Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Where's the Primer thread?

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Where's the Primer thread?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-05 | 02:24 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Los Angeles and Amsterdam
Where's the Primer thread?

How come I can't find a thread on Primer? This movie has to cause one of the biggest potential threads around. Makes Momento seem like a Disney flick is what I read. After seeing it, I have an urge to read other peoples reactions.
Old 06-27-05 | 02:49 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 10,521
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Lower Beaver, Iowa
If you're interested in the movie, why not start a thread about it, instead of starting a thread about the lack of a thread?
Old 06-27-05 | 02:57 AM
  #3  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,085
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Phoenix
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=396130
Old 06-27-05 | 05:28 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,137
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: San Marcos, TX
I was fortunate enough to see an advanced screening of this film a long while ago. I have to say, it was the most useful writer/director Q&A I've ever sat through. My initial review, yet to be updated with the additional awards, nominations, and etc:

Plot: Four friends, rich in scientific knowledge, are attempting to come up with an invention that will catch the world's attention and, consequently, build the four of them a pretty substantial nest egg. However, when two of the four discover that they've accidentally produced a makeshift time machine, they shut the other two out of the group and decide to use the machine to their advantage. Every minute spent in the machine is a minute gone back in time. So, they start the machine in the morning, cocoon in a motel room for the day (checking sports scores and stock movement), then spend the entire evening in the machine. They leave the machine in the morning, and bet on games which they already know the outcome to (or purchase stocks with the most substantial increases for the day). For kicks...in the evening, they return to the machine only to see doubles of themselves (doubles that have spent the entire day in a hotel room studying sports scores and stocks) entering the machine, in the exact same manner as they had earlier, er, later..or um, earlier in the day. Got that?

Comments: Thus far, Primer is one of the ten best films I've seen in 2004...and I have no doubt that it will remain on that list for the remainder of the year. The film was made on a $7,000 budget (not including post-production expenses) by a first-time writer and director named Shane Carruth. Carruth also stars in the film, along with a cast of actors with zero experience. So, the film must really suck, huh? Apparently not. It was the hit film of this year's Sundance film festival, and looks about as professionally done as any independent film I've ever seen.

The plot, which deals with time travel, isn't anything new...but the film still manages to remain fresh. It creates an identity for itself separate from the Back to the Futures of the cinematic world. This alone is quite an accomplishment. Primer is definitely a thinking-man's movie, filled with paradoxes that my mind had a hell of a time wrapping itself around. Don't expect any favors from Carruth, though. He certainly doesn't slow things down for you to catch up. Not to mention...the heady, mindfuck of a story is only magnified by the constant use of scientific terminology that only an engineer could ever hope to keep up with. The best part of this is that all of the terminology (leading up to the time travel) is accurate, as Carruth went out of his way to study the science he intended to use for this picture.

The acting isn't anything remarkable, but it's certainly more than I'd expect from a group of guys with no experience, who simply wanted to take part in making a film (without pay, might I add). They don't come off as amateurish all that often...surprising given their ridiculously complex dialogue, and (due to the film's budget) minimal number of takes per scene. The key to this film...the one thing it lives or dies by (and that carries it to a moderate level of greatness) is it's story. For the story alone (probably the most convincing time-travel tale ever brought to the screen), Primer is worth watching at least once...though, trust me when I say that one viewing won't suffice. You'll definitely be in for two or three viewings, just to make sure you've kept up with everything in the picture. Then you'll want to watch it once more, for enjoyment's sake. After all, you will have earned it.

Awards & Nominations:
2004 Sundance Film Festival - Alfred P. Sloan Feature Film Prize
2004 Sundance Film Festival - Grand Jury Prize (Best Picture)

JP's Rating: 9.0/10
IMDB.com Rating: N/A (Pre-release)
-JP
Old 06-27-05 | 01:38 PM
  #5  
Geofferson's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 39,973
Received 156 Likes on 127 Posts
From: The Village Green
My bro rented this over the weekend and I plan on watching it tonight. He loved it and every review I've read about it has been glowing. Can't wait to see for myself!
Old 06-27-05 | 02:38 PM
  #6  
Matthew Chmiel's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 13,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Las Vegas, NV
Primer is one of those films with an outstanding premise, but the execution is completely terrible. The film is only 70 minutes long, but nothing ever really happens until the last 20-25 minutes. Basically, a good two-thirds of the film is two people just talking and bullshitting with one another. I don't know about you, but for me, that is some non-exciting cinema right there.

