Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-07 | 03:03 PM
  #26  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: H-Town, TX
You're better off avoiding M:I-2. The 3rd one's actually a decent flick and doesn't seem like a Tom Cruise vanity project.
Old 05-16-07 | 03:10 PM
  #27  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Philadelphia
Originally Posted by cleaver
Watch Notorious intead.
I had actually seen MI2 in the theater, and as I said earlier, enjoyed it in a guilty pleasure, turn my mind off, what-the-fuck-is-Sir-Anthony-Hopkins-Doing-in-this sort of way... and I had yet to see the masterpiece Notorious. Well, years later, I'm sitting in a film history class watching Notorious. It took about 15 minutes before I said aloud, "you gotta be F-ing kidding me..."

There's derivitive, and then there's straight-up ripping off a classic.



Doc
Old 05-16-07 | 03:18 PM
  #28  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MI2 is my favorite one in the series...
Old 05-16-07 | 07:03 PM
  #29  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: union grove, wi
Bah, MI3 is more outrageous then MI2 if ask me, just missing the Woo MTV slow mo. The bridge scene alone should have killed Ethan at least 50 times. I enjoyed 1 and 2 but 3 not so much, just seemed rushed with dull outrageousness to it.
Old 05-17-07 | 06:53 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 798
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Woo is supposedly directing 4.
Old 07-29-18 | 07:20 PM
  #31  
Why So Blu?'s Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 40,384
Received 1,758 Likes on 1,336 Posts
From: Los Angeles
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

I watched part 2 this morning and it's even worse than I remember. That whole film is dated and awkward. Woo's trademark action is lame and doesn't flow well.

As bad as Face/Off is that action is much more consistent and flows properly. I heard that MI:2 was neutered to get the PG-13 rating down.
Old 07-29-18 | 07:39 PM
  #32  
OldBoy's Avatar
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 54,117
Received 1,721 Likes on 1,411 Posts
From: "Are any of us really anywhere?"
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
I watched part 2 this morning and it's even worse than I remember. That whole film is dated and awkward. Woo's trademark action is lame and doesn't flow well.

As bad as Face/Off is that action is much more consistent and flows properly. I heard that MI:2 was neutered to get the PG-13 rating down.
Agree. Between the constant slomos, face lifts and doves I was in Woo overload. I could take them way back when in The Killer and Hardboiled, but 2 was preposterous...
Old 07-29-18 | 08:04 PM
  #33  
Banned by request
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,800
Received 779 Likes on 583 Posts
From: Goodbye and Good Luck
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

Originally Posted by OutRun2
Woo is supposedly directing 4.
Confirmed, not true!
Old 07-30-18 | 05:53 AM
  #34  
The Bus's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 54,920
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
From: New York
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

I think the last ~25 minutes of M-I:2 are fine
Old 07-30-18 | 09:58 AM
  #35  
Banned by request
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,800
Received 779 Likes on 583 Posts
From: Goodbye and Good Luck
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

This was more exciting than 2.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tx8Atds3HXA" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Old 07-30-18 | 10:24 AM
  #36  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20,052
Received 169 Likes on 127 Posts
From: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

The problem with 2 is that there’s incredibly little action in the film. There’s a high rise heist at the mid-point and a motorcycle chase that ends in a knife fight at the end. That’s it.

For all the flack that 2 gets for stealing from Notorious, no one ever bitches about how part 3 cribs from Danger Diabolik and tons of other euro espionage films.

Last edited by Mabuse; 07-30-18 at 10:32 AM.
Old 07-30-18 | 10:52 AM
  #37  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 47,774
Received 2,292 Likes on 1,422 Posts
From: Rosemount, MN
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

We tried to go see Fallout last week but an emergency with our dog at home forced us to leave early (she's fine). So we're going back later this week.

With that in mind, I just had a fun three days watching all five MI movies basically back to back. I've never done that before and it was fascinating to see how wildly different they all are. I mean, I knew that in the abstract but I've never done a viewing like that.

2 is problematic from start to finish - even Cruise is overacting and I blame the dialogue for being super-cheesy (the "I WILL FIND YOU" stuff is ripped straight out of Last of the Mohicans). I like that his martial art skills have completely changed from movie to movie too. The motorcycle stuff is actually pretty fun at the end but the rest is just blah. And too much "wire-fu" stuff too. And I saw pointed out that 2 is actually the only MI movie up to Fallout where Cruise and his team are on an actual MI mission and not fighting the IMF bureaucracy.

It was weird to go straight into 3 which is a much more interesting movie, has great dialogue and way better set pieces.

