The Reurn of the King: Analysis of the difference between the book and movie.
01-07-04, 03:10 PM
#1
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
The Reurn of the King: Analysis of the difference between the book and movie.
I haven't read the books and I've found these guides to be incredibly useful:
The Return of the King
A Movie-goer’s Guide
Peter Jackson's movie version of The Return of the King, the final instalment of the trilogy, is probably the most powerful and impressive of the three films. For that matter, it's surely among the most powerful and impressive films of its kind ever made. Now that we can see the entire story in movie form, there's no denying that it's an astonishing, spectacular achievement.
The Encyclopedia of Arda is a site dedicated to Tolkien's original books, rather than the movies, so our particular interest lies in the transition of the stories to the screen. It could be argued that The Return of the King is the most successful of the three films from this point of view. While it doesn't - of course - follow Tolkien's story to the letter, the fundamental strands that make up those stories are woven together well.
Like our previous Movie-goer's Guides, this article is mainly intended for those who have seen the movie, but aren't familiar with the complexities of the original story. Here you'll discover some of the scenes that didn't make it into the movie, as well as some background on the details that were shown. If you're wondering why the Orcs were chanting 'Grond!', or who Sam's 'old Gaffer' was, this is the page for you.
We've had a lot of feedback from the first two Guides, and based on that feedback, it'll be useful to make a couple of introductory comments. A number of readers seem to have inferred that, because they concentrate on their differences from the books, these Guides are intended as a criticism or a negative review of the movies. That's certainly not the case: it's clearly quite impossible to translate 1,200 pages of story into a film, or even into three films, without making significant changes to its structure and details. The mere fact that we discuss some of those changes here certainly shouldn't be taken as a criticism of the film-makers (who have, it should be said, remained relatively close to the original in most fundamental respects). That said, a few of the changes do seem rather strange, or jar slightly with the details of the books. In those cases, of course, we've tried to discuss why the change might be problematic.
This Guide is not intended to be an exhaustive catalogue of every difference between the books and the films. The Movie-goer's Guides for The Fellowship of the Ring and The Two Towers each generated a flood of e-mail with readers' own suggested additions. Some of these were very useful indeed, and we did incorporate several of the common suggestions into the Guides themselves. On the other hand, many of the suggestions were pointing out extremely minor changes - we've generally avoided extremely trivial changes like this. So, if you'd like to send along your own ideas about this Guide to The Return of the King, please feel free to do so, but please also bear in mind that we've already considered many of the smaller issues and deliberately omitted them.
Finally, it should be said that this article contains numerous 'spoilers', including an in-depth discussion of the movie's ending. If you haven't seen the movie, or read the book, we'd strongly recommend doing one or the other before you read any further!
Unseen Events
It seems fair to say that the movie version of The Return of the King follows the story of the books more closely than The Two Towers. Certainly, there are some changes in the details of events, and a few events that don't occur in the original story, but nothing so radically different as (for example) the arrival of Haldir's Elves at Helm's Deep in The Two Towers.
Probably the most significant difference between the two versions is the movie's considerable (and surely unavoidable) compression of the story. This means that there are more than a few events in the books that don't appear on the screen. Most of these don't directly affect the action, but a few do help to shed light on the events that are shown. These, then, are the more significant scenes that didn't make it into the movie:
Probably the best known omission from the movie is Gandalf's final confrontation with Saruman among the ruins of Isengard, where he breaks Saruman's staff and casts him out of the Order of Wizards. Unlike the other scenes listed here, we know for sure that this one was shot: Christopher Lee has described it in detail, and was reportedly quite indignant that it wasn't included in the theatrical version of the movie (though surely we can expect to see it in the Extended Edition).
One event in this part of the story is crucial to what follows. Gríma, who is imprisoned in Orthanc with Saruman, chooses a heavy object as a weapon and throws it down at his enemies. Unknowingly, the weapon he chooses is Saruman's palantír, which explains how Pippin is able to find this enormously valuable object lying in the wreckage around the Tower.
The movie seems to suggest that Théoden's Rohirrim rode directly to Gondor without hindrance. In the book, their story is more complicated. The route to Minas Tirith was blocked by an enemy army, and the Riders had to ally themselves with the Drúedain, a strange woodland people, to find a secret route through the Mountains.
Though the Drúedain themselves don't appear in the movie, we do get an indirect glimpse of them. The weird, eroded statues on the road beneath Dunharrow, which the Rohirrim called the Púkel-men, were ancient carvings of the Drúedain.
Denethor's madness is an important factor in both the book and the movie, but the film omits any mention the reasons for this. What we're not told is that he had secretly been using a palantír of his own, which Sauron had subverted to drive him mad with despair and hopelessness. The movie's Denethor appears to be completely irrational, whereas in the book, though he's driven to the most desperate lengths by despair, there's always an inner logic to his actions.
Although there's no direct mention of Denethor's palantír in the film, he does hint from time to time that he has access to a special source of knowledge, which may be an indirect reference to his secret Seeing-stone.
The Movie-goer's Guide to The Fellowship of the Ring mentions a missing scene in that movie, in which the hobbits lay their hands on rare and powerful weapons in the Barrow-downs east of the Shire. Instead, Aragorn presents them with a selection of swords on Amon Sûl, and never hints that they're anything but ordinary weapons.
This missing scene from The Fellowship of the Ring raises a problem for Merry on the battlefield before Minas Tirith. In the original version, he finds himself confronted by the Witch-king with an enchanted blade of Westernesse, and uses that weapon to make the Nazgûl vulnerable to Éowyn's own attack. In the movie, though, he finds himself in the same situation with an ordinary sword, so that (in principle) the Witch-king should have survived.
While Gandalf and Aragorn lead their armies away to Mordor, the wounded Faramir and Éowyn meet in the Houses of Healing in Minas Tirith, and Éowyn transfers her affections from Aragorn to Faramir. The fact that this isn't shown in the movie doesn't really affect the action, but it helps to explain why these two are seen together at Aragorn's coronation. There is one slight inconsistency here, though: in the book, Merry's wound from his encounter with the Witch-king means that he, too, remains in the Houses of Healing with Faramir and Éowyn. In the movie, though, he's recovered enough to ride to Mordor with the army.
When Aragorn issues his challenge at the Gates of Mordor, the book sees him answered by the chilling Mouth of Sauron, who shows tokens captured from Frodo by the Orcs, including his mithril-coat. Not knowing that Frodo and Sam have escaped, then, Aragorn and his army fight their last battle thinking that the quest has certainly failed. Like the Houses of Healing, this can't really be said to be an essential scene in terms of the plot, but it's a particularly memorable moment in the book.
Probably the most significant omission from the movie is the sequence known as the Scouring of the Shire. In the book, Frodo and his companions return only to find that Men and corrupt hobbits have allied themselves and taken over the Shire. While they've been away, the green fields have been turned into an blighted industrial wasteland, in which the Shire-hobbits live their lives regulated by 'The Rules'. So Frodo and his companions have to fight another battle before the true ending of the book, freeing the Shire and defeating the evil 'Sharkey', who turns out to be none other than Saruman.
It could be said that these events aren't absolutely essential to the plot. If you've read reviews of the movie, though, you'll have noticed that perhaps the only common criticism is the way it seems to have several endings closely following each other. This is partly due to the loss of the story of the Scouring, which stands between these various endings in the book.
If it isn't essential to the mechanics of the plot, the Scouring of the Shire is an important part of the message Tolkien was trying to convey. In the original book, the universal War of the Ring has universal consequences, and evil lurks even among the hobbit-holes of the idyllic Shire, even though the great Enemy has been defeated. We know from his letters that this reflects what Tolkien saw happening to England in the years after the Second World War (and it's perhaps no coincidence that the Shire under Saruman shows many parallels to George Orwell's 1984, which was written in the same country at the same time). The Scouring of the Shire is arguably one of the book's most important serious statements, though admittedly it's hard to see how the film-makers could have hoped to communicate all this in the closing scenes of the movie.
