Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Thoughts on De Palma's FEMME FATALE

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Thoughts on De Palma's FEMME FATALE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-02, 11:12 AM
  #26  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 23,511
Received 203 Likes on 157 Posts
Judging from these reveiws, I can find a better way to spend my time. Think I'll catch AOTC Imax instead.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/FemmeFatale-1118216/
Old 11-06-02, 11:15 AM
  #27  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Banging your mother
Posts: 18,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Dr. DVD
Sean Connery's kick a$$ performance aside, that wasn't a very good movie. Also, it falls into the category of having good screenwriters and actors invovled (though Costner was awful). David Mamet wrote the script, and it did have Connery for Pete's sake.

Carlito's Way had Pacino carrying it. M:I had Cruise, and Carrie never really impressed me much aside from a good performance by Spaceck. Dressed to Kill had Michael Caine.
Whats he got to do to impress you? Make a movie with no actors?
Old 11-06-02, 11:21 AM
  #28  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 23,511
Received 203 Likes on 157 Posts
Originally posted by joltaddict
Whats he got to do to impress you? Make a movie with no actors?

No, he just has to make a movie that doesn't seem to stress style over substance. Leaving Antonio Banderas out of Femme Fatale would have been a good way to win me back as well. I'm sorry, but I just lose respect for any director that casts him in a serious role. Aside from Desperado, he has yet to leave an impression on me as a "serious" actor.
Old 11-06-02, 11:38 AM
  #29  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Times Square
Posts: 12,135
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Here's Roger Ebert's FOUR STAR **** review, which contains a wonderful appreciation for DePalma's career:

http://www.suntimes.com/output/ebert...r-femme06.html

Please note: I have used a newly developed anti Ebert-Bashing spray all over this forum, so if you wanna bash Ebert, don't threadcrap here - start your own thread.

P.S. - I'm heading out the door right now for a 1:15 showing.
Old 11-06-02, 11:43 AM
  #30  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 23,511
Received 203 Likes on 157 Posts
Okay then. Ebert giving a movie four stars makes me less likely to see it. Sorry, but he is really losing credibility fast.
Old 11-06-02, 11:43 AM
  #31  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: "Sitting on a beach, earning 20%"
Posts: 6,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Dr. DVD
No, he just has to make a movie that doesn't seem to stress style over substance. Leaving Antonio Banderas out of Femme Fatale would have been a good way to win me back as well. I'm sorry, but I just lose respect for any director that casts him in a serious role. Aside from Desperado, he has yet to leave an impression on me as a "serious" actor.
Well since Desperado wasn't a serious film in any way I don't see how it could have made an impression on you that he is a "serious" actor.
Old 11-06-02, 11:54 AM
  #32  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 23,511
Received 203 Likes on 157 Posts
Originally posted by Pants
Well since Desperado wasn't a serious film in any way I don't see how it could have made an impression on you that he is a "serious" actor.
That wasn't my argument. Desperado was the only thing I saw him in that gave me the impression he had the potential to be one. The film was not serious (though that is debatable) in the modern sense, but then again it is getting harder to determine what is meant as camp and what isn't nowadays.


That said, I think I'll take a bite this afternoon and see if this movie is worth anything. If it is as bad as Snake Eyes or M2M, I am blaming you guys for arguing in its defense. This is one film that I know darn well if I don't catch it, I'll just be killed with not knowing what it was like. On the flip side, it is a movie that I know darn well I might not even make it through a DVD showing if the power to turn it off at any time were in my hands.
Old 11-06-02, 04:24 PM
  #33  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Times Square
Posts: 12,135
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by Dr. DVD
Okay then. Ebert giving a movie four stars makes me less likely to see it. Sorry, but he is really losing credibility fast.
Let's try this again....

Please note: ... if you wanna bash Ebert, don't threadcrap here - start your own thread.


Talk about losing crediblity....
Old 11-07-02, 12:46 AM
  #34  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: A little bit here and a little bit there.
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of the best films of the year. Period.
Old 11-07-02, 09:01 AM
  #35  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Banging your mother
Posts: 18,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Dr. DVD
If it is as bad as Snake Eyes or M2M, I am blaming you guys for arguing in its defense.
Hey now, Im defending Depalma, I havent even seen this yet!
Old 11-07-02, 09:20 AM
  #36  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 23,511
Received 203 Likes on 157 Posts
Saw it. I kept an open mind. I didn't want to pre-judge or say it stunk without a viewing. Well, once again I made a mistake by keeping an open mind and should have trusted my instincts.
The first few minutes were entertaining, and I did walk in about five minutes into the movie. (I arrived when all of the laser cutting was going on and Rebecca was about to get all funky with the chick wearing the diamond bra.) Granted, RRS looked damn hot, and if watching her do lesbian action, stripteases, and full frontal nudity(at least I think that was her body in the water sequence) sells you, then by all means go and see it. DePalma has made some good films, but this one really leaves much to be desired. For the most part it left me .
Spoiler:
I tend to view the old "this was all a dream gimmick" as a copout of sorts, but that's just me.


