Where's the Primer thread?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles and Amsterdam
Where's the Primer thread?
How come I can't find a thread on Primer? This movie has to cause one of the biggest potential threads around. Makes Momento seem like a Disney flick is what I read. After seeing it, I have an urge to read other peoples reactions.
#3
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
#4
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
I was fortunate enough to see an advanced screening of this film a long while ago. I have to say, it was the most useful writer/director Q&A I've ever sat through. My initial review, yet to be updated with the additional awards, nominations, and etc:
-JP
Plot: Four friends, rich in scientific knowledge, are attempting to come up with an invention that will catch the world's attention and, consequently, build the four of them a pretty substantial nest egg. However, when two of the four discover that they've accidentally produced a makeshift time machine, they shut the other two out of the group and decide to use the machine to their advantage. Every minute spent in the machine is a minute gone back in time. So, they start the machine in the morning, cocoon in a motel room for the day (checking sports scores and stock movement), then spend the entire evening in the machine. They leave the machine in the morning, and bet on games which they already know the outcome to (or purchase stocks with the most substantial increases for the day). For kicks...in the evening, they return to the machine only to see doubles of themselves (doubles that have spent the entire day in a hotel room studying sports scores and stocks) entering the machine, in the exact same manner as they had earlier, er, later..or um, earlier in the day. Got that?
Comments: Thus far, Primer is one of the ten best films I've seen in 2004...and I have no doubt that it will remain on that list for the remainder of the year. The film was made on a $7,000 budget (not including post-production expenses) by a first-time writer and director named Shane Carruth. Carruth also stars in the film, along with a cast of actors with zero experience. So, the film must really suck, huh? Apparently not. It was the hit film of this year's Sundance film festival, and looks about as professionally done as any independent film I've ever seen.
The plot, which deals with time travel, isn't anything new...but the film still manages to remain fresh. It creates an identity for itself separate from the Back to the Futures of the cinematic world. This alone is quite an accomplishment. Primer is definitely a thinking-man's movie, filled with paradoxes that my mind had a hell of a time wrapping itself around. Don't expect any favors from Carruth, though. He certainly doesn't slow things down for you to catch up. Not to mention...the heady, mindfuck of a story is only magnified by the constant use of scientific terminology that only an engineer could ever hope to keep up with. The best part of this is that all of the terminology (leading up to the time travel) is accurate, as Carruth went out of his way to study the science he intended to use for this picture.
The acting isn't anything remarkable, but it's certainly more than I'd expect from a group of guys with no experience, who simply wanted to take part in making a film (without pay, might I add). They don't come off as amateurish all that often...surprising given their ridiculously complex dialogue, and (due to the film's budget) minimal number of takes per scene. The key to this film...the one thing it lives or dies by (and that carries it to a moderate level of greatness) is it's story. For the story alone (probably the most convincing time-travel tale ever brought to the screen), Primer is worth watching at least once...though, trust me when I say that one viewing won't suffice. You'll definitely be in for two or three viewings, just to make sure you've kept up with everything in the picture. Then you'll want to watch it once more, for enjoyment's sake. After all, you will have earned it.
Awards & Nominations:
2004 Sundance Film Festival - Alfred P. Sloan Feature Film Prize
2004 Sundance Film Festival - Grand Jury Prize (Best Picture)
JP's Rating: 9.0/10
IMDB.com Rating: N/A (Pre-release)
Comments: Thus far, Primer is one of the ten best films I've seen in 2004...and I have no doubt that it will remain on that list for the remainder of the year. The film was made on a $7,000 budget (not including post-production expenses) by a first-time writer and director named Shane Carruth. Carruth also stars in the film, along with a cast of actors with zero experience. So, the film must really suck, huh? Apparently not. It was the hit film of this year's Sundance film festival, and looks about as professionally done as any independent film I've ever seen.
The plot, which deals with time travel, isn't anything new...but the film still manages to remain fresh. It creates an identity for itself separate from the Back to the Futures of the cinematic world. This alone is quite an accomplishment. Primer is definitely a thinking-man's movie, filled with paradoxes that my mind had a hell of a time wrapping itself around. Don't expect any favors from Carruth, though. He certainly doesn't slow things down for you to catch up. Not to mention...the heady, mindfuck of a story is only magnified by the constant use of scientific terminology that only an engineer could ever hope to keep up with. The best part of this is that all of the terminology (leading up to the time travel) is accurate, as Carruth went out of his way to study the science he intended to use for this picture.
The acting isn't anything remarkable, but it's certainly more than I'd expect from a group of guys with no experience, who simply wanted to take part in making a film (without pay, might I add). They don't come off as amateurish all that often...surprising given their ridiculously complex dialogue, and (due to the film's budget) minimal number of takes per scene. The key to this film...the one thing it lives or dies by (and that carries it to a moderate level of greatness) is it's story. For the story alone (probably the most convincing time-travel tale ever brought to the screen), Primer is worth watching at least once...though, trust me when I say that one viewing won't suffice. You'll definitely be in for two or three viewings, just to make sure you've kept up with everything in the picture. Then you'll want to watch it once more, for enjoyment's sake. After all, you will have earned it.
Awards & Nominations:
2004 Sundance Film Festival - Alfred P. Sloan Feature Film Prize
2004 Sundance Film Festival - Grand Jury Prize (Best Picture)
JP's Rating: 9.0/10
IMDB.com Rating: N/A (Pre-release)
#5
Moderator
My bro rented this over the weekend and I plan on watching it tonight. He loved it and every review I've read about it has been glowing. Can't wait to see for myself!
