View Poll Results: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
0
0%
0
0%
Voters: 357. You may not vote on this poll
Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
#101
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
Also, to the person who asked "Who cares?". Well, clearly the people who commenting about it. Are we not allowed to? Thought this was a discussion group. Pro and con.
#102
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 9,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#103
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
Since I didn't much keep up with all the goings-on for the Star Trek film (I've gotten to the point where I'd rather save some surprises for myself while seeing the film for the first time), I was surprised to see Tyler Perry and Winona Ryder in the film (along with Rachel Nichols, who dyed her hair for the 1 minute or so of screen time at the behest of Abrams, she worked on Alias's 5th season). And it wouldn't be a JJ Abrams production without Greg Grunberg (Kirk's Stepdad's voice on the Nokia phone call ), and Amanda Foreman.
Last edited by Patman; 05-08-09 at 03:11 PM.
#105
DVD Talk Hero
#108
Inane Thread Master, 2018 TOTY
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Are any of us really anywhere?
Posts: 49,850
Received 986 Likes
on
823 Posts
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
Adjectives used to describe my feelings:
thrilling, exciting, dramatic, nostalgic, hilarious, emotional, re-invigorating, gorgeous, sonicly teeth rattling, edge-of-your-seat.
Short, but Sweet Review:
saw this right after work with a friend of mine. this is what Summer movies are all about. it really was a great re-invention of the franchise. i am one who loves the "Star Trek" theatrical productions, but never got into the series' so i was all pumped for a new movie.
this did the franchise justice and then some. J.J. Abrams really took care with an already established and fruitful product. he made a movie for fans and non-fans alike. all you have to be is a fan of good movies to enjoy this one. but i do think you get more enjoyment out of it if you know some of the history, some of the key lines and mannerisms of the established characters.
Acting:
Chris Pine just started a career and he will be in high demand after this. as many have said...he owns "James T. Kirk" and his character was probably the only one that didn't closely resemble its elder counterpart. he made it fresh and new, but kept the spirit of what Kirk is all about, portrayed by Shatner, very much alive.
Quinto did a very good job as well, but i was completely and pleasantly surprised at how much John Cho kicked ass as Sulu! and Simon Pegg is "Scotty" and i would just see anything he is in because he rocks.
i was also impressed with Leonard Nimoy and the fact that Abrams gave him a really good role and not just a throwaway cameo.
Audio and Visuals:
also, loved the title card sequence. really insignificant and small, but that scene alone gave me chills. and really stunning and breath-taking visuals throughout. great CGI, inventive and creative. even and consistent and never really looked forced or fake.
sound was just off-the-charts. great bass and really stunningly rattling. also, loved the absence of sound when
2 minor gripes:
1. Karl Urban, i thought over-impersonated DeForest Kelley's McCoy, but i was surprised to see another level to him and the fact he could actually be verbose as most of the films i've seen him in (Riddick, Bourne 2, Pathfinder, Doom) he didn't say too much. also, Yelchin's Chekov was a little much as well.
2. one too many throat grabs.
Summation:
first time in a really long time that i had an urge to see it again right away. don't think i will, but it gives you that sense of thrill to want to experience it over and over. like a great roller coaster ride where once just isn't enough and probably another time would cement the fact that you enjoyed it so much the first time.
excellent kick-off to the summer for me and i really can't see anything topping it, though the new trailer for "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" that played before made that look pretty good.
just a really good job all around by everyone involved.
i'm giving it 4 out of 5 as yes, there were some hiccups, and i didn't truly think the movie took off until the Enterprise did. but very minor as the before was still very good and in retrospect i think i will think a grade higher is in order, but right now 4.
Final Words:
with those aside, very fun time at the movies and don't forget to stick around for the end credits because
thrilling, exciting, dramatic, nostalgic, hilarious, emotional, re-invigorating, gorgeous, sonicly teeth rattling, edge-of-your-seat.
Short, but Sweet Review:
saw this right after work with a friend of mine. this is what Summer movies are all about. it really was a great re-invention of the franchise. i am one who loves the "Star Trek" theatrical productions, but never got into the series' so i was all pumped for a new movie.
this did the franchise justice and then some. J.J. Abrams really took care with an already established and fruitful product. he made a movie for fans and non-fans alike. all you have to be is a fan of good movies to enjoy this one. but i do think you get more enjoyment out of it if you know some of the history, some of the key lines and mannerisms of the established characters.
Acting:
Chris Pine just started a career and he will be in high demand after this. as many have said...he owns "James T. Kirk" and his character was probably the only one that didn't closely resemble its elder counterpart. he made it fresh and new, but kept the spirit of what Kirk is all about, portrayed by Shatner, very much alive.
Quinto did a very good job as well, but i was completely and pleasantly surprised at how much John Cho kicked ass as Sulu! and Simon Pegg is "Scotty" and i would just see anything he is in because he rocks.
i was also impressed with Leonard Nimoy and the fact that Abrams gave him a really good role and not just a throwaway cameo.
