Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull REVIEWS Thread
#576
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aliens and the Nuked Fridge have been around since a 1992 treatment Darabont had NOTHING to do with. The first of many screenplays using this was Indiana Jones and the Saucer Men from mars, which was written around 1993-1996. A draft of the script had been online since the late 90's. I'm surprised more people don't know about this.
#577
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is info on one of the first versions of Indy 4, from the mid 90's.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana...m_Mars_(script)
http://www.theindyexperience.com/fil..._4_scripts.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana...m_Mars_(script)
http://www.theindyexperience.com/fil..._4_scripts.php
#578
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by RichC2
Was Darabont's the original script? from the sound of it, these things may have existed before that.
I haven't read the Jeb Stuart script.
EDIT: I just skimmed the Stuart script - the fridge scene is in there too, although much later in the movie. Yep, looks like this was a Lucas idea that he insisted Darabont keep.
BTW, Stuart's script has much more of the 1950's Sci-Fi B-Movie "feel" to it than even the final version of INDY IV. Much more "saucer action" at the end of this one.
Sheesh - with these three scripts to work from, it's no wonder Koepp couldn't put together a better screenplay. It's also no wonder why INDY IV took 20 years to make - those are some painful reads. Still, Darabont's is, I believe, the corniest of the three...at least Columbus and Stuart try to take Indy seriously. Darabont's is filled with all this silly "one liners" and "cute" references.
Last edited by Shannon Nutt; 06-12-08 at 03:28 PM.
#580
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
The Fridge stuff wasn't in the Chris Columbus' "Monkey King" script (also pretty bad, BTW) from the 90's -the only thing I remember in that script that made it into INDY IV was the "Mac" character.
I haven't read the Jeb Stuart script.
EDIT: I just skimmed the Stuart script - the fridge scene is in there too, although much later in the movie. Yep, looks like this was a Lucas idea that he insisted Darabont keep.
BTW, Stuart's script has much more of the 1950's Sci-Fi B-Movie "feel" to it than even the final version of INDY IV. Much more "saucer action" at the end of this one.
Sheesh - with these three scripts to work from, it's no wonder Koepp couldn't put together a better screenplay. It's also no wonder why INDY IV took 20 years to make - those are some painful reads. Still, Darabont's is, I believe, the corniest of the three...at least Columbus and Stuart try to take Indy seriously. Darabont's is filled with all this silly "one liners" and "cute" references.
I haven't read the Jeb Stuart script.
EDIT: I just skimmed the Stuart script - the fridge scene is in there too, although much later in the movie. Yep, looks like this was a Lucas idea that he insisted Darabont keep.
BTW, Stuart's script has much more of the 1950's Sci-Fi B-Movie "feel" to it than even the final version of INDY IV. Much more "saucer action" at the end of this one.
Sheesh - with these three scripts to work from, it's no wonder Koepp couldn't put together a better screenplay. It's also no wonder why INDY IV took 20 years to make - those are some painful reads. Still, Darabont's is, I believe, the corniest of the three...at least Columbus and Stuart try to take Indy seriously. Darabont's is filled with all this silly "one liners" and "cute" references.
I enjoyed the movie, but it isn't all the memorable. I'm over it, next?
#581
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Planet Houston, TX
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
The Fridge stuff wasn't in the Chris Columbus' "Monkey King" script (also pretty bad, BTW) from the 90's -the only thing I remember in that script that made it into INDY IV was the "Mac" character.
I haven't read the Jeb Stuart script.
EDIT: I just skimmed the Stuart script - the fridge scene is in there too, although much later in the movie. Yep, looks like this was a Lucas idea that he insisted Darabont keep.
BTW, Stuart's script has much more of the 1950's Sci-Fi B-Movie "feel" to it than even the final version of INDY IV. Much more "saucer action" at the end of this one.
Sheesh - with these three scripts to work from, it's no wonder Koepp couldn't put together a better screenplay. It's also no wonder why INDY IV took 20 years to make - those are some painful reads. Still, Darabont's is, I believe, the corniest of the three...at least Columbus and Stuart try to take Indy seriously. Darabont's is filled with all this silly "one liners" and "cute" references.
