![]() |
COLLATERAL review thread...
(Positive)
http://www.filmjerk.com/nuke/article990.html "After excursions to true life tales of whistle-blowing (“The Insider”) and sports legends (“Ali,” a rare misfire), Mann pulls up his collar and stumbles back into the city of neon, crime, and indifference to create his best film in over a decade." http://www.joblo.com/collateral.htm "Tom Cruise can do no wrong. Consider this film yet another amazing achievement in this man's burgeoning movie resume, which at this point, can likely be considered one of the greatest looking filmographies of all-time." |
Re: COLLATERAL review thread...
Originally posted by scott shelton "Tom Cruise can do no wrong. Consider this film yet another amazing achievement in this man's burgeoning movie resume, which at this point, can likely be considered one of the greatest looking filmographies of all-time." |
The guy in the 2nd one must have forgotten about Legend.
|
ColLAteral
With it's shaky digital camera look and gritty feel Collateral comes off as one of the years best films to me. Michael Mann's addiction to Los angeles comes out strong. You might only be seeing Jaime Foxx, Tom Cruise and Jade Smiths name on the tag line but you are missing Mann's other big star which comes out beautifully in this film. The City of Los Angeles. Much of what you saw in HEAT but only 10x's stronger comes out here. In heat you got a small sample of the greater los angeles area. This time Mann takes you for a tour ride in a cab along the streets of this beautiful city. Thanks to Catch21, I got to see it tonight and I loved it. Perhaps a bit to much. Growing up in Los Angeles has left an imprint on me. I'm about 5 minutes away from Downtown Los Angeles so the beautiful city of angels has left it's mark on me. I love it. Every inch of it. From it's dirty gritty look to it's beautiful areas. I tried once to leave it and came back to it missing it. Michael Mann uses all of what I love of Los Angeles into this film and brings Tom Cruises' "cool guy" hitman to play around in it. Between having that calm, cool and collective attitude while carrying out his hits Cruise brings out a villian you want to hate, but just end up wanting to be like. He carries himself well throughout the picture. When something goes wrong he rolls with the punches and expresses that in a cool manner that you just have to respect. Jaime Foxx comes into the picture as the average joe taxi driver. You care about the guy because you can relate. Looking for that next big thing but just going along with the program waiting around. You feel for him and the situation he has been put in. You don't at anytime feel like he could get out of it. The best thing you can do is just watch him react and realize that he never really had a choice. The films look is what shines. Mann's use of Los Angeles in almost every shot of this reflects the mood of the picture. The situation and the action in it is very believable. I usually find myself nitpicking films. Not at all in this one. The events of the night unfold almost to natural. Nothing to question and everything to enjoy. I found myself loving every minute of this film and loving the cinematography so much that I'm going to see it again just to take it all in. If there is one reason alone to watch this film is to view Los Angeles from a lot of different angles and get the feel of what Mann does best.. Brings out the city of Los Angeles like no one else does. I loved it. |
I liked the movie as well. Thanks Catch21 for the ticket.
|
This film has been getting some very mixed reviews. I'll still be there opening night.
|
Originally posted by Rivero This film has been getting some very mixed reviews. I'll still be there opening night. Fresh: 65 Rotten: 6 pretty impressive in my book update Friday, Aug. 6 morning |
Mixed according to whom? I haven't seen a full-out negative review yet.
|
Ebert's 3 1/2-star review here. Can't wait to see this one! :up:
|
2 excellent reviews in the Wash Post. I'm really looking forward to seeing this film.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2004Aug5.html "Collateral' is the best kind of genre filmmaking: It plays by the rules, obeys the traditions and is both familiar and fresh at once." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2004Aug5.html "If 'Collateral' is all formula, it's polished to a fine sheen." |
I can not tell you how much I loved this film. Simply put I want to see it again and again. . From what I hear, only one scene was shot in 35mm because mann felt that digital didn't look good in a certain nightclub scene.