In terms of Ebert bashing, I was merely stating my personal opinion of him. Sometimes he is one of the few critics I agree with on what makes a good film. Most of the time he is, but he hasn't been as of late. That's why his reviews make me wary.

Originally posted by Sunday Morning
One of the best films of the year. Period.
Care to elaborate? I refuse to accept that on your word alone. I do not intend to further bash the film, if someone could explain it in a little more detail than DePalma did, I might figure out that I like it. I just don't like it right now and am glad that I had my Attack of the Clones IMAX experience awaiting me after I finished this movie.

Last edited by Dr. DVD; 11-07-02 at 09:23 AM.
Old 11-07-02, 10:14 AM
  #37  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: A little bit here and a little bit there.
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Dr. DVD

Care to elaborate? I refuse to accept that on your word alone. I do not intend to further bash the film, if someone could explain it in a little more detail than DePalma did, I might figure out that I like it. I just don't like it right now and am glad that I had my Attack of the Clones IMAX experience awaiting me after I finished this movie.
I'm not asking you to accept that on my word. It's just my opinion on the film. It wasn't a review directed at you or your dislike of the film.

It's Brian depalma's best in a long, long time.
A return to a genre he knows well, does well and should keep making films in. I was totally entertained by it, It made me think, it was ludicrious, it was funny, it was mesmerizing, it was what a film in this genre should be. These other directors who make modern day thrillers should hang their heads low in shame.

Oh, By the way, Dr. Dvd...
Spoiler:
I don't think its a cop out at all, in fact, I hate films that use that technique, but it really works here. This is a film about vouyuerism, second chances, etc. It's approach is very european, and that switch towards the end makes sense, especially since the film had clues all along to tell you that the reality they were in wasn't exactly real or normal. I would wait for a second viewing before dismissing this, because this film is VERY visual and there are visual clues in the film, and almost every shot has something to say


What other recent thrillers can say so much visually and be so much fun at the same time?
Old 11-07-02, 10:22 AM
  #38  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Times Square
Posts: 12,135
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by Sunday Morning
One of the best films of the year. Period.

I agree completely! When it was over, I was thinking that here was a movie for movie-lovers, made by a man who obviously loves movies himself. Then I came across the following from rave review in the L.A.Times:

"The film has the high-buffed gloss and high-octane jolts you expect of De Palma, but what makes it transporting is that it's also one of the smartest, most pleasurable expressions of pure movie love to come from an American director in years."
-- Manohla Dargis, LOS ANGELES TIMES


This is pure movie joy, although people who think Jackass has anything to do with movies will surely be disappointed.
Old 11-07-02, 10:32 AM
  #39  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 23,511
Received 203 Likes on 157 Posts
Oh well, guess I'll have to see it again.

In all honesty, whether or not I like it this time will make no difference whatsoever in terms of this film's success. I am sure it will bomb because of lack of interest.

Could someone please post a spoiler filled synopsis to tell me what to look for second time around? I really must have missed something.

Last edited by Dr. DVD; 11-07-02 at 01:29 PM.
Old 11-07-02, 04:16 PM
  #40  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 23,511
Received 203 Likes on 157 Posts
Here's Peter Travers review, guess he nailed what it's about.

How's this for openers? Laure (Rebecca Romijn-Stamos) corners Veronica (Rie Rasmussen) in a restroom at the Cannes Film Festival, slips off the gold, diamond-encrusted serpent thingie curled around Veronica's boobs and replaces it with a fake one without Veronica knowing. How? One hot, gratuitous lesbo love scene, that's how.
Writer-director Brian De Palma (Dressed to Kill, Body Double) is back playing teasing, erotic suspense games. OK, he's making less sense than usual. Romijn-Stamos, leggy and luscious, plays a jewel thief who switches identities with a suicide... Hell, I don't know who she's playing. Don't care. Antonio Banderas shows up as a paparazzo who falls prey to Laure's machinations. Who wouldn't? She's a femme fatale of the old school. De Palma -- a master of kinky, delirious visuals -- hooks you good.


PETER TRAVERS
Old 11-07-02, 04:56 PM
  #41  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: A little bit here and a little bit there.
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Romijn reminds me of those ramen noodles ever time i hear her name.