Differences of Detail
If the events shown in the movie follow the book closely, it's hardly surprising to find that it doesn't follow the original text to the letter. Characters and events have been moved around here and there, and there are even a few scenes that don't appear in Tolkien's books.
In comparison with the original trilogy, the events shown in the final film don't come exclusively from The Return of the King, but also include material from the later chapters of The Two Towers. This is especially true of the story of Frodo and Sam. The book of the The Return of the King starts with Frodo having been captured by Orcs and held in the Tower of Cirith Ungol. In fact, Gollum is hardly even mentioned in the book of The Return of the King until he plays his vital final role.
The change of pacing aside, these are some of the differences in events between the book and the movie.
The idea of Arwen's riding to the Grey Havens was introduced by the movie The Two Towers, and is carried on in the The Return of the King, where she has a vision of her future son, Eldarion, which causes her to turn back to Rivendell. There's nothing in the books to correspond to these episodes. When Arwen discusses her vision with Elrond, it's interesting that they discuss 'the child' as if there will only be one. In fact, Tolkien describes at least two daughters as well as Eldarion, though we aren't given their names.
Sam's deeply suspicious relationship with Gollum exists in both versions of the story. The idea that Gollum could manipulate Frodo to the extent of breaking his friendship with Sam, and that Sam would actually abandon his master to Gollum on the borders of Mordor, appear only in the movie.
Gondor's use of the seven Beacons to call for aid from Rohan appears in both the book and the film. In the original story, though, it would have been quite unnecessary for Pippin to light the first Beacon-fire in defiance of Denethor. In that version, Denethor orders the Beacons lit himself, even before Gandalf and Pippin arrive at Minas Tirith. To complicate matters further, the first Beacon wasn't in Minas Tirith, but on the hilltop of Amon Dîn many miles north of the city, so Pippin couldn't realistically have lit it even if he'd needed to.
In the same way that the book's Denethor was rational enough to light the Beacons himself, he also retained enough reason not send his son's company on an effective suicide mission, as the movie suggests. In the book, Faramir's men still held the western part of Osgiliath when he reported to his father, so his return to the garrison, while certainly dangerous, was by no means the hopeless charge shown in the movie.
The story of the Aragorn's sword Andúril is rather different in the movie's version of events. In Tolkien's original story, the sword is reforged before Aragorn sets out from Rivendell, and he carries it throughout the adventures of the Fellowship.
The movie's suggestion that it was reforged later, and then delivered to Aragorn in Rohan, does essentially follow a template from the book, in which a party of Dúnedain arrives (accompanied by Arwen's brothers Elladan and Elrohir) and delivers gifts from the north. The idea of having Elrond deliver the sword himself, though, is entirely an invention of the film-makers. Indeed, it does seem strange to see one of the most important of all Elf-lords carrying probably the world's most valuable sword, apparently alone, across hundreds of miles just to deliver it to Aragorn.
The conduct of Aragorn's coronation is at variance with the events described in the book in many minor respects. Perhaps the most obvious is his crown itself, for which we have a very detailed description: '...the crown of Gondor (the S[outh] Kingdom) was very tall, like that of Egypt, but with wings attached, not set straight back but at an angle.' (The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien, No. 211, dated 1958). It was intended to follow the general design of the winged helmets worn by guards in Minas Tirith (which are actually shown in the movie). The film's version of Aragorn's crown, though, follows a much more traditional design.
Elvish and Other Languages
There are a few fragments of Elvish in the movie that aren't translated on-screen. Here, we'll provide explanations not only of the Elvish words and phrases used, but also one or two other linguistic peculiarities.
Several times during their conversation in Rivendell, Arwen calls Elrond, adar. That's simply the Elvish word for 'father'.
When Frodo holds out Galadriel's Star-glass in Shelob's Lair, he cries out: 'Aiya Eärendil Elenion Ancalima!', which means 'Hail Eärendil brightest of stars!' 'Eärendil' was the Elves' name for the Morning and Evening Star, Venus, some of whose light was carried within the Phial. It comes ultimately from the name of a great Mariner, who was in fact Elrond's father, who legend said sailed the skies with a shining Jewel bound to his brow. (The full legend is bound up with the long story of The Silmarillion, and rather too complicated to explain in detail here. If you click the various links here, though, you can travel to entries in the Encyclopedia itself that will explain matters further.)
The Dark Door leading to the Paths of the Dead is shown in the movie with a line of mysterious symbols above it. The book (The Return of the King V 2) describes these: 'Signs and figures were carved above its wide arch too dim to read...' which is only natural given that they were thousands of years old. In the movie, though, they're clearly legible, though the hieroglyphic script is apparently unique - it isn't related to any the alphabets devised by Tolkien himself.
As the great battering-ram is brought up to Minas Tirith's Gate, the Orcs can be heard chanting 'Grond! Grond!' That's actually a name given to the ram, a name with a much older source. In the First Age, it was the name of the Hammer of the Underworld, used by the first Dark Lord, Morgoth, in single combat with the Elf-king Fingolfin.
At Aragorn's coronation, he sings an Elvish chant: 'Et Eärello Endorenna utúlien. Sinome maruvan ar Hildinyar tenn' Ambar-metta!'. This is a Gondorian tradition, honouring the words of Aragorn's distant ancestor Elendil after his first arrival in Middle-earth: 'Out of the Great Sea to Middle-earth I am come. In this place will I abide, and my heirs, unto the ending of the world.' (The Return of the King VI 5). Perhaps particularly interesting here is the fact that his words contain the Elvish term for Middle-earth: Endor.
A Collection of Curiosities
These are a few moments throughout the film that seem just a little odd. In some cases, these must be small deliberate changes by the film-makers, but in others, it's hard to avoid the conclusion that they're minor mistakes.
Real spiders poison their victims by biting them, and use the glands at the end of their bodies to make silk for their webs. Tolkien's Shelob is the same, giving her victims a bite of poison with her 'beak', and obviously also quite capable of spinning webs. Oddly, the movie's version of Shelob has acquired a stinger on her tail, almost like a scorpion. The idea of a gigantic spider is so fantastical that it seems chirlish to point to such a trivial change, except perhaps that Shelob's tail-sting is exactly where her web-spinning glands should be - in principle, the movie's Shelob shouldn't be able to make webs.
While explaining the history of the Dead and their curse, Legolas mentions that they were cursed by the 'last King of Gondor'. His history is a little inaccurate: Isildur was far from the last King of Gondor. Instead, he was succeeded by his nephew Meneldil, whose descendants ruled Gondor for nearly two thousand more years. There were in fact no less than thirty-one Kings of Gondor after Isildur, until the true last King, Eärnur, was lost in Minas Morgul.
In a scene that only exists in the movie, Gandalf comforts Pippin before the assault on Minas Tirith. 'Death is just another path', he tells the hobbit, and strangely then adds, 'one we must all take.' It seems to have slipped Gandalf's mind that Middle-earth is full of immortal beings, and that he himself is one of them. He then goes on to describe the sights the Elves see as they sail into the West, but the reasons for this are unclear, because mortal Pippin would never be able to make that journey.
Actually, even these comments represent a fairly gross over-simplification of the metaphysics of Middle-earth. Though it isn't inevitable, beings like Gandalf can die in a sense (indeed, at this point in the story, Gandalf already has, and then returned). What's more, the word 'immortality' doesn't have quite its usual meaning in Tolkien's universe. Suffice to say, this apparently harmless insertion into the movie's script hides quite a tangle of philosophical complexities.