I'd recommend The Butterfly Effect or Donnie Darko or even Back to the Future to someone who wanted to watch a good "time travel" film before ever recommending Primer.
Old 06-27-05 | 06:34 PM
  #7  
calhoun07's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I liked it. It can be quite confusing as hell (I was reading some comments on IMDB.com and even though I was doing my best to pay attention, I know I missed some stuff) and is rewarding with repeat viewings. This is not a movie to rent, this is a movie to buy. That said, I did rent this first, because I had no idea what to expect, but will be buying this in the future. I am just hoping some kind of special edition comes out. This is the type of movie that should have a bonus features laden edition.

Ebert has a good review.

Last edited by calhoun07; 06-27-05 at 06:41 PM.
Old 06-27-05 | 06:43 PM
  #8  
Joe Molotov's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,507
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Oklahoma, USA
My brother bought this movie the other day, so I may check it out this weekend.
Old 06-28-05 | 01:18 AM
  #9  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 15,097
Received 303 Likes on 239 Posts
From: a mile high, give or take a few feet
I really enjoyed the movie. It took me a bit to figure things out, and I'm still not quite sure. They did what I probably would have done in their position, which may be one of the reasons I liked it.
Old 06-30-05 | 09:54 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,080
Received 822 Likes on 575 Posts
This film is great. It's incredibly complex and hard to figure out, but the film does supply all the answers if you catch all the clues. Easily in my mind one of the best sci-fi films ever, certainly one of the best time travel films.

The great thing about the film is how almost every scene has hidden meanings and significance that you may not catch until the second viewing. Even the "conventional" first half has new meanings after having seen the whole film.
Old 07-01-05 | 03:47 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Los Angeles and Amsterdam
I would like to hear more about the hidden meanings and what to look for on the second viewing. I got this from the first viewing:

Spoiler:
These guys build a device and figure it that it's a time machine that sends you back for 16 hours or so, but it actually only sends you back for a fraction of a second and makes a duplicate of you at the same time that is sent back 16 hours previously?
Old 07-01-05 | 04:41 AM
  #12  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,080
Received 822 Likes on 575 Posts
Originally Posted by H8nXTC
I would like to hear more about the hidden meanings and what to look for on the second viewing. I got this from the first viewing:

Spoiler:
These guys build a device and figure it that it's a time machine that sends you back for 16 hours or so, but it actually only sends you back for a fraction of a second and makes a duplicate of you at the same time that is sent back 16 hours previously?
Wow. As far as my interpretation went, the scenerio you describe is almost completely wrong.

This is how I interpreted it:
Spoiler:
The two guys build a device and figure it that it's a time machine that sends you back to the moment it was turned on. The amount of time backwards you travel is equal to the amount of time the machine has been on, and takes the same amount of time to travel backwards, e.g. a machine turned on for 8 hours will send you 8 hours into the past and will take 8 hours sitting in the machine to do so.

After Abe, the blonde-haired guy, reveals this to Aaron, the brown-haired guy, Aaron stops a possible assault on Abe's girlfriend by an ex at a party. Abe finds out about this later. This is an important plot point that doesn't reveal itself as such until later.

The guys use this at first to travel 8 hours back in time to the beginning of the day. What they do is first isolate themselves spend 8 hours doing nothing. Then they look up stocks and pick the strong performers that day. Then they spend 8 hours going back in time. They then proceed to buy the stocks they know will perform well that day and take the profits at the end of the day. The machines are one-use only, meaning that you can only travel back to a certain point one time, although you can start them up again and create a new past point to travel to.

Everything is going smoothly until Aaron, the brown-haired guy, suggests hitting his boss and then going back in time to prevent himself from hitting his boss, which would create a paradox. Abe, the blonde-haired guy, is adamant that they avoid paradox. Still, the idea has been planted.

