DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   Movie Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk-17/)
-   -   Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/303684-alien-5-d-blomkamp-s-weaver.html)

Supermallet 03-03-15 11:30 AM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 
The big issue for me is that the chestburster comes out as a fully formed xenomorph. It's slightly less annoying in the assembly cut when the alien gestates inside an ox, versus in the theatrical cut where the xenomorph bursts out fully formed from a dog that is about the same size. That's just fucking lazy.

Also, in regards to Resurrection, I think it would have been received a lot better if the hybrid had any aspects of the xenomorph at all. As it is, the hybrid looks like a reject from an entirely different movie. It should have looked like a traditional xenomorph, but walked upright, no tail, and had a skull-like face with eyes. And they should have gotten Giger to design it.

Josh-da-man 03-03-15 01:22 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 

Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara (Post 12411968)
Where the hell did the egg come from? The queen tore herself loose from her egg sack when she chased after Ripley, and it's preposterous to assume she just happened to grab an egg to take with her, just in case she got a chance to infect someone later on.

Eggs. Ripley and the dog/ox were infected.

Josh-da-man 03-03-15 01:25 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 
Technically, Alien3 is a competantly made film. But it's a horrible Alien film.

RocShemp 03-03-15 02:04 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 

Originally Posted by Supermallet (Post 12412043)
The big issue for me is that the chestburster comes out as a fully formed xenomorph. It's slightly less annoying in the assembly cut when the alien gestates inside an ox, versus in the theatrical cut where the xenomorph bursts out fully formed from a dog that is about the same size. That's just fucking lazy.

Also, in regards to Resurrection, I think it would have been received a lot better if the hybrid had any aspects of the xenomorph at all. As it is, the hybrid looks like a reject from an entirely different movie. It should have looked like a traditional xenomorph, but walked upright, no tail, and had a skull-like face with eyes. And they should have gotten Giger to design it.

Although I agree the hybrid looked all kinds of wrong, it could have been worse. They could have used the creature that Joss Whedon suggested in his script. That had zero traits of both a xenomorph or a human.

EctoCooler 03-03-15 03:32 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 

Originally Posted by Josh-da-man (Post 12412190)
Technically, Alien3 is a competantly made film.

No, it's not even that. I do enjoy it. But no.

hanshotfirst1138 03-03-15 03:34 PM


Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara (Post 12411968)
Where the hell did the egg come from? The queen tore herself loose from her egg sack when she chased after Ripley, and it's preposterous to assume she just happened to grab an egg to take with her, just in case she got a chance to infect someone later on. Even if she did, and even if Ripley didn't give the dropship a thorough decontamination before going into hypersleep, all the eggs we've seen are motion sensitive -- they don't open unless there's a potential host nearby. It makes no sense for an egg to release a facehugger on a spaceship where everyone's in hypersleep -- how would it know it's not in some deserted derelict a la the Space Jockey's ship from the first film?

I'll tolerate the Queen still having and egg in her body and dumping it on the ship before her fight with Ripley, but I've never been able to get around them going into hyper sleep without discovering it. I would have had the computer examine every inch of the damn ship.

Why So Blu? 03-03-15 03:42 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 
The dog alien that bursted out of the dog was small at first but it actually ate, so it got bigger faster.

That rottweiler it bursted out of was huge.

Lt Ripley 03-03-15 04:12 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 

Originally Posted by Josh-da-man (Post 12412184)
Eggs. Ripley and the dog/ox were infected.

He was asking where the eggs came from.

A3 is a good A L I E N film. Not a good Aliens film. But a followup showing Ripley cooking Tewt eggs and pancakes would not be a good film. Tewt running around yelling Ahhhhfirmative isn't important to the Alien legacy.

A5 doesn't need Ripley in it.

Supermallet 03-03-15 04:35 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 

Originally Posted by Why So Blu? (Post 12412365)
The dog alien that bursted out of the dog was small at first but it actually ate, so it got bigger faster.

That rottweiler it bursted out of was huge.

The size ratio was still way off. Look at the size of the chestbursters that came out of humans. Those aren't even as long as our forearms. So a rottweiler has a creature in it that's half its total size? More than half? Where'd the rest of the dog go? :lol:

Why So Blu? 03-03-15 04:46 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 

Originally Posted by Supermallet (Post 12412432)
The size ratio was still way off. Look at the size of the chestbursters that came out of humans. Those aren't even as long as our forearms. So a rottweiler has a creature in it that's half its total size? More than half? Where'd the rest of the dog go? :lol:

http://odinokov.org/content/Articles...lien_3_dog.jpg


Forced perspective?

Solid Snake 03-03-15 05:04 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 

Originally Posted by Lt Ripley (Post 12412399)
He was asking where the eggs came from.

A3 is a good A L I E N film. Not a good Aliens film. But a followup showing Ripley cooking Tewt eggs and pancakes would not be a good film. Tewt running around yelling Ahhhhfirmative isn't important to the Alien legacy.

A5 doesn't need Ripley in it.

