Indy 4......finally!!!!
#27
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by Doughboy
As long as Spielberg sticks with traditional stunts and as little CGI as possible, I think the movie will turn out fine. Unlike Lucas who no longer appears capable of writing or directing a scene if his life depended on it, Spielberg is still a very talented filmmaker.
The big question is will Connery come out of retirement to be in this?
The big question is will Connery come out of retirement to be in this?
I don't care if it will be almost twenty years since Crusade when this finally hits the big screen - I'm there.
#32
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
10 Posts
Originally Posted by calhoun07
And the Last Crusade was a re-hash how? I thought the movie was very good on it's own.
#33
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Illustrious State of Fugue
Posts: 6,255
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by DieselsDen
It was okay. I enjoyed TEMPLE OF DOOM better (and I do realize that I am one of those few who prefer it over CRUSADE). The tank chase in CRUSADE felt like the truck chase from RAIDERS, and we already had Nazi villains in the first movie. At least DOOM went in an entirely different direction.
The roe sham bow (sp?) between Connery and Ford made up for so much that I loved Crusade. And- Any ricochet through the head scene is gold.
That Plus, the seagulls into the propellers …Somebody (anybody!) should tell Sabrett about this flick.
Last edited by Kudama; 12-30-06 at 05:25 PM.
#35
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DieselsDen
It was okay. I enjoyed TEMPLE OF DOOM better (and I do realize that I am one of those few who prefer it over CRUSADE). The tank chase in CRUSADE felt like the truck chase from RAIDERS, and we already had Nazi villains in the first movie. At least DOOM went in an entirely different direction.
I'm with you.
It also had the best cinematography of the series, and the best sidekick.
#37
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Illustrious State of Fugue
Posts: 6,255
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Joe Molotov
How about the Illuminati? They're kinda chic now.
#39
DVD Talk Legend
Temple of Doom is my favorite, mostly because it was one of the early vhs tapes i had as a kid and watched over and over and over and over
I love Raiders...Last Crusade seems the worst to me (but still a great movie), but the wife loves it
I love Raiders...Last Crusade seems the worst to me (but still a great movie), but the wife loves it
#41
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Connery ruined LAST for me. If he would of played like a know it all tough guy instead of a winy old man I would have liked it. I'm sure he thought why play the same character again as he did in UNTOUCHABLES, PRESIDIO, NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN.
#42
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by wm lopez
Connery ruined LAST for me. If he would of played like a know it all tough guy instead of a winy old man I would have liked it. I'm sure he thought why play the same character again as he did in UNTOUCHABLES, PRESIDIO, NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN.
#44
Originally Posted by wm lopez
Connery ruined LAST for me. If he would of played like a know it all tough guy instead of a winy old man I would have liked it. I'm sure he thought why play the same character again as he did in UNTOUCHABLES, PRESIDIO, NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN.
#46
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally Posted by RayChuang
Oh please! Connery was great in The Last Crusade. Connery playing a befuddled old professor was half the charm of the movie....
#47
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rainy ass Seattle yes the weather sucks here, so do our sports teams.
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Loved Temple. LC ehhh it was ok.
The only thing that ruined Last Crusade for me is what they did to Sallah. In Raiders is was a gret digger, well respected, great ally of Indy. In LC they turned his character into a bumbling fool. Plus I liked Raiders & Temple's more serious tone to them (somewhat) LC just felt too goofy. I hope with Indy IV they do the Batman Begins type thing and make it a little more serious tone to it. We will see.
The only thing that ruined Last Crusade for me is what they did to Sallah. In Raiders is was a gret digger, well respected, great ally of Indy. In LC they turned his character into a bumbling fool. Plus I liked Raiders & Temple's more serious tone to them (somewhat) LC just felt too goofy. I hope with Indy IV they do the Batman Begins type thing and make it a little more serious tone to it. We will see.
#48
DVD Talk Legend
I've never met anyone who liked "Temple of Doom". Personally, I hated it too. And thought "The Last Crusade" put the series back on track. Not as good as "Raiders". But very few movies are.
#49
Banned
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Right now, my location is DVDTalk, but then again, you should already know that, shouldn't you?
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Daytripper
I've never met anyone who liked "Temple of Doom".
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Planet Houston, TX
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I love all three films (although the darn-near flawless Raiders rules in my book, by a long shot), but I don't get how Temple is looked at as simply a "darker" Indy. That aspect of the flick is all fine with me, but the Willie-Indy scenes are just plain goofy and sometimes painfully unfunny. In contrast, the Shorty-Indy scenes are humorous and really click (to me, at least).
Overall, I always thought Temple tries to balance too much silliness with a dark storyline. Still, a lot to like!
Oh yeah, really looking forward to IV!
Overall, I always thought Temple tries to balance too much silliness with a dark storyline. Still, a lot to like!
Oh yeah, really looking forward to IV!