Beowulf (11/16/2007)
#52
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 5,628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone think this movie will make any money? I think it will be lucky to get $30 million. IF that Final Fantasy movie didnt make money I dont know how this will.
#53
Moderator
so how does the extra 3D fee actually work, does that amount go to the theatre or to the film box office intake, I would assume to the theatre to defray the cost of the REAL-D system - right?
#54
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by chris_sc77
Does anyone think this movie will make any money? I think it will be lucky to get $30 million. IF that Final Fantasy movie didnt make money I dont know how this will.
#55
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know, this movie has bomb written all over it. For anyone interested in Beowulf, I would suggest picking up the Seamus Heaney translation, which is excellent
http://www.amazon.com/Beowulf-New-Ve...2652742&sr=8-1
http://www.amazon.com/Beowulf-New-Ve...2652742&sr=8-1
#56
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by chris_sc77
Does anyone think this movie will make any money?
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by starseed1981
My most anticipated movie of the year. Zemeckis never lets down.
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: stage left
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chris_sc77
Why not film this in live action though?
They could have made a film that visually looks great like lord of the rings but instead they go with creepy-looking cgi characters.
They could have made a film that visually looks great like lord of the rings but instead they go with creepy-looking cgi characters.
My wife wants to see it which means I will be seeing it. But these electronic puppet characters do nothing for me. I had the same gripe with Polar Express.
#62
Moderator
Originally Posted by Holysmoker
+1
My wife wants to see it which means I will be seeing it. But these electronic puppet characters do nothing for me. I had the same gripe with Polar Express.
My wife wants to see it which means I will be seeing it. But these electronic puppet characters do nothing for me. I had the same gripe with Polar Express.
#63
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally Posted by Holysmoker
+1
My wife wants to see it which means I will be seeing it. But these electronic puppet characters do nothing for me. I had the same gripe with Polar Express.
My wife wants to see it which means I will be seeing it. But these electronic puppet characters do nothing for me. I had the same gripe with Polar Express.
On top of the that, shooting this way gives the actors the utmost freedom in their performance, they don't have to worry about hitting a mark, or waiting for the crew to set up after each take, they just perform. Crispin Glover would not have been cast had it been live action because Zemeckis knows Glover is crazy on a set, but that's irrelevant here.
Furthermore, the film is apparantly incredible in 3D, and by being CG it allows for a much easier and smoother transition to that.
You'd also be interested to know Zemeckis took the Polar Express criticisms very seriously and they developed a new way to capture eye movements and other facial muscles that apparantly is worlds better.
By saying it should be live action misses a big point of what they're going for.
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: stage left
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hear you, but I don't think its about actors freedom in performance. If anything, I think the manipulation of the digital image takes away any freedom they are expressing. In my opinion it would have more interesting to go the Sin City or 300 route.
#65
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally Posted by Holysmoker
I hear you, but I don't think its about actors freedom in performance. If anything, I think the manipulation of the digital image takes away any freedom they are expressing. In my opinion it would have more interesting to go the Sin City or 300 route.
The problem with going the Sin City route is this film would require a lot of FX work, and CG/Live-action intergration comes off poorly, even today. They avoid those issues by making everything CG. I'd rather have a consistency of style, more than anything else that takes me out a film.
Gaiman has described the 3D version as being inside of graphic novel. Avary was originally going to direct the film as a live action piece, but now states that this is the best way the film could've been made.
#66
Member
If it's good, it's good. If it sucks, it sucks. I never get the CGI argument. Unless it looks god awful, CGI can look hokey as long as the story is good. and Polar Express didn't, especially in IMAX 3D, look strange to me. It's animation, not live-action. Just because it has a realistic look doesn't necessarily mean it should look like live-action.
However, based on the commercials and trailer for Beowulf it looks like they are trying for live-action.
However, based on the commercials and trailer for Beowulf it looks like they are trying for live-action.
#67
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by Holysmoker
I hear you, but I don't think its about actors freedom in performance. If anything, I think the manipulation of the digital image takes away any freedom they are expressing. In my opinion it would have more interesting to go the Sin City or 300 route.
In both scenarios you essentially have actors playing against nothing but their imagination with all the external stuff filled in afterwards. Its not like they just wanted someone Ray Winstone's size to go through the motions - they wanted Ray Winstone to act and they got that.
#68
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 5,628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by clemente
I don't understand how the Sin City/300/Sky Captain route is any different?
In both scenarios you essentially have actors playing against nothing but their imagination with all the external stuff filled in afterwards. Its not like they just wanted someone Ray Winstone's size to go through the motions - they wanted Ray Winstone to act and they got that.
In both scenarios you essentially have actors playing against nothing but their imagination with all the external stuff filled in afterwards. Its not like they just wanted someone Ray Winstone's size to go through the motions - they wanted Ray Winstone to act and they got that.
#70
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,374
Received 1,855 Likes
on
1,148 Posts
Originally Posted by Holysmoker
In my opinion it would have more interesting to go the Sin City or 300 route.
...and people would be bitching about that too.
#71
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally Posted by chris_sc77
In Sin City/300/Sky Captain the actors looked real...IN Beowolf they don't...They look like something on a video game.
#72
DVD Talk Hero
I don't know man. It could be a good movie, but from an artistic point of view, I just don't like the look of it. It looks really drab and lifeless, and though the CG is supposed to be cutting edge, both Final Fantasy movies (along with the cutscenes from the last few games) still look more impressive than this does.
#74
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JaxComet
I found it funny that when he says "I am Beowulf!".....It sounds exactly like "This is Sparta!"
#75
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally Posted by slop101
I don't know man. It could be a good movie, but from an artistic point of view, I just don't like the look of it. It looks really drab and lifeless, and though the CG is supposed to be cutting edge, both Final Fantasy movies (along with the cutscenes from the last few games) still look more impressive than this does.
Here's a little pic of the sensors on the face and suit: