![]() |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Wonder if the upcoming Star Wars movies will be done in native 4K (or higher) resolution, and released on 4K bluray.
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138
(Post 12354094)
This is at very, very best a collector's proposition. 4K hasn't even caught on in many cinema or hell, many DIs. You'll at most be seeing The Wizard of Oz, Gone With the Wind, etc. Catalog titles will be non-existent apart from very high profile stuff. The physical media market is hanging on by a thread, I can't see this as a financially winning proposition for most studios.
The studios will never pay the admittedly very high cost for new 4k transfers of any but the most high-profile catalog releases. So, why invest in 4k? Self-fulfilling prophecy... So, we've got about three insurmountable problems: 1. Lack of bandwidth / bandwidth caps for acceptable streaming quality in 4k = distribution problems 2. Physical media = dying / dead format already in blu-ray 3. Studio inertia in making new 4k transfers of any but the newest releases either filmed in 4k already or out in theaters in a digital form. 4. Lack of demand due to 1, 2 and 3 above. No dice for 4k in my future! |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by zyzzle
(Post 12357105)
Studio inertia in making new 4k transfers of any but the newest releases either filmed in 4k already or out in theaters in a digital form.!
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
ULTRA HD Blu-ray (better get used to calling 4K BDs that name) will be for people on the bleeding edge of technology and wealthy enthusiasts. The studios know better this time it won't be a mass-market format. I would not expect penetration beyond the level reached by Laserdiscs. Its retail reach might be even less than Laserdisc had, since the retailing environment is far different from the 90s.
I think less informed consumers will believe they are watching actual 4K content from Netflix, most people are very gullible. |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
I can see UHD Blu-ray working, but only under two conditions.
1) To get studios on board, they will need draconian copy protection, mainly making disc a "digital" purchase, where you need internet authentication for playback. It's like what MS wanted for the Xbox One. The purchase is considered a digital purchase, meaning First Sale protection won't apply. More control for the studios (which is exactly what they want) while having the content on disc will avoid the bandwidth/download problems of traditional digital delivery. I imagine there would be a huge backlash, but human nature being what it is, people will come around. 2) Higher prices. Prices will have be proportional to volume. The lower the volume, the higher the price needs to be to sustain it. If this gets laserdisc levels of adoption, then it will need laserdisc level prices. |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 12357218)
ULTRA HD Blu-ray (better get used to calling 4K BDs that name)...
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Regarding the amount of content likely to be released, I don't really see it as a problem. I'm looking at 4K as a special format reserved for certain titles, not a complete replacement for HD. Of course we all have our own opinions on what is "classic" and what isn't, but I would be okay with only classics getting the 4K treatment. I don't believe it will be like SD vs HD, where once you got used to HD you didn't want to watch SD anymore.
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by bruceames
(Post 12357436)
They should have just called it 4K Blu-ray. 4K has the advantage of being shorter, easier to pronounce and being a recognizable name that is associated with 4K TVs. Heck, 4K even rhymes with Blu-ray. Stupid to call it Ultra HD Blu-ray. Way too many syllables.
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
I can see the 4K physical media gaining as much traction in the marketplace as D-VHS did.
People will buy the 4K TVs in droves when the prices begin to match the current HDTV prices but they'll still be running SD and 720p HD content lamenting on how awesome 4K is. |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by orangerunner
(Post 12358057)
I can see the 4K physical media gaining as much traction in the marketplace as D-VHS did.
People will buy the 4K TVs in droves when the prices begin to match the current HDTV prices but they'll still be running SD and 720p HD content lamenting on how awesome 4K is. |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
a job at CompUSA. Sounds horrible.
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Interesting article that mentions the possibility of a (competing?) 4K digital format (I assume UV).
4K movies are coming to Blu-ray discs and hard drives |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
I'd definitely prefer downloading over streaming. I might even opt for downloading over physical, depending on how prices shake out. There'd almost certainly be a greater variety of 4K films to download than for sale at retail. I just feel like I'd have a much greater selection to choose from that way.
