So, where were the "Uncopyable" FX?
#51
Suspended
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by monkeyboy
people imagine. They used laser scanning technologies to a point that hadn't been done in film before. The facial scans of the 2 characters were HUGE databases of information. The database of info had to be accessed and processed for every single head in every single frame. It was more than just creating a CG head and applying a
people imagine. They used laser scanning technologies to a point that hadn't been done in film before. The facial scans of the 2 characters were HUGE databases of information. The database of info had to be accessed and processed for every single head in every single frame. It was more than just creating a CG head and applying a
#52
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think they did a pretty good job on the faces, it was the movements that gave it away.............we just aren't to the point where we can make CGI appear perfectly human on that big of a scale
#53
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: El Monte, CA
I was pretty impressed with the fight scene. I haven't seen CG humans done that well done before. Remember the Rock as the lobster in Mummy Returns? Or that CG fight scene in Blade 2. They looked real crappy.
#56
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: looking for mangos in the jungle
Originally posted by V-ism
I was pretty impressed with the fight scene. I haven't seen CG humans done that well done before.
I was pretty impressed with the fight scene. I haven't seen CG humans done that well done before.
#57
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just for fun... I saw this on another forum. It's a frame from the final trailer. Someone managed to spot this... don't know how, it goes by quick. Anyhoo, this has to be rough/working footage because the background is dark with part of the hangar it was filmed in still visible. The guy in the corner is most likely one of the stand-ins. Someone thought it was John Gaeta... or at least his face.

I can't wait for the DVD so we can start picking these scenes apart. Mwahahaha....
I thought the Burly Brawl was fantastic. Just following the center of action, I think it's hard to see any flaws in the Smiths. CG Neo is a different story. It is obvious. The action is seamless, IMO, but not the switch from real to CG. Still, overall, it's an impressive piece of cinematic work.
2 years to render? Hadn't heard that. Seems like an awful long time. They need a bigger render farm.

I can't wait for the DVD so we can start picking these scenes apart. Mwahahaha....
I thought the Burly Brawl was fantastic. Just following the center of action, I think it's hard to see any flaws in the Smiths. CG Neo is a different story. It is obvious. The action is seamless, IMO, but not the switch from real to CG. Still, overall, it's an impressive piece of cinematic work.
2 years to render? Hadn't heard that. Seems like an awful long time. They need a bigger render farm.
#58
Cool New Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
REAL inventor of bullet time...
Just for the record, "bullet time" was invented by a man named Eadweard Muybridge, in 1887. That little weasel in the extras for the matrix pretends to be the inventor, and fails to mention the person that did EXACTLY what he did, using the same setup. Thanks.
#59
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: REAL inventor of bullet time...
Originally posted by avatar101
Just for the record, "bullet time" was invented by a man named Eadweard Muybridge, in 1887.
Just for the record, "bullet time" was invented by a man named Eadweard Muybridge, in 1887.

http://photo.ucr.edu/photographers/m...allery567.html
Very interesting, and in a sense, this IS what the first Bullet Time scenes from the Matrix were. The Burly Brawl obviously took this to a different level.
#60
DVD Talk Special Edition
Hmm? That doesn't look like "bullet time" to me, just a linear photographic progession - a precursor to standard cinematography, sure, but not bullet time. If the camera doesn't change angles or move faster than real time, what is to differentiate it from normal slow motion? Because that is the crux of bullet time - creating camera movement that is too fast to replicate in reality. Otherwise, why didn't they just spin the camera around Neo when he dodged those bullets?
No, John Gaeta didn't invent "bullet time" - the techniques of photogrammetry have been around since the beginning of the 20th century, and of course were applied in movies and TV before the Matrix. But Gaeta went a step forward - a full 360 degree rotation in super-slow motion, rather than a freeze frame. A small distinction, to be sure, but I didn't see anything else like it before.
Just like the movie itself, the elements are unoriginal, but it is original in the application.
No, John Gaeta didn't invent "bullet time" - the techniques of photogrammetry have been around since the beginning of the 20th century, and of course were applied in movies and TV before the Matrix. But Gaeta went a step forward - a full 360 degree rotation in super-slow motion, rather than a freeze frame. A small distinction, to be sure, but I didn't see anything else like it before.
Just like the movie itself, the elements are unoriginal, but it is original in the application.
Last edited by RolloTomasi; 05-26-03 at 10:46 AM.
#61
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Originally posted by V-ism
Remember the Rock as the lobster in Mummy Returns?
Remember the Rock as the lobster in Mummy Returns?