Just a fun way to watch them all.
Old 07-30-18 | 11:21 AM
  #38  
stingermck's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 18,979
Received 574 Likes on 373 Posts
From: Cobra Island
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

I love everything about 2 and make no apologies for it
Old 07-30-18 | 11:27 AM
  #39  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 47,774
Received 2,292 Likes on 1,422 Posts
From: Rosemount, MN
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

Originally Posted by stingermck
I love everything about 2 and make no apologies for it
The entire bunker section and motorcycle chase are fantastic. It's getting there that's the issue for me. I really don't like Thandie Newton in the movie either.
Old 07-30-18 | 12:06 PM
  #40  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,252
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
From: Massachusetts
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

Of the first 3, 2 is my favorite with 3 being my least favorite. I actually think 3 is the worst in the whole series. It is unmemorable and PSH is terrible and woefully miscast. I have seen it a few times and I am struggling to remember any action sequences or anything impressive about the movie as I type this.
Old 07-30-18 | 12:34 PM
  #41  
bluetoast's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,880
Received 324 Likes on 244 Posts
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

I remember 2 and 3 being awful (R.I.P. Dougray Scott’s career) with the rest of them being solid. Haven’t seen the first one since the 90s.
Old 07-30-18 | 12:34 PM
  #42  
dex14's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 47,065
Likes: 0
Received 5,339 Likes on 3,597 Posts
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

PSH is easily the best villain.
Old 07-30-18 | 01:03 PM
  #43  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 14,418
Likes: 0
Received 289 Likes on 219 Posts
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

I have such a soft spot for 1. Possibly since I had no clue what was going on when I saw it in the theater so I had to watch it again and really pay attention to finally get it. It's almost a completely different movie from the rest and perhaps that why I despise 2 so much because it followed the original and was just so different.
Old 07-30-18 | 01:14 PM
  #44  
FM
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 524
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Canal Winchester, OH
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

Originally Posted by Timber
I have such a soft spot for 1. Possibly since I had no clue what was going on when I saw it in the theater so I had to watch it again and really pay attention to finally get it. It's almost a completely different movie from the rest and perhaps that why I despise 2 so much because it followed the original and was just so different.
My lasting impression from seeing 1 in the theatre as a 16 year-old was that it made no fucking sense. I rewatched it last week and was shocked to find that my 22 year-long grudge against the movie was unfair. The movie feels dated to me, like it was filmed in the 70s, but the plot is perfectly understandable.
Old 07-30-18 | 01:21 PM
  #45  
Hokeyboy's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,849
Received 1,040 Likes on 620 Posts
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

My thoughts on the series:

I saw MI1 in theaters and hated it (and I love DePalma films, mostly). Years later I watched it again and appreciated it much more. I don't think it's a great film but it's easily a very good one. Unfortunately it set the pattern for "Ethan Hunt & Team on the run/discredited/disavowed/going rogue" etc. instead of actually going on missions.

MI2 (also in theaters) I loved at first, but it was an action film first and foremost, and so much a relic of its time that now the film suffers for it. It's oddly paced as well, replete with lukewarm Hitchcock'ian "To Catch A Thief" leftovers that are oddly fitted with a chemistry-less Cruise/Newton. Still, it has some slick and impressive sequences that are still worthwhile.

MI3 (last one I saw in theaters) was largely forgettable since I largely forgot it. I remember thinking PSH was great in it, but like many JJA movies (and shows) it started very strong and petered out to hohummery by the end.

MI4 was the best since MI1, with a fun story and impressive action sequences. I think here they perfected the formula balancing compelling storylines and cool action. I think the final set piece was a bit of overkill and a letdown after the thrilling Burj Kalifa sequence.

MI5 is IMO the best overall (I haven't seen Fallout yet). Gritty, fun, suspenseful, and engrossing. I was surprised that the fifth entry into a series provided the best experience yet.

My ranking: 5, 4, 1, 2, 3
Old 07-30-18 | 03:12 PM
  #46  
Groucho's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 71,383
Received 130 Likes on 92 Posts
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

Fun fact: Dougray Scott turned down Wolverine to do MI:2.

I imagine he spends his days now going from showing to showing of "The Greatest Showman" with a bottle of cheap Scotch.
Old 07-30-18 | 03:17 PM
  #47  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 11,957
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
From: Pa
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

I still love MI1 the most, with 4 and 5 behind it. It was the only one that really had the TEAM aspect, at least for part of the movie, and not Super-Ethan. If, when, they reboot I hope they go back to using the team concept.
Old 07-30-18 | 03:39 PM
  #48  
Why So Blu?'s Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 40,384
Received 1,758 Likes on 1,336 Posts
From: Los Angeles
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

Originally Posted by Groucho
Fun fact: Dougray Scott turned down Wolverine to do MI:2.

I imagine he spends his days now going from showing to showing of "The Greatest Showman" with a bottle of cheap Scotch.
Turned down? No, he was actually cast as Wolverine but they ran way too long on MI:2 and he could not be released from it, so they recast him with Hugh. From what I remember.
Old 07-30-18 | 04:29 PM
  #49  
TheMovieman's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 13,595
Received 302 Likes on 242 Posts
From: Oregon
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
Turned down? No, he was actually cast as Wolverine but they ran way too long on MI:2 and he could not be released from it, so they recast him with Hugh. From what I remember.
That's what I remember as well.
Old 07-30-18 | 04:32 PM
  #50  
Groucho's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 71,383
Received 130 Likes on 92 Posts
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Mission: Impossible 2 & 3 question...

I think you're right. It was a Tom Selleck situation.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.