Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

4k? Wow me!

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

4k? Wow me!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-22 | 07:45 AM
  #51  
TomOpus's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 41,633
Received 1,818 Likes on 1,302 Posts
From: Kansas City, MO
Re: 4k? Wow me!

Some of the better looking 4k discs are older movies.
Old 05-04-22 | 08:22 AM
  #52  
ViewAskewbian's Avatar
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 16,055
Received 1,084 Likes on 678 Posts
From: Second star to the right and straight on 'til morning.
Re: 4k? Wow me!

Originally Posted by TomOpus
Some of the better looking 4k discs are older movies.
Yeah, at least from some of the clips I've seen or, at least, even in the restoration done on The Shining (finally removing the pink coloring errors from the old DVD release and first blurays), there's a lot to be said for the 4k restorations I am seeing.

Hell, The Good, the Bad and The Ugly has had a horrible run of releases (I guess depending on who you talk to), and the 4k release from Kino has finally released the theatrical cut (without the bad overdubbing on the extended cut scenes) and fixed the green skies. Can't believe how good the flick looks now (and that's based on the restored bluray) so looking forward to the re-released Fistful of Dollars and For a Few Dollars More.
Old 05-04-22 | 05:15 PM
  #53  
PhantomStranger's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 29,339
Received 1,221 Likes on 1,020 Posts
From: The Phantom Zone
Re: 4k? Wow me!

Originally Posted by TomOpus
Some of the better looking 4k discs are older movies.
Generally studios are taking care when restoring older classics for 4K. Some newer movies on UHD are more about quick cash than a real need for the format. I got the new Scream on UHD but it's not a huge leap over BD quality.
Old 05-04-22 | 05:27 PM
  #54  
Toddarino's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,511
Received 1,264 Likes on 798 Posts
From: Northeastern Wisconsin
Re: 4k? Wow me!

Originally Posted by ViewAskewbian
Well at $24 for The Good, the Bad and The Ugly and $26 pre-order price for each of the other Dollars flicks, I ordered my first real batch of 4Ks despite still not having the set up to watch the actual 4k discs.

I will give this format one thing...it is really getting some studios to go and restore their older films and the results have been pretty much amazing. At the moment, I have only snagged 4ks that have the same remaster in the set as a blu-ray like this Man With No Name Trilogy and The Shining. I imagine, eventually, when I get set up the first I snag is Vertigo and The Wizard of Oz. I am gathering Gone With the Wind is on the way, too. Those older technicolor flicks are of more interest in this format then modern movies.
If I’m not mistaken The Good The Bad and the Ugly isn’t in HDR. So while it’ll look better than the blu-ray, it probably won’t be a great example of what 4k is capable of.
Old 05-04-22 | 05:31 PM
  #55  
Banned by request
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,800
Received 779 Likes on 583 Posts
From: Goodbye and Good Luck
Re: 4k? Wow me!

Correct, TGTBTU, is 4K SDR.
Old 05-05-22 | 07:29 AM
  #56  
ViewAskewbian's Avatar
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 16,055
Received 1,084 Likes on 678 Posts
From: Second star to the right and straight on 'til morning.
Re: 4k? Wow me!

Originally Posted by Toddarino
If I’m not mistaken The Good The Bad and the Ugly isn’t in HDR. So while it’ll look better than the blu-ray, it probably won’t be a great example of what 4k is capable of.
Yes, I had read that. I was talking, mainly, about how 4k is causing studios to return to films and clean them up better for the format and, sometimes, for us folk still without a 4k setup, you get a restored bluray as well.

The Shinning is a perfect example of how the old DVD remaster had some colour issues that just kept getting ported over and ported over in various releases until the recent 4k remaster finally opted to correct them. The Leon flicks have a history of bad transfers (again, depending on who you ask) and I've just held off until now.

So, 4k wows me in getting studios to fix past mastering errors and make catalogue titles shine for sure.

Now, when I eventually get set up, I have to think what will be my first flick to try out. That coming Lawrence of Arabia is sure to look sweet!
The following users liked this post:
TomOpus (05-05-22)
Old 05-05-22 | 09:25 AM
  #57  
TomOpus's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 41,633
Received 1,818 Likes on 1,302 Posts
From: Kansas City, MO
Re: 4k? Wow me!

Over at that other forum, in the 4k section, there's a thread about best looking UHD Blu-rays that will has some good-looking discs, both newer and older movies.
Old 05-05-22 | 11:02 AM
  #58  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,855
Received 72 Likes on 46 Posts
Re: 4k? Wow me!

Old movies are the best thing about 4k. Movies shot on 35mm with real lighting look so much better than these digitally shot/color graded creations today. Apocalypse Now is gorgeous. I wish they still shot movies this way.
The following 2 users liked this post by Eddie W:
Josh Z (05-05-22), Spiderbite (05-05-22)
Old 05-05-22 | 02:16 PM
  #59  
Spiderbite's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 20,955
Received 3,001 Likes on 1,852 Posts
From: The Ham, AL
Re: 4k? Wow me!

Originally Posted by Toddarino
If I’m not mistaken The Good The Bad and the Ugly isn’t in HDR. So while it’ll look better than the blu-ray, it probably won’t be a great example of what 4k is capable of.
Any reason HDR wasn't used?
Old 05-05-22 | 02:18 PM
  #60  
ViewAskewbian's Avatar
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 16,055
Received 1,084 Likes on 678 Posts
From: Second star to the right and straight on 'til morning.
Re: 4k? Wow me!

Originally Posted by Spiderbite
Any reason HDR wasn't used?
I read on another forum that it came to cost. It would have cost Kino more $ and they opted to spend what they had on a restoration based on color grading that many have been moaning about regarding this films releases for years.
Old 05-05-22 | 02:38 PM
  #61  
rocket1312's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,378
Likes: 0
Received 1,924 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Re: 4k? Wow me!

Originally Posted by Spiderbite
Any reason HDR wasn't used?
Kino licensed the piss yellow 4k transfer done in Italy however many years ago which was first released in the US on blu-ray by MGM. That restoration was never given an HDR grade. It would have cost some number of dollars to go back and do that and that's not really Kino's game. They license transfers and release them in mass quantities. In this case Kino did take the time to try to color correct the compromised transfer they had and the results were mostly admirable. This is easily the best release the movies ever had. However, to really do it justice, the raw scan would need to be completely regraded from scratch.

Fistful of Dollars and For A Few Dollars more are in the same boat as GBU, with the exception that For A Few Dollars More didn't get the classic Ritrovata piss color grade, meaning that Kino's color correction should be much easier/less compromised.
Old 05-05-22 | 02:44 PM
  #62  
ViewAskewbian's Avatar
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 16,055
Received 1,084 Likes on 678 Posts
From: Second star to the right and straight on 'til morning.
Re: 4k? Wow me!

Originally Posted by rocket1312
Kino licensed the piss yellow 4k transfer done in Italy however many years ago which was first released in the US on blu-ray by MGM. That restoration was never given an HDR grade. It would have cost some number of dollars to go back and do that and that's not really Kino's game. They license transfers and release them in mass quantities. In this case Kino did take the time to try to color correct the compromised transfer they had and the results were mostly admirable. This is easily the best release the movies ever had. However, to really do it justice, the raw scan would need to be completely regraded from scratch.

Fistful of Dollars and For A Few Dollars more are in the same boat as GBU, with the exception that For A Few Dollars More didn't get the classic Ritrovata piss color grade, meaning that Kino's color correction should be much easier/less compromised.
Thanks for more deets, Rocket.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.