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
(Post 12359711)
I'd definitely prefer downloading over streaming. I might even opt for downloading over physical, depending on how prices shake out. There'd almost certainly be a greater variety of 4K films to download than for sale at retail. I just feel like I'd have a much greater selection to choose from that way.
Also another possible advantage would be studio support. They would be more inclined to support a delivery system that is more secure. |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by bruceames
(Post 12359692)
Interesting article that mentions the possibility of a (competing?) 4K digital format (I assume UV).
4K movies are coming to Blu-ray discs and hard drives |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by bruceames
(Post 12359692)
Interesting article that mentions the possibility of a (competing?) 4K digital format (I assume UV).
4K movies are coming to Blu-ray discs and hard drives |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by trespoochies
(Post 12359787)
Supposed to be called RCBD - Really Clear Blu Ray.
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
It took me a long time to upgrade to DVD from VHS, an even longer time to upgrade to Blu-Ray from DVD. I'm still doing both with no intention of upgrading to anything else. Definitely sick of finally deciding to upgrade to the next new technology only to be told there's yet another new technology out there. Not interested in 4K, DVD and BD are fine with me.
5 years from now I'll be bitching about having just upgraded to 4K only to find out there's brain implants available now. |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
(Post 12359711)
I'd definitely prefer downloading over streaming. I might even opt for downloading over physical, depending on how prices shake out. There'd almost certainly be a greater variety of 4K films to download than for sale at retail. I just feel like I'd have a much greater selection to choose from that way.
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
I'd mind if it was streaming or downloading. Until they come up with a compression that could retain full resolution 4k at a fraction of the space it would take up now. I mean how much space would 1 4k movie take up? I'm guessing quite a bit.
|
Re: Panasonic Exhibits Prototype of World's First Next Generation Blu-ray Disc Player
3. Luminance per square meter (cd/m2) - "Blu-ray," "Blu-ray Disc," and "ULTRA HD BLU-RAY" are trademarks of the Blu-ray Disc Association. Bullshit per square foot (bs/ft2) |
Re: Panasonic Exhibits Prototype of World's First Next Generation Blu-ray Disc Player
Originally Posted by DVD Polizei
(Post 12360451)
Ok, well if you guys can do it, I'm going to trademark this:
Bullshit per square foot (bs/ft2) |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
This: ∞
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by Drexl
(Post 12360320)
I wouldn't mind downloading, provided it was like Steam so that you could re-download your movies at any time. I wouldn't want to have to buy all the HDD space to store them, then more if I wanted them backed up.
Already I find it annoying to deal with tv show season sets, which freeze, skip, pixelize, die, etc ... during disc playback, such as numerous Universal tv season sets released on double-sided dvd flipper discs around a decade ago. So I ended up watching these tv show season sets from several computer hard drives, in order to avoid these aggravating playback problems. It's a very annoying time consuming process. I would guess it's even more annoying dealing with 4K digital movie files. In hindsight, it would have been easier, less aggravating, and less expensive to just watch these same tv shows on various streaming services. |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
I love my disc collection but I'm starting to see the wisdom of my wife's thinking in taking advantage of streaming or using the cloud in order to save space and money. I bought way too many DVDs over the years that ended up being single watches (or worse, zero watches) that I've ended up selling to make space.
I just can't get excited about another disc format. I'll gladly pay a few extra bucks a month for 4K Netflix though. |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
AV Watch posted some more technical stuff about Ultra HD Blu-ray. There is, as expected, native 24p support along with the previously announced 60p. European markets and the like will have 25p and 50p, but it doesn't sound like this is required in hardware elsewhere.
No 30p or 48p, though. |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Still haven't outlined the copy protection scheme. Probably still trying to hash that out with the studios (and luck they'll need with that, given the BD+ fiasco still fresh in their minds). These are master level quality movies we're talking about, so the studios are going to be very picky about security.
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
(Post 12364705)
AV Watch posted some more technical stuff about Ultra HD Blu-ray. There is, as expected, native 24p support along with the previously announced 60p.
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
(Post 12364705)
European markets and the like will have 25p and 50p,.
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
(Post 12364705)
but it doesn't sound like this is required in hardware elsewhere.
