![]() |
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
Originally Posted by mcnabb
(Post 11118957)
But I will say that Crusade has them riding off in the sunset at the end and that is a great moment! Should have never done a 4th movie for that reason alone!
|
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
Originally Posted by lamphorn
(Post 11123138)
There are very very poor and malnourished people in India, even now, and not just in the remote villages but in the big cities. The film doesn't shy away from that sad reality, but makes us confront it and take the underprivileged seriously. Had the film just shown Indians to be happy, and singing and dancing, THAT would've been racist because it would have whitewashed the much more sad reality that so many there live in awful poverty.
Well, except for the cartoonishly evil villains who are responsible for the drought. Because the problems faced by the Indians during the colonial period were brought about by other, evil Indians, not by the British who had ruined a land that had been the world's leading economic power prior to their arrival. Instead, it showed someone from the First World being generous and even risking his life to help them out. Isn't that what we Americans are always encouraged to do? To step out of our privileged little cocoons and lend the poor a hand? LOL.. I suspect you're still in school and are writing a paper about this. The ivory tower is a clique of very privileged people who basically accuse everyone not in the ivory tower of being racist/sexist/homophobic/blahblahblah. When an actual Indian from India makes the case that the film is racist, I'll take it a bit more seriously. |
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
When an actual Indian from India makes the case that the film is racist, I'll take it a bit more seriously. Anyway, I've always said that Temple of Doom is the greatest example of Spielberg’s directorial ability, because he rises so far above the shitty material. The script is awful, filled with paternalistic bullshit, unnecessary side-kicks and comic relief. But time and time again Spielberg keeps topping himself. A really gross dinner, bugs, crushing spike rooms, heart-ripping, voodoo spells, out of control mine cars, broken rope bridges, it just keeps getting bigger and bigger. And all of that stuff could have been very different. What’s on the page is nothing near as detailed as the suspense he wrings from the bug scene or the horror he conjures in the heart-ripping scene. It's a film that was "made" in the story boards not in the writing. |
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
Let me also add that ToD was Spielberg and GL's follow up to E.T. and Return of the Jedi respectively. I have to admire them for taking their audiences down such a dark path after making what many consider very family friendly movies. GL has admitted he wanted ToD the way he did due to his divorce, but maybe that proves frustration can enable greatness, if you're a fan of ToD.
I also have to say that Indy's intros in the first two are far superior to how he is done in that latter ones. Temple opens with us learning through his talk with the crime boss that he is not someone you want to cross , hence the son's injured hand and "I spared his life" line. And , who can forget his classic introduction in Raiders? Compare that to TLC where he's first seen as an adult getting punched and then in KotCS where he's being dragged out of the trunk of a car. |
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
(Post 11122083)
The racism of ToD is too overbearing for me -- they might as well have called it Indiana Jones and the White Man's Burden. Oh, those poor, heathen darkies, they need a noble white man to save them because they're incapable of taking care of themselves. Crusade may be stupid, but at least it doesn't insult a billion people.
|
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
Originally Posted by Mabuse
(Post 11125464)
Yeah the history of Indians finding the film racist is lengthy but I don't think any of the filmmakers had any ill intent.
http://www.starwars-holonet.com/holo...ray_nute_1.jpg |
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
Spielberg said TOD was: ""I wasn't happy with Temple of Doom at all. It was too dark, too subterranean, and much too horrific. I thought it out-poltered Poltergeist. "
Nothing about racism of offensive stereotypes. But this is only one quote from wikipedia. Do you think that I am Legend was racist? |
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
(Post 11123289)
That's a complete strawman. I didn't say I had a problem with the village being portrayed as impoverished. What I object to is the way the film infantilizes the Indians, portraying them as lacking in agency and needing the mighty-whitey to save them.
Well, except for the cartoonishly evil villains who are responsible for the drought. Because the problems faced by the Indians during the colonial period were brought about by other, evil Indians, not by the British who had ruined a land that had been the world's leading economic power prior to their arrival. ". |
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
A few comparisons, sorry if it's been done before.
