Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Siskel and Ebert review "True Lies" - Siskel and Ebert are STUPID

Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Siskel and Ebert review "True Lies" - Siskel and Ebert are STUPID

Old 12-23-08, 06:14 AM
  #1  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Siskel and Ebert review "True Lies" - Siskel and Ebert are STUPID

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7ih1IF8axo

Watch their review.

My alarm went off when Ebert said it "provides a lot of comic relief".

Ebert... it IS a comedy. It's not an action movie with elements of comedy in it here and there. It is an action-comedy. There is so much comedy in True Lies that it isn't ABOUT the whole "terrorists plot". That's how I see it. You aren't really that excited about what happens then. It's a big action comedy adventure . The sub-romance with Simon/Carlos the Jackal is just as big part of the movie as everything else. It's central to the plot.

I don't get their review. I thought these guys were supposed to be the big, smart reviewers, but their review is bad.

I think these dumb fools think this is a movie that was supposed to be about Arnold fighting terrorists. I say that's one half the movie's content. The other half is the double life and Simon romance and all the other stuff (chemistry between Arnold and Tom).
Old 12-23-08, 06:34 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sacramento, Calif.
Posts: 13,525
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's not nice to call one dead person and one almost dead person stupid, since I'm sure Ebert's opinion on a film is 10,000 times more valid than any opinion you have.
Old 12-23-08, 06:56 AM
  #3  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Hokeyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 19,218
Received 41 Likes on 32 Posts
The forced comedic elements of "True Lies" weren't that funny to begin with. It's easily the LEAST entertaining of all of James Cameron's films (including Piranha 2) . I think S&E were pretty damn spot-on. Deal with it.


And wow people are still bitching about movie reviews 14 years after the movie was released? Let go, son...
Old 12-23-08, 07:25 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I know a lot of critics and people complained about the Bill Paxon/Jamie Lee Curtis/Arnold Schwarzenegger subplot, but it was the best thing about the movie for me.
Old 12-23-08, 07:26 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
MBoyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: AUSTIN - Land of Mexican Coke
Posts: 3,920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember watching this review. I thought the stuff about the middle of the film was absolutely spot on as well. I have never watched it since I saw it in the theater. Not a fan.
Old 12-23-08, 08:01 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Augusta, GA USA
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, way to hold a grudge. Move on.

I, myself, think Bartholmule Pennipinch the Third's review of The Great Train Robbery was stupid and uneducated. His 1903 review stated that the audio was inaudible throughout the majority of the movie and that it was in black & white and shiz.
Old 12-23-08, 10:26 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
DeanoBKN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 5,291
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Was it marketed as a comedy or as another Arnold action flick?

I thought the comedy parts were the best scenes in the film, once the terrorists came into play I lost interest.

I still get a laugh every time Arnold walks down the street without a care in the world if a car, or bus hits him.
Old 12-23-08, 10:39 AM
  #8  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sitting on a beach, earning 20%
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Parcher View Post
Ebert... it IS a comedy.
No, it's not. You should watch the film before making such an assumption.
Old 12-23-08, 10:43 AM
  #9  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Puyallup
Posts: 16,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Nice post. Its been years since this movie came out and was reviewed. Now one guy has passed, and the other guy is kind of hanging on. I don't understand the point of bringing it up.
Old 12-23-08, 10:50 AM
  #10  
Moderator
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 71,037
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Somebody's stupid, but it isn't Siskel or Ebert.
Old 12-23-08, 10:50 AM
  #11  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Michael Corvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 59,127
Received 114 Likes on 85 Posts
Originally Posted by DonnachaOne View Post
No, it's not. You should watch the film before making such an assumption.
Old 12-23-08, 11:25 AM
  #12  
FuQ
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice topical thread, have you been keeping up with this Lorena Bobbit debacle?
Old 12-23-08, 11:31 AM
  #13  
DVD Talk Legend
 
The Valeyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Building attractions one theme park at a time.
Posts: 10,669
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
I'm miffed with Siskel and Ebert as well over their review of The Birth of a Nation. They just don't get it.
Old 12-23-08, 11:35 AM
  #14  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Jersey represent!
Posts: 5,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thought-provoking and topical. This thread delivers in spades! ****/****
Old 12-23-08, 11:57 AM
  #15  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
fumanstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 55,341
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 1 Post
Man, movies must take a long time to get over to Europe. And their reviews.
Old 12-23-08, 12:00 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Arthur Dent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Formerly known as "awil1026"/ Don't Panic
Posts: 3,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sigh, show some respect for the dead! Siskel WAS stupid.