I think the way L.A. is represented was great. Showed you an L.A. that isn't typically seen through any other film or how tourist would normally see it. |
Originally posted by Jackskeleton I think the way L.A. is represented was great. Showed you an L.A. that isn't typically seen through any other film or how tourist would normally see it. |
This was the movie I've been waiting for all summer... one that just comes out of the gate and does NOT disappoint. It's a really great film, it's funny, exciting and looks fantastic too. If you're going to see this, make sure to see it in Digital Projection if you get the chance... the movie has some great cinematography and the film prints don't reproduce the digital as clearly... The performances in the film are fantastic and Cruise makes a very interesting bad guy. Finally, Michael Mann has made a film that isn't bloated or self important and really hits the mark... he's been close before, but finally he has his GREAT film.
I hope audiences embrace this film...a great movie. MATT and I agree with that one reviewer, Cruise's filmography is quite excellent... I mean, if the guy is in a movie, it's usually good (9 times out of 10 anyhow) |
I'm sure I'm going to be in the minority here, but I thought thisi movie was just laughably horrendous. I mean it was SOOOOOOooooo stupid.
First off, Jamie Fox. This is the current "it" guy that it's just mandatory for Hollywood & critics to love. Any of a hundred actors out there could have played his part & I know he is getting rave reviews, but his performance was a dime a dozen. Critics & the media are warming him up for the PC Oscar nod he will get for the Ray Charles movie, the movie isn't even released, & it's so obvious he will get one. Character wise, there were a million different ways for him to get away from Cruise. There is NOOO WAY, an LA cab driver in real life is going to have a flirty cab encounter with a beautiful, rich, high-end lawyer. Second, the plot & script. What movie are all of these critics seeing that are raving about the story & characters. A man, with no mask, in screaming features like grey hair & a grey suit is driving around LA in a cab that is bashed up & there aren't cops all over the place chasing after this guy? Just one detective happens to be on to him? Give me a break. And the club seen, was so confusing & stupid Spoiler:
Tom Cruise - I've become a huge Cruise fan, & think people are crazy if they think he can't act. And he is good in this movie, but only b/c he is Tom Cruise. There is NOTHING to his character. He kills people, bid deal. A thousand movies have his kind of hearltess killer in them. And worse, rather than just make him a full-out heartless bastard, they have to throw in, IMO Cruise did it himself that bit about Spoiler:
Aside from Cruise playing a bad guy, there is nothing original, exciting or innovative in this movie. I really wanted to like it, but it's nothing more that OK. Yet another typical summer flick. But I may be a bit bitter since I got so excitied to see Jasaon Statham in the beginning, the sinlge most underrated talent in hollywood IMO, & Spoiler:
|
the sinlge most underrated talent in hollywood IMO I enjoyed it though. Even with film cliches and all. Was one of my favorites this year so far. |
I just saw it also, and it is without a doubt one of the best films of the year. It's amazing how I can go from seeing a piece of crap like The Village one week, then the next see something that is just outstanding. Collateral is not the best movie ever, but it's damn solid and very well made. I was highly impressed with Jamie Foxx, and as I posted a few days ago he is well on his way to much bigger and better things. However, I was even more impressed with Tom Cruise. I know many want to hate on him, but I just loved his work in this film. He just fit into the role so perfectly, a role that is a good bit different from most of his other work.
A great story, solid acting from everyone involved, great writing, fantastic direction, all equals a solid film, and a great filmgoing experience. EDIT: The more I think about the film, and all aspects of it, the more I love it. I'm being tempted to go watch it again, and I almost never do that. |
I loved the movie too. Michael Mann is just a total genius in terms of framing the interaction between Cruise & Foxx amidst the sleepless city of LA.
Did anyone question the ending though?? Spoiler:
|
Originally posted by Jackskeleton Underrated talent in hollywood? How so? He already had his own film already. Underrated nothing. he just fits into a certain type of role. that of a hitman. Like I said, for the movie, I love Cruise, but the character was paper thin as was the script. There was nothing new in this movie, I in the worst year ever for American film, saying this is "one my favorites of the year" isn't saying much. |
Really liked the movie too. Tom Cruise wasn't playing Tom Cruise. One of the best of the year. Its hard not to like it.
|
After a second viewing I notice some locations that I can actually see just looking outside of my house. :o
The bridge overpass that is seen after the hospital is right outside. next to a school I went to and well, that's the freeway exit right next to it that I take everyday. Even more reason to love this film. Michael Mann really likes my neighborhood. :p |
You know, people die in this movie, but I couldn't help but laugh with some of the situations in which the humor came shining through the dark of night in L.A.
