View Poll Results: Have you watched Citizen Kane?
Of course I've seen it, do u think I've been living under a rock?



169
80.09%
No way dude, spending over 3 hours watching a black & white movie?



33
15.64%
I don't know, I might have watched it but was drunk to remember.



9
4.27%
Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll
Have You Seen Citizen Kane???
#76
Suspended
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Flava-Country!
Re: Have You Seen Citizen Kane???
Originally posted by kian69
And if it's that good why didn't it win an oscar for best picture then?
And if it's that good why didn't it win an oscar for best picture then?
It's all about popularity - and Kane was anything but popular.
#77
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Canada
Re: Re: Have You Seen Citizen Kane???
Originally posted by El-Kabong
That last bit is eays - the oscars are not an indicator of quality. Case in point: Titanic, an ok flick - but hardly worth 14 oscars. And Matrix over Star Wars for best special effects? I'd like some of what the academy was smoking that year.
It's all about popularity - and Kane was anything but popular.
That last bit is eays - the oscars are not an indicator of quality. Case in point: Titanic, an ok flick - but hardly worth 14 oscars. And Matrix over Star Wars for best special effects? I'd like some of what the academy was smoking that year.
It's all about popularity - and Kane was anything but popular.
And for the record, The Matrix deserved every single one of them IMO.
#78
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
This is a spurious argument. The Oscars are hardly an objective, consistant standard to judge anything by.
IIRC, it wasn't until the 60s that Citizen Kane was "rediscovered" and recognized as any sort of masterpiece.
Lucy:"Beethoven wasn't so great."
Schroeder:"What do you mean Beethoven wasn't so great?!"
Lucy:"He didn't have his face on a bubblegum card."
Schroeder:"What do you mean Beethoven wasn't so great?!"
Lucy:"He didn't have his face on a bubblegum card."
#79
Banned by request
Originally posted by kian69
Hmmmm interesting since your contradicting yourself here. Wouldn't you agree that Star Wars (any one of them) is a far more popular movie than The Matrix. Following your logic Star Wars should have gotten some recognition and at least won one of the Oscars that they were competing against with The Matrix.
And for the record, The Matrix deserved every single one of them IMO.
Hmmmm interesting since your contradicting yourself here. Wouldn't you agree that Star Wars (any one of them) is a far more popular movie than The Matrix. Following your logic Star Wars should have gotten some recognition and at least won one of the Oscars that they were competing against with The Matrix.
And for the record, The Matrix deserved every single one of them IMO.
And, for the record, Star Wars had the better SFX.
#80
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Canada
Originally posted by Suprmallet
Speaking of living under a rock...did you not notice the backlash against Episode I? The Matrix is far more popular than The Phantom Menace.
And, for the record, Star Wars had the better SFX.
Speaking of living under a rock...did you not notice the backlash against Episode I? The Matrix is far more popular than The Phantom Menace.
And, for the record, Star Wars had the better SFX.

I was referring to the box office success, like his Titanic example (most of the time the amount made $$$ has a direct correlation with popularity).
And as for the "which one has the best effects" well I've discussed this about a hundred times in several other threads and quite frankly don't see the relevance of talking about it again, especially in a thread that has nothing to do with it. So I'll keep it to: To each his own.
#81
Banned by request
Originally posted by kian69
First of all, no I'm not living under a rock but thanks for asking
I was referring to the box office success, like his Titanic example (most of the time the amount made $$$ has a direct correlation with popularity).
And as for the "which one has the best effects" well I've discussed this about a hundred times in several other threads and quite frankly don't see the relevance of talking about it again, especially in a thread that has nothing to do with it. So I'll keep it to: To each his own.
First of all, no I'm not living under a rock but thanks for asking

I was referring to the box office success, like his Titanic example (most of the time the amount made $$$ has a direct correlation with popularity).
And as for the "which one has the best effects" well I've discussed this about a hundred times in several other threads and quite frankly don't see the relevance of talking about it again, especially in a thread that has nothing to do with it. So I'll keep it to: To each his own.
My bad, honestly.
I think in this case the box office was not a correct indicator of popularity.
Citizen Kane is better than both, anyway.
#83
It's likely I've seen Citizen Kane more than any other movie. To quote an old friend, "Citizen Kane may not be the best movie ever made, but I've never seen a movie that's better."
#84
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did no one watch the documentary?
The reason that Citizen Kane didn't win the oscar is because of Hearst. He threatened to print all of Hollywood's dirty little secrets that he had been covering up until then in his papers, sicked the FBI on Welles, engaged in a smear campaign, etc...
It's a great movie, it's too bad Hearst destroyed Welles, i've really liked him in both Kane and The Third Man.
The reason that Citizen Kane didn't win the oscar is because of Hearst. He threatened to print all of Hollywood's dirty little secrets that he had been covering up until then in his papers, sicked the FBI on Welles, engaged in a smear campaign, etc...
It's a great movie, it's too bad Hearst destroyed Welles, i've really liked him in both Kane and The Third Man.
Last edited by Mourn; 08-02-02 at 11:58 AM.
#88
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Ummm... Paper Street?
Originally posted by Mourn
Did no one watch the documentary?
The reason that Citizen Kane didn't win the oscar is because of Hearst. He threatened to print all of Hollywood's dirty little secrets that he had been covering up until then in his papers, sicked the FBI on Welles, engaged in a smear campaign, etc...
It's a great movie, it's too bad Hearst destroyed Welles, i've really liked him in both Kane and The Third Man.
Did no one watch the documentary?
The reason that Citizen Kane didn't win the oscar is because of Hearst. He threatened to print all of Hollywood's dirty little secrets that he had been covering up until then in his papers, sicked the FBI on Welles, engaged in a smear campaign, etc...
It's a great movie, it's too bad Hearst destroyed Welles, i've really liked him in both Kane and The Third Man.
IIRC, it wasn't until the mid-50's that the original cut of Kane was discovered, and immediately considered the greatest movie ever made.
#89
Banned
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: "Sitting on a beach, earning 20%"
Citizen Kane was never cut for its first release in 1941 and was never recut for its re-release in 1951. The problem with its 1941 release was not that it was cut, but that it was supressed. It had its premiere on the East Coast and West Coast, then played in maybe a half dozen theaters and that was it. It would be similar to the way contemporary studios today dump films like Crash with no publicity and minimal distribution.
#91
DVD Talk Hero
Originally posted by btornado
I'm watching Citizen Kane for the first time right now.
I'm watching Citizen Kane for the first time right now.
#97
Banned
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
From: At da Island having a Drink! :)
Originally posted by caligulathegod
Just curious, what would possess you to revive a 4 month dead thread just to say that? Me, I'd go "meh" and move on.
Just curious, what would possess you to revive a 4 month dead thread just to say that? Me, I'd go "meh" and move on.

But since your curious i was actually searching for something else and came across this so i decided what the hell and went ahead and posted.
#100
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles, CA. USA
Originally posted by pixyboi
DOWN WITH PAN AND SCAM!@
DOWN WITH PAN AND SCAM!@
especially since this film was made in 1941 and has
an OAR of 1.37 : 1. So if you are waiting for the
anamorphic widescreen of this one you might want
to just put two peices of duct tape on your TV.