I'm in the mood to Eat Ramen Noodles and I wouldn't mind...

Last edited by Sunday Morning; 11-07-02 at 05:01 PM.
Old 11-07-02, 08:50 PM
  #42  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 23,511
Received 203 Likes on 157 Posts
Romjin is pronounced ro-mane, while Ramen is pronounced rah-men.

Now if you were to get some Roumane lettuce....you could toss a salad!
Old 11-08-02, 12:57 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sugar Grove, IL
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldn't mind tossing her salad!
Old 11-08-02, 03:59 AM
  #44  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 2,421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
She's got a girlfriend in Belleville!

Originally posted by Sunday Morning
One of the best films of the year. Period.
AGREED! It will definitely make my top ten this year.

I just saw it a couple of hours ago, completely alone, and was blown away by this film.
Spoiler:
Even the trick ending has a trick ending
Visually, this is the most gorgeous looking film I've seen since Brotherhood of the Wolf and it's the most oneiric I've seen since Mullholland Drive.

It's surreal, over thep top, Hitchcockian, Lynchian, but most of all DePalma at his best in years! The score by Ryuichi Sakamoto is also great, running the gamut from electronic soundscapes, techno, a grand swelling majestic theme to the derigueur Herrmannesque flourishes one expects in a DePalma.

Many will call this no more than an exercise in style, but even on that limited level, it blows most recent American thrillers out of the water.

cheers, Tony Block

Last edited by Tony Block; 11-08-02 at 04:10 AM.
Old 11-08-02, 05:08 AM
  #45  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 2,421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thoughts on De Palma's FEMME FATALE

I just saw FEMME FATALE couple of hours ago, (I didn't even know the film had already opened here in the St. Louis metro area (November 6), until I saw a TV trailer earlier this evening.) Unfortunately, I had the theater all to myself.

However, that disappointment aside, I found myself completely caught up in the film, totally blown away by its beauty, and I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Visually, this is the most gorgeous looking film I've seen since BROTHERHOOD OF THE WOLF, and it's also the most oneiric film I've seen since MULLHOLAND DRIVE.

Trying not to give too much away, FF is surreal, over the top, Hitchcockian, Lynchian, but most of all De Palma at his best in years! If you're partial to De Palma films like SISTERS, DRESSED TO KILL, OBSSESSION, or BODY DOUBLE then, hopefully, you'll find much to enjoy with FEMME FATALE.

Additionally, the score by Ryuichi Sakamoto is great and adds a lot to the moody and off-kilter atmosphere that this film evokes. The music runs the gamut from electronic soundscapes, to techno, to a grand swelling majestic theme, and it also includes the derigueur Herrmannesque flourishes one expects to hear in a De Palma film.

Finally, a warning that many are going to call this no more than an exercise in style, but even on that limited level, as another DVDtalker noted, it blows most recent American thrillers out of the water. Moreover, I'm sure this film is going to divide many of the posters here, making some very very angry with De Palma, and some of the plot choices he makes with the story, while others, willing to go along for a wild ride, will call it bravura DePalma, and, hopefully, will consider FF a strong return to the excellent thrillers he was making in the 70s.

cheers, Tony Block
Old 11-08-02, 08:17 AM
  #46  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Times Square
Posts: 12,135
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Nice to see that I'm not the only one that found this film captivating, intriguing, and an endless source of movie pleasure.
I saw this on Wednesday, and unlike a lot of movies that are simply satisfying at the time, this one has been following me around for two days, and I'm looking forward to seeing it again very soon!
Old 11-08-02, 08:47 AM
  #47  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 4,661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've just recently seen Sisters (my first De Palma movie) and was very pleased by it. I will definately be looking forward to seeing this when it comes out on DVD. Thanks for the informative review.
Old 11-08-02, 09:15 AM
  #48  
Moderator
 
Geofferson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: The Village Green
Posts: 39,768
Received 99 Likes on 82 Posts
Good to read the positive words about this one. I look forward to seeing it this weekend.
Old 11-08-02, 10:29 AM
  #49  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 23,511
Received 203 Likes on 157 Posts
Just how wide a release is this? I saw it in a major city opening day as I just happened to be there for an IMAX AOTC and had time to kill. It doesn't seem to be playing in my near vicinity.

While I didn't find the film all that, I hope it doesn't totally flop. Maybe the weekend will help it drum up some business, but I don't see many people flocking to this movie as I doubt it gets good word of mouth from J6P, aside from the lesbo stuff.
Old 11-08-02, 11:01 AM
  #50  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Times Square
Posts: 12,135
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
According to boxofficemojo.com, it opened on 1066 screens Wednesday, taking in $346,184.
It's probably opening wider today.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.