Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Archives > Archives > Key Thread Archive
Reload this Page >

Star Wars DVDs - Reviews - Part 2

Community
Search

Star Wars DVDs - Reviews - Part 2

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-02 | 09:17 AM
  #51  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally posted by Frank S
Unfortunately no but that is more due to the fact that the bootleggers don't have a outstanding video source to start out with like the SW: SE laserdiscs which are outstanding!
Not entirely accurate.

The re-release of the trilogy on laserdisc with the CAV boxed set and subsequent CLV editions with "face" covers are the best that original trilogy looks on video right now. That was before the clean up on the negative which is why it obviously doesn't look as good as the SE's. That's why I like the SE's so much. The film itself looks absolutely new. But from what I remember, that CAV/CLV release was great...with a very aggressive surround track. The masters are there...the bootleggers just didn't do it.

And in my opinion...i'd rather have a VHS release (or laserdisc, if you had to) of the trilogy than have these bootlegs with their sound delays.

But then again I also prefer the SE's. So what do i know?

Last edited by digitalfreaknyc; 05-25-02 at 09:36 PM.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 05-24-02 | 10:05 AM
  #52  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 14,259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Docking Bay 94
Originally posted by digitalfreaknyc
The re-release of the trilogy on laserdisc with the CAV boxed set and subsequent CLV editions with "face" covers are the best that original trilogy looks on video right now. That was before the clean up on the negative which is why it obviously doesn't look as good as the SE's. That's why I like the SE's so much. The film itself looks absolutely new. But from what I remember, that CAV/CLV release was great...with a very aggressive surround track. The masters are there...the bootleggers just didn't do it.
I was just about to post the same thing. The CLV "face" cover laserdiscs of the OT are fantastic. If someone were to master these properly to DVD (with correct video settings, and NO audio delays) they would be great.

They're not in 5.1 sound (only pro-logic) but I'd rather have decent non-discrete surround than some sort of faked 5.1 that a bootlegger has created. The OT was never mastered in 5.1.

The possibility still exists for a great OT DVD set... until someone with the means takes up the cause, I'll stick with my awesome laserdisc set -- which gets a lot more viewing in my home than my SE set.
bboisvert is offline  
Old 05-24-02 | 11:07 AM
  #53  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,534
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: San Diego, CA
Just got my Five Star yesterday! Unbelievable how fast they came! I ordered on Tuesday (or Monday... most likely Monday... I can't remember!) and got it on Thursday! (from Malaysia??!?!)

ROTJ looks the best. Empire 2nd best. ANH doesn't look as good, but I'm assuming because it's an older film. The trailer/documentary on ROTJ skipped in my PS2, but plays perfectly in my other players.
nodeerforamonth is offline  
Old 05-24-02 | 11:29 AM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Death Star
Hmm.. I ordered mine Monday night from Malaysia.. perhaps even the same place, I hope I get mine before the long weekend..
TK-421 is offline  
Old 05-24-02 | 11:41 AM
  #55  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: USA
Originally posted by digitalfreaknyc


(removed slightly inflammatory remarks -Blade)...not entirely accurate.

The re-release of the trilogy on laserdisc with the CAV boxed set and subsequent CLV editions with "face" covers are the best that original trilogy looks on video right now. That was before the clean up on the negative which is why it obviously doesn't look as good as the SE's. That's why I like the SE's so much. The film itself looks absolutely new. But from what I remember, that CAV/CLV release was great...with a very aggressive surround track. The masters are there...the bootleggers just didn't do it.

And in my opinion...i'd rather have a VHS release (or laserdisc, if you had to) of the trilogy than have these bootlegs with their sound delays.

But then again I also prefer the SE's. So what do i know?
How is what I said not correct? You even admit the SE's are better quality so again where am I wrong? If you watch these LD's on a larger HDTV you will see there is a big difference in the video quality from the Faces THX version and the SE versions which is why the bootleggers don't put out DVD's of the OT that come near the quality of the SE's.

And speaking of not getting it right... The last two SE releases on DVD do not have sound delays so you are incorrect on that point.
Frank S is offline  
Old 05-24-02 | 01:06 PM
  #56  
Member
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could someone post the differences in movie plot between
the originals and the SE versions?
DVD-Crazy is offline  
Old 05-24-02 | 01:09 PM
  #57  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kalamazoo, MI, USA
Originally posted by Frank S
How is what I said not correct? You even admit the SE's are better quality so again where am I wrong? If you watch these LD's on a larger HDTV you will see there is a big difference in the video quality from the Faces THX version and the SE versions which is why the bootleggers don't put out DVD's of the OT that come near the quality of the SE's.