One night, Abe is awoken by someone setting off car alarms. He calls Aaron, who comes over. Abe has been turning on the machines around 5pm to let them run all night before they are turned off and turned on again in the morning for their daily routine. So they can go hit Aaron's boss, go back to 5pm and then proceed to stop the kid from setting off the alarms, thus not waking Abe and causing him to decide to go back in time.

However, on their way to do this, they notice that Abe's girlfriend's dad, Thomas Granger, is following them with a 3-day beard. Mr. Granger is a businessman they've previously tried to persuade to invest in their company. Suspicious, they call his house. Thomas Granger is at home, so they know the Thomas Granger following them is from the future. They try to confront the future Thomas Granger, who flees and then collapses. Unsure of what to do, Abe decides without telling Aaron to use the fail-safe.

The fail-safe is a third time machine that has been running since before Abe first traveled back in time, and since before Abe told Aaron about the time machine. Abe has never told Aaron about this backup device. At this point, going back in time requires several days in the machine, so supplies of water, food, and drugs are needed to make the trip.

Abe travels back and starts to redo the conversation that he had with Aaron at the park bench when he told Aaron about the time machine. However, Abe is weak and collapses. This is where it gets complicated. It's at this point it's revealed that Aaron has also travelled back in time, and multiple times at that, since he has a tape that has all their conversations recorded on them, so that he can recreate them perfectly. Aaron found out about the fail-safe and used it as well.

So, if the machines can only be used once, and there was only one fail-safe, how did Aaron come back? This is where the movie reveals the "box-in-a-box" concept, where Aaron brought a time machine back with him inside the time machine he traveled back in. Thus he was able to create a second unused time machine that comes back to the same point as the fail-safe. Basically, this means that the one-use only rule is out the window, they can go back to the same point in time as many times as they want.

Now here is where recursion kicks in. The Aaron on the park bench, and in fact the abe through most of the film, has been Aaron2, from the future. Aaron2 traveled back almost as soon as he found out about the machine. The reason he was able to stop the assault at the party was because he knew that the assault would happen, although he also knew the ex doesn't actually go through with the assault. Earlier in the film, Aaron's wife complained about noises in the attic, we now know that it was Aaron1 up there, who had been put there by Aaron2 to be out of the way.

Now, remember the narrator? It sounds like Aaron, but it's actually Aaron3. Aaron3 came back and tried to overcome Aaron2, but Aaron2 fought him off, and Aaron3 left, to never return. Up to this point, everything the narrator has described is first-hand experience. After this, it's only what he heard.

Also, after this point, my understanding of motives and such get a little fuzzy. Aaron2 contrives to have Abe2 stop the assault at the party, presumably to put him in good with his girlfriend and her dad, Thomas Granger. Aaron2 and Abe2 then conspire to prevent Abe and Aaron from ever successfully making a time machine. Then the paradox hits in, in that Abe and Aaron never make a time machine and travel back in time, yet Aaron2 and Abe2 continue to exist. They both must leave, although Abe2 doesn't want to leave his girlfriend. Abe2 decides to stay behind and watch over the Abe and Aaron to make sure they never make the machine. Aaron2 bolts for good.

The movie ends with a shot of Aaron3 in a foreign country surpervising a massive project. It's specualtion, but from Aaron3's statement that nobody will ever be able to find him, it seems likely that he's building a massive version of the time machine.

There are plenty of other little touches and things that I haven't touched on, but that's the main plot, in a nutshell (in this case the shell of a really large nut)
Old 07-01-05 | 07:53 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by Jay G.
Wow. As far as my interpretation went, the scenerio you describe is almost completely wrong.

This is how I interpreted it:
for the most part I liked what you said however, there is one thing that I think is different

Spoiler:

I was under the impression that they went back over and over again so that the fight could be stopped. However, every time they did it they wanted to make sure that everything happened the way it was supposed to happen. Ala the time they were playing basketball. Then once the entire day was set up perfectly they had to do something that would prevent the guy from having a gun.

So that is why they were going back again. IMO, it was after they accomplish what they wanted is when they used the box that was set running from the very beginning.


