Dark Knight - 185 mio. budget?! WTF?!
12-19-08, 02:03 PM
#26
DVD Talk Limited Edition
everything about the movie is high class. The sets are all outfitted with nice furnature, top notch actors in every role and as other people mentioned, they blew up a building!!!
12-19-08, 02:11 PM
#27
DVD Talk Reviewer
We should concentrate our efforts more on the disturbing $175m Evan Almighty budget than milling over the relative "bargain" of $185m that it took to cover the pyrotechnics, prop design, star power, viral marketing, and shooting locales for The Dark Knight.
12-19-08, 02:14 PM
#28
Banned by request
12-19-08, 02:20 PM
#29
DVD Talk Legend
Yes, the IMDB numbers don't include what's spent on Marketing. That's why a movie usuually has to make two to three times what it "costs" (budget) to be considered a "hit" - there's more being spent on the film than what's stated as its budget.
12-19-08, 04:38 PM
#30
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Posts: 20,052
Received 168 Likes
on
126 Posts
Without specificly researching it I can still address Troy to some degree. A runaway production like Troy can make a "bigger" movie with less money. By filming in Europe or N. Africa they use non-union crews, local extras, local labor, etc. which are very cheap. Foreign countries often offer film crews tax exemptions and credits that defer costs as well.
When TDK wasn't filming in a studio in the USA (which means union crews $$$) they were shooting on the streets of Chicago which is $$$.
When TDK wasn't filming in a studio in the USA (which means union crews $$$) they were shooting on the streets of Chicago which is $$$.
12-19-08, 07:27 PM
#32
DVD Talk Hero
Without specificly researching it I can still address Troy to some degree. A runaway production like Troy can make a "bigger" movie with less money. By filming in Europe or N. Africa they use non-union crews, local extras, local labor, etc. which are very cheap. Foreign countries often offer film crews tax exemptions and credits that defer costs as well.
When TDK wasn't filming in a studio in the USA (which means union crews $$$) they were shooting on the streets of Chicago which is $$$.
When TDK wasn't filming in a studio in the USA (which means union crews $$$) they were shooting on the streets of Chicago which is $$$.
Hell i was surprised Zack and Miri was a little over 25 mil to make (granted Rogan prob got alot), but i'm gonna assume shooting in Pitsburgh wasn't cheap, and they had to make most of the snow.
12-19-08, 09:48 PM
#33
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Where the sky is always Carolina Blue! (Currently VA - again...)
Posts: 5,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Without specificly researching it I can still address Troy to some degree. A runaway production like Troy can make a "bigger" movie with less money. By filming in Europe or N. Africa they use non-union crews, local extras, local labor, etc. which are very cheap. Foreign countries often offer film crews tax exemptions and credits that defer costs as well.
When TDK wasn't filming in a studio in the USA (which means union crews $$$) they were shooting on the streets of Chicago which is $$$.
When TDK wasn't filming in a studio in the USA (which means union crews $$$) they were shooting on the streets of Chicago which is $$$.
I remember reading about the first real Swedish vampire horror flick to come out (Frost Bite) on twitch a few years back - in one of the interviews the director said he had all these local effects companies falling over each other asking him to let them do the special effects and makeup for next to nothing just for the additional experience and international exposure - since they almost never get to do any real work there.
12-19-08, 11:55 PM
#34
From what I've heard, the salaries were also pretty high:
Bale made $35 million total, part of it was a bonus for the films performance but around 15-20 was upfront.
Oldman made 3-4 million; Freeman made 5 million.
I'd say its safe to assume Ledger made 10-15, Caine made 5-7, Eckhart 5-10, and Nolan himself 10-20.
Bale made $35 million total, part of it was a bonus for the films performance but around 15-20 was upfront.
Oldman made 3-4 million; Freeman made 5 million.
I'd say its safe to assume Ledger made 10-15, Caine made 5-7, Eckhart 5-10, and Nolan himself 10-20.
12-20-08, 03:33 AM
#35
DVD Talk God
Anytime you shoot a movie or TV show outside of Los Angeles, it's going to cost a fortune.
12-20-08, 08:29 AM
#37
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 5,628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also I'm sure with Advertising, Marketing, prints, etc. this cost at LEAST $300 million.
Still it made almost $1 Billion worldwide and will make hundreds of millions more on DVD and broadcast TV sales. Even with profit participation I'm sure this will end up making at least $800 million in profit for WB.
Still it made almost $1 Billion worldwide and will make hundreds of millions more on DVD and broadcast TV sales. Even with profit participation I'm sure this will end up making at least $800 million in profit for WB.
12-20-08, 11:40 AM
#40
DVD Talk God
12-20-08, 01:00 PM
#41
DVD Talk God
Not sure about Chicago though where Dark Knight was filmed if WB got a tax break.
12-20-08, 01:56 PM
#42
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Where the sky is always Carolina Blue! (Currently VA - again...)
Posts: 5,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the difference is "outside LA" stateside vs. "outside LA" international.
12-20-08, 06:32 PM
#43
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: H-Town, TX
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I could see how it cost 185 mil to make. The cast, the crew, the on-location shooting(especially in Hong Kong), the IMAX cameras, the CGI, the Batpod/truck chase scene, the extras(check out the evacuation scene with the ferries as well as the funeral for the Commissioner), blowing up several buildings, not to mention it was a fairly lengthy shoot. Those expenses add up quickly.
I remember reading somewhere that Crapman & Robin cost around 230 mil to make(WB would never admit to this, of course). And that was in 1997 dollars.
I remember reading somewhere that Crapman & Robin cost around 230 mil to make(WB would never admit to this, of course). And that was in 1997 dollars.
12-20-08, 09:49 PM
#45
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I could see how it cost 185 mil to make. The cast, the crew, the on-location shooting(especially in Hong Kong), the IMAX cameras, the CGI, the Batpod/truck chase scene, the extras(check out the evacuation scene with the ferries as well as the funeral for the Commissioner), blowing up several buildings, not to mention it was a fairly lengthy shoot. Those expenses add up quickly.
I remember reading somewhere that Crapman & Robin cost around 230 mil to make(WB would never admit to this, of course). And that was in 1997 dollars.
I remember reading somewhere that Crapman & Robin cost around 230 mil to make(WB would never admit to this, of course). And that was in 1997 dollars.
12-20-08, 09:59 PM
#46
DVD Talk Hero
Batman & Robin reportedly cost $125 million, although, when you factor in the $40 million combined for the 3 leads (Arnold, Clooney, and Uma) plus probably another $5-10 mil spread between the other actors (Silverstone, O'Donnell, Gough, Fox, etc.), you have to question how they could have afforded Schumacher and the production design on just $75 million. Plus, they filmed in Los Angeles studios which can be pricey as well.
12-20-08, 10:58 PM
#47
Batman & Robin reportedly cost $125 million, although, when you factor in the $40 million combined for the 3 leads (Arnold, Clooney, and Uma) plus probably another $5-10 mil spread between the other actors (Silverstone, O'Donnell, Gough, Fox, etc.), you have to question how they could have afforded Schumacher and the production design on just $75 million. Plus, they filmed in Los Angeles studios which can be pricey as well.