We've already commented in the Movie-goers' Guides for The Fellowship of the Ring and The Two Towers on the film-maker's decision to depict Sauron as a giant glowing eye, whereas Tolkien imagined him as a physical being. in fact his brief appearance in the prologue to the movie of The Fellowship of the Ring - huge and armoured, but basically human in shape - would have been more in keeping with Tolkien's description of him during the War of the Ring.
In fact, there's no clear description of Sauron in The Lord of the Rings itself - we have to resort to Tolkien's correspondence for that. What there are, though, are numerous comments and references that only really make sense if Sauron has a physical form (not least, of course, the fact that a disembodied Dark Lord wouldn't have been able to wear his own Ring).
It's curious, then, to find that one of these clues to his physical nature has been included in the movie's script. Outside the Morannon, Aragorn issues a challenge taken directly from the books: 'Let the Lord of the Black Land come forth! Justice shall be done upon him.' (The Return of the King V 10). This makes perfect sense if Sauron has a physical body, but how exactly Aragorn expects a disembodied Red Eye to 'come forth' from the gate, let alone to 'do justice' on it, is something of a mystery.
As the Black Gate opens and the armies of Mordor swarm out, we get a dramatic glimpse of Sauron's Red Eye glaring over the battlefield from the top of his Dark Tower of Barad-dûr. There's a certain amount of artistic licence here: Barad-dûr was a hundred miles from the Morannon, and far off to the east (the left, from the Gondorians' point of view) - it couldn't possibly have been seen from where they stood.
The ship that sails into the West at the end of the movie is referred to as the 'last ship', but in fact it was more properly the 'White Ship'. We don't know exactly when the last ship sailed, but it was at least several decades after Gandalf and the others departed into the West.
The occupants of the ship are slightly different in the two versions. The movie seems to show Celeborn boarding it with Galadriel, while in the book he remains in Middle-earth, at least for a time. On the other hand, Tolkien envisaged Gandalf taking Shadowfax into the West with him, but there's no sign of the great horse at this point in the movie.
Some Historical Background
There's such a range and depth to the history of Tolkien's world that even with the movie running to more than three hours, it can only hope to reflect a tiny fraction of that depth. Here, we'll discuss some of the 'historical' context that the movie had to omit, along with a few trivial but hopefully interesting facts.
Starting the movie with the scene where Gollum first acquired the Ring was certainly an interesting touch. What's perhaps not completely clear in this scene, though, is just how long ago this was, compared with the main story. Sméagol murdered Déagol and took the Ring in about the year III 2463, while The Return of the King is set in III 3019, so the opening scene could have been captioned 'About 556 years earlier...'.
We only see one palantír in the movie, but in fact there were originally seven of them, brought to Middle-earth by Aragorn's ancestor Elendil. By the time of the War of the Ring, three had been lost, but four remained. The one belonging to Saruman, and later foolishly used by Pippin, was the Orthanc-stone of Isengard. Denethor also had possession of one, and Sauron had gained one of his own when he captured Minas Morgul (through which he commanded Saruman and dominated Denethor). The final Stone doesn't come into the story directly: it was held in the tower of Elostirion on the Tower Hills, not far from the Shire.
As Gandalf rides for Minas Tirith on Shadowfax, he's seen fording a river as Pippin asks him where they are. Gandalf's answer, that they are entering the land of Gondor, seems to be exactly correct: the border between Rohan and Gondor was marked by a river, the Mering Stream. According to the geography of the books, though, the road to Minas Tirith crossed the river under the trees of the Firien Wood, whereas in the movie Gandalf is riding across an open plain.
The strange, disfigured creature - some kind of Orc, apparently - who leads the armies of Mordor against Minas Tirith has seen his part in the story expanded immensely. This is Gothmog, the Lieutenant of Morgul, who is mentioned precisely once in the book, and about whom we know practically nothing. Indeed, it's not even clear from the book what kind of creature he is, and there's some debate about this. Some have suggested that he was another one of the Nazgûl, while others prefer to see him as an evil Man. The idea that he was an Orc, as the movie seems to show, is a rather less common suggestion, but there's nothing in the books that would make it impossible.
After Aragorn meets the King of the Dead, we don't see anything of him and his companions until they arrive at the Battle of the Pelennor. In that time, he led the Dead right through the Mountains, emerging on their southern side, in a part of Gondor far distant from Minas Tirith. From there, they travelled nearly three hundred miles through Gondor's southern regions (in the books, they still had their horses to help them make this journey). At the port of Pelargir, they intercepted the enemy fleet and captured it, sailing north to the main battle beneath Minas Tirith.
One small change between the two version occurs here, in that the book has Aragorn freeing the Dead after the battle at Pelargir. So, the Dead were never seen at Minas Tirith, and instead Aragorn's ships were manned by Northern Dúnedain and Gondorians who had rallied to his cause.
As Sam fights the Orcs of Cirith Ungol, he cries out 'That's for Frodo - that's for the Shire - and that's for my old Gaffer!' His 'old Gaffer' is Gaffer Gamgee, his father back in the Shire.
The Tower of Cirith Ungol, where Frodo was briefly imprisoned, was guarded by two powerful sentinels: Silent Watchers that could bar the entranceway to the Tower. In the book, these are a major hindrance and danger. They appear in the movie, too, sitting in the gateway to the Tower, but there they seem completely inert. Perhaps we can take this as a hint of a fuller scene to appear in the Extended Edition.
When he mocks Éowyn, the Lord of the Nazgûl refers to a prophecy that he cannot be slain by the hand of a man. This goes back to the great Battle of Fornost more than a thousand years before, where the Witch-king's armies were defeated, but from which he himself escaped. The Elf-lord Glorfindel prophesied his fate: 'Far off yet is his doom, and not by the hand of man will he fall.' (The Lord of the Rings Appendix A 1 (iv)).
When Aragorn establishes his new royal house, he chooses a familiar name for it: Telcontar, which is Elvish for 'Strider', his nickname in the north.
With all the attention on Aragorn in Gondor, it isn't clear from the film who becomes King in Rohan after Théoden's death. His heir is his nephew Éomer, the brother of Éowyn.
The Ending
The ending of The Lord of the Rings has caused a certain amount of confusion among readers and viewers alike. This is perhaps not completely surprising, because it's necessary to know a little of the history of Middle-earth to understand why Frodo steps onto the White Ship at the Grey Havens.
From the most ancient times, the Valar (the Powers of the World) had dwelt in the land of Valinor, in Aman beyond the Great Sea, called the Blessed Realm and the Undying Lands. Their lands of peace and plenty had once been part of the World, and they welcomed the first Elves there to enjoy their lives of immortal bliss. Through a chain of tragic events, though, some of the Elves rebelled against the Valar, and exiled themselves from Valinor by returning to Middle-earth. Among them were Galadriel and the ancestors of Elrond.
These exiled Elves fought a centuries-long war against the first Dark Lord, Sauron's master Morgoth, in which they were aided by certain houses of Men. After Morgoth's defeat, these Men were rewarded with a new home - the island of Númenor in the middle of the Sea, where they built the greatest and most powerful nation of Men to have ever existed.
Ultimately they became too great even for Sauron to meet in battle, so instead he used the power of his Ring to seduce the already corrupt King of Númenor, and persuaded him to launch an invasion of Aman itself. As Sauron had foreseen, the result of this foolish act was utter disaster for the Númenóreans, and their entire island home was destroyed. A few survivors, led by Elendil, escaped the destruction and returned to Middle-earth.
At the same time, Aman was 'taken away' from the world, so that it became impossible for mortals to sail there except by the special grace of the Valar. However, it was granted to the Elves to continue to travel there, so that Elvish ship travelling into the West would eventually come to the green lands of the Blessed Realm. It's to Aman, then, that the Elves are travelling in The Lord of the Rings, never to return to Middle-earth. This explains Arwen's burden of regret and the difficulty of her choice - by refusing to sail from the Grey Havens, she gives up an eternity in paradise to stay with Aragorn.