And speaking of not getting it right... The last two SE releases on DVD do not have sound delays so you are incorrect on that point.
This is true. The last OT releases on LD were much better than they'd previously been, but really pale in comparison to the SE's. If they used these OT releases for a new DVD release, sorry to say, but they just wouldn't look good. Yeah, and these last two DVD releases of the SE's don't have sound delays. Methinks Frank S does get it, and there's no need to be condescending towards him.
monkey is offline  
Old 05-24-02 | 01:18 PM
  #58  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 15,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are these 5 Star DVD's a representative, for the most part, of what LaserDisk looks like? I've never seen LaserDisk before, and if they are Im not all that impressed. I a/b them to my widescreen VHS set (the latest release) and only found a marginal improvement. Im still happy to have them on an optical medium though.
MJKTool is offline  
Old 05-24-02 | 01:22 PM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could someone post the differences in movie plot between the originals and the SE versions?

Here's a link detailing all the differences :

http://us.imdb.com/AlternateVersions?0076759

Last edited by Joseph B; 05-24-02 at 01:25 PM.
Joseph B is offline  
Old 05-24-02 | 01:45 PM
  #60  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: USA
Originally posted by digitalfreaknyc


(removed slightly inflammatory remarks -Blade)

Read my post again. I wasn't talking about the SE's. I was talking about the OT having sound delays.

(removed slightly inflammatory remarks -Blade)
(removed inflammatory remark -Blade)
Frank S is offline  
Old 05-24-02 | 01:49 PM
  #61  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: USA
Originally posted by MJKTool
Are these 5 Star DVD's a representative, for the most part, of what LaserDisk looks like? I've never seen LaserDisk before, and if they are Im not all that impressed. I a/b them to my widescreen VHS set (the latest release) and only found a marginal improvement. Im still happy to have them on an optical medium though.
I would ask what size/type TV were you viewing these on? I ask because it become much more appearant the differences when viewed on a larger HDTV then it does on smaller (32" and under) analog TV's. With my Panasonic RP91's ability to scale non-anamorphic DVD's I find the SW:SE DVD's (the last 2 releases) to be better then the laserdiscs, which are FAR beyond the quality of VHS tapes.
Frank S is offline  
Old 05-24-02 | 02:21 PM
  #62  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 15,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Frank S
I would ask what size/type TV were you viewing these on? I ask because it become much more appearant the differences when viewed on a larger HDTV then it does on smaller (32" and under) analog TV's. With my Panasonic RP91's ability to scale non-anamorphic DVD's I find the SW:SE DVD's (the last 2 releases) to be better then the laserdiscs, which are FAR beyond the quality of VHS tapes.
Im watching them on a 27 Sony Wega, so your probably right. Dont get me wrong though these new DVD's look pretty damn good for bootlegs. Some scenes look really great, like bright scenes, and some scenes, like dark scenes, look pretty bad though from what I saw.
MJKTool is offline  
Old 05-24-02 | 03:05 PM
  #63  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 14,259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Docking Bay 94
Originally posted by DVD-Crazy
Could someone post the differences in movie plot between
the originals and the SE versions?
Here is the most comprehensive list you will ever find:

http://www.theforce.net/swse
bboisvert is offline  
Old 05-24-02 | 10:35 PM
  #64  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by MJKTool

Some scenes look really great, like bright scenes, and some scenes, like dark scenes, look pretty bad though from what I saw.
Wow. I thought exactly the opposite. The space scenes (although sometimes littered with stairsteps) looked great and the brighter scenes (especially in IV) looked like they were covered in a light coat of vasoline. The brighter scenes in V and VI weren't as bad.
moocher is offline  
Old 05-25-02 | 12:52 AM
  #65  
Disc-Flipper's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Originally posted by DVD-Crazy
Could someone post the differences in movie plot between
the originals and the SE versions?
Try Treadwell's:

http://users.southeast.net/users/dat...ars/sepage.htm
Disc-Flipper is offline  
Old 05-25-02 | 01:31 AM
  #66  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Carrollton, Ga
You guys don't have any laserdisc of the originals? I would assume these bootlegs are terrible compared to the laserdiscs. Maybe most here don't have any LDs. I thought people would be more interested in getting one of the official THX LDs of the originals. Oh well.

Lucas, if you don't put out the originals on DVD, piracy will get even worse. Don't let us down.
Terrell is offline  
Old 05-25-02 | 02:11 AM
  #67  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: USA
Originally posted by Terrell
You guys don't have any laserdisc of the originals? I would assume these bootlegs are terrible compared to the laserdiscs. Maybe most here don't have any LDs. I thought people would be more interested in getting one of the official THX LDs of the originals. Oh well.