Sidekick Temple - Short Round Crusade - Professor Henry Jones Sr. WINNER: Crusade - Sean EM-EFFING Connery Ick Factor Temple - Bugs Crusade - Rats WINNER: Temple - Yucky. Villain Temple - Mola Ram Crusade - Walter Donovan WINNER: Temple - "Mola Ram, prepare to meet Kali......IN HELL!" Henchmen Temple - Thuggees Crusade - Nazis WINNER: Crusade - Indy kicking Nazi ass is awesome. Goal Temple - Sankara stones Crusade - Holy Grail WINNER: Crusade - Uh..JESUS drank from it. Main chick Temple - Willie Scott - Whiny & shrill nightclub singer Crusade - Dr. Elsa Schneider - Cold-blooded Nazi hoo-er. WINNER: Crusade - Angry evil sex! Villain Death Temple - Off a cliff, into the waiting mouths of crocodiles Crusade - Drinking some bad shit, getting old real quick. WINNER: Temple - He screamed all the way down. Final task Temple - Sweet mine car chase, tunnel flooding, and rickety-ass suspension bridge. Crusade - Biblical fakakta obstacle course WINNER: Temple - Great sequence Video Game WINNER: Temple - One of the greatest arcade games EVAH. Goddamn flaming hearts though. |
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
Originally Posted by mcnabb
(Post 11126048)
I think people are looking too deeply into an Indian Jones movie. You have an archaeologist who kicks ass and is on par with James Bond looking for old relics, I think we should all watch these movies with a big grain of salt. ;)
Whenever I watch it now, I put myself into the same frame of mind I had back then (what you mentioned). You know what? It's still a fun time! |
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
(Post 11125617)
Probably not, which is the problem. Racism isn't just hating on people of a different color. It's a way of viewing the world, and when a person makes a statement that reflects a racist worldview, they need to be called on it so they can reconsider their way of thinking. And to Spielberg's credit, he's aware of what's wrong with the film and has distanced himself from it. Lucas on the other hand went on to this:
http://www.starwars-holonet.com/holo...ray_nute_1.jpg Temple of Doom is very "of its time" and by that I don't mean the 1930's I mean the early 1980's. Rather than the film being racist, it is actually paternalistic and couched in the feeling of the time which was very "Concert For Bangladesh", famine in Ethiopia, "We Are The World". Sugar coated pop-philanthropy for the third world. |
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
Originally Posted by Mabuse
(Post 11126456)
Brayzie is right. While Spileberg has distanced himself from the film he has never indicated it is because of any perceived racism but rather because it is too dark and mean.
Temple of Doom is very "of its time" and by that I don't mean the 1930's I mean the early 1980's. Rather than the film being racist, it is actually paternalistic and couched in the feeling of the time which was very "Concert For Bangladesh", famine in Ethiopia, "We Are The World". Sugar coated pop-philanthropy for the third world. As for being of its time, remember this is the same era that gave us this: <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/K6TLYwelOPk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
(Post 11126486)
In the bonus disc for the original Indy boxset, he discusses the criticism the film received and how he didn't become aware of the problems until afterwards.
Couldln't Raidres be considered just as racially offensive to non-whites? I don't want racism in Indiana Jones, but then again, I think it goes against the nature of the pulp source material they're trying to emulate to be overly PC. |
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
(Post 11126486)
Paternalism is a form of racism. That's why Song of the South still receives criticism even though it's set after the Civil War.
|
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
Originally Posted by brayzie
(Post 11125567)
I never got the impression that the villagers in the film were supposed by racially inferior, nor did I think that the village was supposed to represent all of India.
Originally Posted by mcnabb
(Post 11126048)
I think people are looking too deeply into an Indian Jones movie. You have an archaeologist who kicks ass and is on par with James Bond looking for old relics, I think we should all watch these movies with a big grain of salt. ;)
|
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
I went for Last Crusade....however, i love the opening sequence from ToD in Club Obi-Wan. Really great.
|
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
Originally Posted by james2025a
(Post 11132689)
I went for Last Crusade....however, i love the opening sequence from ToD in Club Obi-Wan. Really great.
|
Re: Temple of Doom or Last Crusade
Originally Posted by Charlie Goose
(Post 11133286)
One problem with that scene. Lao Che poisoned Indy to get the diamond back, but was going to double cross him and let him die anyway. So why would Lao Che bring the real antidote?
When this thread first popped up, I watched Temple of Doom again, and while enjoyable, it wasn't quite as good as I remembered. Maybe The Last Crusade was the better sequel after all. I just watched The Last Crusade. Holy crap, it was a chore to get through. The danger and excitement was gone, and it felt like Indy and father were some bumbling fools, going from one scene to the next. Short Round is definitely the better sidekick than Henry Jones Sr. Connery was great in the role, but it was a little too much comedy for me. The sense of the exotic was missing too. Raiders is mostly in Egypt, Temple in India. But The Last Crusade seems to spend a lot of time in Venice and Germany which was pretty dull in comparison. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.