I haven't read the Jeb Stuart script.
EDIT: I just skimmed the Stuart script - the fridge scene is in there too, although much later in the movie. Yep, looks like this was a Lucas idea that he insisted Darabont keep.
BTW, Stuart's script has much more of the 1950's Sci-Fi B-Movie "feel" to it than even the final version of INDY IV. Much more "saucer action" at the end of this one.
Sheesh - with these three scripts to work from, it's no wonder Koepp couldn't put together a better screenplay. It's also no wonder why INDY IV took 20 years to make - those are some painful reads. Still, Darabont's is, I believe, the corniest of the three...at least Columbus and Stuart try to take Indy seriously. Darabont's is filled with all this silly "one liners" and "cute" references.
So Lucas is bad for Indy right, but not that bad? What about the posters who seemed quite certain about the grandness of Darabont's script several pages ago in this thread.
Oh that's right, raped childhood and such ...
#582
DVD Talk Legend
If you're trying to suggest Amistad is a bad film, keep trying.
There's no doubt Ford has picked some real clunkers in the past 10 years, but Spielberg has managed to retain and grow his directorial skills while Lucas seems to have regressed if anything.
And I make these comments again reiterating that I am a fan of the SW prequels. However IMO the quality gap between Indy IV and the first three is much wider than the SW OT and PT quality gap.
There's no doubt Ford has picked some real clunkers in the past 10 years, but Spielberg has managed to retain and grow his directorial skills while Lucas seems to have regressed if anything.
And I make these comments again reiterating that I am a fan of the SW prequels. However IMO the quality gap between Indy IV and the first three is much wider than the SW OT and PT quality gap.
#583
DVD Talk Reviewer Emeritus
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
IMO the quality gap between Indy IV and the first three is much wider than the SW OT and PT quality gap.
#584
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Planet Houston, TX
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
If you're trying to suggest Amistad is a bad film, keep trying.
I actually liked Amistad more than a lot of other recent Spielberg films, but I thought it "read" funnier than most of those. My point is that I personally don't think Spielberg and Ford have been at the top of their game, or at least the best judges of material in recent years.
Certainly, a majority on this forum would say the same thing about Lucas, but that is why we all use words like "personally" and "in my opinion."
Last edited by lawyer goodwill; 06-12-08 at 06:54 PM.
#588
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by big whoppa
Does Lucas have a Indy cartoon in the works too?
http://www.theraider.net/films/raide...ngof/mo_02.jpg
http://www.theraider.net/films/raide...ngof/mo_03.jpg
http://www.theraider.net/films/raide...ngof/mo_04.jpg
http://www.theraider.net/films/raide...ngof/mo_11.jpg
#589
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Leandro/San Francisco
Posts: 7,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by FunkDaddy J
Nah. Lucas's dunderheaded, misguided SW prequels betrayed a universe. The Indy sequels, all silly and wholly separate from the original Raiders, have all been mostly standalone (increasingly ridiculous) adventures and therefore easier to swallow. But still mostly dumb.
#590
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Planet Houston, TX
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by big whoppa
I'd be game for that!
#591
Moderator
so I finally saw this tonight, at the Uptown and while I thought the whole premise and execution of the film felt a tad too goofy in places, I still enjoyed it, but wasn't blown away.
#592
DVD Talk Godfather
Finally saw it tonight. Packed house. Liked it, not loved it. I'll have to see it again to determine that. Would probably rank it the same as everyone else. Just above Temple but behind Ark & Crusade. I have the same complaints as everyone else, fridge/tarzan/aliens, but it was still a damn fun ride. I was surprised that the CGI didn't look near as bad as in the trailers. The jeep scene followed by the ants was spectacular.
I couldn't agree more. I see that Darabont is getting some shit on his take. I haven't read it but to my understanding we have him to thank for getting Marion into the script. I think he at least deserves that. I think she stole the movie. My absolute favorite moment of the film was the look of a giddy schoolgirl she had when Indy told her that the problem with all the other women he's been with was that they weren't her. It's those little character moments that make the film. I'd almost say they compensate for some of the absolute ridiculousness in the film.
Also loved the nod to Han Solo's famous line, "I've got a bad feeling about this." Subtle and cool. Also liked the nod to the 'Saucer men' title.