Old 12-23-08, 12:34 PM
  #17  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Charlie Goose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sesame Street (the apt. next to Bob's)
Posts: 20,198
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I just can't believe the Bills lost the Super Bowl FOUR straight times!
Old 12-23-08, 12:43 PM
  #18  
Member
 
Brack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: near Cincinnati
Posts: 9,954
Received 32 Likes on 22 Posts
Thanks to this review, I'm sure True Lies will bomb at the box office.
Old 12-23-08, 01:16 PM
  #19  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 18,319
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It was fun to watch Siskel and Ebert go head to head like junior high school kids, deciphering, breaking down movies pieces by pieces and totally missing the entire element which is enjoying the movie as a whole. I personally feel that movie critics takes movies way too seriously sometimes.

I think True Lies was a very enjoyable flick, and I had fun seeing the whole scene of Jamie Lee Curtis and the dude acting like a spy lol Plus I was blown away by her sexy body.

Yes I did find it humiliating on what they put her through, but it was hilarious.
Old 12-23-08, 01:27 PM
  #20  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Relocated to Bot-Hell
Posts: 10,315
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
What, no love for Tom Arnold? That man's career is going places!
Old 12-23-08, 01:49 PM
  #21  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Maxflier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 11,921
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
So to all those being jerkoffs to the OP: what exactly is the statute of limitations on complaining about something? I'm sure he didn't watch it back in '94 or whenever it was the movie came out and hold a grudge all this time like some of you insinuate, I figure he just now stumbled upon that review, not everyone sees everything right when it comes out you know. If I watch Citizen Kane tomorrow would I not be allowed to complain about it if I don't like it since it came out so long ago? And who gives a shit if one of the guys bought it and the other isn't far behind, it's not like Parcher is complaining about the review to the guy's surviving family members.

Last edited by Maxflier; 12-23-08 at 02:05 PM.
Old 12-23-08, 01:54 PM
  #22  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I learned a long time ago not to trust critics when it comes to action movies, comedies, or any combination there of.
Old 12-23-08, 03:22 PM
  #23  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
To no one's surprise there are very few posts here that actually address the issue.

I watched True Lies the other day, and still today - as many years ago - find it a very enjoyable action comedy.I enjoyed getting it refreshed in my memory, and so went to check youtube if there was anything interesting on it,

I think it is utterly idiotic to say the movie has "comedy relief" since - I believe - that implies it's an action movie with comedy elements. It's not. It's an action comedy! There is so much comedy in this movie. There isn't ONE serious scene in this movie that doesn't contain some element or tone of comedy. Every action scene has some ridiculous element, funny punch lines, goofy action moves, etc.

As a reviewer I wouldn't bring down a movie just because I personally didn't like it that much when I can see it was still a well made movie that ""objectively"" contains a bunch of good elements and structures. Personally I think True Lies is WAY more than well made, and I think Cameron is one of the finest mainstream moviemakers and one of the biggest names in films ever

If you didn't like the Simon-Helen romance part then you didn't like True Lies, because that WAS the movie,along with the terrorists aspect.
It's no surprise the first thing Ebert mentions is the "action". Really it should be the action as well as the comedy.

Frankly I am sick of people - be it 20, 10 or 2 years or 2 days ago who direct unwarranted criticism towards movies they themselves could NEVER piece together. No chance in hell Siskel or Ebert are/were as visionary as Cameron, no chance they could ever make a movie as good as True Lies, and I think their review should recognize this. Yes it's their job to review, but review it fairly. They certainly missed the point on this one.

Whether they are living or dead doesn't change they missed the point, and you know comedy is a very individual thing in the sense that not everyone has the same taste and people are going to find different things funny. If you didn't like joke #1 in True Lies you probably didn't like joke #2, 3 or 4.
Old 12-23-08, 03:25 PM
  #24  
Moderator
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 71,037
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Parcher View Post
Frankly I am sick of people - be it 20, 10 or 2 years or 2 days ago who direct unwarranted criticism towards movies they themselves could NEVER piece together.
I'll have to quote this back to you next time you criticize a movie.
Old 12-23-08, 03:28 PM
  #25  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Groucho View Post
I'll have to quote this back to you next time you criticize a movie.
I said unwarranted criticism

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.