![]() |
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by Numanoid
(Post 10442070)
Yep. Well, except for the cool bank-robbery scene; and the cool Metropolis Mayhem portion (with the firey gas pipe, super breath, flying upside-down and zapping debris with laservision, catching the Daily Planet globe, etc.); the thrilling lifting-of-the-boat rescue; the way-cool recharging and triumphantly slamming into the ocean floor followed by the lifting of New Krypton scene; the touching falling-back-to-Earth "death" scene; the wonderful and exciting soundtrack (including the new themes); etc. Other than that, yeah, a bleh movie.
But I guess people can always watch Iron Man 2 again, which lacked any inspiring, touching, or thrilling moments, IMO. |
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by Numanoid
(Post 10442070)
Yep. Well, except for the cool bank-robbery scene; and the cool Metropolis Mayhem portion (with the firey gas pipe, super breath, flying upside-down and zapping debris with laservision, catching the Daily Planet globe, etc.); the thrilling lifting-of-the-boat rescue; the way-cool recharging and triumphantly slamming into the ocean floor followed by the lifting of New Krypton scene; the touching falling-back-to-Earth "death" scene; the wonderful and exciting soundtrack (including the new themes); etc. Other than that, yeah, a bleh movie.
But I guess people can always watch Iron Man 2 again, which lacked any inspiring, touching, or thrilling moments, IMO. I agree with that, except the movie was still a fantastic 120-130min film trapped in an above average 154min film. |
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by Numanoid
(Post 10442070)
Yep. Well, except for the cool bank-robbery scene; and the cool Metropolis Mayhem portion (with the firey gas pipe, super breath, flying upside-down and zapping debris with laservision, catching the Daily Planet globe, etc.); the thrilling lifting-of-the-boat rescue; the way-cool recharging and triumphantly slamming into the ocean floor followed by the lifting of New Krypton scene; the touching falling-back-to-Earth "death" scene; the wonderful and exciting soundtrack (including the new themes); etc. Other than that, yeah, a bleh movie.
But I guess people can always watch Iron Man 2 again, which lacked any inspiring, touching, or thrilling moments, IMO. The "Metropolis Mayhem" was just clunky, IMO, and it didn't add anything that wasn't done better in one of the previous Superman movies. And I'm assuming you're being facetious about the "thrilling lifting-of-the-boat rescue" and "way cool recharging" stuff. Really? |
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Let's also not forget that the bank robbery scene was added after the fact to punch up the action. It wasn't even going to be in there originally.
|
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by Boba Fett
(Post 10442111)
I agree with that, except the movie was still a fantastic 120-130min film trapped in an above average 154min film.
|
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by KillerCannibal
(Post 10442144)
Let's also not forget that the bank robbery scene was added after the fact to punch up the action. It wasn't even going to be in there originally.
|
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by CaptainMarvel
(Post 10442011)
The rest is Superman acting like a stalker, or Superman breaking up a happy marriage, or just boring nonsense.
|
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by Vipper II
(Post 10442176)
Or skipping out on the hospital bills and making the tax payers responsible for the expenses for the emergency care and multi-day stay. What an assholish thing to do.
I love some of those panels and covers :lol: http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g2.../116_4_262.jpg Of course, in defense of Superman, Batman isn't any better. How much in property damage did he cause in Batman Begins? |
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by Numanoid
(Post 10442173)
So?
But, of course, I know you disagree so it's a moot point. |
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Everyone keeps minimizing the action scenes, but talking up the "stalker" aspect. Really now, how much screen time did the "stalking" actually take up?
|
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by Numanoid
(Post 10442271)
Everyone keeps minimizing the action scenes, but talking up the "stalker" aspect. Really now, how much screen time did the "stalking" actually take up?
Superman is supposed to be the hero, not some moody all powerful emo douchebag. |
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by TallGuyMe
(Post 10442274)
1 minute is too long.
Superman is supposed to be the hero, not some moody all powerful emo douchebag. |
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by Groucho
(Post 10442054)
This should be the blurb on the front of the Blu-Ray cover.
Originally Posted by Numanoid
(Post 10442070)
Yep. Well, except for the cool bank-robbery scene; and the cool Metropolis Mayhem portion (with the firey gas pipe, super breath, flying upside-down and zapping debris with laservision, catching the Daily Planet globe, etc.); the thrilling lifting-of-the-boat rescue; the way-cool recharging and triumphantly slamming into the ocean floor followed by the lifting of New Krypton scene; the touching falling-back-to-Earth "death" scene; the wonderful and exciting soundtrack (including the new themes); etc. Other than that, yeah, a bleh movie.
But I guess people can always watch Iron Man 2 again, which lacked any inspiring, touching, or thrilling moments, IMO. 2. The Metropolis stuff was boring. He saves the place all the time. Nothing new. 3. The ONLY moment I enjoyed that scene was when you see supes literally stand on it and lift it for that short bit. Mostly cuz the shot zooms out and you see him lifting it out. That and the theme playing...was good. The rest of that scene is eh. 4. I thought the recharge scene was alright. The music playing during that moment was too much. Slamming into the ocean floor and what not? Reminds me too much for Superman 1. 5. Lifting New Krypton and THEN faling to earth? Kind of predictable and boring. 6. The score? it's a good score...except...we've all heard that score sooo much so...that...kind of only makes some of those boring moments more enjoyable. That boat rescue. The theme saves that scene. Without the music it'd be more boring. Hell...that airplane rescue is entertaining for sure. The landing it in a Baseball field and people cheering? Too corny for me. Also...Bosworth was "serviceable" as Lane. She looked too young and petite for Lois Lane. Everyone else was cast fine. Superkid...the idea was horrible. |
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by TallGuyMe
(Post 10442274)
Superman is supposed to be the hero, not some moody all powerful emo douchebag.
|
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by TheMovieman
(Post 10442219)
Of course, in defense of Superman, Batman isn't any better. How much in property damage did he cause in Batman Begins?
|
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by Numanoid
(Post 10442409)
Overexaggerated, once again. But anyway, do you think we're going to get something better with this new reboot?
|
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10442424)
Damage that Bruce Wayne paid for.
|
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Wait? When did Wayne pay for anything? Wouldn't he not want to have his public identity involved at all with anything he did as Batman?
|
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
I seem to recall some line about Wayne paying for stuff, but even if it's not in there, most of the damage in Begins was to Wayne Corp's HQ, so it would make sense he'd pay for it (or have the insurance take care of it).
|
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10442460)
I seem to recall some line about Wayne paying for stuff, but even if it's not in there, most of the damage in Begins was to Wayne Corp's HQ, so it would make sense he'd pay for it (or have the insurance take care of it).
|
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Good point.
|
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
(Post 10442460)
I seem to recall some line about Wayne paying for stuff, but even if it's not in there, most of the damage in Begins was to Wayne Corp's HQ, so it would make sense he'd pay for it (or have the insurance take care of it).
|
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
Originally Posted by Numanoid
(Post 10442409)
Overexaggerated, once again. But anyway, do you think we're going to get something better with this new reboot?
|
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
1 and 2 were well paced. 3 and 4 were messes. Returns was so so fucking slow.
The problem with 2 is...that it's uneven in quality. And it shows cuz Donner filmed part of it while Lester took that footage and used it while also reshooting some moments, adding his stuff in there as well. |
Re: Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
I've got no problem with them doing a reboot with Snyder, but the last thing I want is a movie with Superman not being Superman. This whole wandering the globe horseshit sounds like a colossal waste of my time.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.