There's a lot to like about this film, and the direction appeared effortless (in that I never thought the camerawork got in the way of telling the story or never missed the inner turmoil/conflict that Max has as he is coerced into driving Vincent around for a night of contract killings). Both Cruise and Fox do a fine job needling each other and chipping away at each other's exteriors in the span of their starcrossed night together. I give it 3.5 stars, or a grade of B+. |
Great movie :thumbsup:
|
I saw it tonight and really enjoyed it as well. I don't see how gray hair and a gray suit are "screaming features" as somebody said... if you wanted to look bland and unnoticeable, there's not a much better color to pick than dull gray. As far as the cab being banged up...
Spoiler:
|
Saw it. I really have to hand it to Michael Mann, he can flat out make a great action movie while still making the focus the characters. Foxx probably gave his best performance ever and Cruise defied type unlike anything he has done in the past. I still think Heat is Mann's best movie, but this one is a second.
What made the movie work for me was that while it had a lot of action, it never tried to blow it out of proportion (aka bullet time shots, huge explosions, fancy stunts); the violence and action seemed to have a good base in reality. Unfortunately, I don't think many mainstream audiences will buy into it. I love movies that focus on characters over action, and think that is Mann's true strength. I just don't think the movie had enough major action to keep the average summer movie goer entertained. It kept me entertained, but too many people expect Fast and the Furious and Mission:Impossible 2 type action in their movies to have patience with something that tries to give the action meaning. Furthermore, while he did a good job, I don't think many people will accept Tom Cruise as a bad guy. They still want Ethan Hunt and Jerry Maguire, not Vincent or Frank T.J. Mackey. Oh well, at least I liked it, and that's all that matters. I hope Dreamworks handles the DVD and not Paramount, though with Mann I don't expect much in terms of extras. |
Originally posted by Cardiac161 Spoiler:
The only real negative I had with the movie. Agree totally. |
Michael Mann is one of my favorite directors, probably in my top 2 or 3 who are actively making films, so I was really looking forward to this. I also like Cruise and have enjoyed watching him grow as an actor over the years, even if some people will never give him credit for it.
Anyway, this film <i>really</i> strains the limits of believability, and there were a couple of points where I was tempted to roll my eyes, but it is so brilliantly directed and near perfectly acted, that I was able to overlook the weaknesses in the script and marvel at the end result. Those Washington Post quotes are pretty spot on: the basic plot of this film is complete genre formula. It's the kind of thing I'd expect to see on WGN at 3am. And yet beneath the plot is a wonderful character study set against an incredible tour of L.A.'s night; and just when you think you're walking down a familiar plot path, the story takes you just enough off course to keep it fresh and interesting. Oh, and it was also nice to see half the cast of <i>Robbery Homicide Division</i> show up. In fact, this has a pretty kickass cast all around; I'm surprised it hasn't been hyped more. I do, however, appreciate the low key nature of the trailers for this. I certainly didn't feel like the film had been ruined for me by them. Very strong work. :up: das P.S. Spoiler:
|
Just saw the movie and thought it was pretty good. There does seem to be some weird coincidences ala Training Day, but it didn't ruin the movie for me. It's a pretty gritty movie and I liked the interaction between the characters. I did have a problem with Mark Ruffalo's role. They didn't seem to focus much on him, and then, just when he seems like he's going to be Vincent's main nemesis....
|
Very cool movie. I'll joint the bandwagon. Definitely one of the stronger summer films, and, heck, the year as well. :thumbsup:
|
Top-notch thriller for sure.