The choice of those Elves who sailed on the White Ship was a simple one, then - indeed, for Galadriel, this would be a homecoming: she had been born in Valinor, and been among those exiled millennia before. It would be a homecoming for Gandalf, too, because the Wizards were actually Maiar, immortal beings of the same kind as the Valar themselves.
For Frodo, the two years he spent in the Shire after the Downfall of Barad-dûr were filled with suffering and regret. The wounds he had received on the journey continued to pain him, but worse than this was the memory of the Ring, which during the Quest had taken hold of his mind. "'It is gone for ever,' he said, 'and now all is dark and empty.'" (The Return of the King VI 9). Across the Sea, he could be freed from all this, so his decision to sail into the West is not perhaps so surprising. Being mortal, neither Frodo nor Bilbo could enjoy the unending lives of the other peoples of the Undying Lands, but they could live out their days free of the burden of the Ring.
Beyond the Ending
Though the story of The Lord of the Rings ends with the White Ship sailing from the Grey Havens, and Sam returning to Rose, the history of Tolkien's universe doesn't stop there. We have enough extra information, coming especially from the Appendices to the books, to describe most of the major characters lives after the end of the story. (Note that this list doesn't include the characters who sailed into the West at the end of the story: Bilbo, Elrond, Frodo, Galadriel and Gandalf).
Aragorn enjoyed a long and prosperous rule over the western lands of Middle-earth, including not only Gondor, but also the lost kingdom of Arnor in the north. His Númenórean descent meant that he enjoyed an lifespan far beyond that of normal Men, and reigned as King of the Reunited Kingdom for one hundred and twenty years. He was succeeded as King by his son Eldarion.
Arwen was Aragorn's Queen throughout his long reign. As Elrond had foreseen, she outlived the King, and after his death she took leave of Eldarion her son and wandered away from Gondor. She came to Lórien, which had become an empty land after Galadriel's departure, and there she gave up her life on the green mound of Cerin Amroth.
Éomer succeeded his uncle Théoden to become the eighteenth King of Rohan. He lived to the age of ninety-three, ruling Rohan for sixty-five of those years, and maintained the strong alliance between his country and Gondor. His queen was Lothíriel of Dol Amroth, and he was succeeded as King by their son, Elfwine the Fair.
Éowyn became the consort of Faramir, and dwelt with him among the hills of Emyn Arnen, so becoming Lady Éowyn of Ithilien (Ithilien being the lands held by Gondor east of the Great River, where Frodo had met Faramir in The Two Towers).
Faramir inherited the role of Steward from his father, though he now served the King, rather than ruling the kingdom of Gondor directly. He was also made Prince of Ithilien and Lord of Emyn Arnen by Aragorn, and it was in Emyn Arnen that he dwelt with Éowyn. He had a measure of the blood of the Dúnedain, though to a lesser degree than Aragorn, and he lived to the age of one hundred and twenty.
Gimli brought a part of the people of his homeland of Erebor, and came to the Glittering Caves of Aglarond that lay behind Helm's Deep. There he dwelt as Lord of the Glittering Caves as long as Aragorn's reign lasted. After this time, he seems to have passed into the West with his friend Legolas: probably the only Dwarf to ever do so.
Legolas, like his friend Gimli, removed from his northern home and came into the south. He dwelt with his people in Faramir's wooded land of Ithilien. After the passing of Aragorn, he built himself a ship and sailed into the West, apparently taking Gimli with him.
Merry dwelt happily in the Shire, where he married Estella Bolger. Eleven years after his return from the War, he inherited the title of Master of Buckland from his father Saradoc, and became one of the most important hobbits in the Shire. In the last years of his life, he went travelling with his friend Pippin.
Pippin also lived happily in the Shire for many years. He married Diamond of Long Cleeve, and they named their son after Prince Faramir. Soon after Merry became Master of Buckland, Pippin also inherited an important title, that of Thain of the Shire, from his father Paladin. In their old age, Pippin and Merry journeyed together into the south, passing through Rohan and coming at last back to Minas Tirith, where they lived out their last years together.
Sam married Rose Cotton soon after he returned to the Shire, and together they had no fewer than thirteen children. For much of his life, Sam was the elected Mayor of the Shire, and together with Merry and Pippin became one of the northern councillors of the King. His marriage to Rose lasted sixty-two years, but at last she died, and Sam travelled away from the Shire. Though his fate isn't known with certainty, he was thought to have gone to the Grey Havens and passed over the Sea himself, perhaps to be reunited at last with Frodo in the Blessed Realm.
Saruman's fate is harder to explain, because the key events surrounding it simply don't happen in the movie version. In the book, Gandalf ejects him from the Order of Wizards, but he later escapes from Isengard with Gríma, and they travel north, where his agents have already been at work bringing the Shire under their control. When Frodo and the others return, the succeed in driving him out. In a sudden fit of madness, Gríma turns on his master and cuts his throat. The last we see of Saruman is his disembodied spirit looking back to its original home in the West '...but out of the West came a cold wind, and it bent away, and with a sigh dissolved into nothing.' (The Return of the King VI 8).
It seems appropriate to end with a word of acknowledgement of Peter Jackson and everyone else associated with the movie version of The Lord of the Rings. Though of course they haven't come close to the scope and intricacy of the original story - that would be quite impossible - what they have produced is still nothing less than a masterpiece. The film-makers, and of course Peter Jackson in particular, have to be admired for having the courage to merely take on such an immense challenge, let alone to produce such an exceptional result. The complete story of The Lord of Rings is probably unfilmable, but Peter Jackson has come closer than anyone could have imagined possible.
It's encouraging to see, too, that the movies are drawing more and more new readers to Tolkien's original works. Indeed, awareness of Tolkien's writings is probably more widespread now than at any time since their publication: there can hardly be a person on the planet who doesn't know the names of Frodo, Gandalf or Sauron.
With Frodo's voyage into the West, our own cinematic voyage into Tolkien's world has come to an end, at least for now. That world spreads out far and wide beyond Peter Jackson's three movies, though, and the true voyage through it is almost endless. Quite apart from the richness of the full original story of The Lord of the Rings, there's far more of Middle-earth to experience. The Hobbit takes the story back to Bilbo's own adventures, and the original discovery of the Ring, and though it's a book written for children, it's still hugely enjoyable for an adult audience. Going further back still is the much deeper and darker Silmarillion, the great legendarium of the world of Arda. The Silmarillion crosses oceans of time, from before the beginning of the universe to the days of the War of the Ring, telling especially of the Wars of the Elves against Morgoth in the distant First Age.
Even those three books are just the beginning: the mysteries of palantíri, Wizards and much more are revealed in the Unfinished Tales while, for the truly dedicated, twelve volumes of lore reveal the intricacies of The History of Middle-earth. Add to that the volumes and volumes of material by students of Tolkien's life and work and (as Bilbo was so fond of saying) 'The Road goes ever on and on...'
http://www.glyphweb.com/arda/returnoftheking.html
Also for the other two films:
http://www.glyphweb.com/arda/movie.html
http://www.glyphweb.com/arda/twotowers.html
The Return of the King
A Movie-goer’s Guide
Peter Jackson's movie version of The Return of the King, the final instalment of the trilogy, is probably the most powerful and impressive of the three films. For that matter, it's surely among the most powerful and impressive films of its kind ever made. Now that we can see the entire story in movie form, there's no denying that it's an astonishing, spectacular achievement.