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
It is a serious treat to see Indy back on the big screen. Watching him after all these years, all I could think of was how many poor imitations we've seen (Uncharted: Drake's Fortune, Tomb Raider, National Treasure), and how good of a team Spielberg and Ford make. When Indy cracks that famous smile, you can't help but smile yourself.
I'd say the film is better than Temple of Doom, but not quite as good as The Last Crusade (obviously not as good as Raiders). Certain elements feel a little too rushed (I could have watched ten hours of Allen and Ford getting into their little arguments), and honestly the whole thing felt like it was over a little too soon, but I sincerely hope that this isn't Indy's last outing. If it is, it's a damn good way to go out.
I'd say the film is better than Temple of Doom, but not quite as good as The Last Crusade (obviously not as good as Raiders). Certain elements feel a little too rushed (I could have watched ten hours of Allen and Ford getting into their little arguments), and honestly the whole thing felt like it was over a little too soon, but I sincerely hope that this isn't Indy's last outing. If it is, it's a damn good way to go out.
Also loved the nod to Han Solo's famous line, "I've got a bad feeling about this." Subtle and cool. Also liked the nod to the 'Saucer men' title.
#593
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by Giles
so I finally saw this tonight, at the Uptown and while I thought the whole premise and execution of the film felt a tad too goofy in places, I still enjoyed it, but wasn't blown away.
I finally saw it today, too, w/ my dad, brother and my brother-in-law. All four of us enjoyed it.
***1/2 out of five.
I had lowered my expectations so much that it was much better than I thought it would be. There were a couple of scenes that I could have done w/out, particularly the aforementioned monkey/vine swinging, but overall I was more than happy. I watched the first three over the weekend in preparation, so it was nice to see a few nods to the earlier films/casts. Some of the dialogue between Indy and Marion seemed a bit forced, not to mention that Karen Allen seemed a bit rusty to begin with.
#595
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: maryland
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by B.A.
Some of the dialogue between Indy and Marion seemed a bit forced, not to mention that Karen Allen seemed a bit rusty to begin with.
#596
DVD Talk Gold Edition
My thought is that it comes no where near the quality of Spielberg and Lucas' early work in the series, so it's a major disappointment. However, I don't think it hurts the series like the Star Wars prequels did, and I can even appreciate the fact that it provides closure for the characters.
All nitpicking aside, I get the sense that the story thinks it's clever when the audience is always three steps ahead of it. And, frankly, it's just plain poor. However, I can imagine it would have worked better as the third Indiana Jones movie when everyone involved was still at the top of their game. Last Crusade always felt like a shameless retread of Raiders to me. Crystal Skull at least tries to be an original sequel just like Temple of Doom tried something different.
I feel if Crystal Skull was made 20 years ago and included Sean Connery, it would have been a worthy addition to the series.
All nitpicking aside, I get the sense that the story thinks it's clever when the audience is always three steps ahead of it. And, frankly, it's just plain poor. However, I can imagine it would have worked better as the third Indiana Jones movie when everyone involved was still at the top of their game. Last Crusade always felt like a shameless retread of Raiders to me. Crystal Skull at least tries to be an original sequel just like Temple of Doom tried something different.
I feel if Crystal Skull was made 20 years ago and included Sean Connery, it would have been a worthy addition to the series.
#598
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by Red Dog
Finally saw it this weekend. I was definitely underwhelmed. Perhaps Spielberg and Lucas should be permanently banned from revisiting any of their franchises.
#599
Senior Member
I wonder if the Crystal Skull aliens built that temple in the opening scene of Raiders. A booby-trap set off by a broken beam of light seems a little too sophisticated for the Hovitos to come up with on their own.
Just some idle speculation in the summer heat...
Just some idle speculation in the summer heat...
#600
Suspended; also need updated email
Just saw this on dvd and hmmmm, not terrible but rather disappointing
i thought Harrison still pulled off an older Indy quite well. I'm over Shia Leboef, he is being overexposed.
The story was just lacklustre
i thought Harrison still pulled off an older Indy quite well. I'm over Shia Leboef, he is being overexposed.
The story was just lacklustre