Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Friday Estimates for 04/09/04

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Friday Estimates for 04/09/04

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-04, 04:46 PM
  #51  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 45,336
Received 1,023 Likes on 813 Posts
Originally posted by wm lopez
HELLBOY dropped 52 % in it's 2nd week!
Last year everybody was calling the HULK a bomb because it dropped over 50 % in it's 2nd week.
Come on fellas.
When the STAR WARS prequals didn't meet people's liking they were bashing Lucas for years and praising THE MATRIX.
When the 3rd MATRIX sequal came out and was not liked by their fans.
They sure as hell didn't give the producers the bashing Lucas still gets. It's like it's swept under the carpet let's move on.
Wow, you're all over the place, aren't you? I'm afraid to say this but you are incorrect about the Hulk/Hellboy connection. Most action movies that have a moderate to high opening drop an average 50% in their second weekend, Spider-man was an exception and dropped a meager 38%.

You were wrong with the Hulk for this simple reason, it was seen as a bomb not because it dropped over 50% in it's second weekend, but because it collapsed with a massive 70% in it's second weekend. And not only that, Hulk had been anticipated to be one of the biggest grossers of the year, and that was obviously not going to happen at this point in time - the expectations were also brought upon by Hulks massive budget and gargantuous advertising campaign.

Dawn of the Dead has had one of the larger "drops" as of late and dropped 60% in it's second weekend.

50% being a deadringer for the "average" droprate.

The Matrix: Reloaded dropped a reasonable 60% in it's second weekend period, which was fine considering how extraordinary it's opening weekend was. The Matrix: Revolutions, however, dropped a massive 67% after a less-than-expected opening and continued a quick downward spiral.

But on the bright side, Shaolin Soccer only dropped 24% from last week

And to answer your question, no, Hellboy - seen as a bit of a "risk" due to title and obscurity, lesser known actors and lower budget - is not a flop.

Oh and as for the Star Wars bashing, we also didn't have to wait 20 years for a sequel to the Matrix. That and some of the content of the prequels had a negative impact on memories of the originals for some people (namely what "the force" was), and such. But rest assured, The Matrix series has seen a massive amount of backlash as well.

mms://media.hostway.co.kr/funhappy/arahan/trailer_500k_vbr.wmv

RANDOM!!

Last edited by RichC2; 04-11-04 at 04:55 PM.
Old 04-11-04, 04:54 PM
  #52  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool, I stand corrected.
But HELLBOY sure looks like an expensive movie in the trailers.
The cgi doesn't look like a cheap video game the way the HULK did.
I didn't know HELLBOY didn't cost that much.
LXG also looked expensive and was.
So that's why I assumed that if HELLBOY doesn't make $100 mil it's a bomb.
CHARLIE'S ANGELS 2 made over a $100 and that's considered a bomb.
Old 04-11-04, 05:00 PM
  #53  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 45,336
Received 1,023 Likes on 813 Posts
A movie is seen as a success when it meets/beats how much it cost to "make" domestically (in the US), most don't even consider the cost advertising.

For example (Made $$ is for the US only, several have made substantially more overseas):

Hellboy - Budget: $66m - Made so far: $41.1m [+ advertising: $25m]
Charlie's Angels 2 - Budget: $120m - Made: $100m [+ advertising: 40m]
THE LEAGUE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENTLEMEN - Budget: $75m - Made: $66.5m [+ advertising: $30m]
Old 04-11-04, 06:18 PM
  #54  
DVD Talk Legend
 
matome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: NY
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by wm lopez
HELLBOY dropped 52 % in it's 2nd week!
Last year everybody was calling the HULK a bomb because it dropped over 50 % in it's 2nd week.
Hulk was a bomb. Anything that drops 70% in it's second weekend indicates a severe lack of good WOM. Especially with a $60 mil opening. That's a lot of mouths spewing vitriol the next day.

Last edited by matome; 04-11-04 at 06:21 PM.
Old 04-11-04, 06:43 PM
  #55  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Comparing Hellboy to Hulk is very silly. One was Universals BIG entery for summer. It was suppose to top everything and Universal was banking on that. Not to mention it had star power. Riding off the Black Hawk Down and other successes Eric Bana was riding to the top and having Jennifer Connelly was also high on praise and a big time star by that point. You have two top names to bank on and the budget and advertisement campaign on a VERY popular comic character to follow it was a huge flop.

Hellboy is an obscure comic with an obscure actor by a non-big name director. Sony wasn't ponying up the money for it, it was just distributing it. Revolutions made it and made it right. the drop in % is normal for action/comic book film on it's second release and considering how crowded this weekend was, it still held it's own.