The Encyclopedia of Arda is a site dedicated to Tolkien's original books, rather than the movies, so our particular interest lies in the transition of the stories to the screen. It could be argued that The Return of the King is the most successful of the three films from this point of view. While it doesn't - of course - follow Tolkien's story to the letter, the fundamental strands that make up those stories are woven together well.
Like our previous Movie-goer's Guides, this article is mainly intended for those who have seen the movie, but aren't familiar with the complexities of the original story. Here you'll discover some of the scenes that didn't make it into the movie, as well as some background on the details that were shown. If you're wondering why the Orcs were chanting 'Grond!', or who Sam's 'old Gaffer' was, this is the page for you.
We've had a lot of feedback from the first two Guides, and based on that feedback, it'll be useful to make a couple of introductory comments. A number of readers seem to have inferred that, because they concentrate on their differences from the books, these Guides are intended as a criticism or a negative review of the movies. That's certainly not the case: it's clearly quite impossible to translate 1,200 pages of story into a film, or even into three films, without making significant changes to its structure and details. The mere fact that we discuss some of those changes here certainly shouldn't be taken as a criticism of the film-makers (who have, it should be said, remained relatively close to the original in most fundamental respects). That said, a few of the changes do seem rather strange, or jar slightly with the details of the books. In those cases, of course, we've tried to discuss why the change might be problematic.
This Guide is not intended to be an exhaustive catalogue of every difference between the books and the films. The Movie-goer's Guides for The Fellowship of the Ring and The Two Towers each generated a flood of e-mail with readers' own suggested additions. Some of these were very useful indeed, and we did incorporate several of the common suggestions into the Guides themselves. On the other hand, many of the suggestions were pointing out extremely minor changes - we've generally avoided extremely trivial changes like this. So, if you'd like to send along your own ideas about this Guide to The Return of the King, please feel free to do so, but please also bear in mind that we've already considered many of the smaller issues and deliberately omitted them.
Finally, it should be said that this article contains numerous 'spoilers', including an in-depth discussion of the movie's ending. If you haven't seen the movie, or read the book, we'd strongly recommend doing one or the other before you read any further!
Unseen Events
It seems fair to say that the movie version of The Return of the King follows the story of the books more closely than The Two Towers. Certainly, there are some changes in the details of events, and a few events that don't occur in the original story, but nothing so radically different as (for example) the arrival of Haldir's Elves at Helm's Deep in The Two Towers.
Probably the most significant difference between the two versions is the movie's considerable (and surely unavoidable) compression of the story. This means that there are more than a few events in the books that don't appear on the screen. Most of these don't directly affect the action, but a few do help to shed light on the events that are shown. These, then, are the more significant scenes that didn't make it into the movie:
Probably the best known omission from the movie is Gandalf's final confrontation with Saruman among the ruins of Isengard, where he breaks Saruman's staff and casts him out of the Order of Wizards. Unlike the other scenes listed here, we know for sure that this one was shot: Christopher Lee has described it in detail, and was reportedly quite indignant that it wasn't included in the theatrical version of the movie (though surely we can expect to see it in the Extended Edition).
One event in this part of the story is crucial to what follows. Gríma, who is imprisoned in Orthanc with Saruman, chooses a heavy object as a weapon and throws it down at his enemies. Unknowingly, the weapon he chooses is Saruman's palantír, which explains how Pippin is able to find this enormously valuable object lying in the wreckage around the Tower.
The movie seems to suggest that Théoden's Rohirrim rode directly to Gondor without hindrance. In the book, their story is more complicated. The route to Minas Tirith was blocked by an enemy army, and the Riders had to ally themselves with the Drúedain, a strange woodland people, to find a secret route through the Mountains.
Though the Drúedain themselves don't appear in the movie, we do get an indirect glimpse of them. The weird, eroded statues on the road beneath Dunharrow, which the Rohirrim called the Púkel-men, were ancient carvings of the Drúedain.
Denethor's madness is an important factor in both the book and the movie, but the film omits any mention the reasons for this. What we're not told is that he had secretly been using a palantír of his own, which Sauron had subverted to drive him mad with despair and hopelessness. The movie's Denethor appears to be completely irrational, whereas in the book, though he's driven to the most desperate lengths by despair, there's always an inner logic to his actions.
Although there's no direct mention of Denethor's palantír in the film, he does hint from time to time that he has access to a special source of knowledge, which may be an indirect reference to his secret Seeing-stone.
The Movie-goer's Guide to The Fellowship of the Ring mentions a missing scene in that movie, in which the hobbits lay their hands on rare and powerful weapons in the Barrow-downs east of the Shire. Instead, Aragorn presents them with a selection of swords on Amon Sûl, and never hints that they're anything but ordinary weapons.
This missing scene from The Fellowship of the Ring raises a problem for Merry on the battlefield before Minas Tirith. In the original version, he finds himself confronted by the Witch-king with an enchanted blade of Westernesse, and uses that weapon to make the Nazgûl vulnerable to Éowyn's own attack. In the movie, though, he finds himself in the same situation with an ordinary sword, so that (in principle) the Witch-king should have survived.
While Gandalf and Aragorn lead their armies away to Mordor, the wounded Faramir and Éowyn meet in the Houses of Healing in Minas Tirith, and Éowyn transfers her affections from Aragorn to Faramir. The fact that this isn't shown in the movie doesn't really affect the action, but it helps to explain why these two are seen together at Aragorn's coronation. There is one slight inconsistency here, though: in the book, Merry's wound from his encounter with the Witch-king means that he, too, remains in the Houses of Healing with Faramir and Éowyn. In the movie, though, he's recovered enough to ride to Mordor with the army.
When Aragorn issues his challenge at the Gates of Mordor, the book sees him answered by the chilling Mouth of Sauron, who shows tokens captured from Frodo by the Orcs, including his mithril-coat. Not knowing that Frodo and Sam have escaped, then, Aragorn and his army fight their last battle thinking that the quest has certainly failed. Like the Houses of Healing, this can't really be said to be an essential scene in terms of the plot, but it's a particularly memorable moment in the book.
Probably the most significant omission from the movie is the sequence known as the Scouring of the Shire. In the book, Frodo and his companions return only to find that Men and corrupt hobbits have allied themselves and taken over the Shire. While they've been away, the green fields have been turned into an blighted industrial wasteland, in which the Shire-hobbits live their lives regulated by 'The Rules'. So Frodo and his companions have to fight another battle before the true ending of the book, freeing the Shire and defeating the evil 'Sharkey', who turns out to be none other than Saruman.
It could be said that these events aren't absolutely essential to the plot. If you've read reviews of the movie, though, you'll have noticed that perhaps the only common criticism is the way it seems to have several endings closely following each other. This is partly due to the loss of the story of the Scouring, which stands between these various endings in the book.
If it isn't essential to the mechanics of the plot, the Scouring of the Shire is an important part of the message Tolkien was trying to convey. In the original book, the universal War of the Ring has universal consequences, and evil lurks even among the hobbit-holes of the idyllic Shire, even though the great Enemy has been defeated. We know from his letters that this reflects what Tolkien saw happening to England in the years after the Second World War (and it's perhaps no coincidence that the Shire under Saruman shows many parallels to George Orwell's 1984, which was written in the same country at the same time). The Scouring of the Shire is arguably one of the book's most important serious statements, though admittedly it's hard to see how the film-makers could have hoped to communicate all this in the closing scenes of the movie.
Differences of Detail
If the events shown in the movie follow the book closely, it's hardly surprising to find that it doesn't follow the original text to the letter. Characters and events have been moved around here and there, and there are even a few scenes that don't appear in Tolkien's books.
In comparison with the original trilogy, the events shown in the final film don't come exclusively from The Return of the King, but also include material from the later chapters of The Two Towers. This is especially true of the story of Frodo and Sam. The book of the The Return of the King starts with Frodo having been captured by Orcs and held in the Tower of Cirith Ungol. In fact, Gollum is hardly even mentioned in the book of The Return of the King until he plays his vital final role.