Lucas, if you don't put out the originals on DVD, piracy will get even worse. Don't let us down.
The original THX "Faces" LD's are readily owned by people posting here but if they are like me and are not bothered by the Special Edition versions then the DVD's are indeed superior to any LD's out there! I owned both the THX "Faces" and Special Edition LD's and have just sold them as they are obsolete because of the SE DVD's are much better then either LD set. The DVD's that contain the Original theatrical version are of a FAR FAR less quality then the SE versions DVD's and most likely are worse then the LD's but a lot of people don't want to invest hundreds to get a player for a few films they are interested in.

Last edited by Frank S; 05-25-02 at 02:14 AM.
Frank S is offline  
Old 05-25-02 | 03:57 AM
  #68  
Uber Member
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 16,232
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Overlooking Pearl Harbor
digitalfreaknyc,

Please refrain from making condescending remarks to other members. If you think the information they are providing is wrong, simply state your opinion and why you think they are wrong.

--------------------------------

Frank S,

If you have a problem with a member, please email a moderator.

--------------------------------

If there is anything more to say about this, then please email me, but otherwise, let's try to keep this thread on topic.

Thank you.
Blade is offline  
Old 05-25-02 | 10:28 AM
  #69  
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: utica, ny, usa
Can anyone tell me how the menus look on the 5 star versions?
dizmack is offline  
Old 05-25-02 | 08:57 PM
  #70  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Raleigh, NC
Just ordered my set yesterday, cant wait! I also ordered some gold cases to go with them. for 35.99 shipped, I couldnt resist
habers is offline  
Old 05-25-02 | 10:29 PM
  #71  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Carrollton, Ga
The DVD's that contain the Original theatrical version are of a FAR FAR less quality then the SE versions DVD's and most likely are worse then the LD's but a lot of people don't want to invest hundreds to get a player for a few films they are interested in.
I guess I see what you're saying. But I have the THX Definitive Collection LD box set of the originals, and the 1997 THX Special Edition LD box set. Both of these sets have absolutely stunning transfers and incredible sound. I have a hard time believing these bootlegs are better quality than my LDs.

Oh well, no big deal.
Terrell is offline  
Old 05-26-02 | 12:19 AM
  #72  
Mox
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Whoop!
dizmack,

Here's are some pics of the Five Star Collection DVD menus. The starfield in the back is animated in each menu and shows various scenes from the flicks in monotone. I took these with my dig cam from my tv and shrank em down... So the quality isn't the best but you'll get the idea.





BTW, I just wanted to say thanks to all of you for your information and reviews of the Five Star Collection. I ordered a set a couple weeks ago based on what I read here. Mine arrived a few days ago. I couldn't be happier. They are great and I much appreciate the information you all gave me. I hadn't seen these movies in years (I don't own a VHS player and refuse to watch VHS) so this was a real treat. A long over due treat...
Mox is offline  
Old 05-26-02 | 07:43 AM
  #73  
MichaelMeyers's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like the look of those menus, much better then some of the bootlegs that i have seen. I cannot wait for my set to arrive.
MichaelMeyers is offline  
Old 05-26-02 | 07:48 AM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Sugar Grove, IL
Got my set yesterday, exactly 10 days after ordering them. Popped them in and briefly watched a scene from each - they all look and sound very good ("ESB" in DD 2.0, of course). However, I came upon a few problems (this is on a Sony S360 player):

Minor problem: Unable to jump to scenes on the 2nd page of "Star Wars"; not a problem on "ESB" and "ROTJ".

Major problem: Watched the making-of after the trailer on "ROTJ", and the picture kept pausing, for between a split second and as long as 10 seconds, throughout the whole program (probably 15-20 times throughout the 30 minute presentation). My fears were correct - I found this happening while skipping around through the movies also, although it seems to happen more towards the 2nd halves of the films (the 2nd layer more troublesome, perhaps?).

The surface of the discs looked perfect, but each has a "gouge" on the underside of the clear plastic center of the disc, which comes very close to the silver area.

Tried them on my Toshiba, and they seem to play OK (only had time for a brief look, but no pausing problems yet). Could be a compatability problem with the Sony. Will have to investigate further...

Anyone else notice any of these problems?
Anyone else have any experience working with Malaysian customer service?

Oh, by the way, the "AOTC" VCD is mediocre quality - both picture and sound - but worth the $6 just to be able to watch Yoda kick ass over and over...

Last edited by berserker37; 05-26-02 at 11:18 AM.
berserker37 is offline  
Old 05-26-02 | 07:52 AM
  #75  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is driving me crazy. I can not find these discs on the web except Deleted - don't talk about where to get them - Static and those are going for over $75.00

Last edited by Static Cling; 05-27-02 at 01:59 PM.
Binger is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.