I am still working through this movie, so maybe that doesnt make sense or fit in exactally. I liked it, but as said before the execution was not very good. Had the movie been longer it may have been able to unfold better.
Old 07-01-05 | 10:56 AM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Los Angeles and Amsterdam
Thanks for the time you spent enlightening us, now I feel really simple.
Spoiler:
Though I thought there was a reference that one of them had killed one of his "duplicates", but I was tired when I watched it and my brain was half turned off.
Old 07-01-05 | 01:28 PM
  #15  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,080
Received 822 Likes on 575 Posts
Sorry, severly messed up the spoilers before.


Originally Posted by Gasspasser
for the most part I liked what you said however, there is one thing that I think is different

Spoiler:

I was under the impression that they went back over and over again so that the fight could be stopped. However, every time they did it they wanted to make sure that everything happened the way it was supposed to happen. Ala the time they were playing basketball. Then once the entire day was set up perfectly they had to do something that would prevent the guy from having a gun.
Spoiler:
I agree, they do travel back multiple times, at least twice. Aaron2 after all has a tape recording of the whole day, something he wouldn't have thought to do when he first experienced the day before time travelling. Aaron3 in the narration suggests the possibility of many more times, although it's conjecture for him how many more times. Also, I don't think they wanted to prevent the ex from having a gun, but to prevent it from being loaded. They wanted to give the appearance of being heros.

One great bit I liked from the basketball scene was how the conversation drifted from the previously recorded version when Aaron misses the shot, which he made previously, although the outcome of the conversation stayed the same.

Spoiler:
IMO, it was after they accomplish what they wanted is when they used the box that was set running from the very beginning.
Spoiler:
The fail-safe was the only machine that went back far enough to affect the day they kept reliving. The other two machines had been used and reset before Aaron figures out how to get multiple uses out of them. However, once Aaron figures out how to keep going back to the same point repeatedly, the fail-safe is a bit of a moot-point.


I am still working through this movie, so maybe that doesnt make sense or fit in exactally. I liked it, but as said before the execution was not very good. Had the movie been longer it may have been able to unfold better.
Personally, I thought the execution was excellent, precisely because it doesn't unfold the plot and lay it out all nice and neat. All the information is still there, just rolled up and compressed for the viewer to figure out. It's a puzzle box that encourages you to examine and rexamine it, each time unraveling part of the puzzle.

On the other hand, the film is definitely confusing while you're watching it for the first time, and those unprepared or simply used to more conventional narratives may be put off by the way it presents its story.
Old 07-01-05 | 01:49 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,080
Received 822 Likes on 575 Posts
Originally Posted by H8nXTC
Thanks for the time you spent enlightening us, now I feel really simple.
Spoiler:
Though I thought there was a reference that one of them had killed one of his "duplicates", but I was tired when I watched it and my brain was half turned off.
Spoiler:
There definitely are "duplicates" by the end of the film. However, this is more of a side-effect of paradoxes created by time travel than the expressed purpose of the machine.

In their initial stock market plan, they take great steps to insure that when they travel into the past they don't affect their past selves. That way, they don't prevent their past selves from becoming their future selves.

However, at the end, they travel back and directly affect their past selves and their lives. Therefore, they've changed the reason they came back, and their past selves do not correctly progress to becoming their future selves. This creates a paradox. In some films, this paradox is resolved by having the future self dissapear, as Marty McFly almost does in Back to the Future. In this film, the future selves continue to exist, essentially making them duplicates.

I don't recall either of the guys killing a duplicate version of themselves, although they both do subdue and lock up their original past selves to temporarily assume their lives. Also, one future Aaron, Aaron2, has a fight with an even furthur future Aaron, Aaron3, although Aaron3 actually loses and leaves, unable to achieve what he came back to do.
Old 07-01-05 | 02:20 PM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Los Angeles and Amsterdam
Spoiler:
And the reference to why they can write correctly anymore, does this have to do with them being duplicates or that they have changed their pasts and created the paradox?
Old 07-01-05 | 02:35 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cloud Cuckoo Land
I can't say that I enjoyed this movie.