The change of pacing aside, these are some of the differences in events between the book and the movie.
The idea of Arwen's riding to the Grey Havens was introduced by the movie The Two Towers, and is carried on in the The Return of the King, where she has a vision of her future son, Eldarion, which causes her to turn back to Rivendell. There's nothing in the books to correspond to these episodes. When Arwen discusses her vision with Elrond, it's interesting that they discuss 'the child' as if there will only be one. In fact, Tolkien describes at least two daughters as well as Eldarion, though we aren't given their names.
Sam's deeply suspicious relationship with Gollum exists in both versions of the story. The idea that Gollum could manipulate Frodo to the extent of breaking his friendship with Sam, and that Sam would actually abandon his master to Gollum on the borders of Mordor, appear only in the movie.
Gondor's use of the seven Beacons to call for aid from Rohan appears in both the book and the film. In the original story, though, it would have been quite unnecessary for Pippin to light the first Beacon-fire in defiance of Denethor. In that version, Denethor orders the Beacons lit himself, even before Gandalf and Pippin arrive at Minas Tirith. To complicate matters further, the first Beacon wasn't in Minas Tirith, but on the hilltop of Amon Dîn many miles north of the city, so Pippin couldn't realistically have lit it even if he'd needed to.
In the same way that the book's Denethor was rational enough to light the Beacons himself, he also retained enough reason not send his son's company on an effective suicide mission, as the movie suggests. In the book, Faramir's men still held the western part of Osgiliath when he reported to his father, so his return to the garrison, while certainly dangerous, was by no means the hopeless charge shown in the movie.
The story of the Aragorn's sword Andúril is rather different in the movie's version of events. In Tolkien's original story, the sword is reforged before Aragorn sets out from Rivendell, and he carries it throughout the adventures of the Fellowship.
The movie's suggestion that it was reforged later, and then delivered to Aragorn in Rohan, does essentially follow a template from the book, in which a party of Dúnedain arrives (accompanied by Arwen's brothers Elladan and Elrohir) and delivers gifts from the north. The idea of having Elrond deliver the sword himself, though, is entirely an invention of the film-makers. Indeed, it does seem strange to see one of the most important of all Elf-lords carrying probably the world's most valuable sword, apparently alone, across hundreds of miles just to deliver it to Aragorn.
The conduct of Aragorn's coronation is at variance with the events described in the book in many minor respects. Perhaps the most obvious is his crown itself, for which we have a very detailed description: '...the crown of Gondor (the S[outh] Kingdom) was very tall, like that of Egypt, but with wings attached, not set straight back but at an angle.' (The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien, No. 211, dated 1958). It was intended to follow the general design of the winged helmets worn by guards in Minas Tirith (which are actually shown in the movie). The film's version of Aragorn's crown, though, follows a much more traditional design.
Elvish and Other Languages
There are a few fragments of Elvish in the movie that aren't translated on-screen. Here, we'll provide explanations not only of the Elvish words and phrases used, but also one or two other linguistic peculiarities.
Several times during their conversation in Rivendell, Arwen calls Elrond, adar. That's simply the Elvish word for 'father'.
When Frodo holds out Galadriel's Star-glass in Shelob's Lair, he cries out: 'Aiya Eärendil Elenion Ancalima!', which means 'Hail Eärendil brightest of stars!' 'Eärendil' was the Elves' name for the Morning and Evening Star, Venus, some of whose light was carried within the Phial. It comes ultimately from the name of a great Mariner, who was in fact Elrond's father, who legend said sailed the skies with a shining Jewel bound to his brow. (The full legend is bound up with the long story of The Silmarillion, and rather too complicated to explain in detail here. If you click the various links here, though, you can travel to entries in the Encyclopedia itself that will explain matters further.)
The Dark Door leading to the Paths of the Dead is shown in the movie with a line of mysterious symbols above it. The book (The Return of the King V 2) describes these: 'Signs and figures were carved above its wide arch too dim to read...' which is only natural given that they were thousands of years old. In the movie, though, they're clearly legible, though the hieroglyphic script is apparently unique - it isn't related to any the alphabets devised by Tolkien himself.
As the great battering-ram is brought up to Minas Tirith's Gate, the Orcs can be heard chanting 'Grond! Grond!' That's actually a name given to the ram, a name with a much older source. In the First Age, it was the name of the Hammer of the Underworld, used by the first Dark Lord, Morgoth, in single combat with the Elf-king Fingolfin.
At Aragorn's coronation, he sings an Elvish chant: 'Et Eärello Endorenna utúlien. Sinome maruvan ar Hildinyar tenn' Ambar-metta!'. This is a Gondorian tradition, honouring the words of Aragorn's distant ancestor Elendil after his first arrival in Middle-earth: 'Out of the Great Sea to Middle-earth I am come. In this place will I abide, and my heirs, unto the ending of the world.' (The Return of the King VI 5). Perhaps particularly interesting here is the fact that his words contain the Elvish term for Middle-earth: Endor.
A Collection of Curiosities
These are a few moments throughout the film that seem just a little odd. In some cases, these must be small deliberate changes by the film-makers, but in others, it's hard to avoid the conclusion that they're minor mistakes.
Real spiders poison their victims by biting them, and use the glands at the end of their bodies to make silk for their webs. Tolkien's Shelob is the same, giving her victims a bite of poison with her 'beak', and obviously also quite capable of spinning webs. Oddly, the movie's version of Shelob has acquired a stinger on her tail, almost like a scorpion. The idea of a gigantic spider is so fantastical that it seems chirlish to point to such a trivial change, except perhaps that Shelob's tail-sting is exactly where her web-spinning glands should be - in principle, the movie's Shelob shouldn't be able to make webs.
While explaining the history of the Dead and their curse, Legolas mentions that they were cursed by the 'last King of Gondor'. His history is a little inaccurate: Isildur was far from the last King of Gondor. Instead, he was succeeded by his nephew Meneldil, whose descendants ruled Gondor for nearly two thousand more years. There were in fact no less than thirty-one Kings of Gondor after Isildur, until the true last King, Eärnur, was lost in Minas Morgul.
In a scene that only exists in the movie, Gandalf comforts Pippin before the assault on Minas Tirith. 'Death is just another path', he tells the hobbit, and strangely then adds, 'one we must all take.' It seems to have slipped Gandalf's mind that Middle-earth is full of immortal beings, and that he himself is one of them. He then goes on to describe the sights the Elves see as they sail into the West, but the reasons for this are unclear, because mortal Pippin would never be able to make that journey.
Actually, even these comments represent a fairly gross over-simplification of the metaphysics of Middle-earth. Though it isn't inevitable, beings like Gandalf can die in a sense (indeed, at this point in the story, Gandalf already has, and then returned). What's more, the word 'immortality' doesn't have quite its usual meaning in Tolkien's universe. Suffice to say, this apparently harmless insertion into the movie's script hides quite a tangle of philosophical complexities.
We've already commented in the Movie-goers' Guides for The Fellowship of the Ring and The Two Towers on the film-maker's decision to depict Sauron as a giant glowing eye, whereas Tolkien imagined him as a physical being. in fact his brief appearance in the prologue to the movie of The Fellowship of the Ring - huge and armoured, but basically human in shape - would have been more in keeping with Tolkien's description of him during the War of the Ring.
In fact, there's no clear description of Sauron in The Lord of the Rings itself - we have to resort to Tolkien's correspondence for that. What there are, though, are numerous comments and references that only really make sense if Sauron has a physical form (not least, of course, the fact that a disembodied Dark Lord wouldn't have been able to wear his own Ring).