#6
DVD Talk Legend
Primer is one of those films with an outstanding premise, but the execution is completely terrible. The film is only 70 minutes long, but nothing ever really happens until the last 20-25 minutes. Basically, a good two-thirds of the film is two people just talking and bullshitting with one another. I don't know about you, but for me, that is some non-exciting cinema right there.
I'd recommend The Butterfly Effect or Donnie Darko or even Back to the Future to someone who wanted to watch a good "time travel" film before ever recommending Primer.
I'd recommend The Butterfly Effect or Donnie Darko or even Back to the Future to someone who wanted to watch a good "time travel" film before ever recommending Primer.
#7
I liked it. It can be quite confusing as hell (I was reading some comments on IMDB.com and even though I was doing my best to pay attention, I know I missed some stuff) and is rewarding with repeat viewings. This is not a movie to rent, this is a movie to buy. That said, I did rent this first, because I had no idea what to expect, but will be buying this in the future. I am just hoping some kind of special edition comes out. This is the type of movie that should have a bonus features laden edition.
Ebert has a good review.
Ebert has a good review.
Last edited by calhoun07; 06-27-05 at 06:41 PM.
#9
DVD Talk Legend
I really enjoyed the movie. It took me a bit to figure things out, and I'm still not quite sure. They did what I probably would have done in their position, which may be one of the reasons I liked it.
#10
DVD Talk Legend
This film is great. It's incredibly complex and hard to figure out, but the film does supply all the answers if you catch all the clues. Easily in my mind one of the best sci-fi films ever, certainly one of the best time travel films.
The great thing about the film is how almost every scene has hidden meanings and significance that you may not catch until the second viewing. Even the "conventional" first half has new meanings after having seen the whole film.
The great thing about the film is how almost every scene has hidden meanings and significance that you may not catch until the second viewing. Even the "conventional" first half has new meanings after having seen the whole film.
#11
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles and Amsterdam
I would like to hear more about the hidden meanings and what to look for on the second viewing. I got this from the first viewing:
Spoiler:
#12
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by H8nXTC
I would like to hear more about the hidden meanings and what to look for on the second viewing. I got this from the first viewing:
Spoiler:
This is how I interpreted it:
Spoiler:
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by Jay G.
Wow. As far as my interpretation went, the scenerio you describe is almost completely wrong.
This is how I interpreted it:
This is how I interpreted it:
Spoiler:
I am still working through this movie, so maybe that doesnt make sense or fit in exactally. I liked it, but as said before the execution was not very good. Had the movie been longer it may have been able to unfold better.
#15
DVD Talk Legend
Sorry, severly messed up the spoilers before.
Personally, I thought the execution was excellent, precisely because it doesn't unfold the plot and lay it out all nice and neat. All the information is still there, just rolled up and compressed for the viewer to figure out. It's a puzzle box that encourages you to examine and rexamine it, each time unraveling part of the puzzle.
On the other hand, the film is definitely confusing while you're watching it for the first time, and those unprepared or simply used to more conventional narratives may be put off by the way it presents its story.
Originally Posted by Gasspasser
for the most part I liked what you said however, there is one thing that I think is different
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
I am still working through this movie, so maybe that doesnt make sense or fit in exactally. I liked it, but as said before the execution was not very good. Had the movie been longer it may have been able to unfold better.
On the other hand, the film is definitely confusing while you're watching it for the first time, and those unprepared or simply used to more conventional narratives may be put off by the way it presents its story.
#16
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by H8nXTC
Thanks for the time you spent enlightening us, now I feel really simple.
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
#18
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Cloud Cuckoo Land
I can't say that I enjoyed this movie.
It moves along fine til they have that "what if?" conversation. Then it went straight to hell. It was so jumbled that I had absolutely no desire to even attempt to get some sense out of it in a second viewing.
It moves along fine til they have that "what if?" conversation. Then it went straight to hell. It was so jumbled that I had absolutely no desire to even attempt to get some sense out of it in a second viewing.
#20
DVD Talk Special Edition
thank you, Jay G., I just finished it, and my mind turned off after
because of your explanation I don't need to see it again
but I thoroughly enjoyed the movie, even though sometimes, I didn't understand what was going on. It was still mind-stimulating nonetheless. Very good skunkworks movie
I do have one question though
Spoiler:
because of your explanation I don't need to see it again

but I thoroughly enjoyed the movie, even though sometimes, I didn't understand what was going on. It was still mind-stimulating nonetheless. Very good skunkworks movie

I do have one question though
Spoiler:
Last edited by joeydaninja; 07-05-05 at 01:34 PM.
#21
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by H8nXTC
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
I'd also second the recommendation for the Official Primer Film Forum for those looking for more answers, information. I'm perfectly happy to keep providing my interpretation of the film and the events and plot of it here, but the Official forum has a lot more opinions and theories about the film.
#23
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by riley_dude
I saw this the other night. Was looking forward to it but everyone that watched with me hated it. I'll have to agree with them.
#24
DVD Talk Legend
Finally got around to seeing it, and I enjoyed it. However, I don't pretend to understand everything. This is a movie that you really need to concentrate on, and not one to have on in the background. I would like to see it again, and might pick it up on DVD.
#25
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
I liked this flim a lot but I won't lie, my head was killing me at the end and i'm still cofused. Definitely going to sit through this one again.