It moves along fine til they have that "what if?" conversation. Then it went straight to hell. It was so jumbled that I had absolutely no desire to even attempt to get some sense out of it in a second viewing.
Old 07-01-05 | 07:02 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Virginia Beach, VA
I also enjoyed Primer. Here is the official forum.
Old 07-05-05 | 06:08 AM
  #20  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Makati, Philippines
thank you, Jay G., I just finished it, and my mind turned off after

Spoiler:
they were talking at the fountain


because of your explanation I don't need to see it again

but I thoroughly enjoyed the movie, even though sometimes, I didn't understand what was going on. It was still mind-stimulating nonetheless. Very good skunkworks movie

I do have one question though

Spoiler:
how many days have passed since they first went into the machines? because, if i understood the movie correctly, that's exactly the amount of time they have to spend in the machine each time they go back. and i don't think one could stay long in a machine like that

Last edited by joeydaninja; 07-05-05 at 01:34 PM.
Old 07-05-05 | 05:18 PM
  #21  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,080
Received 822 Likes on 575 Posts
Originally Posted by H8nXTC
Spoiler:
And the reference to why they can write correctly anymore, does this have to do with them being duplicates or that they have changed their pasts and created the paradox?
Spoiler:
I don't think it has to do with them being doubles. For example, their original stock market scheme created a period of doubling up where there were two versions of them during the day: a past one hiding in a hotel, and their future versions buying stocks. This doubling resolved itself when the past selves would eventually travel to the past to become the future ones. Its only when they create a paradox where their past versions don't become their future selves that the doubling becomes permanent.

So the act of creating a paradox is what causes changes, and possibly their afflictions as well. One of them mentions that the Mr. Granger from the future can't get near one of them without passing out, which may be because of the paradox of his trip backward changing whatever caused him to come back in the first place.

Another theory is that the inability to write, the passing out, and the bleeding from the ear are caused by extended and/or repeated bouts inside the force field of the time machine. They do initiall describe the slightly odd feeling of being within the field, and the film also shows the ill effects of trying to exit the field when it's not at its weakest.

Each possibility has its drawbacks. The force field theory doesn't explain why Future Mr Granger keeps passing out. The paradox theory doesn't explain why Mr. Granger is so greatly affected while Abe and Aaron, who repeatedly create such paradoxes, are only lesser so.


Spoiler:
how many days have passed since they first went into the machines? because, if i understood the movie correctly, that's exactly the amount of time they have to spend in the machine each time they go back. and i don't think one could stay long in a machine like that
Spoiler:
It has been several days, about 3-4, although not a week. Before Abe makes his trip back through the fail-safe the narrator explicitly says how long it's been. To make that initial trip back, Abe uses medical equipment to induce a hibernative like state while keeping him hydrated and monitored. Basically, he just slept all the days back, with only a minimum of food and water. No wonder he looks so beat up when he makes it back. Aaron has been making trips back since the end of Day1, so he hasn't had to travel so far.

After each one's initial trip back to the beginning (when the fail safe was first started), each subsequent trip needn't had been from their original points, but from whenever they decide to travel back again. This is probably a period of no more than 16 hours or so, since the main thing they're trying to change, the attempted assault at the party, happens during the first day


I'd also second the recommendation for the Official Primer Film Forum for those looking for more answers, information. I'm perfectly happy to keep providing my interpretation of the film and the events and plot of it here, but the Official forum has a lot more opinions and theories about the film.
Old 07-12-05 | 07:10 PM
  #22  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: San Leandro/San Francisco
I saw this the other night. Was looking forward to it but everyone that watched with me hated it. I'll have to agree with them.
Old 07-12-05 | 07:16 PM
  #23  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,080
Received 822 Likes on 575 Posts
Originally Posted by riley_dude
I saw this the other night. Was looking forward to it but everyone that watched with me hated it. I'll have to agree with them.
Why? Peer pressure?
Old 08-22-05 | 05:51 AM
  #24  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 14,020
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Newfoundland, Canada
Finally got around to seeing it, and I enjoyed it. However, I don't pretend to understand everything. This is a movie that you really need to concentrate on, and not one to have on in the background. I would like to see it again, and might pick it up on DVD.
Old 09-28-05 | 08:44 PM
  #25  
Rival11's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,322
Received 337 Likes on 234 Posts
From: Western N.Y.
I liked this flim a lot but I won't lie, my head was killing me at the end and i'm still cofused. Definitely going to sit through this one again.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.