It's curious, then, to find that one of these clues to his physical nature has been included in the movie's script. Outside the Morannon, Aragorn issues a challenge taken directly from the books: 'Let the Lord of the Black Land come forth! Justice shall be done upon him.' (The Return of the King V 10). This makes perfect sense if Sauron has a physical body, but how exactly Aragorn expects a disembodied Red Eye to 'come forth' from the gate, let alone to 'do justice' on it, is something of a mystery.
As the Black Gate opens and the armies of Mordor swarm out, we get a dramatic glimpse of Sauron's Red Eye glaring over the battlefield from the top of his Dark Tower of Barad-dûr. There's a certain amount of artistic licence here: Barad-dûr was a hundred miles from the Morannon, and far off to the east (the left, from the Gondorians' point of view) - it couldn't possibly have been seen from where they stood.
The ship that sails into the West at the end of the movie is referred to as the 'last ship', but in fact it was more properly the 'White Ship'. We don't know exactly when the last ship sailed, but it was at least several decades after Gandalf and the others departed into the West.
The occupants of the ship are slightly different in the two versions. The movie seems to show Celeborn boarding it with Galadriel, while in the book he remains in Middle-earth, at least for a time. On the other hand, Tolkien envisaged Gandalf taking Shadowfax into the West with him, but there's no sign of the great horse at this point in the movie.
Some Historical Background
There's such a range and depth to the history of Tolkien's world that even with the movie running to more than three hours, it can only hope to reflect a tiny fraction of that depth. Here, we'll discuss some of the 'historical' context that the movie had to omit, along with a few trivial but hopefully interesting facts.
Starting the movie with the scene where Gollum first acquired the Ring was certainly an interesting touch. What's perhaps not completely clear in this scene, though, is just how long ago this was, compared with the main story. Sméagol murdered Déagol and took the Ring in about the year III 2463, while The Return of the King is set in III 3019, so the opening scene could have been captioned 'About 556 years earlier...'.
We only see one palantír in the movie, but in fact there were originally seven of them, brought to Middle-earth by Aragorn's ancestor Elendil. By the time of the War of the Ring, three had been lost, but four remained. The one belonging to Saruman, and later foolishly used by Pippin, was the Orthanc-stone of Isengard. Denethor also had possession of one, and Sauron had gained one of his own when he captured Minas Morgul (through which he commanded Saruman and dominated Denethor). The final Stone doesn't come into the story directly: it was held in the tower of Elostirion on the Tower Hills, not far from the Shire.
As Gandalf rides for Minas Tirith on Shadowfax, he's seen fording a river as Pippin asks him where they are. Gandalf's answer, that they are entering the land of Gondor, seems to be exactly correct: the border between Rohan and Gondor was marked by a river, the Mering Stream. According to the geography of the books, though, the road to Minas Tirith crossed the river under the trees of the Firien Wood, whereas in the movie Gandalf is riding across an open plain.
The strange, disfigured creature - some kind of Orc, apparently - who leads the armies of Mordor against Minas Tirith has seen his part in the story expanded immensely. This is Gothmog, the Lieutenant of Morgul, who is mentioned precisely once in the book, and about whom we know practically nothing. Indeed, it's not even clear from the book what kind of creature he is, and there's some debate about this. Some have suggested that he was another one of the Nazgûl, while others prefer to see him as an evil Man. The idea that he was an Orc, as the movie seems to show, is a rather less common suggestion, but there's nothing in the books that would make it impossible.
After Aragorn meets the King of the Dead, we don't see anything of him and his companions until they arrive at the Battle of the Pelennor. In that time, he led the Dead right through the Mountains, emerging on their southern side, in a part of Gondor far distant from Minas Tirith. From there, they travelled nearly three hundred miles through Gondor's southern regions (in the books, they still had their horses to help them make this journey). At the port of Pelargir, they intercepted the enemy fleet and captured it, sailing north to the main battle beneath Minas Tirith.
One small change between the two version occurs here, in that the book has Aragorn freeing the Dead after the battle at Pelargir. So, the Dead were never seen at Minas Tirith, and instead Aragorn's ships were manned by Northern Dúnedain and Gondorians who had rallied to his cause.
As Sam fights the Orcs of Cirith Ungol, he cries out 'That's for Frodo - that's for the Shire - and that's for my old Gaffer!' His 'old Gaffer' is Gaffer Gamgee, his father back in the Shire.
The Tower of Cirith Ungol, where Frodo was briefly imprisoned, was guarded by two powerful sentinels: Silent Watchers that could bar the entranceway to the Tower. In the book, these are a major hindrance and danger. They appear in the movie, too, sitting in the gateway to the Tower, but there they seem completely inert. Perhaps we can take this as a hint of a fuller scene to appear in the Extended Edition.
When he mocks Éowyn, the Lord of the Nazgûl refers to a prophecy that he cannot be slain by the hand of a man. This goes back to the great Battle of Fornost more than a thousand years before, where the Witch-king's armies were defeated, but from which he himself escaped. The Elf-lord Glorfindel prophesied his fate: 'Far off yet is his doom, and not by the hand of man will he fall.' (The Lord of the Rings Appendix A 1 (iv)).
When Aragorn establishes his new royal house, he chooses a familiar name for it: Telcontar, which is Elvish for 'Strider', his nickname in the north.
With all the attention on Aragorn in Gondor, it isn't clear from the film who becomes King in Rohan after Théoden's death. His heir is his nephew Éomer, the brother of Éowyn.
The Ending
The ending of The Lord of the Rings has caused a certain amount of confusion among readers and viewers alike. This is perhaps not completely surprising, because it's necessary to know a little of the history of Middle-earth to understand why Frodo steps onto the White Ship at the Grey Havens.
From the most ancient times, the Valar (the Powers of the World) had dwelt in the land of Valinor, in Aman beyond the Great Sea, called the Blessed Realm and the Undying Lands. Their lands of peace and plenty had once been part of the World, and they welcomed the first Elves there to enjoy their lives of immortal bliss. Through a chain of tragic events, though, some of the Elves rebelled against the Valar, and exiled themselves from Valinor by returning to Middle-earth. Among them were Galadriel and the ancestors of Elrond.
These exiled Elves fought a centuries-long war against the first Dark Lord, Sauron's master Morgoth, in which they were aided by certain houses of Men. After Morgoth's defeat, these Men were rewarded with a new home - the island of Númenor in the middle of the Sea, where they built the greatest and most powerful nation of Men to have ever existed.
Ultimately they became too great even for Sauron to meet in battle, so instead he used the power of his Ring to seduce the already corrupt King of Númenor, and persuaded him to launch an invasion of Aman itself. As Sauron had foreseen, the result of this foolish act was utter disaster for the Númenóreans, and their entire island home was destroyed. A few survivors, led by Elendil, escaped the destruction and returned to Middle-earth.
At the same time, Aman was 'taken away' from the world, so that it became impossible for mortals to sail there except by the special grace of the Valar. However, it was granted to the Elves to continue to travel there, so that Elvish ship travelling into the West would eventually come to the green lands of the Blessed Realm. It's to Aman, then, that the Elves are travelling in The Lord of the Rings, never to return to Middle-earth. This explains Arwen's burden of regret and the difficulty of her choice - by refusing to sail from the Grey Havens, she gives up an eternity in paradise to stay with Aragorn.
The choice of those Elves who sailed on the White Ship was a simple one, then - indeed, for Galadriel, this would be a homecoming: she had been born in Valinor, and been among those exiled millennia before. It would be a homecoming for Gandalf, too, because the Wizards were actually Maiar, immortal beings of the same kind as the Valar themselves.