Audio and Visuals:
also, loved the title card sequence. really insignificant and small, but that scene alone gave me chills. and really stunning and breath-taking visuals throughout. great CGI, inventive and creative. even and consistent and never really looked forced or fake.
sound was just off-the-charts. great bass and really stunningly rattling. also, loved the absence of sound when
Spoiler:
2 minor gripes:
1. Karl Urban, i thought over-impersonated DeForest Kelley's McCoy, but i was surprised to see another level to him and the fact he could actually be verbose as most of the films i've seen him in (Riddick, Bourne 2, Pathfinder, Doom) he didn't say too much. also, Yelchin's Chekov was a little much as well.
2. one too many throat grabs.
Summation:
first time in a really long time that i had an urge to see it again right away. don't think i will, but it gives you that sense of thrill to want to experience it over and over. like a great roller coaster ride where once just isn't enough and probably another time would cement the fact that you enjoyed it so much the first time.
excellent kick-off to the summer for me and i really can't see anything topping it, though the new trailer for "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" that played before made that look pretty good.
just a really good job all around by everyone involved.
i'm giving it 4 out of 5 as yes, there were some hiccups, and i didn't truly think the movie took off until the Enterprise did. but very minor as the before was still very good and in retrospect i think i will think a grade higher is in order, but right now 4.
Final Words:
with those aside, very fun time at the movies and don't forget to stick around for the end credits because
Spoiler:
Last edited by OldBoy; 05-08-09 at 05:06 PM.
#109
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
If someone says "I found Nero underwritten and I didn't like that," I don't think anyone would argue. But when someone says "Spock isn't Spock anymore, he's running around making out with everyone!" Then you can't help but feel that said person just wanted TOS translated directly to the screen without any changes.
Okay- now if I may have a total geek moment regarding the four-part comic prequel "Countdown";
Spoiler:
#110
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: WPB FL
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
I liked it, it was a pretty good movie coming from a casual Star Trek fan. I didn't think it was amazing, but still very well done. I have to say the guy who played Bones kicked major ass.
#111
Inane Thread Master, 2018 TOTY
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Are any of us really anywhere?
Posts: 49,850
Received 986 Likes
on
823 Posts
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
did anyone else think Urban's McCoy was a bit overdone? i am wondering if i read him wrong, thinking it was an over-impersonation.
#112
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
I think another thing fans that complain about this movie are missing: the very fact that Abrams and company went to great lengths to fit this reboot in with existing continuity shows how much they respect the original material.
They could have just pulled a BSG and made a completely insular, stand-alone reboot... but they didn't. The Spock stuff alone is worth the price of admission for any fan.
They could have just pulled a BSG and made a completely insular, stand-alone reboot... but they didn't. The Spock stuff alone is worth the price of admission for any fan.
#115
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
#117
Inane Thread Master, 2018 TOTY
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Are any of us really anywhere?
Posts: 49,850
Received 986 Likes
on
823 Posts
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
yeah, maybe not. it didn't detract from the movie, i just thought it was more of an imitation where everyone else seemed to make their parts unique in their ways.
#119
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ormond Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
Saw it earlier today. I have never liked anything "Trek" before but I loved this movie! It didn't feel like a Trek movie, which is probably why I liked it
#120
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
I also loved Chris Pine channeling Shatner in the simulation test while eating the apple. Just the right amount of impersonation.
#122
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: West Richland,WA
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
I love it ((Star Wars Fan)) and I think I will see this marvelous film AGAIN!(2-3 times maybe).
#123
Enormous Genitals
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: a small cottage on a cul de sac in the lower pits of hell.
Posts: 37,333
Received 594 Likes
on
340 Posts
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
It's amazing how this movie both didn't and did feel like Trek. I felt like I was revisitng old friends, and starting a whole new story. Exactly what Abrams intended, I guess.
#124
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
I think the review in LA Weekly by Scott Foundas said it best:
"Already overpraised... (re alt timeline) a concept about as novel as the "dream" season of Dallas that ended with Bobby Ewing in the shower... Starfleet 90210"..
You have to wade through a lot of melodrama and cliches to get to the decent stuff
C'mon, just from a cinematic perspective, not Trekker quibbles
"Already overpraised... (re alt timeline) a concept about as novel as the "dream" season of Dallas that ended with Bobby Ewing in the shower... Starfleet 90210"..
You have to wade through a lot of melodrama and cliches to get to the decent stuff
C'mon, just from a cinematic perspective, not Trekker quibbles
Spoiler:
Last edited by hasslein; 05-09-09 at 12:30 AM.
#125
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Star Trek (J.J. Abrams, 2009) — The Reviews Thread
This was one of the most flat out entertaining Summer movies I've ever seen. There were numerous problems in it both on a plot and execution level (for the love of god Abrams, BACK OFF THE ACTORS. I don't need to see up their nose.) but surprisingly, it didn't bother me much.
So in the end, not perfect but hugely entertaining. 4 out of 5. The Iron Man comparison the ads are making is apt, it's actually a bit more fun than that movie but they both felt a bit hollow.
Also there was a weird sexual vibe going on between Quinto and Rider. It kind of creeped me out.
So in the end, not perfect but hugely entertaining. 4 out of 5. The Iron Man comparison the ads are making is apt, it's actually a bit more fun than that movie but they both felt a bit hollow.
Also there was a weird sexual vibe going on between Quinto and Rider. It kind of creeped me out.
Last edited by RichC2; 05-09-09 at 12:22 AM.