Just because it looks expensive in the ad's doesn't mean it is.
Old 04-11-04, 07:15 PM
  #56  
DVD Talk Legend
 
matome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: NY
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Charlie's Angels 2 cost $120 mil to make? WTF??? Was there a filmed lez scene between the three stars sitting in some exec's office somewhere?
Old 04-11-04, 07:27 PM
  #57  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No, the three just felt that they needed a nice pay raise.
Old 04-11-04, 09:22 PM
  #58  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,866
Received 216 Likes on 155 Posts
Originally posted by moocher
Kinda surprised at the low numbers this week (for all films) but not at all surprised Passion returned to #1. I still think they will adjust Passion's Sunday gross upward tomorrow but judging by Friday, I expected it to best 20 mil for the weekend. We'll see when the actuals come out tomorrow...
Same here. I figured it'd have 22mill in the bag this wknd. 6 on fri, 9 on sat, 7 on sun. Hmmm...
Old 04-12-04, 12:23 AM
  #59  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Berlin
Posts: 3,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I pity the Rock.Walking Tall is almost gone by next week!
Old 04-12-04, 12:43 AM
  #60  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by RichC2
A movie is seen as a success when it meets/beats how much it cost to "make" domestically (in the US), most don't even consider the cost advertising.

For example (Made $$ is for the US only, several have made substantially more overseas):

Hellboy - Budget: $66m - Made so far: $41.1m [+ advertising: $25m]
Charlie's Angels 2 - Budget: $120m - Made: $100m [+ advertising: 40m]
THE LEAGUE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENTLEMEN - Budget: $75m - Made: $66.5m [+ advertising: $30m]
And now we count DVDs and International Box Office in on the tallies (CA 2 is over 300 million now) for the most part. All three films listed will have turned a profit by the time the smoke clears.

Look at BROTHER BEAR. All this whining about how it was a failure. Then this past week, it sells 6 million DVDs, clearing over 60 million in revenue. And that's only in one week.

It's getting harder and harder to peg a film as a "bomb." You can only do that in the most superficial sense.
Old 04-12-04, 12:54 AM
  #61  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Deftones, Esq
What you said isn't true at all. Anyone that follows the box office on a regular basis knows this time of year is fairly weak for movie releases.

However, more people see movies in the winter holidays than this time of year since the weather is much better right now. Just because there is more competition doesn't mean less people will see a certain movie.
Sure it means that!

Give audiences 5 new releases, and their dollars go everywhere. Give them a weekend of only, say, VAN HELSING, and quality or not, most of the money will go to the one big release.

Outside this message board (imagine that!), people actually average one or two movies per month, and with this many choices this past weekend (plus the PASSION itch due to Easter), the sheer number of selections to pick from lead the box office to several films doing about the same numbers.

Again, what I said before was that ALAMO isn't a "strong" film, and most likely would do the same number any season it played in. A holiday release doesn't guarantee anything.

"Anyone that follows the box office on a regular basis" would know that.
Old 04-12-04, 09:30 AM
  #62  
DVD Talk God
 
Deftones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Arizona
Posts: 81,030
Received 1,366 Likes on 928 Posts
Originally posted by scott shelton
Sure it means that!

Give audiences 5 new releases, and their dollars go everywhere. Give them a weekend of only, say, VAN HELSING, and quality or not, most of the money will go to the one big release.

Outside this message board (imagine that!), people actually average one or two movies per month, and with this many choices this past weekend (plus the PASSION itch due to Easter), the sheer number of selections to pick from lead the box office to several films doing about the same numbers.

Again, what I said before was that ALAMO isn't a "strong" film, and most likely would do the same number any season it played in. A holiday release doesn't guarantee anything.

"Anyone that follows the box office on a regular basis" would know that.
Wow, can anyone run a babelfish translator on this to see how it was a rebuttal to my post?
Old 04-12-04, 01:45 PM
  #63  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Just north of Atlanta
Posts: 5,215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Deftones, Esq
Wow, can anyone run a babelfish translator on this to see how it was a rebuttal to my post?
Well, you said:

Just because there is more competition doesn't mean less people will see a certain movie.
and he said:



Sure it means that!

Give audiences 5 new releases, and their dollars go everywhere. Give them a weekend of only, say, VAN HELSING, and quality or not, most of the money will go to the one big release.
So I can see the rebuttal, even if he was only rebutting the last sentence of your post.
Old 04-12-04, 02:36 PM
  #64  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Bill Geiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,924
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Deftones, Esq
Wow, can anyone run a babelfish translator on this to see how it was a rebuttal to my post?
Guess it is all greek to you. Here's the French translation.