EDIT: The footnote is rather interesting. http://av.watch.impress.co.jp/img/av...3/374/dg11.jpg Makes it seem like the framerates are available but won't default to 25p or 50p unless a 50 Hz TV is used. That seems perfectly reasonable, as long as it's an option you can toggle (useful for content natively shot at 25p or 50p).
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
(Post 12364705)
No 30p or 48p, though.
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
So when do you suppose we'll be getting calibration discs that conform to BT.2020?
http://av.watch.impress.co.jp/img/av...3/374/dg14.jpg |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by milo bloom
(Post 12360739)
I love my disc collection but I'm starting to see the wisdom of my wife's thinking in taking advantage of streaming or using the cloud in order to save space and money. I bought way too many DVDs over the years that ended up being single watches (or worse, zero watches) that I've ended up selling to make space.
I just can't get excited about another disc format. I'll gladly pay a few extra bucks a month for 4K Netflix though. I'm fully aware now that I don't have a strong desire to revisit movies, except personal favorites, but I'm wondering if that desire was ever present? Even when I was younger, the only stuff I would revisit was horror/sci-fi and anime, but even then the revisits were few and far between. And, honestly, even stuff I like, I don't feel like revisiting that often. For years now, when I watch a movie, I never think of buying it. I watch it, give it a rating in my logbook, and move on to the next. Even the few films I see in theaters, I rarely feel like revisiting afterwards. |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by morriscroy
(Post 12360721)
Already I find it annoying to deal with tv show season sets, which freeze, skip, pixelize, die, etc ... during disc playback, such as numerous Universal tv season sets released on double-sided dvd flipper discs around a decade ago.
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
That's still the exception rather than the rule, as I have tapes and discs that are more than 35 years old that still play. I'm seriously doubting that any "Ultraviolet" movies I have will be accessible that long from now. It'd be nice if CDs and DVDs had a lifetime guarantee since they're never supposed to wear out, if they ever become unplayable due to rot then they get replaced free of charge. I heard Criterion didn't even have the rights to some of those rotted titles anymore so they couldn't print new ones :(
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
(Post 12364705)
European markets and the like will have 25p and 50p, but it doesn't sound like this is required in hardware elsewhere.
|
Isn't 25p still not supported for 25 FPS material since Blu can't handle it, making most 25 FPS material encoded at 50i? If the format can support 60p? Why would it not be able to support lower frame rates?
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Ultra HD Blu-Ray does support 25p. No need for any interlacing tricks. In fact, there aren't any interlaced options at all in the docs I've seen. 30p and 48p are the glaring omissions.
|
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
(Post 12365539)
Ultra HD Blu-Ray does support 25p. No need for any interlacing tricks. In fact, there aren't any interlaced options at all in the docs I've seen.
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
(Post 12365539)
30p and 48p are the glaring omissions.
Any word on 3D capability? |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 12365563)
Any word on 3D capability?
The only thing conspicuously absent is 3D. While BDA reps assured us that the format (and new disc players) will be backwardly compatible to play current Blu-ray 3D Discs in 3D mode, there are not currently any plans to create or support a new 3D-capable native-4K option in the new format. I was personally a bit disappointed in this as I do occasionally enjoy 3D movies at home and would have loved the option of seeing "Avatar" or "Gravity" in 4K 3D. |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
(Post 12366012)
There is a 3D extension for HEVC, so maybe this is something that can be incorporated into players down the line...? |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 12365563)
It'd been nice if all UHD sets and players offered all the available frame rates without having to worry about which country your UHD TV set comes from.
What a frustrating format this seems to be. So many specs I wanted (10-bit color, 60p) are there, so many (3D, universal 25p support) are absent. What bugs me is that the missing functions aren't missing because of technical limitations or high design/manufacturing/implementation costs; they could all just as easily be included as not. :brickwl2: |
re: Let's talk about Ultra HD Blu-ray
How big would a 4k movie be? 4x the size of a blu-ray movie? Like 200GB? Pretty crazy.
What's the file structure like for blu-rays? Do they split them in 1GB blocks like with DVDs? I think Sony and Oppo are the only players that can do 4k using dual-core CPUs. Does that mean most basic blu-ray players use single core CPUs? |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.