy thread in the Store Forum is great, btw). One of my supervisors walks up on me and barks "What the hell are you doing, better not be on that Myspace crap!" I said "No sir, just browsing a movie forum. Don't look at stuff at work that can get me in trouble." Just as I say that, I'm scrolling through the second page of this thread, and the shirtless pics of Jan Michael Vincent and Orlando Bloom pop up. I'm like "oh hell", but he just started laughing and said "Wait until I tell everyone you're looking at gay porn up here!" and walked off laughing.
#56
Member
Originally Posted by KingSmoth
So last night was a slow night at work, and I'm passing the time reading DVDTalk(the Best Buy thread in the Store Forum is great, btw). One of my supervisors walks up on me and barks "What the hell are you doing, better not be on that Myspace crap!" I said "No sir, just browsing a movie forum. Don't look at stuff at work that can get me in trouble." Just as I say that, I'm scrolling through the second page of this thread, and the shirtless pics of Jan Michael Vincent and Orlando Bloom pop up. I'm like "oh hell", but he just started laughing and said "Wait until I tell everyone you're looking at gay porn up here!" and walked off laughing.

#58
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 62,004
Received 1,237 Likes
on
823 Posts
Originally Posted by Mercury&Solace
Poor roles? I disagree. Post X-Men.... I not only think he is a very talented actor, AND he has been able to shed the type casting of Wolverine, while still doing a Wolverine movie. He also takes challenging and thought provoking roles that test his acting ability. Yes Van Helsing IMO was garbage, and Swordfish was ok (never saw Kate & Leopold) but he did The Prestige and The Fountain, which I thought were both superb movies, with some great performances by him. I will even say that his performance in The Fountain was Oscar worthy. I say he is a pretty big star.
Agreed. Plus didn't he get lots praise for his stage stuff? I'm not sure how much of it he did though.
#62
DVD Talk Legend
What about Mark Hammill? He was the lead in what was (at the time) the biggest movie of all time. Except for the two sequels, he's done little of note except for voice over work. All the prize roles and the big career went to supporting actor Harrison Ford.
#63
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Michael Paré. Was supposed to be the breakout star of the early 80's but never could find the right movie. Instead he's gone on to a very successful b-movie career. He certainly had screen presence (imo) to be a star based on his performances in "Eddie and the Cruisers" and "Streets of Fire".
Maxwell Caulfield. Similar story as Paré. Starred in Grease 2, the movie that was supposed to turn him and his co-star Michelle Pfeiffer into superstars. Movie bombed and his career never took off.
Maxwell Caulfield. Similar story as Paré. Starred in Grease 2, the movie that was supposed to turn him and his co-star Michelle Pfeiffer into superstars. Movie bombed and his career never took off.
#64
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Jason
What about Mark Hammill? He was the lead in what was (at the time) the biggest movie of all time. Except for the two sequels, he's done little of note except for voice over work. All the prize roles and the big career went to supporting actor Harrison Ford.
#65
DVD Talk Legend
Costas Mandylor
the name makes me laugh when I remember he was suppose to be the next big thing.
Freddie Prinze Jr is now writing scripts for the WWE.
the name makes me laugh when I remember he was suppose to be the next big thing.
Freddie Prinze Jr is now writing scripts for the WWE.
#66
Poor roles? I disagree. Post X-Men.... I not only think he is a very talented actor, AND he has been able to shed the type casting of Wolverine, while still doing a Wolverine movie. He also takes challenging and thought provoking roles that test his acting ability. Yes Van Helsing IMO was garbage, and Swordfish was ok (never saw Kate & Leopold) but he did The Prestige and The Fountain, which I thought were both superb movies, with some great performances by him. I will even say that his performance in The Fountain was Oscar worthy. I say he is a pretty big star.
Even with The Dark Knight, I think Heath Ledger qualifies if only because of his untimely death. He would be an A-list star had he stayed alive.
#72
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Jan Michael Vincent.
I can't find the quotes, and I'm kind of surprised they aren't on wiki, but back in the 70s, quite a few Hollywood people felt that JMV would be the greatest thing ever to come out of Hollywood, and as we all know, he has been anything but.
Then:

Most recent I could find, 1996...lots of drugs/drinking and a couple of car accidents later:

I can't find the quotes, and I'm kind of surprised they aren't on wiki, but back in the 70s, quite a few Hollywood people felt that JMV would be the greatest thing ever to come out of Hollywood, and as we all know, he has been anything but.
Then:

Most recent I could find, 1996...lots of drugs/drinking and a couple of car accidents later:

#74
Senior Member
I thought some of the recent Oscar winners who went on to pick insanely lame and stupid roles (Halle Berry, Charlize Theron, Jamie Foxx, etc.).
#75
DVD Talk Gold Edition
I think there are some TV stars that need to stay on TV; and some movie stars that may want to look into TV.
Ted Danson & Tom Selleck come to mind as actors who just need to stay on TV. 'Three Men & Baby" not withstanding, they've never really had any kind of big screen presence, but pretty good success on TV. Based on their early TV work, people pegged them as the next big thing in movies. Never happened. There's just something about them, I think, that doesn't translate to movies.
Alec Baldwin strikes me as someone who might want to stick with TV. He's got a good screen presence there. Yeah, he's had a few big starring roles in movies, but I think his best big screen work has been in supporting roles. I just don't think he's leading man material anymore.
This has nothing to do with anyting, really. Just something I was thinking about while going through this old thread.
Ted Danson & Tom Selleck come to mind as actors who just need to stay on TV. 'Three Men & Baby" not withstanding, they've never really had any kind of big screen presence, but pretty good success on TV. Based on their early TV work, people pegged them as the next big thing in movies. Never happened. There's just something about them, I think, that doesn't translate to movies.
Alec Baldwin strikes me as someone who might want to stick with TV. He's got a good screen presence there. Yeah, he's had a few big starring roles in movies, but I think his best big screen work has been in supporting roles. I just don't think he's leading man material anymore.
This has nothing to do with anyting, really. Just something I was thinking about while going through this old thread.