Certain il signifie de celui-ci ! Donnez aux auditoires 5 de nouvelles libérations, et leurs dollars ils vont partout. Vous leur donnez un week-end seulement, par exemple, VAN HELSING, et la qualité ou non, la plus grande partie de l'argent il ira à celui-ci grande libération. Dehors de ce le tableau de messages (vous imaginez celui-ci !), les personnes calculent en moyenne réellement des ou deux cinémas le mois, et avec ceci de nombreux choix le ce week-end antérieur (plus la PASSION itch qui il est dû à des Pâques), le nombre propre de choix pour qu'ils choisissent du plomb box office à de divers films qui font les chiffres presque mêmes. Encore, que ai-je dit avant était-il qu'alamo isn't "strong" ? le film, et le plus probablement ferait le même nombre n'importe quelle époque qui a joué à l'intérieur. Une libéralisation doesn't d'interruptions garantit rien. "Anyone celui-ci suit box office à un régulier basis" ? saurait celui-ci.
Old 04-12-04, 03:44 PM
  #65  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Glendale, next to L.A.
Posts: 18,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post












Final Figures for Weekend April 9 - 11, 2004
TW LW Title Studio Weekend Gross % Change Theater Count Change Average Total Gross Cost* Week #
1 5 The Passion of the Christ NM $15,216,723 43.50% 3,240 -168 $4,696 $353,006,351 $30 / $20 7
2 1 Hellboy SonR $10,824,129 -53.30% 3,043 15 $3,557 $40,828,171 $66 / $25 2
3 N Johnson Family Vacation FoxS $9,375,307 - 1,317 - $7,118 $11,814,504 $12 / $8 1
4 N The Alamo BV $9,124,701 - 2,609 - $3,497 $9,124,701 $107 / $30 1
5 2 Walking Tall MGM $8,442,008 -45.50% 2,836 - $2,976 $28,953,956 $46 / $25 2
6 4 Home on the Range BV $8,105,171 -41.60% 3,058 11 $2,650 $27,418,973 - / - 2
7 3 Scooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed WB $8,015,496 -45.80% 3,130 -182 $2,560 $62,878,150 - / - 3
8 N The Whole Ten Yards WB $6,685,381 - 2,654 - $2,518 $6,685,381 $40 / $20 1
9 N Ella Enchanted Mira. $6,169,030 - 1,931 - $3,194 $6,169,030 $31 / $15 1
10 N The Girl Next Door Fox $6,003,806 - 2,148 - $2,795 $6,003,806 - / - 1



It looks like they overestimated Passion for the first time!

Chris
Old 04-12-04, 03:51 PM
  #66  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Girl next door really bombed. It will be interesting to read what fox is going to say about this in todays reporter.
Old 04-12-04, 03:58 PM
  #67  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess knowing their past failures in correctly estimating the Sunday take for Passion, this time they overcompensated thinking that Easter Sunday would be big. I guess people just didn't want to get depressed on Easter and picked staying home with the family instead.

Even though it held #1, I am surprised that Passion did not do better this weekend. It will likely plummet from here. I expect it will finish as the #7 film all time (pretty darn good for a low budget - foreign language film). I don't expect it to pass ROTK. It did have a great run though and proved Mel Gibson a genious. Wonder whether he can do it again...
Old 04-12-04, 04:38 PM
  #68  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Glendale, next to L.A.
Posts: 18,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I would rather it stay at #7, which is Gods #, instead of #6 which Satan's # !

Chris
Old 04-12-04, 05:32 PM
  #69  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago, IL,
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So can we say Hellboy officaly bombed?

The Alamo sure as hell is.
Old 04-12-04, 05:33 PM
  #70  
DVD Talk God
 
Deftones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Arizona
Posts: 81,030
Received 1,366 Likes on 928 Posts
Originally posted by Scot1458
So can we say Hellboy officaly bombed?
No. Have you looked at it's budget? It will probably make that back.
Old 04-12-04, 05:37 PM
  #71  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
The Antipodean's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 6,640
Received 165 Likes on 118 Posts
Enough about Hellboy, "Alamo" is going to be the bomb that causes some bg shakeups at Disney methinks...
Old 04-12-04, 07:13 PM
  #72  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Scot1458
So can we say Hellboy officaly bombed?

The Alamo sure as hell is.
No, It didn't. Read the thread before posting next time.

It's made 40+ in it's two weeks of release. it's cost was 66. It will make it back. It took the typical drop for a second week release action/comic book film. It's already greenlighted a sequel. Hellboy didn't bomb.
Old 04-12-04, 07:17 PM
  #73  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
fumanstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 55,349
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally posted by Kumar J
I pity the Rock.Walking Tall is almost gone by next week!
Looking at the budget, it looks like it oughta make it back though. So it will probably be less of a dud then The Rundown. It does raise the question whether the Rock will ever be able to be a 100 million dollar draw.
Old 04-12-04, 07:25 PM
  #74  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Looking at Arnolds earlier days, his movies weren't breaking the bank. They made just enough to get him by to the next action film.

Eventually the rock will be a 100 million dollar draw. Just give him time
Old 04-12-04, 09:24 PM
  #75  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I'm liking the Rock's movies so far. He's actually a much better actor than most people would think and the guy just oozes charisma on the big screen, even more than in wrestling.

Walking Tall has some good word of mouth but frankly no one seems much interested in going to the movies right now. I usually see a movie a weekend and basically the only things I've watched in about two months were Hellboy and Walking Tall, just nothing to really compel me to go to the theater, and many people are feeling the same way. So basically I expect Walking Tall to be a big DVD sales/rental sucess as people remember that friends said it was pretty good.

As to the Rock becoming a $100 million movie maker, I think it's inevitable.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.