Only the "unbelievability" factor detracted from it, and that wasn't much of a big deal. It's a summer movie folks. BANG BANG Too bad Javier Bardem wasn't used more or Ruffalo either. Exciting, darkly funny and well-acted. my grade = A- |
Originally posted by Jackskeleton ColLAteral With it's shaky digital camera look and gritty feel Collateral comes off as one of the years best films to me. Michael Mann's addiction to Los angeles comes out strong. You might only be seeing Jaime Foxx, Tom Cruise and Jade Smiths name on the tag line but you are missing Mann's other big star which comes out beautifully in this film. The City of Los Angeles. Much of what you saw in HEAT but only 10x's stronger comes out here. In heat you got a small sample of the greater los angeles area. This time Mann takes you for a tour ride in a cab along the streets of this beautiful city. Thanks to Catch21, I got to see it tonight and I loved it. Perhaps a bit to much. Growing up in Los Angeles has left an imprint on me. I'm about 5 minutes away from Downtown Los Angeles so the beautiful city of angels has left it's mark on me. I love it. Every inch of it. From it's dirty gritty look to it's beautiful areas. I tried once to leave it and came back to it missing it. Michael Mann uses all of what I love of Los Angeles into this film and brings Tom Cruises' "cool guy" hitman to play around in it. Between having that calm, cool and collective attitude while carrying out his hits Cruise brings out a villian you want to hate, but just end up wanting to be like. He carries himself well throughout the picture. When something goes wrong he rolls with the punches and expresses that in a cool manner that you just have to respect. Jaime Foxx comes into the picture as the average joe taxi driver. You care about the guy because you can relate. Looking for that next big thing but just going along with the program waiting around. You feel for him and the situation he has been put in. You don't at anytime feel like he could get out of it. The best thing you can do is just watch him react and realize that he never really had a choice. The films look is what shines. Mann's use of Los Angeles in almost every shot of this reflects the mood of the picture. The situation and the action in it is very believable. I usually find myself nitpicking films. Not at all in this one. The events of the night unfold almost to natural. Nothing to question and everything to enjoy. I found myself loving every minute of this film and loving the cinematography so much that I'm going to see it again just to take it all in. If there is one reason alone to watch this film is to view Los Angeles from a lot of different angles and get the feel of what Mann does best.. Brings out the city of Los Angeles like no one else does. I loved it. Grade: B+ |
Unfortunately the film only made about $8 million on opening Friday. That translates into about $25 million for the weekend.
Granted that's very good for August and for an R-rated film, but I don't know what this guy has to do to buy a huge opening. I'm glad his films aren't watered down to PG-13 to make more money though. Only the M:I series does that. We'll see, hopefully it'll have legs. My hopes are that the "hard to believe" aspect of the film's second half doesn't dampen people's opinion of it. It didn't bother me too much. |
What are some of the hard to believe moments everyone is talking about? I still can't think of any. Someone want to shed some light?
|
• Frank TJ Mackey • Unfortunately the film only made about $8 million on opening Friday. That translates into about $25 million for the weekend. das |
• PopcornTreeCt • What are some of the hard to believe moments everyone is talking about? I still can't think of any. Someone want to shed some light? Spoiler:
Don't get me wrong; I loved this movie. das |
I liked the movie...as long as you didn't think about it too much. For instance:
Spoiler:
Like I said, don't think about it too much and you'll enjoy it. |
I agree with a lot of the posters, the look of the film is great, it's best attribute IMO. I really admired Mann's direction the digital video used very nicely whether for the intriguing dialogue cab scenes or the exciting action sequences, and I loved the high overhead shots of the L.A. landscape, I thought it gave the film a heightened sense of reality that worked tremendously well for the film.