For Frodo, the two years he spent in the Shire after the Downfall of Barad-dûr were filled with suffering and regret. The wounds he had received on the journey continued to pain him, but worse than this was the memory of the Ring, which during the Quest had taken hold of his mind. "'It is gone for ever,' he said, 'and now all is dark and empty.'" (The Return of the King VI 9). Across the Sea, he could be freed from all this, so his decision to sail into the West is not perhaps so surprising. Being mortal, neither Frodo nor Bilbo could enjoy the unending lives of the other peoples of the Undying Lands, but they could live out their days free of the burden of the Ring.
Beyond the Ending
Though the story of The Lord of the Rings ends with the White Ship sailing from the Grey Havens, and Sam returning to Rose, the history of Tolkien's universe doesn't stop there. We have enough extra information, coming especially from the Appendices to the books, to describe most of the major characters lives after the end of the story. (Note that this list doesn't include the characters who sailed into the West at the end of the story: Bilbo, Elrond, Frodo, Galadriel and Gandalf).
Aragorn enjoyed a long and prosperous rule over the western lands of Middle-earth, including not only Gondor, but also the lost kingdom of Arnor in the north. His Númenórean descent meant that he enjoyed an lifespan far beyond that of normal Men, and reigned as King of the Reunited Kingdom for one hundred and twenty years. He was succeeded as King by his son Eldarion.
Arwen was Aragorn's Queen throughout his long reign. As Elrond had foreseen, she outlived the King, and after his death she took leave of Eldarion her son and wandered away from Gondor. She came to Lórien, which had become an empty land after Galadriel's departure, and there she gave up her life on the green mound of Cerin Amroth.
Éomer succeeded his uncle Théoden to become the eighteenth King of Rohan. He lived to the age of ninety-three, ruling Rohan for sixty-five of those years, and maintained the strong alliance between his country and Gondor. His queen was Lothíriel of Dol Amroth, and he was succeeded as King by their son, Elfwine the Fair.
Éowyn became the consort of Faramir, and dwelt with him among the hills of Emyn Arnen, so becoming Lady Éowyn of Ithilien (Ithilien being the lands held by Gondor east of the Great River, where Frodo had met Faramir in The Two Towers).
Faramir inherited the role of Steward from his father, though he now served the King, rather than ruling the kingdom of Gondor directly. He was also made Prince of Ithilien and Lord of Emyn Arnen by Aragorn, and it was in Emyn Arnen that he dwelt with Éowyn. He had a measure of the blood of the Dúnedain, though to a lesser degree than Aragorn, and he lived to the age of one hundred and twenty.
Gimli brought a part of the people of his homeland of Erebor, and came to the Glittering Caves of Aglarond that lay behind Helm's Deep. There he dwelt as Lord of the Glittering Caves as long as Aragorn's reign lasted. After this time, he seems to have passed into the West with his friend Legolas: probably the only Dwarf to ever do so.
Legolas, like his friend Gimli, removed from his northern home and came into the south. He dwelt with his people in Faramir's wooded land of Ithilien. After the passing of Aragorn, he built himself a ship and sailed into the West, apparently taking Gimli with him.
Merry dwelt happily in the Shire, where he married Estella Bolger. Eleven years after his return from the War, he inherited the title of Master of Buckland from his father Saradoc, and became one of the most important hobbits in the Shire. In the last years of his life, he went travelling with his friend Pippin.
Pippin also lived happily in the Shire for many years. He married Diamond of Long Cleeve, and they named their son after Prince Faramir. Soon after Merry became Master of Buckland, Pippin also inherited an important title, that of Thain of the Shire, from his father Paladin. In their old age, Pippin and Merry journeyed together into the south, passing through Rohan and coming at last back to Minas Tirith, where they lived out their last years together.
Sam married Rose Cotton soon after he returned to the Shire, and together they had no fewer than thirteen children. For much of his life, Sam was the elected Mayor of the Shire, and together with Merry and Pippin became one of the northern councillors of the King. His marriage to Rose lasted sixty-two years, but at last she died, and Sam travelled away from the Shire. Though his fate isn't known with certainty, he was thought to have gone to the Grey Havens and passed over the Sea himself, perhaps to be reunited at last with Frodo in the Blessed Realm.
Saruman's fate is harder to explain, because the key events surrounding it simply don't happen in the movie version. In the book, Gandalf ejects him from the Order of Wizards, but he later escapes from Isengard with Gríma, and they travel north, where his agents have already been at work bringing the Shire under their control. When Frodo and the others return, the succeed in driving him out. In a sudden fit of madness, Gríma turns on his master and cuts his throat. The last we see of Saruman is his disembodied spirit looking back to its original home in the West '...but out of the West came a cold wind, and it bent away, and with a sigh dissolved into nothing.' (The Return of the King VI 8).
It seems appropriate to end with a word of acknowledgement of Peter Jackson and everyone else associated with the movie version of The Lord of the Rings. Though of course they haven't come close to the scope and intricacy of the original story - that would be quite impossible - what they have produced is still nothing less than a masterpiece. The film-makers, and of course Peter Jackson in particular, have to be admired for having the courage to merely take on such an immense challenge, let alone to produce such an exceptional result. The complete story of The Lord of Rings is probably unfilmable, but Peter Jackson has come closer than anyone could have imagined possible.
It's encouraging to see, too, that the movies are drawing more and more new readers to Tolkien's original works. Indeed, awareness of Tolkien's writings is probably more widespread now than at any time since their publication: there can hardly be a person on the planet who doesn't know the names of Frodo, Gandalf or Sauron.
With Frodo's voyage into the West, our own cinematic voyage into Tolkien's world has come to an end, at least for now. That world spreads out far and wide beyond Peter Jackson's three movies, though, and the true voyage through it is almost endless. Quite apart from the richness of the full original story of The Lord of the Rings, there's far more of Middle-earth to experience. The Hobbit takes the story back to Bilbo's own adventures, and the original discovery of the Ring, and though it's a book written for children, it's still hugely enjoyable for an adult audience. Going further back still is the much deeper and darker Silmarillion, the great legendarium of the world of Arda. The Silmarillion crosses oceans of time, from before the beginning of the universe to the days of the War of the Ring, telling especially of the Wars of the Elves against Morgoth in the distant First Age.
Even those three books are just the beginning: the mysteries of palantíri, Wizards and much more are revealed in the Unfinished Tales while, for the truly dedicated, twelve volumes of lore reveal the intricacies of The History of Middle-earth. Add to that the volumes and volumes of material by students of Tolkien's life and work and (as Bilbo was so fond of saying) 'The Road goes ever on and on...'
http://www.glyphweb.com/arda/returnoftheking.html
Also for the other two films:
http://www.glyphweb.com/arda/movie.html
http://www.glyphweb.com/arda/twotowers.html
01-08-04, 11:44 AM
#8
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A far green country
Posts: 5,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very well written article. I especially like the nod to the filmmakers at the end. Despite all of my misgivings and problems with the films, this statement perfectly sums up how I feel about them:
It seems appropriate to end with a word of acknowledgement of Peter Jackson and everyone else associated with the movie version of The Lord of the Rings. Though of course they haven't come close to the scope and intricacy of the original story - that would be quite impossible - what they have produced is still nothing less than a masterpiece. The film-makers, and of course Peter Jackson in particular, have to be admired for having the courage to merely take on such an immense challenge, let alone to produce such an exceptional result. The complete story of The Lord of Rings is probably unfilmable, but Peter Jackson has come closer than anyone could have imagined possible.
01-08-04, 04:59 PM
#10
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
Originally posted by kuyax
thanks for the article...but the link seems to be dead
thanks for the article...but the link seems to be dead
01-09-04, 12:32 PM
#12
DVD Talk Legend
Thread Starter
Originally posted by KenobiKid22
Great article, the links were working about an hour ago but nothing now.
Great article, the links were working about an hour ago but nothing now.
