Know what really annoys me? (pointless nitpick)
07-16-08, 05:50 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Know what really annoys me? (pointless nitpick)
I'm not sure why but it annoys me when people type out the name of a movie and use numbers where Roman Numerals should be. For example, Superman 2 instead of Superman II. Anyone else? Or am I just way too nit-picky?
07-16-08, 06:18 PM
#9
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by BobSchlapowitz
I'm not sure why but it annoys me when people type out the name of a movie and use numbers where Roman Numerals should be. For example, Superman 2 instead of Superman II. Anyone else? Or am I just way too nit-picky?
07-16-08, 07:20 PM
#11
DVD Talk Legend
If it weren't for Roman numerals, I wouldn't call the MIB sequel Men Invariably In Black.
07-16-08, 07:31 PM
#12
DVD Talk Hero
Yea. That's pretty dumb.
You know what yanks my chain? People who chew like pigs in movies; especially good ones. I'm looking at you --- Brad Pitt in Oceans 11/12/13. Ya big jerk. Chew with your damn mouth closed.
You know what yanks my chain? People who chew like pigs in movies; especially good ones. I'm looking at you --- Brad Pitt in Oceans 11/12/13. Ya big jerk. Chew with your damn mouth closed.
07-16-08, 07:39 PM
#13
Inane Thread Master, 2018 TOTY
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Are any of us really anywhere?
Posts: 49,678
Received 957 Likes
on
799 Posts
Originally Posted by troystiffler
Yea. That's pretty dumb.
You know what yanks my chain? People who chew like pigs in movies; especially good ones. I'm looking at you --- Brad Pitt in Oceans 11/12/13. Ya big jerk. Chew with your damn mouth closed.
You know what yanks my chain? People who chew like pigs in movies; especially good ones. I'm looking at you --- Brad Pitt in Oceans 11/12/13. Ya big jerk. Chew with your damn mouth closed.
07-17-08, 02:30 AM
#16
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I prefer to render the title as the movie does in its logos. If it says SUPERMAN II, then it's SUPERMAN II, but X2 is X2, not XII, and SPIDER-MAN 2 is SPIDER-MAN 2, not SPIDER-MAN II, et cetera.
07-17-08, 02:32 AM
#17
Originally Posted by John_Shil
I prefer to render the title as the movie does in its logos. If it says SUPERMAN II, then it's SUPERMAN II, but X2 is X2, not XII, and SPIDER-MAN 2 is SPIDER-MAN 2, not SPIDER-MAN II, et cetera.
07-17-08, 04:03 AM
#18
Cool New Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by John_Shil
I prefer to render the title as the movie does in its logos. If it says SUPERMAN II, then it's SUPERMAN II, but X2 is X2, not XII, and SPIDER-MAN 2 is SPIDER-MAN 2, not SPIDER-MAN II, et cetera.
07-17-08, 08:06 AM
#21
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by toddly6666
BobSchlapowitz,
Are you the type of person that also gets annoyed when people refer "The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor" as "The Mummy 3"?
Are you the type of person that also gets annoyed when people refer "The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor" as "The Mummy 3"?
07-18-08, 01:27 PM
#25
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't see why the marketing people felt the need to advertise SUPERMAN (1978) with "The Movie" in the ads. The title of the film is simply SUPERMAN.
Warner did the same thing with the video releases of BATMAN (1966) and now people think that "The Movie" is part of the title when it isn't.
Warner did the same thing with the video releases of BATMAN (1966) and now people think that "The Movie" is part of the title when it isn't.