I don't think Tom Cruise playing a bad guy is much of a big deal because in most of his performances he usually carries a certain intensity in his characters that I enjoy. So I thought the bad guy Cruise came pretty natural to him. I was impressed by Jamie Foxx quite a bit as well, he did a fantasic job opposite Cruise (I think almost upstaging him a couple of times). The dialogue scenes in the cab between Vincent and Max, I thought were truly engrossing, and how you found out a lot of the characters and their pasts in such an odd situation as the one they are in. The payoff wasn't too unpredictiable and I thought the script was a little weak nearing the end of second act around the whole nightclub scene and the shootout. It could of been tightened up a little better. But for the most part Collateral is an exciting action thriller with Cruise giving another electrifying performance along with Mann's smart and energetic direction lift this film from run-of-the-mill action thrillers. |
How the hell does he find the DA in the building? By looking at the phone lines?! The man does this for a living. I think the whole point spread throughout the film in the various hits that obviously took vincent a hard time to do (the jazz singer) is that this is his living. One of his last communications with max "I do this for a living" spread it out that this is why he kills. Just like Max drives a cab. Because that is what he is paid to do. I loved that fact of it all. Vincent doesn't have a screw loose. Vincent didn't have a messed up childhood (remember, he said J/K about the story of his youth). He kills people because that is what he is paid to do. I loved the city look. So much that I'll do one of my night time drives tonight because of it. Perhaps I'll take my digital camera and snap a few shots. Simply one hell of a good movie. |
i ****ing loved this movie. thrilling, funny, just brilliant. i think you get even a bigger kick out of it if you live in LA, like me. i spoted my dads bank downtown and saw trhe film in pasadena, where jadie describes drivers as "slow"
got a huge applause. great damn movie. i loved it. |
Interesting article on the digital camera used for the film:
Revving up digital cinematography Michael Mann road-tests the Viper camera on his mixed-media opus By Carolyn Giardina Leave it to Michael Mann to shake up the system. The Oscar-nominated director famous for gritty yet visually dazzling depictions of urban life and an uncompromising attitude toward his craft is now ushering digital filmmaking from the extreme reaches of science fiction and low-budget indie into the realm of high-profile studio thriller. The director has elected to use Thomson Grass Valley's Viper FilmStream camera for his upcoming "Collateral," the Tom Cruise-starrer financed by DreamWorks and Paramount, scheduled for an Aug. 6 release. As the first director to road-test the Viper -- much anticipated as the first cinema camera capable of storing images as data, directly to a hard drive -- Mann's choices are worth noting in a creative community coming to grips with the practicalities and pitfalls of digital imaging. The Viper isn't the only camera Mann is using to shoot the movie, which he describes as a "multimedia" effort. He's using the Sony CineAlta high-definition camera, as well as shooting film, but of the roughly 80% of the finished film Mann estimates he's captured digitally, about 80% originated from the Viper. Mann says his choice was driven by the film's creative needs. The story -- of a veteran hit man (Cruise) who hijacks a cab and forces the driver (Jamie Foxx) to traverse the streets of Los Angeles, transporting him from job to job until the LAPD and the FBI begin to pursue the vehicle -- seems well-suited to electronic cameras. "Everything is pretty much driven by story, and this whole picture takes place at night," the director says. "I wanted to see into the night. I wanted the night to be alive so that it becomes very three-dimensional. That's what I was trying to get," says Mann, kicking back at the Santa Monica offices that house his production company, Forward Pass. "There was a quality to the Viper cam that I responded to," says Mann, who is no stranger to digital cameras, having employed high-definition video for the opening sequences of his 2001 biopic "Ali." In particular, he says, the Viper's color imaging worked well for this particular film. "It had to do with the sensitivity of reds and yellows and oranges. This was not only seeing deeply into the night, seeing what you see with the naked eye and something more than you can see with the naked eye, but also the color information. It had an aesthetic that I wanted." The Viper operates in several modes. At the high end is FilmStream, which captures unprocessed imagery -- no color correction, no compression -- in the 4:4:4 RGB color space, the full color range of an electronic image signal. (While analog film still offers significantly greater color sensitivity than any electronic medium, 4:4:4 RGB is the highest level currently offered in the electronic realm. Film scanned into the digital domain for effects manipulation or what have you is scanned at 4:4:4 RGB. By way of comparison, broadcast HD operates in a 4:2:2 YUV environment, subsampling in blue and red. The Viper also offers 4:2:2 options.) Though other high-end digital cameras, including the