I've seen you do this before... wtf is up with the Tewt?

Supermallet 03-03-15 06:37 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 

Originally Posted by Why So Blu? (Post 12412438)

I watched the assembly cut chestburster scene and the theatrical cut chestburster scene right afterwards. It's that way because the xenomorph was meant to come out of an ox. They used the same footage of the alien in both cuts. The only difference were the animals it came out of, and the shot of the alien retreating (which in the assembly cut is a CG alien running off, and in the theatrical is a backwards POV where we never see the alien).

Lt Ripley 03-03-15 07:01 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 

Originally Posted by Solid Snake (Post 12412447)
I've seen you do this before... wtf is up with the Tewt?

My nickname for Newt.

"Nobody calls me Tewt, except for Ripley."

Solid Snake 03-03-15 07:06 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 
...

Lt Ripley 03-03-15 07:07 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 
.-..
---
.-..

hanshotfirst1138 03-03-15 11:19 PM

Isn't the implication that the xenomorph partially takes on the characteristics of whatever host the facehugger impregnates? Hence the quadruped creature in the third film and the half Predator-half-Alien creature in AVP-R?

Josh-da-man 03-04-15 12:53 AM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 

Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138 (Post 12412735)
Isn't the implication that the xenomorph partially takes on the characteristics of whatever host the face hugged impregnates? Hence the quadruped creature in the third film and the half Predator-half-Alien creature in AVP-R?

I think so, yeah.

In the Colonial Marines comic book series (which isn't, to my knowledge, canon) there are aquatic xenomorphs which resemble dolphins. It makes a certain amount of sense that the paraditic, space-faring species would take on the characteristics of their hosts.

Supermallet 03-04-15 02:18 AM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 
That would explain why the adult is quadrupedal, but not why the chestburster comes out as a smaller version of the adult.

brayzie 03-04-15 02:45 AM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 

Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara (Post 12411968)
Where the hell did the egg come from?

Forgot about that. Even when I first watched movie as a kid I thought "how did an egg get into the ship?"


Originally Posted by Supermallet (Post 12412043)
It should have looked like a traditional xenomorph, but walked upright, no tail, and had a skull-like face with eyes. And they should have gotten Giger to design it.

Giger has one alien design where its standing upright, has large black ovals where eyes would be, and no tail. Looks somewhat similar to the Syngenor design. That would have been a good way to go.

Still would have had the fan-fic vibe to it. Why start experimenting with xenomorph hybrids when the films hadn't yet established what exactly the xenomorphs were. A species, a bio-weapon, a disease...?



Originally Posted by Why So Blu? (Post 12412365)
The dog alien that bursted out of the dog was small at first but it actually ate, so it got bigger faster.

I wondered about that after seeing Alien 3. It looks like the dog alien eats its victims, but according to ALIEN, it grew at a rapid rate without eating anything. Ashe described it as the perfect killing machine, something that can survive in any environment, the ultimate survivor. So with that I assumed that it only killed to ensure its survival and dominance in its new environment.
If it was seen eating, then that's seems like just one more example of straying from what was established in the first film.

Josh-da-man 03-04-15 02:58 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 

Originally Posted by Supermallet (Post 12412783)
That would explain why the adult is quadrupedal, but not why the chestburster comes out as a smaller version of the adult.

Since it was originally supposed to come out of an ox, maybe the larger the host animal, the more formed the xenomorph is when it erupts from the host?

Josh-da-man 03-04-15 03:02 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 

Originally Posted by brayzie (Post 12412793)
I wondered about that after seeing Alien 3. It looks like the dog alien eats its victims, but according to ALIEN, it grew at a rapid rate without eating anything. Ashe described it as the perfect killing machine, something that can survive in any environment, the ultimate survivor. So with that I assumed that it only killed to ensure its survival and dominance in its new environment.
If it was seen eating, then that's seems like just one more example of straying from what was established in the first film.

That's one of the biggest science errors in the original film, that the xenomorph grows from something the size of a ferret to something larger than a man in what seems like a few hours and without eating anything. Even if it did eat (and we can assume there wasn't a lot of food on the Nostromo since the crew was kept in hibernation), then it would still take time to metabolize the food into mass. As it stands, the thing violates one of the fundamental principles of physics.

inri222 03-04-15 03:21 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 
Maybe it raided the food & water supply of the Nostromo and gobbled up hundreds of pounds of it.

Or maybe it ate a huge piece of furniture

Or maybe it consumes gasses for food

Or maybe...

Lt Ripley 03-04-15 04:25 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 
As each film takes more mystery away from the xenos, the more boring the xenos become.

Shazam 03-04-15 05:18 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 

Originally Posted by Lt Ripley (Post 12413478)
As each film takes more mystery away from the xenos, the more boring the xenos become.

Hey they're people just like you and me.

https://cinematicdissection.files.wo...8041661422.jpg

Lt Ripley 03-04-15 05:44 PM

Re: Alien 5 (D: Blomkamp) S: Weaver
 
:lol:

Show mommy how the xenos eat.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.