CineAlta, also shoot in 4:4:4 RGB, Thomson vp strategic marketing and business development Jeff Rosica says that what sets the Viper apart is the proprietary CCDs that capture the image as well as the way the data, once acquired, is distributed. The CCDs capture 12-bit linear image, which is then transmitted and stored at 10-bit log space. "Because it's logarithmic, it actually emulates the most important properties of a 12-bit linear signal," says Rosica. The signal is then transferred to a recording device via a dual-link serial HD connection. Mann and his team began an extensive testing phase by recording material in FilmStream onto a DVS digital disk recorder. "The total capacity was 55 minutes, and it took 35 hours to download (to videotape for dailies)," Mann says. "So obviously that wasn't ready for feature film production." Next, they tested S.two digital mags to store the uncompressed raw data. "So our storage went down to something that was physically manageable in a much more compact hard drive," Mann says. "But what it posed upon us was a long-term storage capacity of 330 terabytes, which is economically unfeasible with the current limits of the drive technology." (A terabyte of storage costs about $50,000.) Mann then decided "to see what would happen if we put a mild compression on (the images)" and switched to Viper's VideoStream mode, which offers a 10-bit 4:4:4 RGB video, as opposed to data, signal and provides light image processing allowing for truer color reproduction in the field. "With FilmStream you're getting raw data. VideoStream functions more like a normal high-def camera, which allowed him to control the ASA," says "Collateral" associate producer Bryan Carroll. Both modes lens in 2.37:1 widescreen without any loss of vertical resolution. "We took it all the way to the equivalent of a release print, so it's not like we were looking at something on a monitor and taking it on faith," Mann says. While employing the latest in digital imaging technologies, Mann took care to note that his storytelling fundamentals are essentially unchanged. "In our system, we impose on everybody the grammar and syntax that we are shooting film. All the disciplines apply, and that's very important on the floor during production. We are mixing a digital culture with a film culture, and it has to be film grammar." That approach drove the design of a massive workflow system that brought together the material from the film camera, Viper, and the other camera system Mann employed, Sony's CineAlta F900 HD. The HDCAM footage essentially had to be handled as camera negative. Everything that was shot -- film and digital -- was digitized into Avids for postproduction, during which a digital color grading session will take place. Mann cites Carroll as well as Thomson's Mark Chiolis, Laser Pacific's Leon Silverman and Terry Brown and Panavision's Nolan Murdock as integral to working out the bugs in the system. Prior to filming, a team including Mann and A-camera operator Gary Jay, (who has worked with Mann since 1992's "The Last of the Mohicans") guided modifications to the Viper. "The camera body itself wasn't ergonomic for use on a production," Mann says. "We wanted weights added to the rear of the camera to increase the mass and balance back there. We needed rods for the matte box and focus-bracket system because we do a lot of hand-holding. The control buttons needed covers because you could unbalance the camera and not know you did it. This is small stuff, but it's major when you just got done having a take that's brilliant, or you think that the actors were brilliant and it looks perfect, and you find out you switched it to FilmStream." With his arsenal of camera technology, production began and Mann focused his attention on directing. Dion Beebe ("Chicago") came on board as director of photography. As 27 pages of the "Collateral" screenplay take place in a car, mobility was a priority. There were some limitations as the Viper was cabled to its recording deck. Mann says that when he wanted complete mobility for handheld work, the crew used the CineAlta F900 (which is configured more like a camcorder, recording to either standard Sony HDCAM or SW tapes). "The benefit is that there is a 55-minute tape, so in that sense there are fewer interruptions," Mann says. "(With film) if you are hand holding and you have a 400-foot mag in there, every three minutes and 45 seconds you are having to stop." (There are third-party developers working on Viper recording options, including a portable drive to enable cinematographers to work untethered.) Creatively, he says, "there's no silver bullet in all of this. ... You have to know what you want, more so than film. In film, you can rely on certain conventional looks, almost like a perceptual preset about what you're used to having. Not so in video, it's a much broader spectrum so you have to know what you want. "What I like about the Viper is it sees colors, it sees things, in a different way," Mann says. "People are reaching for more expressive ways to visualize and have emotional impact. That's what it all comes down to, the emotional impact to tell a story." |
Originally posted by PopcornTreeCt What are some of the hard to believe moments everyone is talking about? I still can't think of any. Someone want to shed some light? Spoiler:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.